Trump associate Roger Stone found guilty of lies that protected Trump

[IGotWorms 3,311]

1 hour ago, Filthy Fernadez said:

So it should be easy for you to post proof of it then. Put up or shaddup.

Off the top of my head, when you were claiming that no republicans were allowed at the impeachment inquiry depositions and then had to admit you were lying or they victim of disinformation when the deposition transcripts proved that not only were there a bunch of republicans allowed they also got equal time for questions and lodged a sh1tload of objections

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

1 minute ago, IGotWorms said:

Off the top of my head, when you were claiming that no republicans were allowed at the impeachment inquiry depositions and then had to admit you were lying or they victim of disinformation when the deposition transcripts proved that not only were there a bunch of republicans allowed they also got equal time for questions and lodged a sh1tload of objections

There still is a measure of truth to that assertion. What witnesses have the Republicans been allowed to call? They HAVE been stopped from asking questions not approved by Schiff.

Dig deeper. You said every political post. Should be easy.

[IGotWorms 3,311]

1 minute ago, Filthy Fernadez said:

There still is a measure of truth to that assertion. What witnesses have the Republicans been allowed to call? They HAVE been stopped from asking questions not approved by Schiff.

Dig deeper. You said every political post. Should be easy.

Weak sauce bro. Fact is you bought into lies spread by twitter trolls, which is a recurring problem for you

[Intense Observer 344]

Just to clarify, Roger Stone was not convicted on anything to do with Russia collusion.

He was convicted on misleading statements to Congress and telling a witness to plead the fifth or he would get destroyed.

Womp fücking womp.

Mueller/muh Russia convictions 0

MAGA still undefeated

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

9 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Weak sauce bro. Fact is you bought into lies spread by twitter trolls, which is a recurring problem for you

Name the lies, phag or walk. MMMMMMMMMMMMMkay?

[Intense Observer 344]

4 minutes ago, Filthy Fernadez said:

There still is a measure of truth to that assertion. What witnesses have the Republicans been allowed to call? They HAVE been stopped from asking questions not approved by Schiff.

Dig deeper. You said every political post. Should be easy.

Don't bother with that dishonest hack. 

The reality is that there is so much information out there that things sometimes get conflated, mixed up.

Especially when there are so many moving parts and rules are made up as they go (as for the inquiry)

Bottom line is that the Dems allowed the Republicans on the one specific committee into the private meetings.

They also have refused questions and witnesses from the Republicans.

People like Worms and MDC can't win on facts so they resort to nitpicking irrelevant bullshite. Like Worms with this and MDC with his constant refrain of "muh Burisma was being investigated for actions prior to Biden", as if that matters.

Typical lawyer strategy, from bottom feeding losers like Worms all the way to Congress and Mueller. Notice there have been zero convictions related to Russia Collusion, every single one has been a process crime (minus Manafort) that wouldn't exist without the investigation. Same nitpicking bullshite from top to bottom.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Just now, Intense Observer said:

Don't bother with that dishonest hack. 

The reality is that there is so much information out there that things sometimes get conflated, mixed up.

Especially when there are so many moving parts and rules are made up as they go (as for the inquiry)

Bottom line is that the Dems allowed the Republicans on the one specific committee into the private meetings.

They also have refused questions and witnesses from the Republicans.

People like Worms and MDC can't win on facts so they resort to nitpicking irrelevant bullshite. Like Worms with this and MDC with his constant refrain of "muh Burisma was being investigated for actions prior to Biden", as if that matters.

Typical lawyer strategy, from bottom feeding losers like Worms all the way to Congress and Mueller. Notice there have been zero convictions related to Russia Collusion, every single one has been a process crime (minus Manafort) that wouldn't exist without the investigation. Same nitpicking bullshite from top to bottom.

Worms is the typical hack. Won't read anything posted that varies from his party's established narratives thus he replies 'I don't know about all the rest of that' or 'Probably no so much on the rest of that'. 

Willfully ignorant to maintain deniability of the facts.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,631]

I also love how they distance themselves from the Squad and the pooping in the street DA's, as if they don't really matter, but in reality that's who is driving the leftist agenda. 

[MDC 5,890]

41 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Off the top of my head, when you were claiming that no republicans were allowed at the impeachment inquiry depositions and then had to admit you were lying or they victim of disinformation when the deposition transcripts proved that not only were there a bunch of republicans allowed they also got equal time for questions and lodged a sh1tload of objections

Pow! Veal.  

