Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Djgb13

Another school shooting in California

Recommended Posts

yes he has been captured:

Quote

After a roughly hourlong search, authorities said that the suspect had been apprehended.

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2019-11-14/shooting-reported-at-saugus-high-school-in-santa-clarita-police-searching-for-teen-suspect

This is the high school Katie Hill graduated from.  Coincidence?   Hmmmm.......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Djgb13 said:

Why does it always seem to be California where these take place? And why do they still blame the gun in these cases? Also, the suspect is a dark haired asian male in dark clothing who I hasn’t been captured yet 

 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2019/11/14/us/california-school-shooting/index.html

Southern schools seem to be quite popular.  California, Texas and Florida have a lot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Djgb13 said:

Why does it always seem to be California where these take place? And why do they still blame the gun in these cases? Also, the suspect is a dark haired asian male in dark clothing who I hasn’t been captured yet 

 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2019/11/14/us/california-school-shooting/index.html

I think the bigger focus should be on the fact that all of these shootings take place in gun free zones. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The initial description of the suspect was simply male in black clothing. You can bet your arse if he was white they would have been screaming that from the highest mountain. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, 12th Man said:

The initial description of the suspect was simply male in black clothing. You can bet your arse if he was white they would have been screaming that from the highest mountain. 

Damn right. The media is cucked. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A 15 y.o. with a gun.... odds are the gun was taken from his gun right supporting parents.

I wonder if any of the victims parents are also gun right supporters. If so, they're probably reevaluating those beliefs now. Maybe wondering if they indirectly did this to themselves. Which they did.

  • Haha 2
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, GobbleDog said:

A 15 y.o. with a gun.... odds are the gun was taken from his gun right supporting parents.

I wonder if any of the victims parents are also gun right supporters. If so, they're probably reevaluating those beliefs now. Maybe wondering they indirectly did this to themselves. Which they did.

Most Asians I know don’t really have guns or mess with them. 

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, GobbleDog said:

A 15 y.o. with a gun.... odds are the gun was taken from his gun right supporting parents.

I wonder if any of the victims parents are also gun right supporters. If so, they're probably reevaluating those beliefs now. Maybe wondering they indirectly did this to themselves. Which they did.

If we are jumping to conclusions here, I'm going with a colored gangbanger thug. Shall we place a wager?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In Europe they call goat fockers asians. Stand by. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, riversco said:

betting shooter is athiest.  most shooters are athiest and dont value human life.  

Already have liberals saying it was a mental health issue but if it was a white person he would be a “terrorist” and be crucified 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, bostonlager said:

If we are jumping to conclusions here, I'm going with a colored gangbanger thug. Shall we place a wager?

I was right. Yellow colored. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Teachers in Florida carry guns now. I know it’s a sensitive subject but in this instance it would’ve helped. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, bostonlager said:

I think the bigger focus should be on the fact that all of these shootings take place in gun free zones. 

 

We protect the president with guns, banks with guns, courts with guns, celebrities with guns,

yet we protect schools with signs that that "Gun Free Zone"

Libs think that "Gun Free Zone" signs are the best way of defending vs. guns.  I wonder if the next democratic president will just use signs?

Seems to be working well.

 

Also, no one blames the gun when a police officer shoots an unarmed black man. Why?

 

And this one is perfect:

https://static1.fjcdn.com/comments/Why+are+you+blaming+the+gun+for+the+mass+killings+_3fce3d3181ebd94fba3be32356c9ddc6.jpg

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, tubby_mcgee said:

We protect the president with guns, banks with guns, courts with guns, celebrities with guns,

yet we protect schools with signs that that "Gun Free Zone"

All first world countries protect presidents, banks, and courts with guns, but don't guard schools.

Yet they don't have nearly the amount of school shootings the U.S. has, let along gun violence rates.  What could the difference possibly be? Very perplexing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the thread where everyone repeats the same thing they say in all of these threads like its some gotcha moment.

"But how can this happen in a gun free zone?"

"Im sure he got the gun from a parent"

We already know everyones stance and automated response to this here at the geek club.  But by god they will repeat it again just to make sure, incase we didnt get it the first 1000 times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, GobbleDog said:

All first world countries protect presidents, banks, and courts with guns, but don't guard schools.

Yet they don't have nearly the amount of school shootings the U.S. has, let along gun violence rates.  What could the difference possibly be? Very perplexing.

Odd, you’d think every country on earth would like lots of guns around children. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, GobbleDog said:

All first world countries protect presidents, banks, and courts with guns, but don't guard schools.

Yet they don't have nearly the amount of school shootings the U.S. has, let along gun violence rates.  What could the difference possibly be? Very perplexing.

My first guess would be the racial diversity that exists in the U.S. that doesn't exist in the other countries.  My second guess would be the MSM and Leftist politicians telling everyone who isn't a white male, that they're victims of the white male.  My third guess is the hate that has perpetuated globally from the Left, in general, that has been going on since the 1800's.  My fourth guess would be that the Leftist politicians felt that isolating the mentally ill was inhumane, allowing more of them to roam around the streets.  My fifth guess is that kids are azzholes and the fear mongering hatists on the Left breed kids who are like them and bully other kids.  In turn, the only recourse those that are bullied (because the leftist turd kids are protected by the leftist turd educators do nothing), is to take violent means... violent means that the Left say are your only recourse when you are marginalized.

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

complete fallacy bro, nice try

 

its an objective fact.  look up all of the shooters in the us this century and a majority are known athiests.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm an atheist and I've never shot anyone. I also know how to spell atheist.

