Jump to content

Coronavirus - Doomsday

Cdub100

By Cdub100
in The Geek Club

 Share

Recommended Posts

TimHauck FF Geek

TimHauck

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, nobody said:

Look at this guy.  He just can't stop making it political. 

I don't want to live in a world with mandates for a useless jab either.  

Rest In Power.

I was always against the mandates.  Just pointing out that data shows they saved  lives

  • Replies 25k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • TimHauck

    3705

  • lod001

    1573

  • Hardcore troubadour

    1413

  • TimmySmith

    1151

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

jerryskids
jerryskids

No he didn’t. https://www.allsides.com/story/fact-checkers-disagree-whether-biden-called-trumps-china-travel-ban-xenophobic You can drink the koolaid served to you by the MSM and lefty fac

TimHauck
TimHauck

I mean I knew you were a POS, so I guess I shouldn’t be surprised you can’t even admit when you’re wrong

MTSkiBum
MTSkiBum

Posted Images

BudBro FF Geek

BudBro

Posted
Posted

Breaking: 188% rise in mortality risk among NZ teens following Covid Vax

Quote

The 12-19 and 20-30 age brackets had a disproportionate mortality risk in the 3 months following vaccination. This may have contributed to the deaths of as many as 40 teenagers and 70 people in their twenties. It greatly increases the likelihood that a number of unexplained or unexpected deaths noted among the younger age brackets occurring in 2021 and 2022 were caused by mRNA Covid vaccination. By implication the health, including long term health, of thousands more may have been adversely affected.

 

BudBro FF Geek

BudBro

Posted
Posted

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and the Multi-Hit Hypothesis of Oncogenesis

Quote

This staggering intricacy calls for caution when advising all people with cancer (or a previous history of cancer) to receive the COVID-19 primary vaccine series plus additional booster doses. Moreover, because these patients were not included in the pivotal clinical trials, considerable uncertainty remains regarding vaccine efficacy, safety, and the risk of interactions with anticancer therapies, which could reduce the value and innocuity of either medical treatment. After reviewing the available literature, we are particularly concerned that certain COVID-19 vaccines may generate a pro-tumorigenic milieu (i.e., a specific environment that could lead to neoplastic transformation) that predisposes some (stable) oncologic patients and survivors to cancer progression, recurrence, and/or metastasis.

 

BudBro FF Geek

BudBro

Posted
Posted

At Least 55 Undeclared Chemical Elements Found in COVID-19 Vaccines

Quote

By the end of 2023, 24 undeclared chemical elements had been detected by Scanning Electron Microscopy Coupled with Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (SEM-EDX), in the COVID-19 vaccines of the different brands, by various research groups from different countries around the world. In this paper, we report laboratory results from high precision Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) that confirm and expand previous results by SEM-EDX. To this end, the contents of vials from different lots of the brands AstraZeneca/Oxford, CanSino Biologics, Pfizer/BioNTech, Sinopharm, Moderna and Sputnik V were analyzed. Among the undeclared chemical elements were detected 11 of the 15 cytotoxic lanthanides used in electronic devices and optogenetics. In addition, among the undeclared elements were all 11 of the heavy metals: chromium was found in 100% of the samples; arsenic 82%; nickel 59%; cobalt and copper 47%; tin 35%; cadmium, lead and manganese in 18%; and mercury in 6%. A total of 55 undeclared chemical elements were found and quantified with ICP-MS. Combining these findings with results from SEM-EDX, altogether 62 undeclared chemical elements have been found in the various products. In all brands, we found boron, calcium, titanium, aluminum, arsenic, nickel, chromium, copper, gallium, strontium, niobium, molybdenum, barium and hafnium

 

BudBro FF Geek

BudBro

Posted
Posted

https://dailysceptic.org/2024/10/29/my-warning-to-australia-on-the-cancer-risks-of-covid-vaccines-did-not-go-unheeded/

Quote

We reviewed all the scientific evidence that mRNA vaccines can theoretically induce cancer in at least 10 different ways. What this has revealed is that the mRNA vaccines do not as promised disappear in days but can integrate into cells and induce cancer. Indeed, I have just on my return spoken to someone in Australia who has identified the vaccine DNA, from a vaccine of six months ago, in a tumour mass removed at operation. This in addition to all the other early reports, including those by Ryan Cole, of identical observations.

Our joint opinion is that all mRNA vaccines must now be banned. Fortunately five Senators and the town council of Port Hedland, Western Australia, have all agreed with the presentation I sent them. The outcome, their call for the suspension of all Covid vaccines, made the trip extraordinarily worthwhile.

 

  • Like 1
Baker Boy FF Geek

Baker Boy

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, TimHauck said:

I was always against the mandates.  Just pointing out that data shows they saved  lives

There is also data that shows the vaccine didn’t save any lives and actually cost lives. It all depends on how you interpret the data.

