Nancy has arrows in her quiver - Another impeachment?

[Utilit99 4,099]

Pelosi won't rule out using impeachment as option to stop Trump Supreme Court pick

'We have a resonsibility to meet the needs of the American people.'

 

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Sunday would not rule out impeachment as an option to stop President Trump’s U.S. Supreme Court pick from being confirmed to the bench, saying Democrats will “use every arrow in our quiver” to block the eventual nominee.

...

Pelosi was pressed again on whether she would employ impeachment tactics, to which she said the Constitution requires that Congress “use every arrow in our quiver.”

 

[Boots11234 107]

Wouldn’t surprise me. Talk about abuse of power. But the Left has never been so close to being in power and they think all it will take is just a little more of a shove. 

[TimmySmith 2,782]

She has hasn't had an arrow in that quiver in decades.

[DonS 3,066]

I saw some quote from Schumer that nothing is off the table if Trump replaces Ginsberg before election and Dems regain power.  Like they haven't been playing dirty pool for the last 4 focking years???? 

[FlyinHeadlock 459]

Send the FBI to her house. Charge her for making physical threats to the President.

[TimmySmith 2,782]

1 hour ago, DonS said:

I saw some quote from Schumer that nothing is off the table if Trump replaces Ginsberg before election and Dems regain power.  Like they haven't been playing dirty pool for the last 4 focking years???? 

What is on the table? Hope it doesn't go to the SC.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,618]

And they want the other side to show decorum.  

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,513]

I'm sorry, how does that exactly stop THE SENATE from putting a vote on a SC Justice?  She's a member of the House - they can't stop sh#t from happening in the Senate.

She's got nothing.

[drobeski 3,061]

Crybabies   

[Mike Honcho 4,014]

It's abuse of power to deny a president the ability to nominate judges?  

[Reality 2,710]

7 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

I'm sorry, how does that exactly stop THE SENATE from putting a vote on a SC Justice?  She's a member of the House - they can't stop sh#t from happening in the Senate.

She's got nothing.

100%, her cackling means nothing. Get this thing done immediately.

[Strike 3,956]

11 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

I'm sorry, how does that exactly stop THE SENATE from putting a vote on a SC Justice?  She's a member of the House - they can't stop sh#t from happening in the Senate.

She's got nothing.

Supposedly impeachment has priority over judges so if she impeaches Trump again the Senate would have to take that up before dealing with the SC judge.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,513]

1 minute ago, Strike said:

Supposedly impeachment has priority over judges so if she impeaches Trump again the Senate would have to take that up before dealing with the SC judge.

Except that impeachment starts in the house.  The senate can still do it's thing until they walk the articles over to the Senate.

Let's say the do it and send the articles over a week later - the senate takes a vote right away and boom - still time.  In fact, the Senate can vote the week that the House is trying to get their sh#t together.

[JustinCharge 2,397]

18 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

It's abuse of power to deny a president the ability to nominate judges?  

She doesn't have the power to do that.  So one has to assume she is going to do something beyond her powers to stop Trump from replacing RBG.  Maybe start a riot?  Encourage violence?  It would have to be some abuse of power or criminal activity.

[drobeski 3,061]

Elections have consequences 

[Hardcore troubadour 12,618]

20 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

It's abuse of power to deny a president the ability to nominate judges?  

So you see nothing wrong with the gamesmanship to get around the constitution? What a mutt. 

[Utilit99 4,099]

She better get her budget together for some new custom pens. Get that order in early. Hope she has some pull at the local Staples.

[shorepatrol 1,737]

7 minutes ago, drobeski said:

Elections have consequences 

 

[JustinCharge 2,397]

Maybe we should take her at her word.  Pelosi literally has arrows.  She is gonna go full Hunger Games and shoot both Trump and Pence with arrows and then line of succession makes her president.  Then she pardons herself of the murder charge.

[Utilit99 4,099]

2 minutes ago, riversco said:

Maybe we should take her at her word.  Pelosi literally has arrows.  She is gonna go full Hunger Games and shoot both Trump and Pence with arrows and then line of succession makes her president.  Then she pardons herself of the murder charge.

Warren would be impressed.

