Jump to content
Rusty Syringes

[** Official President Joe Biden Thread **]

Recommended Posts

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/20/technology/qanon-inauguration.html?referringSource=articleShare&fbclid=IwAR12DaiUaePD4UVcWdJkY9hpeR37sVDAfvbMUVN0Rio2yN5G-3zNCVEY98Y

2 hours ago, Gladiators said:

Think I should buy? I’ve got a decent chunk of cash sitting idle.

Qanon believers struggling in inauguration aftermath. Ha ha.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great start to tonight's inauguration program. Springsteen and Hanks were powerful. This is a day to celebrate! This administration has shown that it will be classy and honest.

What a sense of relief we all share in this moment!

:cheers:

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I note that Sotomayor mispronounced Harris’s name much like Tucker Carlson did, and yet, no accusations of racist were applied to her....how odd. 🤔

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, RLLD said:

I note that Sotomayor mispronounced Harris’s name much like Tucker Carlson did, and yet, no accusations of racist were applied to her....how odd. 🤔

She mispronounced her OWN FOCKING NAME!!!  @2:10

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

She mispronounced her OWN FOCKING NAME!!!  @2:10

 

Great hill upon which to plant a flag. Name pronunciation super gotcha. 🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

She mispronounced her OWN FOCKING NAME!!!  @2:10

 

Tucker  is the best. Steyn is great too. 

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Rusty Syringes said:

Great hill upon which to plant a flag. Name pronunciation super gotcha. 🤣

Planting flag on  a hill?  What a maroon. I do agree, though. But tell that to the MSM and Dems that screeched sexism and misogyny when Trump and Tucker mispronounced her name. Sounds pretty serious to them.  More proof the left actually stands for nothing except trying to fight whatever the rights platform is.     

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Fireballer said:

Planting flag on  a hill?  What a maroon. I do agree, though. But tell that to the MSM and Dems that screeched sexism and misogyny when Trump and Tucker mispronounced her name. Sounds pretty serious to them.  More proof the left actually stands for nothing except trying to fight whatever the rights platform is.     

And the right only stands for fighting whatever platform the left’s is. Two sides, one coin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

Planting flag on  a hill?  What a maroon. I do agree, though. But tell that to the MSM and Dems that screeched sexism and misogyny when Trump and Tucker mispronounced her name. Sounds pretty serious to them.  More proof the left actually stands for nothing except trying to fight whatever the rights platform is.     

Rusty missed that part of it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

And the right only stands for fighting whatever platform the left’s is. Two sides, one coin.

This is stupid. The right wants the borders open only for legal immigration, not illegal immigration, no matter what the left says. Same for small government, 2nd amendment, etc, etc, etc.

LIberals are so dumb....:doh:

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Republicans should give President Biden the same respect the Democrats gave President Trump.  It’s only fair.  
 

Unity.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, KSB2424 said:

The Republicans should give President Biden the same respect the Democrats gave President Trump.  It’s only fair.  
 

Unity.  

LOL. Biden "calls" for unity.  Yep. That'll do'r. That'll unify us.

Imagine for a second if a conservative held a "chopped off" of Biden or Harris like what Kathy Griffin did.

What would happen?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, OldMaid said:

And the right only stands for fighting whatever platform the left’s is. Two sides, one coin.

Only one party wants to restrict constitutional rights. And before you pull abortion out of your bag of talking points that’s a states issue. They have openly advocated for restrictions on the 1st, 2nd and 5th amendments. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a formality but pipeline done.  Back to depending on the ME and importing much more than we export.  Gas prices climb steadily.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, listen2me 23 said:

Just a formality but pipeline done.  Back to depending on the ME and importing much more than we export.  Gas prices climb steadily.

Quote

 

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday said he was “disappointed” in President Biden’s pledge to revoke a permit for the controversial Keystone XL pipeline — as the company behind it said work on the project was being suspended.

In a statement issued following Biden’s inauguration, Trudeau said he “spoke directly” to Biden about the $8 billion project in November, and other Canadian officials “made the case” in favor of it “to high-level officials in the incoming administration.”

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, KSB2424 said:

The Republicans should give President Biden the same respect the Democrats gave President Trump.  It’s only fair.  
 

Unity.  

