Biden to nominate Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to Supreme Court

[Utilit99 4,099]

awesome. 

Our country is going to shlt, the world is going to shlt, and creepy joe and kameltoe are working hard on their inclusion and diversity agenda.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-supreme-court-nominee-ketanji-brown-jackson

[RLLD 3,455]

I don't know anything about her.  She might be a good and decent advocate for the constitution and rule of law. 

If I were to dislike her purely because of who nominated her, then I become a Democrat.  Let's see if Biden saw more than gender and skin color in this instance. 

[vomit 502]

What's wrong with her?

[TBayXXXVII 2,105]

If she's qualified, I'm fine with anyone.  But, my guess is that she's a leftist and as long as they're outnumbered 6-3, it doesn't bother me.  To me, this is the ideal way to do things.  Give leftists a voice, but ignore them.  Brown, Sotomayor, & Kagan will be able to say and do anything they want... their voices will just be muted.  Democrats are fine, Leftists are not.

[Utilit99 4,099]

3 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I don't know anything about her.  She might be a good and decent advocate for the constitution and rule of law. 

If I were to dislike her purely because of who nominated her, then I become a Democrat.  Let's see if Biden saw more than gender and skin color in this instance. 

He previously said he was going to nominate based upon race and gender. 

That's not right from last I heard.

[TheNewGirl 1,018]

I've only briefly read about her back ground, and I am not mad at it....I'd like to learn more though. 

[TBayXXXVII 2,105]

Did Breyer officially resign though?  I thought someone suggested that he should, because he's older, and while a Democrat is in office, now would be the time he should do it.

[vomit 502]

2 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

I've only briefly read about her back ground, and I am not mad at it....I'd like to learn more though. 

I know nothing about her, she could be fine.  Util is pissed because she's black, he's a racist.

[Mike Honcho 4,007]

6 minutes ago, Utilit99 said:

He previously said he was going to nominate based upon race and gender. 

That's not right from last I heard.

But not like how Reagan, Bush 1 & 2 and Trump all selected judges based on one of those qualities....it's when someone does both that it's an issue.  

[Hardcore troubadour 12,576]

She gets overturned. A lot. Like almost everything. 

[Utilit99 4,099]

17 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

But not like how Reagan, Bush 1 & 2 and Trump all selected judges based on one of those qualities....it's when someone does both that it's an issue.  

When did amy of them say they were focusing on race or gender? Biden said it multiple times that he was. 

[wiffleball 4,631]

I liked the original Ketanji with Robin Williams. 

[Utilit99 4,099]

I say they give her the white man Kavanaugh treatment to progressively make the process reflect true equality.  

[Cdub100 3,366]

30 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

She gets overturned. A lot. Like almost everything. 

That's what I'm reading too. She ignored clear law in an effort to try and strike down President Trumps E.O.

[Utilit99 4,099]

5 minutes ago, Cdub100 said:

That's what I'm reading too. She ignored clear law in an effort to try and strike down President Trumps E.O.

And if she gets cut down, you know what word of the day will be. Racist!!

That's why the libs want a black female.

[Cdub100 3,366]

1 minute ago, Utilit99 said:

And if she gets cut down, you know what word of the day will be. Racist!!

That's why the libs want a black female.

It's why the centrist in this thread are even scared to criticize her.

[RLLD 3,455]

5 minutes ago, Utilit99 said:

And if she gets cut down, you know what word of the day will be. Racist!!

That's why the libs want a black female.

But we have seen the leftists go after black females as well.  Look at how they handled Winsome Sears.

If you are a leftist people can only think one way, your way, or they are evil.  This is what they did to her as well.  Now her gender and skin color afforded her a nice measure of protection, but they still tried.

Totalitarianism does not allow for alternative view points.

[MDC 5,875]

1 hour ago, RLLD said:

I don't know anything about her.  

Neither does Peefoam. He doesn’t like her cause she’s black.

