Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Fireballer

Confirmation hearings for Hon Amy Coney Barrett

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Gladiators said:

Are you able to judge her penmanship?

I could, but a broad's penmanship isn't really a deal breaker for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure it was mentioned here already but it just disappoints me that its almost a lock that every democrat will vote against her and every republican will vote for her confirmation.

Heck if there are any that plan to go against the party it is the republicans.  

There is no right minded person who can look at her and say she is not a good candidate for the highest court.  None.  Yet, partisanship is so think now it's insane.

Ugh...Hate it all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, supermike80 said:

I'm sure it was mentioned here already but it just disappoints me that its almost a lock that every democrat will vote against her and every republican will vote for her confirmation.

Heck if there are any that plan to go against the party it is the republicans.  

There is no right minded person who can look at her and say she is not a good candidate for the highest court.  None.  Yet, partisanship is so think now it's insane.

Ugh...Hate it all.

I think the Democrats know that their attempts to pervert the election with ballot stuffing will reach the court, and this woman is a threat to undo all their hard work to sway the election through vote manipulation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, supermike80 said:

I'm sure it was mentioned here already but it just disappoints me that its almost a lock that every democrat will vote against her and every republican will vote for her confirmation.

Heck if there are any that plan to go against the party it is the republicans.  

There is no right minded person who can look at her and say she is not a good candidate for the highest court.  None.  Yet, partisanship is so think now it's insane.

Ugh...Hate it all.

So why would it disappoint you that every Republican is voting for her confirmation?  Seems your problem should be ONLY with Democrats.  The Republicans seem to be doing their actual, you know, job.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

damn ya think they would just end this thing asap. she's making a mockery of all of them:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

I could, but a broad's penmanship isn't really a deal breaker for me.

What are the chances of a guy like her and a girl like you ending up together?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, supermike80 said:

I'm sure it was mentioned here already but it just disappoints me that its almost a lock that every democrat will vote against her and every republican will vote for her confirmation.

Heck if there are any that plan to go against the party it is the republicans.  

There is no right minded person who can look at her and say she is not a good candidate for the highest court.  None.  Yet, partisanship is so think now it's insane.

Ugh...Hate it all.

The left leadership is all about Roe v. Wade and makes every appointment about it.  This is done both for their followers and their Elected officials, to keep them in line.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just watched a few short clips of ACB's questioning and I think I have a girl crush on her. WOW. 

No notes, totally calm, maybe a few facial expressions...but otherwise very collected. This girl knows her shite. 

 

Also some of the tweet comments were hilarious. 

ACB has a higher IQ than the entire Dem party. Combined. 

How high were HI voters when they elected Hirono? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ooh.  Hirono is up again.  This should be good.  🍿

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Strike said:

Ooh.  Hirono is up again.  This should be good.  🍿

Crap. She's mentally ill AND rude. Just what the left likes.

She sounds like a drunk pelosi and she had nasty lunch or something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone asked her who does the laundry in her house? 

Did they ask Kavanaugh this? FFS. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

Someone asked her who does the laundry in her house? 

Did they ask Kavanaugh this? FFS. 

No, they asked Kavanaugh how many girls he raped and how often he farts. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have we find out if she drinks beer, or ever has yet? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Have we find out if she drinks beer, or ever has yet? 

No, but I can confirm she sucks cawk. She’s very good at it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Gladiators said:

No, but I can confirm she sucks cawk. She’s very good at it.

I’m not talking about Kamala. Or your mom. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Mike Honcho said:

Yes, when judging her on a purely superficial level, her voice is the only thing I have against her.  

Jeez, you guys are wound way too focking tight. 

I also don’t care for that squeaky voice, I noticed at the Rose Garden ceremony.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I’m not talking about Kamala. Or your mom. 

Maybe next time you’ll be clear upfront.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, porkbutt said:

where you think blasey ford is now??:lol:

She’s wondering why nobody else is stepping forward and following in her footsteps. She took one for the team. Personally, I don’t think there are any heterosexual men left in the Democratic Party anymore. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wood! What an extremely intelligent, composed, beautiful woman. Big fan 👍

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I find it interesting (?) I guess how they are asking her questions regarding things that she really can't answer; more opinion based, at least from my POV. What does she think of mail in voting? What does she think about climate change? Have you raped someone? Who does your laundry? 

I mean, ACB isn't wrong when she's saying these are all policy issues. You can't really say HOW you'd vote on a case if 1) it hasn't been presented to you 2) if it ever IS presented to you, you need the facts/evidence, and 3) if she says she'd vote one way, hears the evidence and votes another...I mean...the questions just aren't making sense to me. She's a JUDGE. 