[IGotWorms 3,311]

1 hour ago, Intense Observer said:

Just to clarify, Roger Stone was not convicted on anything to do with Russia collusion.

He was convicted on misleading statements to Congress and telling a witness to plead the fifth or he would get destroyed.

Womp fücking womp.

Mueller/muh Russia convictions 0

MAGA still undefeated

Just to clarify, the bold is absolutely wrong.

[IGotWorms 3,311]

56 minutes ago, Intense Observer said:

Don't bother with that dishonest hack. 

The reality is that there is so much information out there that things sometimes get conflated, mixed up.

Especially when there are so many moving parts and rules are made up as they go (as for the inquiry)

Bottom line is that the Dems allowed the Republicans on the one specific committee into the private meetings.

They also have refused questions and witnesses from the Republicans.

People like Worms and MDC can't win on facts so they resort to nitpicking irrelevant bullshite. Like Worms with this and MDC with his constant refrain of "muh Burisma was being investigated for actions prior to Biden", as if that matters.

Typical lawyer strategy, from bottom feeding losers like Worms all the way to Congress and Mueller. Notice there have been zero convictions related to Russia Collusion, every single one has been a process crime (minus Manafort) that wouldn't exist without the investigation. Same nitpicking bullshite from top to bottom.

Actually I believe it was the members of the different committees allowed. But regardless, you basically validated everything I said despite all your other verbal diarrhea.

Thanks

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

27 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Just to clarify, the bold is absolutely wrong.

Please name the Russians he was colluding with.

Please name the Russians anyone with the Trump campaign was colluding with (and let Mueller know since he didn't find them).

[Cdub100 3,380]

31 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Just to clarify, the bold is absolutely wrong.

There you go being a liar again.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,631]

7 minutes ago, Filthy Fernadez said:

Please name the Russians he was colluding with.

Please name the Russians anyone with the Trump campaign was colluding with (and let Mueller know since he didn't find them).

For a normal, well adjusted person, this would end the silly assertion being made. But with TDS, it won't happen. You people are sick, you just don't know it. 

[Utilit99 4,099]

6 minutes ago, Cdub100 said:

There you go being a liar again.

That worms dude has just gotta be trolling because nothing he says makes any sense. I think he simply copy pasting from CNN or some other left wing rag. 

[IGotWorms 3,311]

20 minutes ago, Filthy Fernadez said:

Please name the Russians he was colluding with.

Please name the Russians anyone with the Trump campaign was colluding with (and let Mueller know since he didn't find them).

Trump —> Stone —> Wikileaks —> Russians

And vice-versa

HTH

[Hardcore troubadour 12,631]

Hillary> Steele>Pee Pee> Russians

[IGotWorms 3,311]

7 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Hillary> Steele>Pee Pee> Russians

How many people have been convicted of felonies on that?

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

22 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Trump —> Stone —> Wikileaks —> Russians

And vice-versa

HTH

Link? 

Russians still haven't been shown to have hacked the DNC emails. Unless you're going with the now debunked Crowdstrike report that the FBI didn't even get a full draft of.   

[IGotWorms 3,311]

7 minutes ago, Filthy Fernadez said:

Link? 

Russians still haven't been shown to have hacked the DNC emails. Unless you're going with the now debunked Crowdstrike report that the FBI didn't even get a full draft of.   

That’s not what our intelligence agencies say—I.e. the folks who would actually know

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Just now, IGotWorms said:

That’s not what our intelligence agencies say—I.e. the folks who would actually know

The same ones now under investigation. Oh, you forgot about Barr/Durham? I didn't.

Mifsud...................was he a Russian asset? 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,515]

35 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Trump —> Stone —> Wikileaks —> Russians

And vice-versa

HTH

That's categorically wrong.  The Mueller Report showed that there was no collusion between Trump, Trump's campaign and the Russians.  Period. Stop.  End of Story.

Like other liberals with TDS, you're confusing Russian "meddling" in our election w/direct "collusion" with Trump.  HTH.

 

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

3 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

That's categorically wrong.  The Mueller Report showed that there was no collusion between Trump, Trump's campaign and the Russians.  Period. Stop.  End of Story.

Like other liberals with TDS, you're confusing Russian "meddling" in our election w/direct "collusion" with Trump.  HTH.

 

I'm still waiting for them to point out the Russians that were meddling. The Facebook/Twitter bot guys? Mifsud.........oops; he's a western asset. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,515]

5 minutes ago, Filthy Fernadez said:

I'm still waiting for them to point out the Russians that were meddling. The Facebook/Twitter bot guys? Mifsud.........oops; he's a western asset. 

