Zimmerman sues Trayvon Martins family

[Hardcore troubadour 12,631]

6 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

After being told by the cops not to do exactly that.

People pinning this on Martin are wacko. Did Zimmerman have the right to shoot him at the exact moment he did? The jury said yes so that’s your answer. But he created the entire situation by playing wannabe cop, stalking Martin and failing to heed the direction of the real authorities.

Bingo. If I were on that jury Zimmerman would be doing time. 

[RLLD 3,455]

1 hour ago, Mike Honcho said:

You are missing the alternative - Zimmerman Stopping and/or attempting to detain Martin(and IMO after seeing more of this guy over the years, I believe this is what happpened)---just as equally not fine

Perhaps if Zimmerman did just  y'know..."watch the neighborhood" rather than leave his vehicle like 911 asked him not to do, then actual policemen trained to deal with these situations might have been able to deal with it in a less Bernie Goetz manner. 

The facts do not support the assertion you just made

[RLLD 3,455]

1 hour ago, Mike Honcho said:

And a "fact" that nobody can say happened with any degree of certainty.   

The Democrats are attempting to impeach trump with less evidence.....

[RLLD 3,455]

56 minutes ago, MDC said:

You’re assuming that Trayvon initiated the physical altercation. All we have to go on there is the testimony of a freak who had a strong incentive to push that version of events.

Quote

As documented below, almost every news report summarized Zimmerman’s shooting of Martin as occurring while Martin was on the way back to his father’s house from a nearby 7-Eleven. That is a direct contradiction of the testimony from Martin’s friend Rachel Jeantel who had been on the phone with Martin when Martin and Zimmerman first saw each other. Martin initially started to approach Zimmerman, then decided to run away, at which point his phone call with Jeantel disconnected. She said in court that when they reconnected a short time later Martin sounded tired and told her that he was back by his father’s house (first reported by Andrew Branca at Legal Insurrection).

Source: http://errortheory.blogspot.com/2015/07/media-still-claiming-that-trayvon.htmlRink

There are more sources such as this, we have as much to suggest Martin initiated as we do that Trump quid-pro-quo'd

[RLLD 3,455]

48 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

So the guy who exited his vehicle is the one that was minding his own business? Seems he was doing anything but. 

Nor should he as the neighborhood watch, he had every right to be there as Martin did....

[RLLD 3,455]

Instead of turning back to have a confrontation, something Zimmerman was notably avoiding, he could have called the police, as Zimmerman did, instead of initiating contact. Jenteal admitted Martin told her he was near his house, and yet the confrontation tool place farther away, clear indication he walked back....

[cbfalcon 824]

57 minutes ago, tanatastic said:

Martin didn’t deserve to be killed but he messed with the wrong guy and got shot. That’s what happens when you act like a hood rat, which he was.

Zimmerman is a certified AHole but mind your own damn business and you won’t be killed.

Really, Trayvon’s true mistake was not having his own gun, with which he could have killed Zimmerman. Then he says Zimmerman attacked and he feared for his life (or whatever Zim claimed), and you’d be here defending Trayvon in his lawsuit of Zimmerman’s parents. 

[IGotWorms 3,311]

6 minutes ago, RLLD said:

The Democrats are attempting to impeach trump with less evidence.....

So which part is lacking? The July 25 transcript or when the chief of staff admitted it was quid pro quo and said “get over it”?

To say nothing of all the other evidence.

[IGotWorms 3,311]

Just now, cbfalcon said:

Really, Trayvon’s only mistake was not having his own gun, with which he could have killed Zimmerman. Then he says Zimmerman attacked and he feared for his life (or whatever Zim claimed), and you’d be here defending Trayvon in his lawsuit of Zimmerman’s parents.

Lol that’s funny 

[Hardcore troubadour 12,631]

7 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Nor should he as the neighborhood watch, he had every right to be there as Martin did....

Even after he was told to stay in his car? 

