Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Utilit99

Biden to nominate Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to Supreme Court

Recommended Posts

Just now, posty said:

:lol: 

Yep...

To be fair when conservatives were fighting for alternate covid treatments they brought out that crazy black woman doctor who does voodoo so... I mean... never mind.

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Cdub100 said:

To be fair when conservatives were fighting for alternate covid treatments they brought out that crazy black woman doctor who does voodoo so... I mean... never mind.

She was smarter than fauci in the end.

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Utilit99 said:

She was smarter than fauci in the end.

While also true it's just... to your point, we couldn't find one normal black woman doctor?

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Cdub100 said:

While also true it's just... to your point, we couldn't find one normal black woman doctor?

Beats me. My take if that's the best of the best, time to focus on other skin tones and genders.

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mitt Romney, like many aging baby boomers who have had it easy their whole life, is terrified of being called a racist again. They all need to go away. 

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just disgusting that this thing has ascended to the highest court in the land, partly because of her skin color and genitals,  but mostly because she is an activist, hard core left wing ideologue. She has to be one of a handful of judges in the country that is soft on pedophiles and makes excuses for their crimes. Nice work libtards. 

  • Sad 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Imagine a conservative judge going easy on, and making excuses for, Catholic pedophile priests ? Where my libtards at? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why even bother nominating her and going thru this whole process?    Just declare that we will count Sotomayor's votes twice and leave Breyer's spot open.    The results would be exactly the same.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Masshole said:

Why even bother nominating her and going thru this whole process?    Just declare that we will count Sotomayor's votes twice and leave Breyer's spot open.    The results would be exactly the same.  

To me the problem is the reaction to and defending of her. Never mind her incredible “I’m not a biologist” reply, which should have seen her escorted out the door, but shouldn’t certain things, like consistently going soft on pedophiles, just be met with a hard no? No explanation, no rationalization. Just no, next candidate? It’s often said the appearance of impropriety is often just as bad as the impropriety itself. She obviously has a twisted view of how pedophiles ought to be treated. These aren’t people who got caught up in the drug game who she’s advocating for. These are sick and dangerous creatures who ought to be removed from society every time there is an opportunity to do so. These aren’t crimes for money. This is something way beyond  that. These are monsters who can’t be cured. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Imagine a conservative judge going easy on, and making excuses for, Catholic pedophile priests ? Where my libtards at? 

I'll answer for them just like kunta brown jackson would. We are not Theologians. So we can't imagine that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Judges at a school spelling bee are stumped and infuriated when a child dares to ask them for a definition of the word “woman.”

 

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to make history as Supreme Court's first Black woman justice

With that, Jackson will become the 104th associate justice – marking the first time women and people of color outnumber white men on the court.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2022/06/30/ketanji-brown-jackson-become-first-black-woman-supreme-court/7772768001/

 

*What is a woman I ask?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fortunately she is completely irrelevant for the foreseeable future. Someone that stupid should not be making rulings. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, lod001 said:

Fortunately she is completely irrelevant for the foreseeable future. Someone that stupid should not be making rulings. 

+ only men should be about serve on the SC

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Alias Detective said:

*What is a woman I ask?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The floor is Sotomayor which is judicial absolute zero. Meanwhile the ceiling is Kagan. We’ll get an across the board left wing hack on every issue, the difference is the level of annoyance and IQ. 
 

The chances that she’ll actually read the laws and apply what is written are near zero, otherwise she never would have been nominated.

Anyway, enthusiasm is 0.00. Hopefully she never writes a majority opinion in her career unless its 9-0 or 8-1.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

The floor is Sotomayor which is judicial absolute zero. Meanwhile the ceiling is Kagan. We’ll get an across the board left wing hack on every issue, the difference is the level of annoyance and IQ. 
 

The chances that she’ll actually read the laws and apply what is written are near zero, otherwise she never would have been nominated.

Anyway, enthusiasm is 0.00. Hopefully she never writes a majority opinion in her career unless its 9-0 or 8-1.

I believe Jackson is now the floor.  For the reasons you listed.  

 

At least we received a great ruling slapping down Obama's overreaching enviro bullsh!t

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

GMA is on the ball I see. Its been up 5 hours. Astounding.

 

 

My God.

:doh:

I thought it was fake...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They did that on purpose. So obvious. If it was a mistake, it would have been deleted and fixed inside a couple minutes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, lod001 said:

They did that on purpose. So obvious. If it was a mistake, it would have been deleted and fixed inside a couple minutes.

Yeah, I was thinking the same.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Voltaire said:

The floor is Sotomayor which is judicial absolute zero. Meanwhile the ceiling is Kagan. We’ll get an across the board left wing hack on every issue, the difference is the level of annoyance and IQ. 
 

The chances that she’ll actually read the laws and apply what is written are near zero, otherwise she never would have been nominated.

Anyway, enthusiasm is 0.00. Hopefully she never writes a majority opinion in her career unless its 9-0 or 8-1.

If we are lucky, she will continue to grow fatter and wont last too long. Shes already an obese blob. Sitting around all day should increase her fat intake and quicken her exit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Alias Detective said:

 

*What is a woman I ask?

I dunno. People who want to act like Gerald Nadler or Adam Schiff, maybe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not only was Biden cemented himself as the most horrific president this country has ever had he is trying to lap the former number one Jimmy Carter. 
 

But hey the board retards should keep focusing on Trump and their fake insurrection.  Focking morons.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

By lib logic, she will commit perjury the first time she rules on a woman's case because she admitted in the hearings under oath she didn't know what one was.  :lol: 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Bert said:

Not only was Biden cemented himself as the most horrific president this country has ever had he is trying to lap the former number one Jimmy Carter. 
 

But hey the board retards should keep focusing on Trump and their fake insurrection.  Focking morons.  

This x's a billion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Masshole said:

Yes, shocking really:

 

And just like KJB, I cannot tell if that is a woman or a man.  We really just don't know what a woman is even after being on this planet in one form or another for at least a million years.  The science is just not settled on this matter.  :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

And just like KJB, I cannot tell if that is a woman or a man.  We really just don't know what a woman is even after being on this planet in one form or another for at least a million years.  The science is just not settled on this matter.  :dunno:

She doesn't know the definition of a woman, she isn't a biologist...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, posty said:

She doesn't know the definition of a woman, she isn't a biologist...

She knows the definition of getting paid to vote how she's told. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, she has removed all doubt that she’s an idiot.  Can’t do basic math.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Well, she has removed all doubt that she’s an idiot.  Can’t do basic math.  

She wrote three solo dissents in her first term.  So, three times even her progressive colleagues didn't agree with her.  It took John Roberts 16 years before he wrote his FIRST solo dissent.  Some people think it's a good thing to write solo dissents, and in rare circumstances it probably is, but three in your first term just makes you look like you shouldn't even be there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Strike said:

She wrote three solo dissents in her first term.  So, three times even her progressive colleagues didn't agree with her.  It took John Roberts 16 years before he wrote his FIRST solo dissent.  Some people think it's a good thing to write solo dissents, and in rare circumstances it probably is, but three in your first term just makes you look like you shouldn't even be there.

It took Clarence Thomas only 5 months before he wrote his first solo dissent and had 6 this term.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

It took Clarence Thomas only 5 months before he wrote his first solo dissent and had 6 this term.  

So he didn't write three his first term?  Thanks for supporting my point.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×