Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
vuduchile

Nike dropped Antonio Brown

Recommended Posts

It's pretty sad when Nike has more ethics than you do.  And yes, by you I'm referring to the Patriots.

 

:wave:

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, vuduchile said:

https://www.yahoo.com/sports/report-nike-ends-shoe-deal-152224435.html

They stuck with Big Ben and Kobe when they were accused.  

They even re-signed Vick when he got out of prison  

 

 

True, but your instances were both prior to them achieving "woke" status with that retard Kaepernick.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TBayXXXVII said:

I don't know about you guys, but I live in America.  Innocent until proven guilty.

Guilt or innocence is not relevant for a corporate sponsorship.  It's all about whether the person's image brings in more money than they cost.  All about the $.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TBayXXXVII said:

I don't know about you guys, but I live in America.  Innocent until proven guilty.

In a court of law yeah. Th court of public opinion is just that, an opinion. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Kanil said:

Guilt or innocence is not relevant for a corporate sponsorship.  It's all about whether the person's image brings in more money than they cost.  All about the $.

But what about freeze peach? :unsure: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, RLLD said:

True, but your instances were both prior to them achieving "woke" status with that retard Kaepernick.....

Not woke...go broke

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Kanil said:

Guilt or innocence is not relevant for a corporate sponsorship.  It's all about whether the person's image brings in more money than they cost.  All about the $.

Shows that no society is perfect, companies are influenced by consumer groupings, so a select loud few can take away your rights...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, kutulu said:

Let me know when Kraft does.

The cheese stands alone. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Kanil said:

Guilt or innocence is not relevant for a corporate sponsorship.  It's all about whether the person's image brings in more money than they cost.  All about the $.

BIngo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, sderk said:

Chik Fil A

Yumm…..Fvck those liberal assh0les like Worms.

The fock you even talking about, halfwit? :wacko:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, IGotWorms said:

The fock you even talking about, halfwit? :wacko:

At least I'm half, Mr. nowit. You have to be one of the biggest idiots on this site next to only be challenged by MDC, Urethra, and Newbie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, RLLD said:

Shows that no society is perfect, companies are influenced by consumer groupings, so a select loud few can take away your rights...

At least until the civil war breaks out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Kanil said:

Guilt or innocence is not relevant for a corporate sponsorship.  It's all about whether the person's image brings in more money than they cost.  All about the $.

 

15 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

In a court of law yeah. Th court of public opinion is just that, an opinion. 

Just because people are pressured by other people to act and feel a certain way, doesn't mean they're right.  I don't operate that way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guy is a moron and I expect that he will be on the exempt list very soon (today?).  He just can't help himself from being stupid and an a-hole.

However, teams should be careful and not just throw a guy on the exempt list or cut them until the investigation is complete.  Otherwise, you will have situations where civil suits will be filed against the starting QB of every team right before a big game.  If you file a false police report, then you get in trouble with the law.  Not the same threshold for civil suits.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Josh Gordon even shakes his head when looking at Antonio Clown

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now he's sending harrassing/threatening text messages to one of his accusers, including a pic of her kids???  The NFL and/or the Patriots should not let him suit up Sunday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Strike said:

Now he's sending harrassing/threatening text messages to one of his accusers, including a pic of her kids???  The NFL and/or the Patriots should not let him suit up Sunday.

Link ?

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Djgb13 said:

It wasn’t threatening. Woman lied about that too. 

Threatening or not, it was focking stupid. This man is a lunatic 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Djgb13 said:

It wasn’t threatening. Woman lied about that too. 

If it wasn't threatening or meant as intimidation, then why copy her on the group text? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Djgb13 said:

It wasn’t threatening. Woman lied about that too. 

You're dumber than dirt.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

You're dumber than dirt.  

Yeah, but to be fair, he knows all about lieing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Strike said:

Yeah, but to be fair, he knows all about lieing.

He's no good at it though. But he keeps trying

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, Strike said:

If she accused him and he contacted her in any way, then he is s focking moron.....

Maybe she is lying, maybe she isnt, he just ruined any defense he had by talking to her at all...who is advising this retard?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, kutulu said:

Bump up Dorsett

And James White. AB was going to seriously eat into his targets

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, RLLD said:

If she accused him and he contacted her in any way, then he is s focking moron.....

Maybe she is lying, maybe she isnt, he just ruined any defense he had by talking to her at all...who is advising this retard?

Consider this.  She has been kept anonymous in all the reports on their interaction in 2017.  He just sent a group text to a bunch of people she doesn't know, identifying her and asking them to "investigate" her.  She has no idea if they're just hired thugs.  He included a pic of her kids.  Don't see how anyone can defend this as NOT being intimidation at best, and potentially a lot worse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

You're dumber than dirt.  

Sorry 👶 but everyone here knows that you are by far the most retarded troll here. Figured you would have left after the savage beating you’ve been taking from everyone all week 🤣🤣🤣

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, IGotWorms said:

Threatening or not, it was focking stupid. This man is a lunatic 

Oh by all means he shouldn’t have done it and was stupid as sh1t to do it. But to say it was “threatening” is just a bold faced lie. If “Let’s look into her background” is now considered “threatening” then all of us have been threatened when having background checks done. 

 

Still, the guy is a moron for doing that. No one can deny that 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Djgb13 said:

Oh by all means he shouldn’t have done it and was stupid as sh1t to do it. But to say it was “threatening” is just a bold faced lie. If “Let’s look into her background” is now considered “threatening” then all of us have been threatened when having background checks done. 

 

Still, the guy is a moron for doing that. No one can deny that 

Just admit you were wrong digby

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Just admit you were wrong digby

Lmfao how was I wrong? Was he threatening her? If you say yes you’re a poosay. Plain and simple. Cause that wasn’t a threat. Not excusing him or saying he is once the right cause he’s not. But he didn’t threaten her HTH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Djgb13 said:

Oh by all means he shouldn’t have done it and was stupid as sh1t to do it. But to say it was “threatening” is just a bold faced lie. If “Let’s look into her background” is now considered “threatening” then all of us have been threatened when having background checks done. 

 

Still, the guy is a moron for doing that. No one can deny that 

If it wasn't threatening, perhaps you'll find the time to answer this question you ignored:

 

Quote

If it wasn't threatening or meant as intimidation, then why copy her on the group text? 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Strike said:

If it wasn't threatening, perhaps you'll find the time to answer this question you ignored:

 

 

To let her know that she’s in deep sh1t cause he’s not going to just sit back and let her lie to try and get money? Or he wanted others to see what he’s sending her so she doesn’t try to photoshop it or lie about it? I don’t know what goes on in his focked up mind. But if all you have to go on is “he included her in the group text” then sadly you don’t have anything to go on HTH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×