[MDC 5,890]

8 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Source: http://errortheory.blogspot.com/2015/07/media-still-claiming-that-trayvon.htmlRink

There are more sources such as this, we have as much to suggest Martin initiated as we do that Trump quid-pro-quo'd

I don’t see what this has to do with the question of who initiated the physical confrontation. 

[Cruzer 1,992]

Still waiting for someone to name/produce the witness who saw Martin attack Zimmerman....

[Intense Observer 344]

No point in rehashing the case. The evidence supported Zimmerman's claim of self defense and the legal system agreed.

Did he act like a Newbie afterwards? Sure, but that is understandable after the media, DOJ, and black terrorist organizations tried to ruin your life.

This lawsuit raises some serious concerns if the allegations are true.

Richard Jewell 2.0

We are all George Zimmerman

Most people know my name, George Zimmerman, largely due to negative stereotypes propagated by the media as a result of the 2012 incident in Sanford, Florida, in which Trayvon Martin died.

Unfortunately, most people don’t recall the fact that I was exonerated of any wrongdoing after a thorough investigation by the Sanford Police Department in March 2012. They had interviewed dozens of witnesses, analyzed 911 calls, and examined the physical evidence of my broken nose, the lacerations on the back of my head, as well as the bruised knuckles of my assailant.

This was all backed up by eyewitness Johnathan Good who told police that he saw me screaming for help while blows were coming down on me “MMA style.”

(Bolded by me for cruzer)

At the conclusion of the police investigation, Sanford Chief of Police Bill Lee announced that my actions were taken in self-defense and there were no grounds for my arrest. It was not even a “stand your ground” case. What followed immediately was a campaign of race-based defamation and incitement against me, led by Martin family attorney Benjamin Crump.

I am the last person who ever expected to be accused of being a bigot. I am Hispanic. My mother is from Peru. I speak fluent Spanish. I was an Obama supporter and a social activist. Just a year earlier, I had led a community-wide effort to get justice for Sherman Ware, a homeless black man who had been attacked by the son of a white police officer. I was also active in a mentoring program where I spent my spare time (and money) with black teens whose parents were in prison.

The Martin family attorney, Benjamin Crump, quickly recruited for his incitement efforts Al Sharpton, a man who was infamous for the 1989 Tawana Brawley race hoax and other incidents of mayhem based on racial incitement over the years. Then, Obama’s Department of Justice sent representatives to Sanford to “investigate,” but they instead helped organize protests demanding my arrest. As the protests heated up and Crump’s false narrative was repeated by the media ad nauseam, even fair-minded people began to demand my arrest without cause. Then, out of the blue, Crump produced a recorded interview of a “phone witness,” whom, he said, was Trayvon Martin’s 16-year-old girlfriend, “Diamond Eugene.”

In the recorded interview with Diamond Eugene, Crump openly led the witness. She mostly just echoed everything Crump said. Two weeks later, prosecutors went to Miami to interview 16-year-old Diamond Eugene under oath. That’s when, as I recently learned, 18-year-old Rachel Jeantel appeared, claiming she was Diamond Eugene. Despite the discrepancy in name and age, prosecutors interviewed Rachel Jeantel anyway and used her obviously false statements to issue an affidavit of probable cause for my arrest. The rest is history.

Hollywood filmmaker Joel Gilbert just released a film and book of the same name, The Trayvon Hoax: Unmasking the Witness Fraud that Divided America. He investigated the public records and made a discovery – Rachel Jeantel was an imposter. She was not “Diamond Eugene.” She was not Trayvon’s girlfriend. She was not on the phone with him before our altercation. She lied in court about everything she claimed to have heard over the phone in order to send me to prison for life.

In The Trayvon Hoax, Gilbert not only proves that Rachel was a fraud, he actually finds Trayvon’s real girlfriend, Diamond Eugene, studying Criminal Justice at Florida State University, of all things! Gilbert also identifies those who knew about the witness fraud, such as Trayvon Martin's mother Sybrina Fulton, now a 2020 Miami Dade Commissioner candidate. Gilbert also identifies the attorneys who likely knew and/or should have known about the witness switch.