They've been so brainwashed to just respond "COLLUSION!" to everything that they don't know any better. The simple and weak-minded are easy to fool - forgive them, for they know not what they do.

[IGotWorms 3,311]

13 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

That's categorically wrong.  The Mueller Report showed that there was no collusion between Trump, Trump's campaign and the Russians.  Period. Stop.  End of Story.

Like other liberals with TDS, you're confusing Russian "meddling" in our election w/direct "collusion" with Trump.  HTH.

 

No that’s just untrue. The mueller report said nothing about “collusion” because that’s not an actual thing in the law. It DID talk about conspiracy, which is a real charge. Mueller definitely did NOT clear anyone of conspiracy. What he did say is there wasn’t enough evidence to charge as conspiracy, especially because a lot of the evidence had been hidden or destroyed. (It’s also worth noting that trump refused to be interviewed despite supposedly having done nothing wrong and earlier claiming that he’d love to sit down with mueller). But I really question  mueller’s belief that there wasn’t sufficient evidence to charge conspiracy as the Stone trial showed that trump was directly involved per the testimony of Robert Gates. Also mueller highlighted ten instances of possible obstruction of justice but said as sitting president can’t be indicted—again, definitely NOT vindication of any kind.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Just now, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

They've been so brainwashed to just respond "COLLUSION!" to everything that they don't know any better. The simple and weak-minded are easy to fool - forgive them, for they know not what they do.

There never was an investigation into Russian Collusion because the people running the investigation knew it was a waste of time. This is the reason the Mueller report just recycled news reports of Russian meddling, DNC server being hacked (without evidence of it), etc..... The end games was ALWAYS about these process crimes but they wanted Trump instead. 

If Barr doesn't go after Team Mueller (Weissman, etc) We, the people need to take care of it. 

[IGotWorms 3,311]

Just now, Filthy Fernadez said:

There never was an investigation into Russian Collusion because the people running the investigation knew it was a waste of time. This is the reason the Mueller report just recycled news reports of Russian meddling, DNC server being hacked (without evidence of it), etc..... The end games was ALWAYS about these process crimes but they wanted Trump instead. 

If Barr doesn't go after Team Mueller (Weissman, etc) We, the people need to take care of it. 

Careful filthy, that sounds an awful lot like a threat

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,515]

12 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

No that’s just untrue. The mueller report said nothing about “collusion” because that’s not an actual thing in the law. It DID talk about conspiracy, which is a real charge. Mueller definitely did NOT clear anyone of conspiracy. What he did say is there wasn’t enough evidence to charge as conspiracy, especially because a lot of the evidence had been hidden or destroyed. (It’s also worth noting that trump refused to be interviewed despite supposedly having done nothing wrong and earlier claiming that he’d love to sit down with mueller). But I really question  mueller’s belief that there wasn’t sufficient evidence to charge conspiracy as the Stone trial showed that trump was directly involved per the testimony of Robert Gates. Also mueller highlighted ten instances of possible obstruction of justice but said as sitting president can’t be indicted—again, definitely NOT vindication of any kind.

This is funny, since it was YOUR side that was screaming COLLUSION to the heavens every 30 seconds for 3 years.  So now you don't believe in collusion?  Now suddenly it's not collusion anymore?    Obstruction was NEVER under consideration until you found out you could just say it and get away with it.  I repeat - it was ALWAYS about direct collusion w/the Russians and Trump.  Period.

Sorry, but your feeble attempt at a face-saving rescue post was just that - feeble.  It was always about DIRECT collusion with you guys, and when that didn't pan you keep switching gears.  Prosecutors DON'T go and exonerate people, which is why it was so weird for him to directly say that in the report.  Even seasoned prosecutors thought that was odd.  Prosecutors find guilt and convict - otherwise, they don't.  Hence, exoneration.

Most of us on this board believe you are a pedophile - So even though we don't have enough evidence to actually convict you, we simply cannot exonerate you.  See how that works?  I hope you like it because that's what you're basically saying.

And now your side actually says hearsay is better than direct evidence. 

What your doing is what the Communist Russia, China, Cuba and the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia all did too.  That's about 100+ million dead so far.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

2 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Most of us on this board believe you are a pedophile - So even though we don't have enough evidence to actually convict you, we simply cannot exonerate you. 

In the words of the left "It's not been unproven".

