Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Ron_Artest said:

Walker missed all of preseason.  Was bound to have a slow start especially in a new offense.  Give it time.

There he is. Good to see you, gutter. It’s been a while since you’ve dipped into this thread. 

Posted
21 hours ago, BiffTannen said:

I'm going to give the props a week to see what happens and plan for a full card week 2. This week I'm taking some dog MLs. 

 

Atlanta +102

Seattle +102

Detroit +110

Brilliant 

Posted
3 minutes ago, BiffTannen said:

There he is. Good to see you, gutter. It’s been a while since you’ve dipped into this thread. 

Took a beating today on that Atlanta loss.  Otherwise hit some unders.  Hoping tenn can hang on for the 8.5

Posted
5 hours ago, Horseman said:

49er-Sea

CMC o3.5

Kupp o3.5

Kittle u5.5

Smith-Nigga u5.5

Den-Tenn

Hufanga o4.5ta

3-2 meh.  Should have known Seattle wouldn't be smart enough to use Kupp.

5 hours ago, Horseman said:

Sides:

Titans +9.0

Det-GB u48.5

 

2-0

The spread was clooooose, thanks Sean Payton. But here is the deal - again Joe Public was on Den huge, something like 94%. Drove the number up to 9, sharps took the points.  

Posted
6 minutes ago, Horseman said:

3-2 meh.  Should have known Seattle wouldn't be smart enough to use Kupp.

2-0

The spread was clooooose, thanks Sean Payton. But here is the deal - again Joe Public was on Den huge, something like 94%. Drove the number up to 9, sharps took the points.  

Paging John Bender for overreaction week!!

  • Like 1
Posted
On 9/2/2025 at 1:53 PM, BiffTannen said:

He posting good plays over there?

Only thing he posted was Oklahoma -4.5, which I was looking for and didn't even think to check. W

Then Modogg showed back up and posted 3 winners (that I didn't see in time either)   

JSN ov 60 yards
Ridley under 55 yards
Jonny smith ov 2.5 catches.
 

Do you still have a login?

Posted
13 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Only thing he posted was Oklahoma -4.5, which I was looking for and didn't even think to check. W

Then Modogg showed back up and posted 3 winners (that I didn't see in time either)   

JSN ov 60 yards
Ridley under 55 yards
Jonny smith ov 2.5 catches.
 

Do you still have a login?

Yeah. I’m TitleistProV1 over there 

Posted

John Hussey is the ref tonight. Who was it that used to bang on him? I tried to tag one of the kilroys but there are multiple. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, BiffTannen said:

Yeah. I’m TitleistProV1 over there 

There's two guys I respect that popped up out of nowhere. I'm just thinking we egg them on maybe we can get it going again. Chainsaw knows who I am but nobody else.

Otherwise there isn't anyone else over there that's.... consistent ...I guess is the nice word.  

Posted
2 minutes ago, Horseman said:

There's two guys I respect that popped up out of nowhere. I'm just thinking we egg them on maybe we can get it going again. Chainsaw knows who I am but nobody else.

Otherwise there isn't anyone else over there that's.... consistent ...I guess is the nice word.  

Where is Swirve these days? He is the one we need to find. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Yep.  Lost track when he stopped posting on Twitter.  

Everyone used to splooge over theguru, but I’ll take Swirve’s picks over him all day 

Posted
30 minutes ago, BiffTannen said:

Everyone used to splooge over theguru, but I’ll take Swirve’s picks over him all day 

Yeah. I think he learned some of guru's secrets and he was really good. And guru got arrogant and greedy and wasn't sharing too much towards the end.  Money does that to people. 

But I'll tell you I tracked ALL of guru's baseball props for two full years, spreadsheeted and everything. We're talking 6 -12 props every day and they hit at a 66% success rate.  Sure some of them were juiced, but, it was a money printing machine. That got a bunch of us banned from multiple offshores for winning too much. 

I've never seen anything like it. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Yeah. I think he learned some of guru's secrets and he was really good. And guru got arrogant and greedy and wasn't sharing too much towards the end.  Money does that to people. 