The damage the trial did to me and my family has been devastating. I suffered from PTSD and, as a result, acted out for a few years before finally returning to the person I was. I was kicked out of college due to threats against the staff by the New Black Panthers. I lost my career path to become an attorney, and to this day I cannot work or even circulate in public. In 2015, someone tried to kill me. The bullet missed my head by inches, and the shooter got 20 years in prison. Today I remain in hiding, as does my family due to constant threats, which appear almost daily in rap songs and social media rants.

Ironically, Trayvon Martin and I ended up having much in common. We were both used to divide America for a political agenda. Since the trial, I have watched in horror as those who incited against me have divided America along racial lines. Black Lives Matter started as a result of my acquittal. BLM took its vigilante act to Ferguson, and the resulting "Ferguson Effect" led to a sharp rise in homicides in black neighborhoods. Even today, Benjamin Crump continues his false race narrative (and defames me) in his new book entitled, Open Season: Legalized Genocide of Colored People.

I have now taken up the cause of bringing America back together again, and I intend to do it by revealing how the country was deceived. I feel that if I can expose and hold accountable those at the origin of this evil witness fraud, the healing can begin.

I have hired attorney Larry Klayman in his private capacity, founder of Judicial Watch and now Freedom Watch. I am suing Rachel Jeantel, Brittany “Diamond” Eugene, Sybrina Fulton, Tracy Martin, Benjamin Crump, prosecutors Angela Corey, Bernie de la Rionda, John Guy, the state of Florida, the FDLE, and HarperCollins Publishing for in excess $100 million. I don't care about the money as much as I care about the truth coming out in discovery and at trial.

Racheal Jeantel lied under oath to deprive me of my constitutional rights and send me to prison for life. The others either suborned perjury or lied under oath to hide their knowledge of the switch of the legitimate phone witness, Diamond Eugene, for Rachel Jeantel, whom they knew was an imposter. My lawsuit is online and can be viewed or downloaded here: Zimmerman v Sybrina Fulton, Crump et al.

I am bringing this action not only to get justice for myself, but for all those Americans who are falsely accused of racial animus as well as those victimized by fake witnesses and unscrupulous prosecutors.

This lawsuit is also for the Bell family, whose sons were falsely accused of involvement in a tragic gym accident that caused the death of Kendrick Johnson. This lawsuit is for Officer Darren Wilson of Ferguson, whom even Eric Holder had to admit was falsely accused of shooting a man who allegedly put his hands up. This lawsuit is for the police officers in Baltimore, both black and white, who were falsely accused of harming Freddy Gray in order to justify mob violence. This lawsuit is for Brett Kavanaugh and any future Supreme Court nominees falsely accused of crimes they did not commit to prevent their nominations.

More than anything else, this lawsuit is for the America I grew up in and still believe in, an America of equal justice for all, where race hoaxes and fake witnesses have no place, an America where the content of one's character, not race, is the basis for one's judgement of another.

With my lawsuit, I hope to make a strong statement that false witnesses will not be tolerated, not in Seminole County Court or any court, and not in the United States Senate chambers. False witnesses must face consequences, or they will continue to ruin lives of innocent people. There is nothing more un-American and irreligious under the Ten Commandments than to bear false witness.

I look forward to succeeding in my court actions and hope to have enough funds to found a center for falsely accused persons of all races, those railroaded by charlatans, prosecutors, and an all too willing establishment media.

[titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745]

Seems to me the legal system got this one right. He didn't break the law, but he's a scuzzy doosh bag... So he didn't get prison time, but he's been bankrupted and is now a public pariah.

Hope he loses these cases and gets nothing. 

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

The prosecutors knowingly using false testimony makes this a slam dunk for Zimmerman. While I don't find him to be a person I'd choose to be friends with, it doesn't change the fact his rights were violated to appease a narrative.

[RLLD 3,455]

6 hours ago, titans&bucs&bearsohmy! said:

Seems to me the legal system got this one right. He didn't break the law, but he's a scuzzy doosh bag... So he didn't get prison time, but he's been bankrupted and is now a public pariah.