They should give him respect because his party has all the power.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Rusty Syringes said:

They should give him respect because his party has all the power.

Like Trump had his first two years? Dummy. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Rusty Syringes said:

They should give him respect because his party has all the power.

The last guy tried that and it failed. Calling the other party "losers" and making this a game drove a deeper wedge in a fractured Congress. Focus on the stuff that we agree on and let's hit those things first. Skip the hot buttons for a while and let things calm down a bit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, listen2me 23 said:

Just a formality but pipeline done.  Back to depending on the ME and importing much more than we export.  Gas prices climb steadily.

The Keystone XL pipeline being rejected actually will prevent more dependence on oil from the middle east.

 

It is complicated, but the Keystone XL pipeline is for Canada to export their oil globally, currently they are forced to sell that oil for less than market value to the northern US.

 

The US imports very little oil from the middle east, we import the majority from Canada. Mexico is also a very large source of oil.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, MTSkiBum said:

The Keystone XL pipeline being rejected actually will prevent more dependence on oil from the middle east.

 

It is complicated, but the Keystone XL pipeline is for Canada to export their oil globally, currently they are forced to sell that oil for less than market value to the northern US.

 

The US imports very little oil from the middle east, we import the majority from Canada. Mexico is also a very large source of oil.

Shhhhhh. Don't use facts. It is not allowed here!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, listen2me 23 said:

Just a formality but pipeline done.  Back to depending on the ME and importing much more than we export.  Gas prices climb steadily.

Gas prices have gradually been going up already and are still lower than they were a year ago.  The price hike in gas because of Biden sounds a lot like fear mongering at the moment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, MTSkiBum said:

The Keystone XL pipeline being rejected actually will prevent more dependence on oil from the middle east.

 

It is complicated, but the Keystone XL pipeline is for Canada to export their oil globally, currently they are forced to sell that oil for less than market value to the northern US.

 

The US imports very little oil from the middle east, we import the majority from Canada. Mexico is also a very large source of oil.

And the jobs it cost? If it’s not a big deal, why stop it? Are the other oil producing countries happy about this? I think they would be. I’m no economist, but I get supply and demand. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, that oil is gonna find it's way to the US anyway, it's just gonna happen over train, which takes longer and costs more, so it's not like it's gonna help climate change.

Another situation of the stupid democrats think they're doing something good to prevent climate change, but all they are doing is focking over a bunch of people and the climate will be the same.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

And the jobs it cost? If it’s not a big deal, why stop it? Are the other oil producing countries happy about this? I think they would be. I’m no economist, but I get supply and demand. 

It would help jobs in canada, but they want to refine that canadian oil in texas. The main competition for them will be west texas and oklahoma.

The US is the largest oil producer in the world and completing the keystone xl pipeline could very well cost americans their jobs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Also, that oil is gonna find it's way to the US anyway, it's just gonna happen over train, which takes longer and costs more, so it's not like it's gonna help climate change.

Another situation of the stupid democrats think they're doing something good to prevent climate change, but all they are doing is focking over a bunch of people and the climate will be the same.

But they are limited to how far they can ship that oil by train. They are selling it to northern US for less than they could get on the global market. This is canada's complaint.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The keystone XL pipeline is clearly good if you are a Canadian oil producer.

It is also pretty good if you are a texas refinery, since it adds another source of competition for the input into the refineries.

 

What is not clear is if it is good for American consumers or the american job market.

  • It may increase gasoline prices in the northern US since now Canada can sell that oil elsewhere.
  • It may also cost drilling jobs in Texas and Oklahoma.

 

There are also some red herrings around the keystone XL pipeline as far as environmental concerns.

  • The keystone XL will not effect global warming as it does nothing to effect the demand or the supply.
  • The keystone XL pipeline does not increase the risk of environmental damage since oil is instead being shipped by train.

To be honest I have no idea where i stand on the pipeline today. I think a better idea would be to build a pipeline to North Dakota instead of Canada. Although since the Keystone XL pipeline is funded by a Canadian company that may not go over too well.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, MTSkiBum said:

The keystone XL pipeline is clearly good if you are a Canadian oil producer.

It is also pretty good if you are a texas refinery, since it adds another source of competition for the input into the refineries.