  • Like 1
TimHauck FF Geek

TimHauck

Posted
Posted
38 minutes ago, Baker Boy said:

There is also data that shows the vaccine didn’t save any lives and actually cost lives. It all depends on how you interpret the data.

Can you provide a link to any that actually ties this conclusion to comparable vaccinated vs non vaccinated populations and does not simply draw conclusions based on deaths in the total population?

Baker Boy FF Geek

Baker Boy

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Can you provide a link to any that actually ties this conclusion to comparable vaccinated vs non vaccinated populations and does not simply draw conclusions based on deaths in the total population?

I have provided links in the past and you reply with some stupid Twitter post by some unknown person.

  • Thanks 1
TimHauck FF Geek

TimHauck

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, Baker Boy said:

I have provided links in the past and you reply with some stupid Twitter post by some unknown person.

I don’t recall you posting many links.   When I reply with Twitter posts in this thread they often also include links to actual studies

  • Haha 2
TimHauck FF Geek

TimHauck

Posted
Posted
On 10/29/2024 at 7:50 PM, nobody said:

Someone gets depressed over unjust jab mandates leading to an overdose and Tim makes it political.  Not surprised.

Just wanted to bump this post from @nobody blaming vax mandates for someone who voluntarily took the vax dying from a drug overdose.  In the words of @Reality, what a garbage human being. 

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Hardcore troubadour FF Geek

Hardcore troubadour

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Denis Rancourt, who I believe @lod001 has quoted and tried to blame the covid vaccines for increases in excess deaths, admits it wasn’t vaccines.  Still won’t admit it was primarily covid though and now blames it on “biological stress.”

https://correlation-canada.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/2024-12-02-Correlation-Medical-hypothesis-pandemic-Rancourt.pdf

🚿 🪖

  • Confused 1
lod001 FF Geek

lod001

Posted
Posted
21 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Denis Rancourt, who I believe @lod001 has quoted and tried to blame the covid vaccines for increases in excess deaths, admits it wasn’t vaccines.  Still won’t admit it was primarily covid though and now blames it on “biological stress.”

https://correlation-canada.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/2024-12-02-Correlation-Medical-hypothesis-pandemic-Rancourt.pdf

We all believe that you a retarded idiot and we are correct. Now go get your booster jab and drop the fock dead.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Cdub100 FF Geek

Cdub100

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 12/2/2024 at 1:48 PM, Strike said:

https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/12.04.2024-SSCP-FINAL-REPORT.pdf

In late January 2023, the most rigorous and comprehensive review of the scientific literature on masks during the COVID-19 pandemic was published by Cochrane.840 Cochrane is considered the worlds most respected organization for evaluating health interventions, is known for being the single best resource for methodologic research, 841 and is recognized as having the highest standard of evidence-based healthcare.842 The January 2023 publication found that wearing any kind of face covering “probably makes little or no difference” in reducing the spread of respiratory illness.843 The study reviewed 15 trials comparing outcomes of wearing surgical masks versus no mask and also versus N95 masks, in hospital and community settings during the pandemic. The conclusion was that the value of wearing masks was approximately zero.844 “There is just no evidence that they make any difference. Full stop.”845

 

One area where the mask mandate may have caused quantifiable harm is the masking of children. The April 3, 2020-February 25, 2022 (with a brief lift between May 13,2021-July 27, 2021) CDC guidance masking in schools was unbelievably far reaching. It called for “universal indoor masking by all students (age two and older), staff, teachers, and visitors to K-12 schools, regardless of vaccinations status.”848 Many countries, including the U.K., Sweden, Norway, and Denmark, followed the guidelines of the WHO. The WHO specifically did not recommend masking children aged five or younger because they are at low risk of illness, masks are “not in the overall interest of the child,” and also because most children that age are not capable of wearing a mask properly or efficiently.849 The WHO also recommended children aged six through 11 not routinely wear masks because of potential adverse impact to psychosocial and learning development.850 The WHO further explicitly advised against children wearing masks during physical activities, such as outside playground time, so as not to impede their breathing.851 But beyond those logical reasons as to not require young children to wear a mask all day, every day, are additional, still unknown consequences. These can be issues such as delayed 848 OPERATIONAL GUIDANCE FOR K-12 SCHOOLS AND EARLY CARE AND EDUCATION PROGRAMS TO SUPPORT SAFE INPERSON LEARNING, CTRS. FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION (last updated Oct. 4, 2023). 849 Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): Children and masks, WORLD HEALTH ORG. (Mar. 7, 2022). 850 Id. 851 Id. Page 213 of 520 speech and language disorders in young children. Many children that wore masks were more hesitant to talk with a mask on, further substantiating insecurities in communication.852

 

For those way in the back.

MASK ARE AND FOREVER HAVE BEEN USELESS!!!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


×
×
  • Create New...