Hope he loses these cases and gets nothing. 

This.  He can be a despicable dooshbag, but that does not make him guilty.....

[Cruzer 1,992]

9 hours ago, Intense Observer said:

No point in rehashing the case. The evidence supported Zimmerman's claim of self defense and the legal system agreed.

Did he act like a Newbie afterwards? Sure, but that is understandable after the media, DOJ, and black terrorist organizations tried to ruin your life.

This lawsuit raises some serious concerns if the allegations are true.

Richard Jewell 2.0

We are all George Zimmerman

Most people know my name, George Zimmerman, largely due to negative stereotypes propagated by the media as a result of the 2012 incident in Sanford, Florida, in which Trayvon Martin died.

Unfortunately, most people don’t recall the fact that I was exonerated of any wrongdoing after a thorough investigation by the Sanford Police Department in March 2012. They had interviewed dozens of witnesses, analyzed 911 calls, and examined the physical evidence of my broken nose, the lacerations on the back of my head, as well as the bruised knuckles of my assailant.

This was all backed up by eyewitness Johnathan Good who told police that he saw me screaming for help while blows were coming down on me “MMA style.”

(Bolded by me for cruzer)

At the conclusion of the police investigation, Sanford Chief of Police Bill Lee announced that my actions were taken in self-defense and there were no grounds for my arrest. It was not even a “stand your ground” case. What followed immediately was a campaign of race-based defamation and incitement against me, led by Martin family attorney Benjamin Crump.

I am the last person who ever expected to be accused of being a bigot. I am Hispanic. My mother is from Peru. I speak fluent Spanish. I was an Obama supporter and a social activist. Just a year earlier, I had led a community-wide effort to get justice for Sherman Ware, a homeless black man who had been attacked by the son of a white police officer. I was also active in a mentoring program where I spent my spare time (and money) with black teens whose parents were in prison.

The Martin family attorney, Benjamin Crump, quickly recruited for his incitement efforts Al Sharpton, a man who was infamous for the 1989 Tawana Brawley race hoax and other incidents of mayhem based on racial incitement over the years. Then, Obama’s Department of Justice sent representatives to Sanford to “investigate,” but they instead helped organize protests demanding my arrest. As the protests heated up and Crump’s false narrative was repeated by the media ad nauseam, even fair-minded people began to demand my arrest without cause. Then, out of the blue, Crump produced a recorded interview of a “phone witness,” whom, he said, was Trayvon Martin’s 16-year-old girlfriend, “Diamond Eugene.”

In the recorded interview with Diamond Eugene, Crump openly led the witness. She mostly just echoed everything Crump said. Two weeks later, prosecutors went to Miami to interview 16-year-old Diamond Eugene under oath. That’s when, as I recently learned, 18-year-old Rachel Jeantel appeared, claiming she was Diamond Eugene. Despite the discrepancy in name and age, prosecutors interviewed Rachel Jeantel anyway and used her obviously false statements to issue an affidavit of probable cause for my arrest. The rest is history.

Hollywood filmmaker Joel Gilbert just released a film and book of the same name, The Trayvon Hoax: Unmasking the Witness Fraud that Divided America. He investigated the public records and made a discovery – Rachel Jeantel was an imposter. She was not “Diamond Eugene.” She was not Trayvon’s girlfriend. She was not on the phone with him before our altercation. She lied in court about everything she claimed to have heard over the phone in order to send me to prison for life.

In The Trayvon Hoax, Gilbert not only proves that Rachel was a fraud, he actually finds Trayvon’s real girlfriend, Diamond Eugene, studying Criminal Justice at Florida State University, of all things! Gilbert also identifies those who knew about the witness fraud, such as Trayvon Martin's mother Sybrina Fulton, now a 2020 Miami Dade Commissioner candidate. Gilbert also identifies the attorneys who likely knew and/or should have known about the witness switch.

