Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Starkers

Replace AB

Recommended Posts

Lost AB so need to pick up another WR. Best on the wire are:

 

DK Metcalf

Deebo Samuel

Terry McLaurin

 

10 team, non ppr, QB, 3-WR, 2-RB, WR/RB, WR/RB, TE, K, Def, 6-BN

QB – Deshaun Watson, Jimmy Garoppolo

WR – Christian Kirk, Sterling Shepard, Tyrell Williams, John Ross, Antonio Brown

RB – David Johnson, Le’Veon Bell, Leonard Fournette, Melvin Gordon, Carlos Hyde

TE – O J Howard, Mark Andrews

K – Robbie Gould

D – Cowboys

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You already have Pettis, so there would be no point in getting the competing Samuel (who I would probably rank 3rd of the 3 anyway).

Metcalf will probably have some good games, but at best, he's still WR1b to Tyler Lockett, so I'd probably go with McLaurin, who appears to be the best WR on the Redskins' team by a significant margin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, AxeElf said:

You already have Pettis, so there would be no point in getting the competing Samuel (who I would probably rank 3rd of the 3 anyway).

Metcalf will probably have some good games, but at best, he's still WR1b to Tyler Lockett, so I'd probably go with McLaurin, who appears to be the best WR on the Redskins' team by a significant margin.

Oops.  I forgot to update my roster.  I dropped Pettis for John Ross last week.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ppr? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lockett is that guy that always looks like he's going to break out, but never really does. I think there are targets for Metcalf. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Eriadoc said:

Lockett is that guy that always looks like he's going to break out, but never really does. I think there are targets for Metcalf. 

I guess, if you don't call 1000/10 "breaking out."

But yeah, there will be targets for Metcalf--he just isn't the sole focus of a pass-first offense the way that McLaurin is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol yeah that’s true, Mclaurin has a total of three more targets then Metcalf. 

Its a good thing McLaurin is the sole focus and Metcalf isn’t.  

Oh my soul. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, weepaws said:

Lol yeah that’s true, Mclaurin has a total of three more targets then Metcalf. 

Its a good thing McLaurin is the sole focus and Metcalf isn’t.  

Oh my soul. 

Over the course of the season, that prorates out to 24 more targets for McLaurin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it keeps playing out that way.  

And it might not. 

Just a gut feeling you have that it will I guess huh? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, weepaws said:

Just a gut feeling you have that it will I guess huh? 

Way more than that; it's an Axe Elf prediction that it will play out that way.

(Axually, it will probably play out even MORE in McLaurin's favor than that, but we'll go with 24 more targets for now.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×