[FlyinHeadlock 459]

 

[JustinCharge 2,397]

I'm pretty sure if a republican said they had "arrows in their quiver" when talking about stopping a democrat, that would be construed as a death threat.

[Reality 2,710]

14 minutes ago, drobeski said:

Elections have consequences 

Yup, get this done immediately. The left has acted like lunatics since day 1 of the Trump administration. Pay back is a bltch. Fock every one of those pieces of shlt.

[RLLD 3,455]

23 minutes ago, drobeski said:

Elections have consequences 

Boom, how does it feel when its turned back on you Barry?

[FlyinHeadlock 459]

It's not even payback. He can do it if he wants. Like there is some unwritten honor code in politics...meh. Yeah GTFOH. Accusing the last justice of gang rape with no evidence. Sure.

Nominate NLT WED and let's go get this judge. 

[DonS 3,066]

1 minute ago, FlyinHeadlock said:

It's not even payback. He can do it if he wants. Like there is some unwritten honor code in politics...meh. Yeah GTFOH. Accusing the last justice of gang rape with no evidence. Sure.

Nominate NLT WED and let's go get this judge. 

It's like the unwritten rules of baseball. Constitution doesn't mean sh1t if it hurts somebody's fragile gender confused feelings. 

[Mike Honcho 4,014]

42 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

So you see nothing wrong with the gamesmanship to get around the constitution? What a mutt. 

[drobeski 3,061]

18 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

Inside mikes crying, screaming at the sky.  

[Utilit99 4,099]

1 minute ago, drobeski said:

Inside mikes crying, screaming at the sky.  

Hey, he has feelers too. #IHaveFeelersToo. 

[Reality 2,710]

6 minutes ago, drobeski said:

Inside mikes crying, screaming at the sky.  

100%

[Mike Honcho 4,014]

2 hours ago, Reality said:

100%, her cackling means nothing. Get this thing done immediately.

 

1 hour ago, Reality said:

100%

Just as correct as this 100%--- wrong.  

[Reality 2,710]

20 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

 

Just as correct as this 100% wrong.  

Dumb, typical though.

This one hurts, we know fella. You'll be crying yourself to sleep tonight. And, y'all deserve every bit of it.

[porkbutt 861]

2 hours ago, Mike Honcho said:

It's abuse of power to deny a president the ability to nominate judges?  

dude. stop now. 

[Gladiators 1,904]

I hope someday she looks back on her life and realizes what a waste it was.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,618]

3 minutes ago, Gladiators said:

I hope someday she looks back on her life and realizes what a waste it was.

It’s true. She has obviously done nothing for Black people. They are angrier than ever. But she did wear that African scarf and kneel. So there’s that. Also led a failed impeachment attempt. And passed Obamacare, which is a failure.  

[drobeski 3,061]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

It’s true. She has obviously done nothing for Black people. They are angrier than ever. But she did wear that African scarf and kneel. So there’s that. Also led a failed impeachment attempt. And laser Obama are, that is a failure.  

Whats wrong with a photo op ?

[Utilit99 4,099]

31 minutes ago, Gladiators said:

I hope someday she looks back on her life and realizes what a waste it was.

Ginsberg didn't realize it at the end from what I can tell.

[titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745]

On reddit, all the libtards are advocating packing the court at next opportunity, and if that weren't enough, they want to make Puerto Rico, Guam, the USVI, and the Marianas states, so as to pack the electoral college.

[Mike Honcho 4,014]

17 minutes ago, titans&bucs&bearsohmy! said:

On reddit, all the libtards are advocating packing the court at next opportunity, and if that weren't enough, they want to make Puerto Rico, Guam, the USVI, and the Marianas states, so as to pack the electoral college.

Not sure about the last two, but Guam and Puerto Rico pay federal taxes...sort of remember something in the history books about taxation without representation being bad.   

[RLLD 3,455]

21 minutes ago, titans&bucs&bearsohmy! said:

On reddit, all the libtards are advocating packing the court at next opportunity, and if that weren't enough, they want to make Puerto Rico, Guam, the USVI, and the Marianas states, so as to pack the electoral college.

Like petulant toddlers.