Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
edjr

30 million US renters ‘at risk of eviction’

Recommended Posts

https://money.yahoo.com/housing-expert-30-million-us-renters-at-risk-of-eviction-202003798.html


 

Quote

 

As eviction protections set to expire across the United States, up to 30 million tenants may be at risk of being thrown out of their homes, according to one expert.

“We reached a number of 19 to 23 million tenants in the U.S. at risk of eviction, which is terrifying in this moment,” said  Zach Neumann, co-founder of the COVID-19 Eviction Project, a community legal initiative, told Yahoo Finance recently. “Now we’re approaching 30 million tenants in the United States who may be at risk of eviction and that’s largely based on the U.S. Census Bureau’s survey data.” 

His comments come after nearly a third of American renters missed their July rent payments, according to a study by Apartment List, an apartment listing website. 
Even those who were protected by the CARES Act will see the moratorium on evictions expire Monday.  The law only applied to properties with federally backed mortgages for a 120-day window starting March 27.

There still is an extra cushion for at-risk renters, Neumann said. A renter facing eviction is required to get a one-month advance notice. 

“They’ll enter a 30-day notice period, so you wouldn’t start to see their evictions until early September,” Neumann said. “But I think in states where tenants are not covered by federal eviction moratorium or live in non-covered properties and where those states have lifted the eviction moratorium, you’re starting to see very significant numbers across the country.”

This 30-day notice period will come with its own set of unique technical challenges, Neumann said. 

“Zoom hearings are taking place around the country,” he said. 

Typically, tenants facing eviction can respond to a court case against them by going to the courthouse. But many can’t access the Zoom hearings, meaning the court can enter a default because the renter didn’t show up.

“The early data in Colorado where I live and practice law suggests that in this very first part of the wave of evictions we expect to see, 96% of tenants have defaulted,” Neuman said. 

 

I really do feel for renters and owners. This is going to be a clusterfock. I figure in 12 months, the housing market will be flooded with foreclosures. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We have been trying to buy a house but have this sinking feeling that another crash is coming and we should just wait. This chitstorm is going to ripple effect it’s way through the market and we won’t feel some of the effects for a little while.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s been extended for another month. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, tanatastic said:

We have been trying to buy a house but have this sinking feeling that another crash is coming and we should just wait. This chitstorm is going to ripple effect it’s way through the market and we won’t feel some of the effects for a little while.

you should. we are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are going to get 1200 two times now and an extra 600 for unemployment why can’t people pay rent?

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, KSB2424 said:

If they are going to get 1200 two times now and an extra 600 for unemployment why can’t people pay rent?

:dunno:

 

The $600 payments started on April 10th (plus or minus), that's 15 weeks, so that's $9k.  With the two $1200 payouts, that's $11,400 in 4 months.  If you had a full-time job making $12/hr and got laid off... but got 50% for unemployment, that gave you an additional $3600, bringing your total up to $15k.  If you made $12/hr and worked 40 hours a week, you'd make $7,200 over that same 15 week period.  That means you made more than DOUBLE what you'd have made had you not been laid off.  How can you not be able pay rent?

If you're still working, you got an extra $2400.  Again, how are you not able to pay rent?

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, KSB2424 said:

If they are going to get 1200 two times now and an extra 600 for unemployment why can’t people pay rent?

if I lost my job due to covid, i wouldn't pay rent either. like 2400 over 6 months is so great amount of cash to live off? cmon man

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, edjr said:

if I lost my job due to covid, i wouldn't pay rent either. like 2400 over 6 months is so great amount of cash to live off? cmon man

If you lost you job due to covid you file for unemployment and have been getting normal unemployment PLUS $600 per WEEK extra, every week.  That’s $2,400 per month. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No reason deadbeats should not have been paying rent.  Handouts are a plenty.  Pay your focking bills.  :mad:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What they should have done is the first round stimulus of $1,200, never do the extra $600 a week for unemployment and have rent forgiveness for the rest of 2020, take the $600 you are saving from not giving it to citizens and create some kind of landlord stimulus program. Jan 1st 2021 every goes back to normal. It keeps people in their homes and encourages people to get back to work because they don't have any extra income.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, KSB2424 said:

If you lost you job due to covid you file for unemployment and have been getting normal unemployment PLUS $600 per WEEK extra, every week.  That’s $2,400 per month. 

white privilege 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, TBayXXXVII said:

:dunno:

 

The $600 payments started on April 10th (plus or minus), that's 15 weeks, so that's $9k.  With the two $1200 payouts, that's $11,400 in 4 months.  If you had a full-time job making $12/hr and got laid off... but got 50% for unemployment, that gave you an additional $3600, bringing your total up to $15k.  If you made $12/hr and worked 40 hours a week, you'd make $7,200 over that same 15 week period.  That means you made more than DOUBLE what you'd have made had you not been laid off.  How can you not be able pay rent?

If you're still working, you got an extra $2400.  Again, how are you not able to pay rent?

Yea this is what Ive been wondering.  Got in an argument with someone about the 600 dollars ending.  After a very short discussion I simply said "do you know a single person who is struggling since this hit" they said no.   

I see people buying things they wouldnt.  My neighbors bought a boat.   We live in WNY.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, TBayXXXVII said:

:dunno:

 

The $600 payments started on April 10th (plus or minus), that's 15 weeks, so that's $9k.  With the two $1200 payouts, that's $11,400 in 4 months.  If you had a full-time job making $12/hr and got laid off... but got 50% for unemployment, that gave you an additional $3600, bringing your total up to $15k.  If you made $12/hr and worked 40 hours a week, you'd make $7,200 over that same 15 week period.  That means you made more than DOUBLE what you'd have made had you not been laid off.  How can you not be able pay rent?

If you're still working, you got an extra $2400.  Again, how are you not able to pay rent?

I think you are trying to use sound reasoning on a Yahoo article. Never works. Believe me I tried. The main contributor just had to get in there at the end he practices law. Yes because lawyers know all about finance and spending habits of millions of people like the back of their hand. Should of just said he digs for fossils for fun in CO and knows things.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, TBayXXXVII said:

:dunno:

 

The $600 payments started on April 10th (plus or minus), that's 15 weeks, so that's $9k.  With the two $1200 payouts, that's $11,400 in 4 months.  If you had a full-time job making $12/hr and got laid off... but got 50% for unemployment, that gave you an additional $3600, bringing your total up to $15k.  If you made $12/hr and worked 40 hours a week, you'd make $7,200 over that same 15 week period.  That means you made more than DOUBLE what you'd have made had you not been laid off.  How can you not be able pay rent?

If you're still working, you got an extra $2400.  Again, how are you not able to pay rent?

It's been a huge bonus for lower level wage earners. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, vuduchile said:

It's been a huge bonus for lower level wage earners. 

It's called wealth redistribution. Should have been a low interest loan from day one. Totally fvcked up society where the upper middle class get nothing but a hard time while low wage earners double their income. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, FlyinHeadlock said:

It's called wealth redistribution. Should have been a low interest loan from day one. Totally fvcked up society where the upper middle class get nothing but a hard time while low wage earners double their income. 

 

I'm just happy I finally get free $ like the losers i support with my taxes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, TBayXXXVII said:

:dunno:

 

The $600 payments started on April 10th (plus or minus), that's 15 weeks, so that's $9k.  With the two $1200 payouts, that's $11,400 in 4 months.  If you had a full-time job making $12/hr and got laid off... but got 50% for unemployment, that gave you an additional $3600, bringing your total up to $15k.  If you made $12/hr and worked 40 hours a week, you'd make $7,200 over that same 15 week period.  That means you made more than DOUBLE what you'd have made had you not been laid off.  How can you not be able pay rent?

If you're still working, you got an extra $2400.  Again, how are you not able to pay rent?

I have 8500 in the bank and already payed rent for next month. I only made 200 more a month than I typically did but I knew that the gravy train would end sometime so I saved like a miser. My total bills equal 1300 bucks a month. I live in a cheap apartment. I don't pay child support and don't have a gf. My only responsibility is my 6 year old and a cat. 