But I'll tell you I tracked ALL of guru's baseball props for two full years, spreadsheeted and everything. We're talking 6 -12 props every day and they hit at a 66% success rate.  Sure some of them were juiced, but, it was a money printing machine. That got a bunch of us banned from multiple offshores for winning too much. 

I've never seen anything like it. 

I will take a look tomorrow and see if I still have it. Swirve has a spreadsheet he used to do his magic. I will send it to you if I still have access. 

Posted
18 minutes ago, BiffTannen said:

I will take a look tomorrow and see if I still have it. Swirve has a spreadsheet he used to do his magic. I will send it to you if I still have access. 

Oh man, I'd love to crack that nut.  

There was something special there. I mean the best cappers in the world don't claim success rates that they (we) had back then. 

BTW.   You know that was like 15 years ago right?  Old man.  :ninja:🏌️‍♂️

Posted

I must not have hit submit or something but I swear on my mother's grave this is what I typed:

Quote

 

Hopkins o1.5

Jackson o1.5td

Allen  o1.5td

With such a huge over-under number at least 1 QB is going to get 2 tds. 

 

3-0

  • Haha 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Hint: If you post them ahead of time there is nothing to prove.  Plus we all can benefit.  

I have posted one (coco gauff)  and it lost miserably. I can't handle the jinx. I do text with Biff quite often

I woke up yesterday, my account was at 0. I had a slew of pending bets. Went to bed it was 697. What a day

  • Thanks 1
Posted
19 hours ago, Horseman said:

Oh man, I'd love to crack that nut.  

There was something special there. I mean the best cappers in the world don't claim success rates that they (we) had back then. 

BTW.   You know that was like 15 years ago right?  Old man.  :ninja:🏌️‍♂️

I can't find it. The only thing I still have is the weekly spreadsheets with our plays over a 3 year span. 

 

One thing I know he was using was a Silva report that gave insight into the game script. At the time that article was free, but now you have to sign up for a paid service and its the most expensive service I've ever run across. 

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Horseman said:

Min-Chi

Jones o2.5

Swift o53.5

Van Ginkel o4.5ta

2-1

Another BAD BEAT.  

Swift had 54 yards with 10 minutes left and Chicago had the lead. He had one more rush for -1. JFC. 🤣

I was sitting there staring at those McCarthy unders too, ugh, dunno. 

Totals Week 1:

Props 13-4

76%

Sides 5-1

83% 

😎

 

Posted
34 minutes ago, Horseman said:

:thumbsup:. Like it.  I got

Deeboo o5.5rushyds

Love o5.5rushyds

Jacob's o1.5rec with lots of juice

 

You give me a hook ansnil all in 

  • Like 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Heyo!

Crawford moving up to a weight he has never sniffed is something.  A straight bet is probably safer.  Canelo hasnt been knocking guys out, but they do just put it in "get to a decision mode" and are bigger fighters.  Crawford has more skill than the guys Canelo has been fighting, but his defense trails his offense.  

Will be interesting to see what his game plan is.  Canelo has a granite chin and good defense.  If Crawford chooses to go out on his shield trying to find a shot, he could get KOd for sure.  

Im banking on 

1. 2 highly skilled guys who just find a way to get to the cards. 

2. Crawford comes out ok but Canelo walks through everything and Crawford gets on his bike not wanting to get stopped after feeling Canelo's power, like many other guys.  (For the interest of the fight, I hope not)

3.  They get to the scorecards and its some odd majority decision for Canelo with interest in cashing in on a rematch.  

Its a tough fight to win for Crawford.  He finds stoppages with his elite punch selection.  But hes going up multiple weights vs a guy who has a proven chin vs heavier guys.  Then unless its a spectacular fight for Crawford and its undeniable, we all know Canelo is tough to beat on the scorecards when fights are fairly close.  "Boxing politics"

I havent been impressed by Canelo lately but again guys go in survive mode.  And bet aside I will be rooting for Crawford.  But I think the stylistic matchup with Canelo is not favorable at all.  

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...