The damage the trial did to me and my family has been devastating. I suffered from PTSD and, as a result, acted out for a few years before finally returning to the person I was. I was kicked out of college due to threats against the staff by the New Black Panthers. I lost my career path to become an attorney, and to this day I cannot work or even circulate in public. In 2015, someone tried to kill me. The bullet missed my head by inches, and the shooter got 20 years in prison. Today I remain in hiding, as does my family due to constant threats, which appear almost daily in rap songs and social media rants.

Ironically, Trayvon Martin and I ended up having much in common. We were both used to divide America for a political agenda. Since the trial, I have watched in horror as those who incited against me have divided America along racial lines. Black Lives Matter started as a result of my acquittal. BLM took its vigilante act to Ferguson, and the resulting "Ferguson Effect" led to a sharp rise in homicides in black neighborhoods. Even today, Benjamin Crump continues his false race narrative (and defames me) in his new book entitled, Open Season: Legalized Genocide of Colored People.

I have now taken up the cause of bringing America back together again, and I intend to do it by revealing how the country was deceived. I feel that if I can expose and hold accountable those at the origin of this evil witness fraud, the healing can begin.

I have hired attorney Larry Klayman in his private capacity, founder of Judicial Watch and now Freedom Watch. I am suing Rachel Jeantel, Brittany “Diamond” Eugene, Sybrina Fulton, Tracy Martin, Benjamin Crump, prosecutors Angela Corey, Bernie de la Rionda, John Guy, the state of Florida, the FDLE, and HarperCollins Publishing for in excess $100 million. I don't care about the money as much as I care about the truth coming out in discovery and at trial.

Racheal Jeantel lied under oath to deprive me of my constitutional rights and send me to prison for life. The others either suborned perjury or lied under oath to hide their knowledge of the switch of the legitimate phone witness, Diamond Eugene, for Rachel Jeantel, whom they knew was an imposter. My lawsuit is online and can be viewed or downloaded here: Zimmerman v Sybrina Fulton, Crump et al.

I am bringing this action not only to get justice for myself, but for all those Americans who are falsely accused of racial animus as well as those victimized by fake witnesses and unscrupulous prosecutors.

This lawsuit is also for the Bell family, whose sons were falsely accused of involvement in a tragic gym accident that caused the death of Kendrick Johnson. This lawsuit is for Officer Darren Wilson of Ferguson, whom even Eric Holder had to admit was falsely accused of shooting a man who allegedly put his hands up. This lawsuit is for the police officers in Baltimore, both black and white, who were falsely accused of harming Freddy Gray in order to justify mob violence. This lawsuit is for Brett Kavanaugh and any future Supreme Court nominees falsely accused of crimes they did not commit to prevent their nominations.

More than anything else, this lawsuit is for the America I grew up in and still believe in, an America of equal justice for all, where race hoaxes and fake witnesses have no place, an America where the content of one's character, not race, is the basis for one's judgement of another.

With my lawsuit, I hope to make a strong statement that false witnesses will not be tolerated, not in Seminole County Court or any court, and not in the United States Senate chambers. False witnesses must face consequences, or they will continue to ruin lives of innocent people. There is nothing more un-American and irreligious under the Ten Commandments than to bear false witness.

I look forward to succeeding in my court actions and hope to have enough funds to found a center for falsely accused persons of all races, those railroaded by charlatans, prosecutors, and an all too willing establishment media.

Maybe you're confused as to what "eye witness who saw Martin attack Zimmerman" means.

When reduced down - this what you really get from this monologue:

The evidence supported Zimmerman's claim of self defense and the legal system agreed.

More like half right. Yes the legal system acquitted Zimmerman. But no the evidence doesn't support Zimmerman's actual claim anymore than it does Martin's family claim.

This was all backed up by eyewitness Johnathan Good who told police that he saw me screaming for help while blows were coming down on me “MMA style.”

The only thing this backs up and substantiates is that Mr. Good saw Zimmerman getting his ass kicked, screaming for help. It does not, once again, say he saw who attacked who or who threw the 1st punch.

