Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Fumbleweed

**Round Seven-Ten Commentary**

Recommended Posts

Man, Hawkeye is going to be pissed when he sees Ray’s selection...that was cold. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Fumbleweed said:

Man, Hawkeye is going to be pissed when he sees Ray’s selection...that was cold. 

Great point!! LOL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Missed out on Mattison but I'm alright with it.  Needed more RB depth so I went with a boom/bust player.  He could see some decent playing time or could just get the goal line carries.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sniped again by Iceman.  Wasn't expecting you to take your 2nd TE there, but Cook was who I had my eye on.  If Higbee can continue close to how he finished last year though I'll be happy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, remote controller said:

Definitely the latest Ray has gone without a Defense. 

 

😤

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Higbee was free agent gold for me in so many leagues last year. I hope he keeps it up. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Upside RB4 in Breida, he puts up numbers when he's on the field.

Henry's also had trouble staying on the field, but he's a solid producer when he does. Whoever's playing QB for the Chargers could rely on him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This mock is just brutal!

ICEMAN

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, ICEMAN said:

This mock is just brutal!

ICEMAN

How’s that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just can't remember a year where the startable RB's were so shallow. There are so many questions about all but 5-6 running backs, in my mind.

ICEMAN

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, ICEMAN said:

I just can't remember a year where the startable RB's were so shallow. There are so many questions about all but 5-6 running backs, in my mind.

ICEMAN

This is how. I’ve felt for the last 5 years. The RB position has been crap for a while. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, he was still open on my list at his proper ADP, will correct, stand by

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still think this mock needs to go 18 rounds. A lot of talent left on the board at the end. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

9 starters 7 bench pretty standard. Only reason to increase rounds would be for the best ball format aspect. 
 

I think if it ain’t broke, don’t fix 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Need a thread for Round 11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I texted Dan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t like projecting out on a season cut short but Stafford was on pace to be QB3 or 4 last year, I believe. Think he was 3rd on a ppg basis. 
 

originally I had planned to just wait and target him as my QB1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, WhiteWonder said:

I don’t like projecting out on a season cut short but Stafford was on pace to be QB3 or 4 last year, I believe. Think he was 3rd on a ppg basis. 
 

originally I had planned to just wait and target him as my QB1

I loved your Stafford pick.  It meant that you didn't take Fant, who I really wanted, and feel has an enormous upside.  :)

Beyond that, yeah, Stafford has good potential.  Quality pick in its own right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Dan said:

I loved your Stafford pick.  It meant that you didn't take Fant, who I really wanted, and feel has an enormous upside.  :)

Beyond that, yeah, Stafford has good potential.  Quality pick in its own right.

Hah. I was thinking maybe I sniped stafford from you and I was just hoping you didn’t take Gronk who seems like a great gamble as a TE2

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×