[wiffleball 4,631]

Well, I'm sure the other members of scotus are appreciative that there's one more member with a receding hairline.

[RLLD 3,455]

4 minutes ago, MDC said:

Neither does Peefoam. He doesn’t like her cause she’s black.

Time to do some research I think, learn what we can. I think its an exciting time actually. Over the least 4-5 years I think we have seen a rejuvenation in the court. I like it generally speaking.

[wiffleball 4,631]

5 minutes ago, posty said:

Is Biden going to be against her like he was when Bush nominated a black woman for the SCOTUS in 2003?

Have you ever smelled black women's hair? It smells like baby powder and chemicals. 

[Hardcore troubadour 12,576]

36 minutes ago, Cdub100 said:

That's what I'm reading too. She ignored clear law in an effort to try and strike down President Trumps E.O.

That’s why they want her. She DGAF, she will toe the party line, legalities be damned. Constitution. Pfffft. Only when it fits. 

[RLLD 3,455]

29 minutes ago, wiffleball said:

Have you ever smelled black women's hair? It smells like baby powder and chemicals. 

I do enjoy the smell of cocoa butter.... 

[peenie 1,690]

I think everyone that serves on the court votes according to their beliefs and not in alignment with their color. See: Clarence Thomas 

[wiffleball 4,631]

9 minutes ago, peenie said:

I think everyone that serves on the court votes according to their beliefs and not in alignment with their color. See: Clarence Thomas 

I love Clerence, literally slept through the first twenty years of his term. Talk about reinforcing a stereotype. Dude didn't give a f***. Knew he couldn't be fired.

[Utilit99 4,099]

1 hour ago, RLLD said:

But we have seen the leftists go after black females as well.  Look at how they handled Winsome Sears.

If you are a leftist people can only think one way, your way, or they are evil.  This is what they did to her as well.  Now her gender and skin color afforded her a nice measure of protection, but they still tried.

Totalitarianism does not allow for alternative view points.

When it comes to opposing political parties, social views, etc., the liberals see party affiliation and that's it. 

[RLLD 3,455]

1 hour ago, peenie said:

I think everyone that serves on the court votes according to their beliefs and not in alignment with their color. See: Clarence Thomas 

I think this is 100% accurate. I do not believe that black people can or should only think one way. But there are those out there who do.......

[jerryskids 5,166]

She's qualified on paper; is she the one who clerked for Breyer in the past?  The link in the link in the OP described the overturns; those are disconcerting because they show her as an activist vs. a jurist.  But that is par for the course for liberal appointees.  As Obama said, elections have consequences, so hopefully she can just sit in the corner with Sotomayor and Kagan making activists votes with no basis in law, and nothing will come of it.   

[NEWPOSTERGUY! 266]

a mummified sh1t i took in 1987 is more qualified than that idiot Sotomayor. 

Worst choice ever, she is a complete focking moron.

Thanks for listening. 

[Cdub100 3,366]

Liberal friend of mine on Faceberg "the visual of this nomination is what we needed today"

I know we already know that liberals do not care about anything other than their feelings.

[shorepatrol 1,735]

I know she'll be terrible. See all the other appointees made by this insane left shItbag administration. 

[wiffleball 4,631]

4 hours ago, peenie said:

I think everyone that serves on the court votes according to their beliefs and not in alignment with their color. See: Clarence Thomas 

Soprised he never got an endorsement deal with Coke...

[Utilit99 4,099]

10 hours ago, jerryskids said:

She's qualified on paper; is she the one who clerked for Breyer in the past?  The link in the link in the OP described the overturns; those are disconcerting because they show her as an activist vs. a jurist.  But that is par for the course for liberal appointees.  As Obama said, elections have consequences, so hopefully she can just sit in the corner with Sotomayor and Kagan making activists votes with no basis in law, and nothing will come of it.   

Yeah. I hope the republicans put her through hell during this process. She is not a good candidate for that job and should not be in this position. 

