Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Fireballer

Confirmation hearings for Hon Amy Coney Barrett

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Herbivore said:

what do think about the hypocrisy relative to Garland?

Obama was President but the Senate was controlled by the GOP,  hence Garland isn't on the Supreme Court.  It's not the same thing.

Now....of course its political.  I have no illusions that one side does things for political reasons and the other doesn't.  :dunno:

Both sides are hypocritical....but that's not really the question.  The question is.....is this constitutional and have precedent?  Yes and Yes. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, KSB2424 said:

Obama was President but the Senate was controlled by the GOP,  hence Garland isn't on the Supreme Court.  It's not the same thing.

Now....of course its political.  I have no illusions that one side does things for political reasons and the other doesn't.  :dunno:

Both sides are hypocritical....but that's not really the question.  The question is.....is this constitutional and have precedent?  Yes and Yes

Correct.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/13/2020 at 7:14 PM, TimmySmith said:

What?

Down’s.

You know what they say about women over 40: If the pregnancy’s hard, you’re having a tard. :thumbsup: 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MDC said:

You know what they say about women over 40: If the pregnancy’s hard, you’re having a tard. :thumbsup: 

Never heard that before.  I am glad to hear it from you so I don't have to think less of anyone else. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, TimmySmith said:

Never heard that before.  I am glad to hear it from you so I don't have to think less of anyone else. 

You’d have to be retarded to have a kid after 40. Don’t blame me that’s just science.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MDC said:

Down’s.

You know what they say about women over 40: If the pregnancy’s hard, you’re having a tard. :thumbsup: 

So, your mom had you whe she was 90 years old and struggled the whole time. Makes sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, MDC said:

You’d have to be retarded to have a kid after 40. Don’t blame me that’s just science.

Tammy Duckworth had one at 50. This is our moment. I'm reaching across the isle and agreeing with you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, FlyinHeadlock said:

Tammy Duckworth had one at 50.

Her husband never smiled again. :( 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shes amazing,  thank got that ugly hag finally passed on and our country gets a great upgrade in every aspect.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

miserable feminazi hags biggest gripe with her is that she is a good mom and has too many kids for their liking :wacko:

bitter bitter people. can't comprehend how a mother of 7  can rise to the supreme court while they can't decide what color to dye their hair or feed their poodle that they treat like a kid. so then they attack her downs kid. pure class :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, porkbutt said:

miserable feminazi hags biggest gripe with her is that she is a good mom and has too many kids for their liking :wacko:

bitter bitter people. can't comprehend how a mother of 7  can rise to the supreme court while they can't decide what color to dye their hair or feed their poodle that they treat like a kid. so then they attack her downs kid. pure class :thumbsup:

Nailed, lefty losers should be mocked and laughed at repeatedly.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, crackattack said:

I really really like her. I can't stress that enough. I got a crush on her 💘 

Same. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, MDC said:

Down’s.

You know what they say about women over 40: If the pregnancy’s hard, you’re having a tard. :thumbsup: 

WOW. In nearly 20 years here, I can't remember the last time I read something so focked up. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, TheNewGirl said:

WOW. In nearly 20 years here, I can't remember the last time I read something so focked up. 

 

They are who we said they are. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

WOW. In nearly 20 years here, I can't remember the last time I read something so focked up. 

 

Really?  Cause we've said some focked up stuff.  :unsure:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There probably is some truth to it. Woman in their 40's have been exposed to more harmful chemicals than a younger woman on average. Hard and tard however are likely not in scientific journals on the subject.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, FlyinHeadlock said:

There probably is some truth to it. Woman in their 40's have been exposed to more harmful chemicals than a younger woman on average. Hard and tard however are likely not in scientific journals on the subject.  

MDC was only speaking from very personal experience.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, crackattack said:

I really really like The New Girl. I can't stress that enough. I got a crush on her 💘 

Same.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, TheNewGirl said:

WOW. In nearly 20 years here, I can't remember the last time I read something so focked up. 

 

He's technically not wrong :dunno:

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So they vote as a committee to recommend her to the full Senate on the 22nd and McConnell starts holding hearings on the 23rd.

As a precursor, there was a Dem delay tactic in the committee that the GOP shot down 12-10 in a straight party line vote.