 

That being said. My brother has a family of 6. He would need way more than I to keep things running. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, kilroy69 said:

I have 8500 in the bank and already payed rent from the month. I only made 200 more a month than I typically did but I knew that the gravy train would end sometime so I saved like a miser. My total bills equal 1300 bucks a month. I live in a cheap apartment. I don't pay child support and don't have a gf. My only responsibility is my 6 year old and a cat. 

You made 200 more a month. What did you make to earn it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, FlyinHeadlock said:

You made 200 more a month. What did you make to earn it. 

Couple of really nice crocheted mittens

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, FlyinHeadlock said:

You made 200 more a month. What did you make to earn it. 

He lost his job because the government shut down. Is that his fault? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

He lost his job because the government shut down. Is that his fault? 

Not only that I WANT to go back. Keep the 200 a month extra. My job gives me a feeling of self worth and to me is more than a paycheck. It's what I do. These people that do not want to go back to work have shittyy jobs or poor work ethic. I have neither. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

He lost his job because the government shut down. Is that his fault? 

I get that part. It's the I make more now part. Nobody is making more now not working. They receive more. The only people making more are those still working either by longer hrs or a raise.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, FlyinHeadlock said:

I get that part. It's the I make more now part. Nobody is making more now not working. They receive more. The only people making more are those still working either by longer hrs or a raise.

 

 

 

The help was needed fast. I don’t think they had time to try and figure out who made what. This round should be more efficient. We’ll see. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

The help was needed fast. I don’t think they had time to try and figure out who made what. This round should be more efficient. We’ll see. 

Yup

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Should have been a zero interest loan for 5 years. Take as much as you need but it will be paid back approach. Either by not getting a tax refund check or pay it back monthly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I made $10K over a 10 week layoff, plus $3900 stimulus. That's enough to live comfortably, and start dabbling in Robinhood.

I don't see how people aren't making their rent. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

The help was needed fast. I don’t think they had time to try and figure out who made what. This round should be more efficient. We’ll see. 

It is not just that. Most people think oh the state can just put a new program in place on their system and BAM it calculates the rate at 70% and pays you out.  That is laughably simple minded. These state systems were built on Cobol.  The first thing is that cobol is like the human body. Implementing a wage payout by percentage would mean changing the code and once you do that it causes problems down the line. Think turning off a cancer gene but suddenly growing hair like a bear. Somewhere downstream its gonna break.  Then lets talk about the job itself. The AVERAGE age of a software engineer is 32 years old.  The average age of a cobol programmer is 56 and 10% a year are aging out of the system. 

You need the people who understand this language and can test it and a large majority of those people are retired or getting ready to. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, FlyinHeadlock said:
  • Should have been a zero interest loan for 5 years. Take as much as you need but it will be paid back approach. Either by not getting a tax refund check or pay it back monthly.

TB12 got a loan from the gubment for his snake oil, why shouldnt everyone have been able to do the same?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, kilroy69 said:

I have 8500 in the bank and already payed rent for next month. I only made 200 more a month than I typically did but I knew that the gravy train would end sometime so I saved like a miser. My total bills equal 1300 bucks a month. I live in a cheap apartment. I don't pay child support and don't have a gf. My only responsibility is my 6 year old and a cat. 

 

That being said. My brother has a family of 6. He would need way more than I to keep things running. 

Are they renting?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Are they renting?

No. They own and his wife makes bank so they are in no risk unless she loses her job which is unlikely. If they did though what the state pays would not cover them for sure. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, kilroy69 said:

No. They own and his wife makes bank so they are in no risk of anything 

Ok, cool.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, iam90sbaby said:

What they should have done is the first round stimulus of $1,200, never do the extra $600 a week for unemployment and have rent forgiveness for the rest of 2020, take the $600 you are saving from not giving it to citizens and create some kind of landlord stimulus program. Jan 1st 2021 every goes back to normal. It keeps people in their homes and encourages people to get back to work because they don't have any extra income.

That makes too much sense.  The government would never do that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×