Ron_Artest Posted February 13 Posted February 13 8 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said: Up 12%. I'm waiting for a bounce to buy back in. I think we could see 15% before the close. Nonetheless I'd be holding bullish if you can. Up $200. I sold, will have a nice dinner tonight. thanks Quote
Maximum Overkill Posted February 13 Posted February 13 Just now, Ron_Artest said: Up $200. I sold, will have a nice dinner tonight. thanks Good deal. About to hit 15% Cash out, wait for a bounce and get back in Quote
easilyscan Posted February 13 Posted February 13 Good old penny stocks. Haven't dabbled in those since the early 2000s Might dip a toe in the water next Tuesday Quote
Maximum Overkill Posted February 13 Posted February 13 5 minutes ago, easilyscan said: Good old penny stocks. Haven't dabbled in those since the early 2000s Might dip a toe in the water next Tuesday We need a daily penny stock thread. I made $400 on this one today. I'm even considering buying back in based on news that's been coming out 1 Quote
Maximum Overkill Posted February 14 Posted February 14 This is such a great time to be an investor. Perhaps Libs should stop complaining and instead take advantage of the great opportunity that's in front of them. You can close your eyes and make $5,000 a day by day trading, anyone can. Libtards will complain that the economy sucks but do nothing about it except wait for your Government to do something. Stop being lazy, go make money. Quote
seafoam1 Posted February 14 Posted February 14 1 hour ago, Maximum Overkill said: This is such a great time to be an investor. Perhaps Libs should stop complaining and instead take advantage of the great opportunity that's in front of them. You can close your eyes and make $5,000 a day by day trading, anyone can. Libtards will complain that the economy sucks but do nothing about it except wait for your Government to do something. Stop being lazy, go make money. I'm up 18% over the last twelve months in just my 401k account. I'm literally making more money a year than I need for three years in the future to live off of at this time. And that's only one of three accounts I have and without even touching the original investment funds. It's only going up and I won't even need to touch it for another 6 or 7 years. I can only think that liberals are living off the government or don't know how to take care of their money. BUT "TRUMP!!! " How the fock are they whining about the overall economy at this time? Quote
easilyscan Posted February 18 Posted February 18 For you penny stock traders. Do your own DD, but an alleged genius hedge fund manager on CNBC this morning said that AMC is undervalued. Full disclosure: I'm not participating AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (AMC) 1.2500 +0.0200 (+1.63%) At close: 4:00:03 PM EST My most recent move was H&R Block (HRB) on Friday the 13th. Bought 300 @ $30.83 & sold 05-15-26 $35.00 calls @ $1.15 proceeds = $343.00 Quote
thegeneral Posted February 20 Posted February 20 Money pouring back into beat down Mag 7 today. No whammies!! Quote
Gepetto Posted February 23 Author Posted February 23 What’s that’s supposed to mean? The market is fine. Quote
HotRod Posted February 23 Posted February 23 another buying opportunity thank you president trump 1 Quote
thegeneral Posted February 23 Posted February 23 38 minutes ago, Gepetto said: What’s that’s supposed to mean? The market is fine. They don’t sure don’t seem to enjoy Bozo’s tariffs. Overall trailing Biden at this point in their presidencies. Sad. Quote
Scary Gary Posted February 23 Posted February 23 2 minutes ago, thegeneral said: They don’t sure don’t seem to enjoy Bozo’s tariffs. Overall trailing Biden at this point in their presidencies. Sad. So Trump becomes President, market goes up 8,000 points in his presidency, that's Bidens work still "settling in". During the fluctuations where it's down, that's Trump's fault. Got it. What other genius theories do you have? Also, I'm guessing you're broke. Congrats, libby. You found a a way to be broke in a country where making money is like taking candy from a baby. Quote
Caine Mutiny Posted February 23 Posted February 23 A 750 pt plunge isn’t catastrophic. It will probably come back up. But if the traders say, as they are, that this is due to Trump’s tariff instability, why shouldn’t we believe them? Quote
seafoam1 Posted February 23 Posted February 23 Just now, Scary Gary said: So Trump becomes President, market goes up 8,000 points in his presidency, that's Bidens work still "settling in". During the fluctuations where it's down, that's Trump's fault. Got it. What other genius theories do you have? Also, I'm guessing you're broke. Congrats, libby. You found a a way to be broke in a country where making money is like taking candy from a baby. Yep. He never stops crying about it. Over the past year and a half after I retired I have a friend's company managing my stocks and such so I don't have to do it anymore. And I just look at it every few weeks or so and feel great at how it's rolling along nicely. Imagine a guy like Newsom being in office at this time instead of Trump. Or the kamaltoe. Quote