 

What is not clear is if it is good for American consumers or the american job market.

  • It may increase gasoline prices in the northern US since now Canada can sell that oil elsewhere.
  • It may also cost drilling jobs in Texas and Oklahoma.

 

There are also some red herrings around the keystone XL pipeline as far as environmental concerns.

  • The keystone XL will not effect global warming as it does nothing to effect the demand or the supply.
  • The keystone XL pipeline does not increase the risk of environmental damage since oil is instead being shipped by train.

To be honest I have no idea where i stand on the pipeline today. I think a better idea would be to build a pipeline to North Dakota instead of Canada. Although since the Keystone XL pipeline is funded by a Canadian company that may not go over too well.

 

There's no need to muddy it up.  Did the project give jobs to Americans ? Will canceling it cause Americans to lose job's? 

Its as easy as that. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Gutterboys Flip Flops said:

There's no need to muddy it up.  Did the project give jobs to Americans ? Will canceling it cause Americans to lose job's? 

Its as easy as that. 

Cancelling it may save American jobs at the expense of Canadian jobs.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Gutterboys Flip Flops said:

There's no need to muddy it up.  Did the project give jobs to Americans ? Will canceling it cause Americans to lose job's? 

Its as easy as that. 

And it won’t do a damn thing as far as global warming is concerned. Someone benefits from this, and it ain’t just the environmentalists? Who? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, MTSkiBum said:

The keystone XL pipeline is clearly good if you are a Canadian oil producer.

It is also pretty good if you are a texas refinery, since it adds another source of competition for the input into the refineries.

 

What is not clear is if it is good for American consumers or the american job market.

  • It may increase gasoline prices in the northern US since now Canada can sell that oil elsewhere.
  • It may also cost drilling jobs in Texas and Oklahoma.

 

There are also some red herrings around the keystone XL pipeline as far as environmental concerns.

  • The keystone XL will not effect global warming as it does nothing to effect the demand or the supply.
  • The keystone XL pipeline does not increase the risk of environmental damage since oil is instead being shipped by train.

To be honest I have no idea where i stand on the pipeline today. I think a better idea would be to build a pipeline to North Dakota instead of Canada. Although since the Keystone XL pipeline is funded by a Canadian company that may not go over too well.

 

No, according to Biden and liberals.....oil is bad. He’s admitted it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, MTSkiBum said:

The keystone XL pipeline is clearly good if you are a Canadian oil producer.

It is also pretty good if you are a texas refinery, since it adds another source of competition for the input into the refineries.

 

What is not clear is if it is good for American consumers or the american job market.

  • It may increase gasoline prices in the northern US since now Canada can sell that oil elsewhere.
  • It may also cost drilling jobs in Texas and Oklahoma.

 

There are also some red herrings around the keystone XL pipeline as far as environmental concerns.

  • The keystone XL will not effect global warming as it does nothing to effect the demand or the supply.
  • The keystone XL pipeline does not increase the risk of environmental damage since oil is instead being shipped by train.

To be honest I have no idea where i stand on the pipeline today. I think a better idea would be to build a pipeline to North Dakota instead of Canada. Although since the Keystone XL pipeline is funded by a Canadian company that may not go over too well.

 

I'm for it because it helps the Texas refineries. Plus, there are so many focking pipelines in this country anyway, so what's one more?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

And it won’t do a damn thing as far as global warming is concerned. Someone benefits from this, and it ain’t just the environmentalists? Who? 

Canadian oil companies benefit. That is why the Canadian prime minister is mad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Mr. Hand said:

No, according to Biden and liberals.....oil is bad. He’s admitted it. 

Of all the things Biden said during the debates, his position on oil was the one with which I took the most issue. I'm all for easing into alternative energy sources, but not at the pace Biden wants. That would fock up a lot of businesses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Gutterboys Flip Flops said:

May ? Are Americans employed on this project now ? If its canceled, will they still be employed ?

Americans are employed temporarily on this project, however if it is completed it will cause competition between West Texas/Oklahoma and Canada, which will reduce the amount of permanent jobs.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, MTSkiBum said:

Canadian oil companies benefit. That is why the Canadian prime minister is mad.

Ok.  But there has to be others. Wall Street? I legit don’t know. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×