UGH. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, TheNewGirl said:

I find it interesting (?) I guess how they are asking her questions regarding things that she really can't answer; more opinion based, at least from my POV. What does she think of mail in voting? What does she think about climate change? Have you raped someone? Who does your laundry? 

I mean, ACB isn't wrong when she's saying these are all policy issues. You can't really say HOW you'd vote on a case if 1) it hasn't been presented to you 2) if it ever IS presented to you, you need the facts/evidence, and 3) if she says she'd vote one way, hears the evidence and votes another...I mean...the questions just aren't making sense to me. She's a JUDGE. 

UGH. 

Everything they are doing is pointedly to enhance Senate races.   They know they cannot stop this thing.  So they are hoping they can use the stage to sway voters.  They believe they can take the Senate and then will make up another situation to then impeach the president.  This is their plan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Everything they are doing is pointedly to enhance Senate races.   They know they cannot stop this thing.  So they are hoping they can use the stage to sway voters.  They believe they can take the Senate and then will make up another situation to then impeach the president.  This is their plan.

They amount of money they've thrown at trying to impeach him drives me insane. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it is a shame its so political now.  not like 4 years ago when Merritt Garlands nomination was sidelined by repubs.  that wasnt political at all.  :thumbsdown:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TheNewGirl said:

They amount of money they've thrown at trying to impeach him drives me insane. 

 

how did you feel about all the benghazi hearings?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Herbivore said:

how did you feel about all the benghazi hearings?

People should have been imprisoned over that,  so very disappointing. 

Aren't you embarrassed yet to call yourself a Democrat? You should be.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Herbivore said:

it is a shame its so political now.  not like 4 years ago when Merritt Garlands nomination was sidelined by repubs.  that wasnt political at all.  :thumbsdown:

When you say political, don’t you mean constitutional? What’s political about following the constitution, especially when it comes to the people that will be interpreting it and ruling if cases  adhere to the constitution? You’re not one of those low information voters who thinks this has never happened before, are you? You know, when things weren’t so political. The 29x it occurred before.  Orange man bad. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, TheNewGirl said:

I find it interesting (?) I guess how they are asking her questions regarding things that she really can't answer; more opinion based, at least from my POV. What does she think of mail in voting? What does she think about climate change? Have you raped someone? Who does your laundry? 

I mean, ACB isn't wrong when she's saying these are all policy issues. You can't really say HOW you'd vote on a case if 1) it hasn't been presented to you 2) if it ever IS presented to you, you need the facts/evidence, and 3) if she says she'd vote one way, hears the evidence and votes another...I mean...the questions just aren't making sense to me. She's a JUDGE. 

UGH. 

So basically like every other confirmation hearing ever?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Herbivore said:

how did you feel about all the benghazi hearings?

As Hillary once said, "What difference does it make?" 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Herbivore said:

it is a shame its so political now.  not like 4 years ago when Merritt Garlands nomination was sidelined by repubs.  that wasnt political at all.  :thumbsdown:

They should just use the filibu......oh wait, nevermind....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anybody ask about the cult she belonged to?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1.  She’s definitely qualified.
 

2.  The timing of RBG’s death was not good for Democrats, but the GOP is following precedent and if the sides were flipped the Dems would do the same.  When one party has a President while a majority in the Senate this happens.  Elections have consequences.  
 

I mean, what else is there to really say?  

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ACB > RBG

it seriously couldn't have happened any sweeter... and to a bigger bunch of dirtbag morons.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Herbivore said:

how did you feel about all the benghazi hearings?

Jesus.. imagine being this clown.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

When you say political, don’t you mean constitutional? What’s political about following the constitution, especially when it comes to the people that will be interpreting it and ruling if cases  adhere to the constitution? You’re not one of those low information voters who thinks this has never happened before, are you? You know, when things weren’t so political. The 29x it occurred before.  Orange man bad. 

not surprisingly, you have missed the point

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, KSB2424 said:

1.  She’s definitely qualified.
 

2.  The timing of RBG’s death was not good for Democrats, but the GOP is following precedent and if the sides were flipped the Dems would do the same.  When one party has a President while a majority in the Senate this happens.  Elections have consequences.  
 

I mean, what else is there to really say?  

what do think about the hypocrisy relative to Garland?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Herbivore said:

it is a shame its so political now.  not like 4 years ago when Merritt Garlands nomination was sidelined by repubs.  that wasnt political at all.  :thumbsdown:

The republicans won the senate in the last election, giving them the power to block supreme court nominees.  The people gave them this power.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, Herbivore said:

not surprisingly, you have missed the point

No, I pointed out you don’t have one.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×