Hardcore troubadour Posted February 23 Posted February 23 3 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said: A 750 pt plunge isn’t catastrophic. It will probably come back up. But if the traders say, as they are, that this is due to Trump’s tariff instability, why shouldn’t we believe them? If there is one industry we can trust in this country it’s the financial one. Their record of honesty and accuracy is unquestionable. Quote
thegeneral Posted February 23 Posted February 23 18 minutes ago, Scary Gary said: So Trump becomes President, market goes up 8,000 points in his presidency, that's Bidens work still "settling in". During the fluctuations where it's down, that's Trump's fault. Got it. What other genius theories do you have? Also, I'm guessing you're broke. Congrats, libby. You found a a way to be broke in a country where making money is like taking candy from a baby. Do Biden’s last year versus this first one of Bozo then, chumpinski. Look you can believe all Don’s BS about how amazing stuff is when in reality it’s all worse or treading water. Not broke. Sorry Scary Gary! Which banned guy are you? Quote
Caine Mutiny Posted February 23 Posted February 23 2 minutes ago, seafoam1 said: Imagine a guy like Newsom being in office at this time instead of Trump. Or the kamaltoe. Why would either Newsom or Kamala being in office have caused the market to behave differently? What should we imagine would have happened? Quote
thegeneral Posted February 23 Posted February 23 8 minutes ago, seafoam1 said: Yep. He never stops crying about it. Over the past year and a half after I retired I have a friend's company managing my stocks and such so I don't have to do it anymore. And I just look at it every few weeks or so and feel great at how it's rolling along nicely. Imagine a guy like Newsom being in office at this time instead of Trump. Or the kamaltoe. You made more under Biden last two years than last year, that’s when we were dead! That’s weird. Quote
Caine Mutiny Posted February 23 Posted February 23 2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: If there is one industry we can trust in this country it’s the financial one. Their record of honesty and accuracy is unquestionable. Interesting. In the two days I’ve posted here I’m already seeing a pattern with you: you attack the source anytime Donald Trump is attacked or accused of wrongdoing. Are there any sources of information you rely on regularly? Or is it simply a matter of only accepting news you like? Quote
seafoam1 Posted February 23 Posted February 23 8 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said: Why would either Newsom or Kamala being in office have caused the market to behave differently? What should we imagine would have happened? Because their severe lack of productive governamce would have caused consumer confidence to plummet, prices would be through the roof for staples to live, they would be putting people in places to fock our border as much or more than biden did, they would negatively effect the world economy with their reckless spending, their transportation leader would be focking up our shipping, and a lot more. Things go sour when leadership is weak and is made up of very poor decision makers. Markets get negatively affected by things like this. Seems you don't know much about the things that affect our lives on a daily basis. Quote
thegeneral Posted February 23 Posted February 23 Just now, seafoam1 said: Because their severe lack of governamce would have caused consumer confidence to plummet, prices would be through the roof for staples to live, they would be putting people in places to fock our border as much or more than biden did, they owuld effect th world economy with their reckless spending, thier transportation leader would be focking jup our shipping, and a lot more. Things go sour when leadership is weak and is made up of very poor decision makers. Markets get negatively affected by things like this. Then how did the markets go up essentially exactly the same over the course of 4 years with Biden versus Don 1.0. How is GDP growth down 25% 2025 over 2024. How were new jobs way down in 2025 versus 2024. You looked at the consumer confidence levels recently? Quote
seafoam1 Posted February 23 Posted February 23 Just now, thegeneral said: Then how did the markets go up essentially exactly the same over the course of 4 years with Biden versus Don 1.0. How is GDP growth down 25% 2025 over 2024. How were new jobs way down in 2025 versus 2024. You looked at the consumer confidence levels recently? Wrong premise. The rest is useless. Quote
thegeneral Posted February 23 Posted February 23 1 minute ago, seafoam1 said: Wrong premise. The rest is useless. Wrong premise lol Those are just the numbers. But keep waiving your pompoms! Quote
