Tempted to start both Cook and Mattison. Crazy? Make sense?

[dpbuddha 9]

I have 4 RBs on my roster and Bell is out this week...that leaves me with just Cook, Snell, and Mattison. TD heavy league (need 70 yards before you get anything there).

Last week of regular season, I have a playoff spot locked up (top 4 make it, 2 week playoff) but want to hold my points league for that bonus $, so taking a zero from Cook if the Vikings pull some shenanigans is going to hurt, especially if I have Mattison on the bench. I like Snell's matchup, but I need him to fall into the endzone or get 70 yards...no guarantee there. What would you do?

[weepaws 2,452]

I would play Mattison and Snell. 

[dpbuddha 9]

45 minutes ago, weepaws said:

I would play Mattison and Snell. 

Well that just messes me all up! lol

[jimaveli 119]

If we don’t get some actionable tea leaf data in the next few hours, I am sitting Michel and one of Tyler Lockett Or John Brown in order to start both Cook and Mattison. So personally, I’m fine with starting both Cook and Mattison as long as the person you’re sitting to start Mattison isn’t some clear stud person.

[weepaws 2,452]

Darn it, sorry about to that. 

[gridirongoofs 75]

29 minutes ago, weepaws said:

Darn it, sorry about to that. 

You are only human

[jimaveli 119]

Whew. Mattison outscored the hell out of Michel and was just ahead of both Lockett and Brown. And Snell. So it worked out.