McConnell says he has the votes. All of the "not during an election year" GOP members have come around. He has Romney. Of his 53 votes, he may lose Collins and Murkowski, Dems would still need to peel away two more GOP members and there are none to be found. They may even lose some of their own, Manchin voted for Kavanaugh and may do so again for ACB. There will not be any Dem votes, both Manchin and Tim Kaine, who voted for her to the circuit court, will vote against because of the "too close to the election" rationale.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Voltaire said:

So they vote as a committee to recommend her to the full Senate on the 22nd and McConnell starts holding hearings on the 23rd.

As a precursor, there was a Dem delay tactic in the committee that the GOP shot down 12-10 in a straight party line vote.

McConnell says he has the votes. All of the "not during an election year" GOP members have come around. He has Romney. Of his 53 votes, he may lose Collins and Murkowski, Dems would still need to peel away two more GOP members and there are none to be found. They may even lose some of their own, Manchin voted for Kavanaugh and may do so again for ACB. There will not be any Dem votes, both Manchin and Tim Kaine, who voted for her to the circuit court, will vote against because of the "too close to the election" rationale.

Misogynist Dems are playing the unconstitutional card here under the guise of the will of the people.  So yeah, she'll get no Dem votes and never would have under any circumstance. She'll get all of the Republicans,  they have already committed.  If, somehow, Trump loses the election,  this Judge will be the last piece of a glorious puzzle that have have saved the US for a few decades. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was surprised to find out the other day that there are like five or six Catholics on the Supreme Court now? I'm not anti Catholic by any means, but that seems a bit much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With that many Catholics on scotus, it's just a matter of time before scotus declares crackers and wine to be biological material.

 

Of course, we have to overturn the death penalty. Because, eternal life and all that.

 

Not to mention Zombie Jesus.

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love how the leftists pick and choose which religions to worry about.

The Muslims, oh they are fine and good, but Catholics....oh man, those EVIL Catholics....

They really seem to think we are stupid enough to fall for this sh!t

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, RLLD said:

I love how the leftists pick and choose which religions to worry about.

The Muslims, oh they are fine and good, but Catholics....oh man, those EVIL Catholics....

They really seem to think we are stupid enough to fall for this sh!t

Um excuse me.   Islam is the religion of peace.  

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, supermike80 said:

Um excuse me.   Islam is the religion of peace.  

Oh yeah, uhm, right, guess I forgot.... 🤤

Good times...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, wiffleball said:

I was surprised to find out the other day that there are like five or six Catholics on the Supreme Court now? I'm not anti Catholic by any means, but that seems a bit much.

40 million Catholics in the country that can read and write at grade level. Seeing as you have to exclude about 200 million based on that it’s not out of line. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, wiffleball said:

I was surprised to find out the other day that there are like five or six Catholics on the Supreme Court now? I'm not anti Catholic by any means, but that seems a bit much.

There are six+one= seven Catholics and now down to two Jews. Potatomayor is allegedly Catholic.

 Gorisch was raised Catholic but is Episcopal, so I was sneaky, the one in the  six+one formula isn't ACB but Gorsich.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I think of which dystopian nightmare future is worse, If I had to choose between woke or Islamic fundamentalism, sign me up for Islamic fundamentalism. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The democrats put pictures of so called victims in their chairs and didn't show up. 

:lol:  they're such focking childish losers.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, drobeski said:

The democrats put pictures of so called victims in their chairs and didn't show up. 

:lol:  they're such focking childish losers.  

Have to admit, that is funny as hell.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, drobeski said:

The democrats put pictures of so called victims in their chairs and didn't show up. 

:lol:  they're such focking childish losers.  

They behave just like kids on a college  campus with their little stunts. Did they all wear  black or white or purple too? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

They behave just like kids on a college  campus with their little stunts. Did they all wear  black or white or purple too? 

Were the "victims" wearing masks? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what a bunch of disgusting focking losers. take your cardboard cut outs and shove em up ur ass.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, drobeski said:

The democrats put pictures of so called victims in their chairs and didn't show up. 

:lol:  they're such focking childish losers.  

Victims of what?  Voting for Democrats?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×