Jump to content
DonS

Playboy - WHAT IN THE HOLY FOCK???

Recommended Posts

everybody's ghey or black nowadays........try to keep up

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Fireballer said:

@MDC says he don't ever see no trannies, so just ignore. 

Not nearly as many as you see. :wub: 

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said:

Hugh is turning over in his grave. 

I doubt it.  Hugh was a pretty liberal person and was all about people's rights.  I don't know if he wouldn't put this on his cover but I but he would've supported the idea of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't wait to see what he, her, it, identifies as?

Maybe even an actual bunny rabbit? :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

I doubt it.  Hugh was a pretty liberal person and was all about people's rights.  I don't know if he wouldn't put this on his cover but I but he would've supported the idea of it.

Men have a right to be on the cover of playboy?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Dizkneelande said:

Men have a right to be on the cover of playboy?

Playboy has the right to put one on the cover if they want.  You should watch the documentary on Hugh.  He was pretty big on equality.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

why are they allowed to show it's nips on the cover? that's kinda sexciss

 

god bless america

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, porkbutt said:

why are they allowed to show it's nips on the cover? that's kinda sexciss

 

god bless america

Not enough fat around those nips.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Playboy 1953 publishes nude Marlyn pics. Reaction.  OMG, Shame, Think of the children!

Playboy 2021 cover has tranny.  Reaction.  OMG, Shame, Think of the children!

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

Playboy 1953 publishes nude Marlyn pics. Reaction.  OMG, Shame, Think of the children!

Playboy 2021 cover has tranny.  Reaction.  OMG, Shame, Think of the children!

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

I think we can all agree America was better in 1953 than its current state in 2021. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said:

I think we can all agree America was better in 1953 than its current state in 2021. 

What are your reasons?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, avoiding injuries said:

I think we can all agree America was better in 1953 than its current state in 2021. 

:shocking:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

Playboy 1953 publishes nude Marlyn pics. Reaction.  OMG, Shame, Think of the children!

Playboy 2021 cover has tranny.  Reaction.  OMG, Shame, Think of the children!

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

Not even equivalent.  One is outrage over the exposure of a woman, the other is perpetuating the fallacy that a man can be a woman.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like that’s the end of Playboy. Way to alienate your audience. No straight man wants to see that. Only fags like MDC like it 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People still pay to see nekkid boobies and cootches? 

Also. 

Bretman Rock is a gay man. He's not trans. So...Playboy's demo is hetero/cis men (probably like 90%). Why would gay men subscribe to a magazine that shows nekkid women? They'd be better off putting the gay/trans man on Playgirl. IMO. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TheNewGirl said:

People still pay to see nekkid boobies and cootches? 

Perhaps, though I agree it's stupid to pay for it nowadays.  This stunt won't even scratch that itch since there are no boobies nor cootches involved.

Maybe they're trying to make folks yearn for their previous brilliant decision to stop showing nekkid chicks?  At least they showed attractive women with that failed effort. :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Mike Honcho said:

Playboy 1953 publishes nude Marlyn pics. Reaction.  OMG, Shame, Think of the children!

Playboy 2021 cover has tranny.  Reaction.  OMG, Shame, Think of the children!

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

They need to get John C. Reilly on the next cover.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Hawkeye21 said:

I doubt it.  Hugh was a pretty liberal person and was all about people's rights.  I don't know if he wouldn't put this on his cover but I but he would've supported the idea of it.

He was a businessman so I'm guessing he was all about money and power.  But I could see you being naive enough to think otherwise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Dizkneelande said:

Men have a right to be on the cover of playboy?

Its a private business which means liberals have a fundamental right to access and a say in how things are done and what is spoken, while anyone on the right needs to be silent and not demand representation in the business world or they are dictators.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Hawkeye21 said:

Playboy has the right to put one on the cover if they want.  You should watch the documentary on Hugh.  He was pretty big on equality.

You switched REALLY fast from talking about "people's rights" to the rights of the corporation or the owner of the business LOLOLLLLLLOOOOLOLLLLLOLOL.  How the fock did you not break your neck flip flopping at such speed???

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Utilit99 said:

Brilliant. A sinking row boat taking on a 200 pound sand bag. That should help things out. Great "leadership" meetings they must be having. MDCack must be in those meetings. 

 

It's the "any publicity is good publicity" idea.  When's the last time you uttered the word Playboy before seeing this thread?   Has to have been several years for me.  So, if a few flamers see this story and pick up the magazine as a result, they'll have gotten what they wanted from the story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Strike said:

It's the "any publicity is good publicity" idea.  When's the last time you uttered the word Playboy before seeing this thread?   Has to have been several years for me.  So, if a few flamers see this story and pick up the magazine as a result, they'll have gotten what they wanted from the story.

I suppose that could be a good plan if they turn it into Playgay or some other kind of freak show magazine.

Maybe next issue they can do cows. :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Utilit99 said:

Brilliant. A sinking row boat taking on a 200 pound sand bag. That should help things out. Great "leadership" meetings they must be having. MDCack must be in those meetings. 

 

Obsessed. Loser. :( 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, JustinCharge said:

You switched REALLY fast from talking about "people's rights" to the rights of the corporation or the owner of the business LOLOLLLLLLOOOOLOLLLLLOLOL.  How the fock did you not break your neck flip flopping at such speed???

What are you blabbering about now?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Strike said:

It's the "any publicity is good publicity" idea.  When's the last time you uttered the word Playboy before seeing this thread?   Has to have been several years for me.  So, if a few flamers see this story and pick up the magazine as a result, they'll have gotten what they wanted from the story.

This is probably the most accurate take on it so far.  They need to do something to gain popularity again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

This is probably the most accurate take on it so far.  They need to do something to gain popularity again.

I don't think this is it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×