Cordarrelle Patterson...

[kutulu 1,545]

What is your league listing his position as? tia

[Jedi Sensei 17]

ESPN league, he's purely RB

[weepaws 2,456]

The three I’m in , there live leagues we not use espn etc, he’s listed as a rb.  

 

[MTSkiBum 1,593]

He is a wr on mfl, he is a wr/rb on sleeper and yahoo.

[SF Forty Niners 22]

WR /RB actually picked him up as I’ve only have Carson & Ingram as my RB (starting RBs)

have 4 back ups waiting in hallway to grab a opportunity if some reason someone goes down -

 

[Cretins 21]

RB only on nfl.com

[frank 2,144]

CBS has him listed as a WR but on eligibility, it only says RB and flex.

 

Eta: He shows up in searches for both wr and rb. 

[gcmmidwest 98]

The way there using him I'd be surprised if he remained healthy kick returns ,rb,wr there playing frogger with him 

[Phil Simms 11 127]

I added him in one league with barren waivers. Didn’t add him in any others as I viewed him as a known commodity, he’s been the same player for 8 years now. Still think he’s got limited upside but definitely worth an add, he’s WR/RB in yahoo. 

[weepaws 2,456]

He’s worth a bench spot. 

[rallo 132]

IMO, he is an excellent WR3 or flex option if they keep up this usage, they are going to need dynamic playmakers judging by what I've seen so far.

[weepaws 2,456]

He wasn’t week one

[gcmmidwest 98]

6 hours ago, weepaws said:

He’s worth a bench spot. 

Trying to fix my wife's team she's  0-2 thax to a 0 f/ kittle and a 0 f/ Tyreek and Dak a whopping 2 points in any event she has #1 waiver spot do you think he's worthy ? Personally I don't 

[Serenity Now 44]

42 minutes ago, gcmmidwest said:

Trying to fix my wife's team she's  0-2 thax to a 0 f/ kittle and a 0 f/ Tyreek and Dak a whopping 2 points in any event she has #1 waiver spot do you think he's worthy ? Personally I don't 

With both hill and Kittle on her team, I’m assuming RB is a problem or thin at best, but I don’t see him as a savior of anyone’s season. Potential to be a solid depth piece, but probably not what you’re looking for.

Dak will have better games. Hill will still have his great games. Kittle is someone that should be of concern right now.

[gcmmidwest 98]

15 minutes ago, Serenity Now said:

With both hill and Kittle on her team, I’m assuming RB is a problem or thin at best, but I don’t see him as a savior of anyone’s season. Potential to be a solid depth piece, but probably not what you’re looking for.

Dak will have better games. Hill will still have his great games. Kittle is someone that should be of concern right now.

J Robinson 

D Henderson

Are her backs ,but we only need to start one at every position???  

 

[Serenity Now 44]

13 minutes ago, gcmmidwest said:

J Robinson 

D Henderson

Are her backs ,but we only need to start one at every position???  

 

Ppr, .5, or non? Henderson being hurt adds a bit to this. 0-2 isn’t desperation time, but it’s getting close. 

[weepaws 2,456]

1 hour ago, gcmmidwest said:

Trying to fix my wife's team she's  0-2 thax to a 0 f/ kittle and a 0 f/ Tyreek and Dak a whopping 2 points in any event she has #1 waiver spot do you think he's worthy ? Personally I don't 

He’s the best rb available? 

[gcmmidwest 98]

4 minutes ago, weepaws said:

He’s the best rb available? 

Listed at wr but yeah slim pickens in a 14 team with 11 on the bench 

[gcmmidwest 98]

46 minutes ago, Serenity Now said:

Ppr, .5, or non? Henderson being hurt adds a bit to this. 0-2 isn’t desperation time, but it’s getting close. 

Non ppr 

[Serenity Now 44]

13 minutes ago, gcmmidwest said:

Non ppr 

TDs are king there, so he’s worth less since a lot of his production will based on receptions. I actually have him in that format in one league, and it wouldn’t take much of an offer to send him away. Unfortunately, that’s a format where stud rbs decide crowns, so I’m not super optimistic about your wife’s team, but I could be wrong. 
 

I guess my answer would be, no I wouldn’t burn the priority on him.

[weepaws 2,456]

I would agree , non ppr he’s not worth it. Ppr maybe based on how bad her rb situation is.  

