Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Djgb13

Animal shelter in CA bans gun supporters

Recommended Posts

WOW! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have a problem with this.  Her business, she can do what she wants.  Just like a baker not wanting make a gay wedding cake, she doesn't want gun supporters buying from her.  Have at it.  There are other places to get pets.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Way to let your stupid politics get in the way of finding good homes for animals in need of one. :thumbsdown:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the kind of stupid sh1t that makes me hate Dem libs.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There should be a backlash any day from the media about this negativity...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems like animal cruelty.  Bring in strays and animals who have been abused.  Pile them into cages.  Then refuse to let them get a good home if the adopter doesn't agree with your opinion.    

Virtue signaling lunatics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How do you put them out of their misery when you get that vet bill to do surgery? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

California is the most degenerate fagg0t filled place in the world. No idea why anyone would want to live there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TBayXXXVII said:

I don't have a problem with this.  Her business, she can do what she wants.  Just like a baker not wanting make a gay wedding cake, she doesn't want gun supporters buying from her.  Have at it.  There are other places to get pets.

Correct. 

She should be able to decide who can patronize her business.  If they are gay, denied!  If they are gun owners, denied!  Republican? DE-NIED, black....de....uh oh, hold on now....  :huh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Correct. 

She should be able to decide who can patronize her business.  If they are gay, denied!  If they are gun owners, denied!  Republican? DE-NIED, black....de....uh oh, hold on now....  :huh:

Sexual orientation, gun ownership and political orientation aren’t protected under the Civil Rights Act. Race is. HTH.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, MDC said:

Sexual orientation, gun ownership and political orientation aren’t protected under the Civil Rights Act. Race is. HTH.

as i say, we need to amend the CRA to address this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, MDC said:

Sexual orientation, gun ownership and political orientation aren’t protected under the Civil Rights Act. Race is. HTH.

Sexual orientation is protected

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Sexual orientation is protected

I stand corrected. That’s pretty new. Glad to hear it. 👍🏻 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, MDC said:

I stand corrected. That’s pretty new. Glad to hear it. 👍🏻 

Was added in 2020. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Hawkeye21 said:

Bold strategy.  Let's see if it pays off.

Great reference😅

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Per the anti-gun policy, the rescue animal purveyor will conduct a one-hour interview with prospective pet parents, during which they will “grill” them on if they “care about children being gunned down in our schools?”

Wait, you want to interrogate me for an hour before I can take home this shelter animal? Buh-bye. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

Wait, you want to interrogate me for an hour before I can take home this shelter animal? Buh-bye. 

I would turn it around and say I need to interview the dog to make sure to see what they identify as. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Mike Honcho said:

Wait, you want to interrogate me for an hour before I can take home this shelter animal? Buh-bye. 

This won't turn out well. Too many have an hour to waste to make fun of a snowflake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, RLLD said:

Correct. 

She should be able to decide who can patronize her business.  If they are gay, denied!  If they are gun owners, denied!  Republican? DE-NIED, black....de....uh oh, hold on now....  :huh:

The funny thing is, this virtually the same thing as the baker, but Liberals won't have a problem with this because they're anti-gun.  I am curious if someone tries to file a civil suit against her.  I mean, this really is the same thing as the baker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

The funny thing is, this virtually the same thing as the baker, but Liberals won't have a problem with this because they're anti-gun.  I am curious if someone tries to file a civil suit against her.  I mean, this really is the same thing as the baker.

There is no actual justice under liberalism because decisions are predicated on their morality instead of philosophical integrity.    Crimes have a scale based on skin color, religion, gender, socio-economic factors......when in reality its simply crime, none of the rest matters. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, RLLD said:

There is no actual justice under liberalism because decisions are predicated on their morality instead of philosophical integrity.    Crimes have a scale based on skin color, religion, gender, socio-economic factors......when in reality its simply crime, none of the rest matters. 

Yeah, I just enjoy watching the liberturds call "hypocrisy" as if they don't do it on a daily basis themselves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Easily opens up a lawsuit. When something is in the constitution and you refuse ppl because they agree with the constitution then you’re going to get sued

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Djgb13 said:

Easily opens up a lawsuit. When something is in the constitution and you refuse ppl because they agree with the constitution then you’re going to get sued

That is true.  There is more of a reason to sue her than the baker.  The baker had a protected right, in religious freedom, to lean on.  This lady has no such protected right.  Her stance is purely a moral and/or political one... neither which are protected.  That said, I'd like to think that conservatives are more mature than the childish liberals, and just let her business fold.  I have a feeling that I will be disappointed.  LOL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TBayXXXVII said:

The funny thing is, this virtually the same thing as the baker, but Liberals won't have a problem with this because they're anti-gun.  I am curious if someone tries to file a civil suit against her.  I mean, this really is the same thing as the baker.

What decision made gun owners a protected class again?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

What decision made gun owners a protected class again?  

It is an attack on sexual orientation 

 

Attack on straight men

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

What decision made gun owners a protected class again?  

2A is a protected amendment so if you refuse service to ppl who support the constitution then what you’re doing is illegal. Not that hard to figure out :dunno: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So the bakery that turned down the gay guys actually went out of their way to find another bakery that the gays could go to and get a cake. 

Is the dog shelter doing the same for those who believe in the constitution that they are turning away?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Mike Honcho said:

Wait, you want to interrogate me for an hour before I can take home this shelter animal? Buh-bye. 

I adopted a pet from the local shelter, and then almost went thru a place called Sweet Paws, each time a 1 hour grilling would have been fine. It was multiple hrs, and denied a few times. Full 30 min interviews with our references..my sister was finally like "wtf", this dog is going to be treated like royalty! Sounds like this lady is carrying that attitude a bit further.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, MDC said:

This is the kind of stupid sh1t that makes me hate Dem libs.

It's so common place now. What the fock are they actually thinking? Or are they?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, listen2me 23 said:

It is an attack on sexual orientation 

 

Attack on straight men

:lol: 

Nice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×