At the conclusion of the police investigation, Sanford Chief of Police Bill Lee announced that my actions were taken in self-defense and there were no grounds for my arrest.

Based on the testimony of the guy still alive, based on the testimony of Zimmerman. Pretty convenient how that works out when the only other real witness is dead.

[MDC 5,890]

1 hour ago, RLLD said:

This.  He can be a despicable dooshbag, but that does not make him guilty.....

Nobody here is saying he should have been found guilty. We’re saying Zimm’s irresponsible actions created the situation and his claim that Trayvon hit first is suspect. 

[IGotWorms 3,311]

1 minute ago, MDC said:

Nobody here is saying he should have been found guilty. We’re saying Zimm’s irresponsible actions created the situation and his claim that Trayvon hit first is suspect. 

Well and that it’s ballsy and dooshy as to sue the family of the kid you killed

[MDC 5,890]

Just now, IGotWorms said:

Well and that it’s ballsy and dooshy as to sue the family of the kid you killed

Obviously Zimm doesn’t expect to win and it’s about getting attention and $ on the speaking circuit. GC hero right here though. They love him.

[TimmySmith 2,782]

3 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Well and that it’s ballsy and dooshy as to sue the family of the kid you killed

Any lawyerly predictions on the outcome?  

[IGotWorms 3,311]

52 minutes ago, TimmySmith said:

Any lawyerly predictions on the outcome?  

What MDC said. He’ll sell some books and speeches to a bunch of focktards

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

1 hour ago, Cruzer said:

More like half right. Yes the legal system acquitted Zimmerman.

Based on the testimony of the guy still alive, based on the testimony of Zimmerman. Pretty convenient how that works out when the only other real witness is dead.

The legal system was perverted to try to gin up witnesses to appease the mob/narrative.

Yes or No, was there prosecutorial misconduct?

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

5 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

What MDC said. He’ll sell some books and speeches to a bunch of focktards

So as long as it's directed against someone you don't like, prosecutors can manufacture evidence, right?

[Cruzer 1,992]

8 minutes ago, Filthy Fernadez said:

The legal system was perverted to try to gin up witnesses to appease the mob/narrative.

Yes or No, was there prosecutorial misconduct?

I know there was indeed discrepancy from some of the witnesses.

Whether that was or was not at the direction of the prosecution - I do not know.

I also know there has yet (still) to be a single witness (outside of Zimmerman) who can say they saw the altercation start - who can say they saw which man attacked who.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

35 minutes ago, Cruzer said:

I know there was indeed discrepancy from some of the witnesses.

Whether that was or was not at the direction of the prosecution - I do not know.

I also know there has yet (still) to be a single witness (outside of Zimmerman) who can say they saw the altercation start - who can say they saw which man attacked who.

This lawsuit is about defamation and misconduct. It's clear there was. Set aside the dislike we share for Zimmerman and make a reasonable determination.

It seems clear the guy has a very strong case.

[Cruzer 1,992]

1 minute ago, Filthy Fernadez said:

This lawsuit is about defamation and misconduct. It's clear there was. Set aside the dislike we share for Zimmerman and make a reasonable determination.

It seems clear the guy has a very strong case.

Oh I really don't know - have not read his full complaint.

What I do know is this guy is a pathetic clown, a wannabe big shot. What I do know is this guy is mentally unstable - has made his way thru life conning people, and the system. 

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Just now, Cruzer said:

Oh I really don't know - have not read his full complaint.

What I do know is this guy is a pathetic clown, a wannabe big shot. What I do know is this guy is mentally unstable - has made his way thru life conning people, and the system. 

You and I know what the media has allowed us to. Nothing more.

I'm looking at the prosecutors knowingly using a phony witness. Zimmerman's wounds support his version.

Again, I don't care for him but maybe I've listened to the narrative about him too much. 

[Cruzer 1,992]

1 hour ago, Filthy Fernadez said:

You and I know what the media has allowed us to. Nothing more.

I'm looking at the prosecutors knowingly using a phony witness. Zimmerman's wounds support his version.