Caine Mutiny Posted February 23 Posted February 23 8 minutes ago, seafoam1 said: Because their severe lack of productive governamce would have caused consumer confidence to plummet, prices would be through the roof for staples to live, they would be putting people in places to fock our border as much or more than biden did, they would negatively effect the world economy with their reckless spending, their transportation leader would be focking up our shipping, and a lot more. Things go sour when leadership is weak and is made up of very poor decision makers. Markets get negatively affected by things like this. Seems you don't know much about the things that affect our lives on a daily basis. These arguments seem to be inconsistent with the actual performance of the stock market under recent Democratic Presidents. Quote
seafoam1 Posted February 23 Posted February 23 Just now, thegeneral said: Wrong premise lol Those are just the numbers. But keep waiving your pompoms! Thegenital doesn't remember the past. Quote
Caine Mutiny Posted February 23 Posted February 23 1 minute ago, seafoam1 said: Thegenital doesn't remember the past. Sorry I don’t remember it either. Can you point to a specific time in the past with a Democratic President when the stock market plunged as per your arguments? Quote
seafoam1 Posted February 23 Posted February 23 1 minute ago, Caine Mutiny said: These arguments seem to be inconsistent with the actual performance of the stock market under recent Democratic Presidents. They are not inconsistent. And Newsom or the Kameltoe would have been a disaster if they had gotten into the white house last year. But you do you. Quote
Grace Under Pressure Posted February 23 Posted February 23 7 minutes ago, thegeneral said: Then how did the markets go up essentially exactly the same over the course of 4 years with Biden versus Don 1.0. How is GDP growth down 25% 2025 over 2024. How were new jobs way down in 2025 versus 2024. You looked at the consumer confidence levels recently? MAGA does not care about facts. They will simply spin anything into “Daddy Trump good! Libs bad!”. And that’s a true statement for any and all topics. Kudos for at least offering the actual truth. Quote
Caine Mutiny Posted February 23 Posted February 23 Just now, seafoam1 said: They are not inconsistent. And Newsom or the Kameltoe would have been a disaster if they had gotten into the white house last year. But you do you. Well if they’re not inconsistent then you should have no problem providing evidence to the contrary. We had 8 years of Obama as President and 4 of Biden over the last 16. When did the market perform poorly as a result of their policies? 1 Quote
thegeneral Posted February 23 Posted February 23 6 minutes ago, seafoam1 said: Thegenital doesn't remember the past. Lol GDP growth: 2024: ~2.8% 2025: ~2.2% New jobs: 2024: ~1.46 million jobs added 2025: ~181,000 jobs added Stock market (S&P 500): 2024: ~+21–23% 2025: ~+16% Consumer Confidence dropped in 25 Retail sales lower or flat Hourly wage growth lower Real wage growth flat Quote
thegeneral Posted February 23 Posted February 23 5 minutes ago, Grace Under Pressure said: MAGA does not care about facts. They will simply spin anything into “Daddy Trump good! Libs bad!”. And that’s a true statement for any and all topics. Kudos for at least offering the actual truth. Peefoam’s entire identity is duh liberals are bad. It’s wild Quote
seafoam1 Posted February 23 Posted February 23 8 minutes ago, thegeneral said: Lol GDP growth: 2024: ~2.8% 2025: ~2.2% New jobs: 2024: ~1.46 million jobs added 2025: ~181,000 jobs added Stock market (S&P 500): 2024: ~+21–23% 2025: ~+16% Consumer Confidence dropped in 25 Retail sales lower or flat Hourly wage growth lower Real wage growth flat California, run by Newsom, has 5.6% unempoloyment, and major budget issues. There are homeless people littering the streets. That, is not a good economy. You can fock around with numbers all you like, but leadership, or lack of, shows it's ugly head. California is broke, Illinois is broke. That is liberal "leadership". We don't need idiots running a country because what they manage, always go broke. Well except for them and theirs. Now go back and look up the chinese flu and how Nancy Pelosi formed a walkathon at the begining of it for all of san francisco to join in at the beginning of it's spread. And then biden demanded open borders and everything tanked from there. Then of course the economy wasn't going to stay in that shlt. Even under creepy joe there were actually some smart people on the right to fix shlt. Quote
thegeneral Posted February 23 Posted February 23 Just now, seafoam1 said: California, run by Newsom, has 5.6% unempoloyment, and major budget issues. There are homeless people littering the streets. That, is not a good economy. You can fock around with numbers all you like, but leadership, or lack of, shows it's ugly head. California is broke, Illinois is broke. That is liberal "leadership". We don't need idiots running a country because what they manage, always go broke. Well except for them and theirs. I’m not a big Newsome fan. How was the country so dead during Joe’s run but now it’s the hottest ever? Vast majority of economic numbers are treading water at best. You are worried about debt lol. Maybe look at what Don has done in that regard. Quote