Liberals more than anyone should be pissed at biden for coming out months ago and claiming he will pick someone based on their race and their gender and not on the quality of person, their intelligence of the constitution and what it means, and their record on the job.  

[Masshole 642]

Born in DC.   Mom was school principal, dad was an attorney for a school board.     She went to Harvard in the 90s (Harvard in the 90s was patient zero for wokeness).     Senior thesis at Harvard titled "The Hand of Oppression: Plea Bargaining Processes and the Coercion of Criminal Defendants".    Her husband is white and wears a bow tie.    She clerked for Breyer.   Politico reports that "Jackson is popular with liberal legal activists looking to replace Breyer with a justice willing to engage in ideological combat with the court's conservatives."   

What are the chances she pulls a Souter and goes conservative when she gets appointed?  

[RLLD 3,455]

3 hours ago, Utilit99 said:

Yeah. I hope the republicans put her through hell during this process. She is not a good candidate for that job and should not be in this position. 

Liberals more than anyone should be pissed at biden for coming out months ago and claiming he will pick someone based on their race and their gender and not on the quality of person, their intelligence of the constitution and what it means, and their record on the job.  

I would prefer they not do so.  

I maintain that conservatives MUST NOT ACT LIKE DEMOCRAT TODDLERS

You know how when Biden was elected and they espoused how the adults were back in charge. Well that was projection. One thing is for certain, liberals are NOT adults, that is why they use the term so abundantly.

The vetting process is there to ensure the candidate is suitable, competent and qualified.  Let's return it to that. Let's not replicate the amoral behaviors of Democrats.

 

[Masshole 642]

29 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I would prefer they not do so.  

I maintain that conservatives MUST NOT ACT LIKE DEMOCRAT TODDLERS

You know how when Biden was elected and they espoused how the adults were back in charge. Well that was projection. One thing is for certain, liberals are NOT adults, that is why they use the term so abundantly.

The vetting process is there to ensure the candidate is suitable, competent and qualified.  Let's return it to that. Let's not replicate the amoral behaviors of Democrats.

 

Couldn't agree more.   Worst case scenario is she votes the same way as Breyer.     Why use up a bunch of political capital on this?  

[Utilit99 4,099]

1 hour ago, RLLD said:

I would prefer they not do so.  

I maintain that conservatives MUST NOT ACT LIKE DEMOCRAT TODDLERS

You know how when Biden was elected and they espoused how the adults were back in charge. Well that was projection. One thing is for certain, liberals are NOT adults, that is why they use the term so abundantly.

The vetting process is there to ensure the candidate is suitable, competent and qualified.  Let's return it to that. Let's not replicate the amoral behaviors of Democrats.

 

 

This nomination is the epitome of hypocrisy by liberals on the national stage. Black people accepting to be catered to is a serious problem. All this talk about equality over the last few years and yet the black community will accept inequality only if it benefits them. 

I would have expected this woman to feel offended by being treated as if she is incapable of competing with the whole of the country.  

Watch how much biden pats himself on the back at the state of the union address. 

[RLLD 3,455]

53 minutes ago, Utilit99 said:

 

This nomination is the epitome of hypocrisy by liberals on the national stage. Black people accepting to be catered to is a serious problem. All this talk about equality over the last few years and yet the black community will accept inequality only if it benefits them. 

I would have expected this woman to feel offended by being treated as if she is incapable of competing with the whole of the country.  

Watch how much biden pats himself on the back at the state of the union address. 

Perhaps.  But is she qualified?

[RLLD 3,455]

16 hours ago, Utilit99 said:

When it comes to opposing political parties, social views, etc., the liberals see party affiliation and that's it. 

This is evident.  It comes through clearly in nearly every Democrat speaking situation. Sadly, they wall themselves off from thinking past what is right in front of them.

[listen2me 23 1,529]

I know nothing about her.

But I know Biden said he wasn't considering anyone but a black female.