Again, I don't care for him but maybe I've listened to the narrative about him too much. 

I know what Zimmerman told us.

I know you, nor anyone else, can produce or name a single witness (other than Zimmerman) who saw who attacked who.

I know one guy is dead and isn't here to dispute Zimmerman's claim.

[IGotWorms 3,311]

1 hour ago, Filthy Fernadez said:

So as long as it's directed against someone you don't like, prosecutors can manufacture evidence, right?

No of course not. That’s why you’re probably a complete focking idiot. If prosecutors knowingly put a fake witness on the stand to perjure herself they’d be disbarred. Are you really this thick??

[IGotWorms 3,311]

56 minutes ago, Filthy Fernadez said:

This lawsuit is about defamation and misconduct. It's clear there was. Set aside the dislike we share for Zimmerman and make a reasonable determination.

It seems clear the guy has a very strong case.

Just because it’s in a complaint doesn’t mean it’s true. In fact it’s pretty much always a highly skewed version of half the story at best. In this case and considering the source it may be outright false.

You would really do well to vet your sources in life. If it’s from a Russian twitter bot it may not be true. If it’s from some lunatic conspiracy alt-right site maybe don’t take it as gospel. And if it’s written in a totally self serving document from a highly questionable individual, maybe hesitate to take it as given.

HTH. Seriously

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

1 hour ago, IGotWorms said:

No of course not. That’s why you’re probably a complete focking idiot. If prosecutors knowingly put a fake witness on the stand to perjure herself they’d be disbarred.

So you agree something should happen against all the people who trotted out fake witnesses against Trump in regard to Russia and Ukraine call.

We agree finally.

[IGotWorms 3,311]

26 minutes ago, Filthy Fernadez said:

So you agree something should happen against all the people who trotted out fake witnesses against Trump in regard to Russia and Ukraine call.

We agree finally.

[RLLD 3,455]

5 hours ago, MDC said:

Obviously Zimm doesn’t expect to win and it’s about getting attention and $ on the speaking circuit. GC hero right here though. They love him.

Don't some states have strong laws against frivolous lawsuits....I would love to see him ruined by this....

[DonS 3,067]

I apologize if this was already posted on the moon in this thread, but didn't feel like wading through 3 pages of the usual slap fights. 

 

[Mike Honcho 4,027]

4 hours ago, RLLD said:

Don't some states have strong laws against frivolous lawsuits....I would love to see him ruined by this....

 

Quote

 

Devin Nunes sued a fake cow. And kept suing and suing and suing …

It’s been a big legal year for Republican U.S. Rep. Devin Nunes of Tulare, who once co-sponsored the “Discouraging Frivolous Lawsuits Act.”

He has sued:

¤ A stone fruit farmer in Dinuba, and two other people, for conspiring to damage his 2018 reelection by asking that Nunes not be allowed to call himself a “farmer” on the ballot.

¤ The research firm Fusion GPS and a Democratic group called Campaign for Accountability for attempting to interfere with his “investigation” (quote marks are mine) into ties between President Trump and Russia when he was chairman of the House Intelligence Committee.

¤ Twitter and a couple of parody accounts, including @DevinCow, who has called Nunes “a treasonous cowpoke.” He is asking for $250 million to assuage his hurt feelings.

¤ McClatchy, parent company of Nunes’ hometown paper, the Fresno Bee, for writing that he had a financial interest in a winery sued by an employee who was asked to work on a charity cruise where men behaved very, very badly.

¤ And, most recently, Esquire magazine and the journalist Ryan Lizza, who Nunes claims have defamed him to the tune of $75 million in writing about the Nunes family dairy farm, which is not in California, but in Iowa, a fact Lizza alleged Nunes has sought to downplay. Lizza also wrote about how undocumented workers form the backbone of the Iowa dairy farm industry, and how the industry would collapse without them.

 

Clearly, they need to be much much stronger.

 

[RLLD 3,455]

30 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

 

Clearly, they need to be much much stronger.

 

Agree completely, tort reform is badly needed