seafoam1 Posted February 23 Posted February 23 3 minutes ago, thegeneral said: I’m not a big Newsome fan. How was the country so dead during Joe’s run but now it’s the hottest ever? Vast majority of economic numbers are treading water at best. You are worried about debt lol. Maybe look at what Don has done in that regard. Why do you all deflect to creepy touchy joe? I said newsom and kameltoe. There is nothing really to compare in the past 30 years to the chinese flu. Of course some tanking and recovery was going to happen. I said that if newsom or the kameltoe got in office we would be focked right now. Get over yourself peeboy. You complain the most about the economy and yet I'm feeling good. Sorry you have made poor decisions in life. Quote
Caine Mutiny Posted February 23 Posted February 23 2 minutes ago, seafoam1 said: California, run by Newsom, has 5.6% unempoloyment, and major budget issues. There are homeless people littering the streets. That, is not a good economy. You can fock around with numbers all you like, but leadership, or lack of, shows it's ugly head. California is broke, Illinois is broke. That is liberal "leadership". We don't need idiots running a country because what they manage, always go broke. Well except for them and theirs. California certainly had problems as you’ve noted. On the other hand, under Newsom it has grown from the 6th largest economy in the world to the 4th. Thats a fact that shouldn’t be ignored. If Newsom as President could stimulate anything close to that kind of economic growth it would certainly make his election worth it, no? And you still haven’t explained why, if liberal polices result in severe economic downturns as you claim, this hasn’t happened with any of the Presidents in recent history (actually I can’t think of it happening in the last 100 years- every economic recession or depression or stock market crash that I can recall has happened under a Republican President: 1929, 1932, 1958, 1973, 1987, 2006, 2020- all under Republicans. How do you account for this?) Quote
seafoam1 Posted February 23 Posted February 23 19 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said: Well if they’re not inconsistent then you should have no problem providing evidence to the contrary. We had 8 years of Obama as President and 4 of Biden over the last 16. When did the market perform poorly as a result of their policies? You are so lost. I've mentioned everything above and I'm correct. Quote
Caine Mutiny Posted February 23 Posted February 23 1 minute ago, seafoam1 said: You are so lost. I've mentioned everything above and I'm correct. But you still haven’t offered any examples. Quote
thegeneral Posted February 23 Posted February 23 Just now, seafoam1 said: Why do you all deflect to creepy touchy joe? I said newsom and kameltoe. There is nothing really to compare in the past 30 years to the chinese flu. Of course some tanking and recovery was going to happen. I said that if newsom or the kameltoe got in office we would be focked right now. Get over yourself peeboy. You complain the most about the economy and yet I'm feeling good. Sorry you have made poor decisions in life. Covid was Biden’s mess to deal with, not Donald’s. Who knows what Kamala or Gavin would have done. It’s all guess work. We can see what is going on now one year in and it’s mediocre at best. It’s ok to be critical of the performance of your Orange King. It won’t hurt! Quote
seafoam1 Posted February 23 Posted February 23 1 minute ago, Caine Mutiny said: California certainly had problems as you’ve noted. On the other hand, under Newsom it has grown from the 6th largest economy in the world to the 4th. Thats a fact that shouldn’t be ignored. If Newsom as President could stimulate anything close to that kind of economic growth it would certainly make his election worth it, no? And you still haven’t explained why, if liberal polices result in severe economic downturns as you claim, this hasn’t happened with any of the Presidents in recent history (actually I can’t think of it happening in the last 100 years- every economic recession or depression or stock market crash that I can recall has happened under a Republican President: 1929, 1932, 1958, 1973, 1987, 2006, 2020- all under Republicans. How do you account for this?) If you don't think nearly $2T in debt for one state is bad, then I can't help you. Your numbers and reasoning is based both sides of the isle's work in the economy. My examples of state leadership, or lack there of, is based upon people I would fear running this country. Let's watch New York over the next 3 years or so and see the mandami effect. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.