  • Thanks 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, peenie said:

I'm an atheist and I've never shot anyone. I also know how to spell atheist.

I'm a Christian and never shot anyone. :thumbsup:

 

The link that ties us, being that it's not through religion, is that we're not nuts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

My first guess would be the racial diversity that exists in the U.S. that doesn't exist in the other countries.  My second guess would be the MSM and Leftist politicians telling everyone who isn't a white male, that they're victims of the white male.  My third guess is the hate that has perpetuated globally from the Left, in general, that has been going on since the 1800's.  My fourth guess would be that the Leftist politicians felt that isolating the mentally ill was inhumane, allowing more of them to roam around the streets.  My fifth guess is that kids are azzholes and the fear mongering hatists on the Left breed kids who are like them and bully other kids.  In turn, the only recourse those that are bullied (because the leftist turd kids are protected by the leftist turd educators do nothing), is to take violent means... violent means that the Left say are your only recourse when you are marginalized.

Most of the shootings occur in schools that have very little diversity at the hands of a person who is not of color. What is your point again??? I'm rather confused?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd argue that kids/people have been bullied since the beginning of time. There is another element besides bullying that causes someone to shoot up innocent people. (Remember when post office shooting were common?)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, peenie said:

I'm an atheist and I've never shot anyone. I also know how to spell atheist.

You’ll be happy to hear that everyone is equal in hell 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, GobbleDog said:

All first world countries protect presidents, banks, and courts with guns, but don't guard schools.

Yet they don't have nearly the amount of school shootings the U.S. has, let along gun violence rates.  What could the difference possibly be? Very perplexing.

They also don't have CNN, Facebook, and liberals injecting hatred into society 24/7 and glorifying mass shooters.

Perhaps there is a correlation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they confiscate our guns, they should give them to Venezuelans. Those people could use some firepower right now.

They could give them back to us when we need them again (and we would need them again).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, iam90sbaby said:

You’ll be happy to hear that everyone is equal in hell 

There is no such thing as hell so....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, peenie said:

There is no such thing as hell so....

Fake biologist that claims to have published two research papers says what?

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, lickin_starfish said:

How do you know this for sure?

According the Jews, they do not believe in hell so...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, MDC said:

Odd, you’d think every country on earth would like lots of guns around children. 



So guns work to protect the president? But not kids? 

Typical lib/dem:

"Guns?! Guns in school? !!! Guns in school?!!! THAT'S the problem in the first place!!!! How are guns in schools going to help!!!???"

 

Ya see...lemme explain. No one said to give the guns to the kids.  Or, no on is suggesting that the guns be used to shoot the kids.    Basically, (I know its complicated, try to follow along) what we are suggesting, is to use the guns to protect the kids.

Ya think when Regan got shot, the Secret Service had a conversation "Hey, ya know...jeez...it was a gun that shot the President.  Maybe we should get rid of ours so that he is safer" 

 

How many people would run for POTUS if there was a new rule: "You will be protected only with signs that say "Gun Free Zone. No shooting the President with a gun" ? 

 

Oh...and my original post in this thread...I focked up the link. 

https://static1.fjcdn.com/comments/Why+are+you+blaming+the+gun+for+the+mass+killings+_3fce3d3181ebd94fba3be32356c9ddc6.jpg

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, iam90sbaby said:

Fake biologist that claims to have published two research papers says what?

I have been coauthor on multiple papers thank you. I do not have my PhD so I am not an authority on any subject.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, lickin_starfish said:

If they confiscate our guns, they should give them to Venezuelans. Those people could use some firepower right now.

They could give them back to us when we need them again (and we would need them again).

Venezuelans regret gun ban, 'a declaration of war against an unarmed population'

CUCUTA, Venezuela/Colombia border As Venezuela continues to crumble under the socialist dictatorship of President Nicolas Maduro, some are expressing words of warning and resentment against a six-year-old gun control bill that stripped citizens of their weapons.

Guns would have served as a vital pillar to remaining a free people, or at least able to put up a fight, Javier Vanegas, 28, a Venezuelan teacher of English now exiled in Ecuador, told Fox News. The government security forces, at the beginning of this debacle, knew they had no real opposition to their force. Once things were this bad, it was a clear declaration of war against an unarmed population.

Under the direction of then-President Hugo Chavez, the Venezuelan National Assembly in 2012 enacted the Control of Arms, Munitions and Disarmament Law, with the explicit aim to disarm all citizens. The law took effect in 2013, with only minimal pushback from some pro-democracy opposition figures, banned the legal commercial sale of guns and munitions to all - except government entities

https://www.foxnews.com/world/venezuelans-regret-gun-prohibition-we-could-have-defended-ourselves

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, peenie said:

I have been coauthor on multiple papers thank you. I do not have my PhD so I am not an authority on any subject.

Having a PHD does not make one an authority!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, peenie said:

I have been coauthor on multiple papers thank you. I do not have my PhD so I am not an authority on any subject.

Sure. And we know. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, peenie said:

I'm an atheist and I've never shot anyone. I also know how to spell atheist.

id chuckle but its seems to be a morbid topic for a joke like this.  i could imagine someone saying what you said and being serious tho because some people actually allow personal experience or anecdotal evidence to trump facts. 

"the windows didnt break in MY house during the last hurricane therefore the facts must be wrong and im not boarding them up and i will stand in front of them during the next one!!!!!!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×