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,515]

Just now, Filthy Fernadez said:

In the words of the left "It's not been unproven".

and BOOM goes the dynamite!

[IGotWorms 3,311]

Just now, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

This is funny, since it was YOUR side that was screaming COLLUSION to the heavens every 30 seconds for 3 years.  So now you don't believe in collusion?  Now suddenly it's not collusion anymore? 

Sorry, but your feeble attempt at a face-saving rescue post was just that - feeble.  It was always about DIRECT collusion with you guys, and when that didn't pan you keep switching gears.  Prosecutors DON'T go and exonerate people, which is why it was so weird for him to directly say that in the report.  Prosecutors find guilt and convict - otherwise, they don't.  Hence, exoneration.

Most of us on this board believe you are a pedophile - So even though we don't have enough evidence to actually convict you, we simply cannot exonerate you.  See how that works?  I hope you like it because that's what you're basically saying.

No it was trump that started the collusion talk. Probably because it sounds more definite than conspiracy and thus harder to prove (were it an actual charge). People ran with it just like they’re running with quid pro quo now, but again that’s probably not the real standard.

 Nothing feeble about my post either. I actually read the mueller report and I watched his testimony no matter how focking dull it was. Obviously the guy wasn’t up to snuff and he knew it, so he soft-pedaled the hell out of it lest he become some star witness. But even so, he very pointedly said there were concerning indications of obstruction of justice and the proper route under the constitution would be impeachment.

As for the rest, go fock yourself

 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,515]

8 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

No it was trump that started the collusion talk. Probably because it sounds more definite than conspiracy and thus harder to prove (were it an actual charge). People ran with it just like they’re running with quid pro quo now, but again that’s probably not the real standard.

 Nothing feeble about my post either. I actually read the mueller report and I watched his testimony no matter how focking dull it was. Obviously the guy wasn’t up to snuff and he knew it, so he soft-pedaled the hell out of it lest he become some star witness. But even so, he very pointedly said there were concerning indications of obstruction of justice and the proper route under the constitution would be impeachment.

As for the rest, go fock yourself

 

Jesus H. Christ, dude.  The DNC has their cack so far up your @ss we can see the tip in the back of your throat.  

Face it - facts aren't ever going to be your friends and throwing up smoke screens, revising history and flat out lying aren't working for you in here.  You'll be able to fool the brainwashed snowflakes over at FBGheys but you'll never be able to get away with it in here.  You might want to consider opening an account over there - you'll be protected and you'll have a safe, air-tight bubble where you can circle jerk with people like you.

Oh, yeah, and you can hang out with the other pedophiles over there too.  You know, since we can't really exonerate you from that charge you'll always be guilty I guess.  Just using your logic.

[Cdub100 3,380]

10 minutes ago, Filthy Fernadez said:

In the words of the left "It's not been unproven".

I'm willing to testify with my hearsay knowledge that worms is indeed a pedophile. As we learned this week from the wonderful Democrat congressman hearsay evidence is better than direct evidence.

The only problem is worms and liberals like him are totally okay with pedophilia so this won't phase him one bit.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,515]

Just now, Cdub100 said:

I'm willing to testify with my hearsay knowledge that worms is indeed a pedophile. As we learned this week from the wonderful Democrat congressman hearsay evidence is better than direct evidence.

The only problem is worms and liberals like him are totally okay with pedophilia so this won't phase him one bit.

I can corroborate that I heard Cdub say that he heard from someone else that worms was a pedophile.

#HearsayIsBetterThanDirectEvidence

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Just now, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

I can corroborate that I heard Cdub say that he heard from someone else that worms was a pedophile.

#HearsayIsBetterThanDirectEvidence

Funny; I just overheard the two of you talking and now I'm a third source.

[Utilit99 4,099]

On 11/16/2019 at 9:18 PM, Filthy Fernadez said:

Funny; I just overheard the two of you talking and now I'm a third source.

I heard it from like 4 sources who heard from their sources. Now you all are hearing it too? Must be true about worms.

[IGotWorms 3,311]

You guys done with your little circle jerk?

[Hardcore troubadour 12,631]

I won't feel safe until he turns himself in and is locked away for the rest of his life. I hope some libtard doesn't come along and let him out stating it's a non-violent crime.  

[TimmySmith 2,782]

10 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

You guys done with your little circle jerk?

I don't believe a word of it, but you will have to prove your innocence to me in the face of such testimony. 

[MDC 5,890]

Looks like Trump spent the weekend having a full retard meltdown online. As did most of his Geek Club followers.