[makindollaz 40]

I decided to burn my #1 waiver priority on him in one of my full PPR leagues that I’m 0-2.

[AxeElf 787]

39 minutes ago, makindollaz said:

I decided to burn my #1 waiver priority on him in one of my full PPR leagues that I’m 0-2.

Ouch.

[weepaws 2,456]

1 hour ago, makindollaz said:

I decided to burn my #1 waiver priority on him in one of my full PPR leagues that I’m 0-2.

Who do you own? 

[easilyscan 558]

1 hour ago, makindollaz said:

I decided to burn my #1 waiver priority on him in one of my full PPR leagues that I’m 0-2.

Gutsy move, I hope it works out. 

My league is non-PPR, but rewards kick & punt return yds. He had about 25 each in week 1 & 2.

Subtracting the return yards (I'm assuming your league doesn't reward them) & adding the PPR,  my math says he scored 8.7 pts week 1, & 24 pts week 2

Scoring 2 touchdowns last week was far more than likely a fluke, but depending on what you're using him as, if he can average between 8 and 12 points a week,

you could do a lot worse.

 

 

[Serenity Now 44]

He could be a nice depth piece with bye weeks coming up. Especially if he has dual eligibility and continues to average 10 touches a game.

[GobbleDog 816]

I need RB depth, but decided to pass on Patterson. Don't see the 30-y.o. number 2 banana in Atlanta being a long-term reliable RB.

[weepaws 2,456]

He’s going to be frustrating to his owners based on trust. 

When do you start him.  

 

[jackjohn 31]

9 minutes ago, weepaws said:

He’s going to be frustrating to his owners based on trust. 

When do you start him.  

 

Agreed. I'm going to wake up early and snag him, dropping my K, if he isn't claimed. Try and flip him in a package deal. If not, I'll drop him on Saturday for a K. Worth a $2 gamble, but not a waiver spot.

 

[weepaws 2,456]

Lol now that’s a good move.  

Good luck. 

[DrG 94]

In deeper leagues especially with the dual designation he’s a nice add near the end of the bench and as a flex option when needed. And he might continue to take snaps from Davis.

[Serenity Now 44]

When you have to or if he takes a bigger role.  That dual eligibility makes him a 2 for 1 come bye weeks.

[Skinny_Bastard 154]

Atlanta is very low on playmakers.  Outside of Ridley it's a bunch of JAG.  I think they'll get him more involve going forward.  5-8 RB carries.  5-8 targets.

[TimHauck 1,799]

On 9/19/2021 at 7:52 PM, frank said:

CBS has him listed as a WR but on eligibility, it only says RB and flex.

 

Eta: He shows up in searches for both wr and rb. 

Is this still the case?

I'm in an ESPN (PPR, where he is a RB only), and CBS (0.5 PPR) league, and it looks like he's showing as a WR only on CBS.    But I think CBS lets the commish change it?

[TBayXXXVII 2,108]

There should never be a question with positions.  Websites should use what the team says and that's it.  If the Falcons have him listed as an RB, then every outlet should have that as well.  So stupid to have stuff like this.

[frank 2,144]

1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

Is this still the case?

I'm in an ESPN (PPR, where he is a RB only), and CBS (0.5 PPR) league, and it looks like he's showing as a WR only on CBS.    But I think CBS lets the commish change it?

I think all of that is still true. I’m looking at it on my phone so I am not sure if he is just eligible at rb and rb-wr-te (flex) or if he is also eligible at wr. If you search for him, under his name it says wr. I’m guessing he is eligible at wr too. I am positive our commish did not bother to change anything. 

[easilyscan 558]

On 9/21/2021 at 10:28 PM, weepaws said:

When do you start him. 

 

In my case, it was today. With both Diontae Johnson & Tee Higgins out in one of my leagues, I had no choice.

14.2 pts  NON PPR   *4 of those points were for return yards which count in my league*

In full PPR leagues that don't reward return yards, he would've scored 16.2 points, not spectacular, but not bad either.

[weepaws 2,456]

Congrats, but with those other two  out, you didn’t really trust starting him, and that was the beginning of that post I had made.  

 

 

[easilyscan 558]

All I know is that it worked out, & for that I'm thankful.

 

[weepaws 2,456]

Again congrats I’m happy for you any one else that had to start him.