Jump to content
craftsman

Trump's residence raided by the FBI

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

You keep making it about Trump. Trump is temporary. You just won’t see the big picture. If they only went after Trump that would be one thing. But they can’t, he keeps kicking their ass. So they go after everyone. Even parents at school board meetings. Yelling is cause for federal intervention now. You’re cool with it though. 

Oh this is about the DOJ going after parents at school board meetings now. :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, JustinCharge said:

Putin already decided that America has given up on what it once stood for.  Putin doesnt think the right wing in America will stand up to any of this corruption.  Thats why Putin has decided to nuke NYC and other major cities in one final try to make the liberals listen and if that doesnt work he is blowing up the planet.  its out of our hands now, has been since biden became president.

🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Hawkeye21 said:

Didn't Hillary go on trial though?  Would Trump ever go on trial?

Where the hell are you getting your info?    Hillary never went on trial for that or anything else.    The FBI announced and then closed an investigation into it and the result was that they said she used poor judgement in doing the private server thing.     That's it.    

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Masshole said:

Where the hell are you getting your info?    Hillary never went on trial for that or anything else.    The FBI announced and then closed an investigation into it and the result was that they said she used poor judgement in doing the private server thing.     That's it.    

I must be thinking of her campaign lawyer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

Didn't Hillary go on trial though?  Would Trump ever go on trial?

Ooof. Low information. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

To actually claim that McCabe was fired for political purposes shows that the leftist media knows they are talking to people with blinders on. 

The level of not paying attention is astounding.  McCabe should have been hanged for treason and gutterpedo thinks he's a hero. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

I must be thinking of her campaign lawyer.

I can see why you would confuse the two. No sweat. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, TimmySmith said:

The level of not paying attention is astounding.  McCabe should have been hanged for treason and gutterpedo thinks he's a hero. 

What can you do? Everyone has their bias, but to know so little and say so much is astounding. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Oh this is about the DOJ going after parents at school board meetings now. :lol:

Oh, so they didn’t intervene or you're ok with it? Which one is it? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Oh, so they didn’t intervene or you're ok with it? Which one is it? 

I've never seen the DOJ at one of our school board meetings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Masshole said:

Yup, this is correct:
 

 

Does the White House need to know about it ahead of time?

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

I've never seen the DOJ at one of our school board meetings.

Didn’t ask about yours. Childish. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

Does the White House need to know about it ahead of time?

One would think that you should let your boss know what you are about to do when its something like this

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

Does the White House need to know about it ahead of time?

:lol:  A raid on a former President's house?  Seriously?  

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, lod001 said:

One would think that you should let your boss know what you are about to do when its something like this

They knew. Maybe not sleepy Joe, but his handlers did.  They ordered it.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

They knew. Maybe not sleepy Joe, but his handlers did.  They ordered it.  

Source?

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, JustinCharge said:

Putin already decided that America has given up on what it once stood for.  Putin doesnt think the right wing in America will stand up to any of this corruption.  Thats why Putin has decided to nuke NYC and other major cities in one final try to make the liberals listen and if that doesnt work he is blowing up the planet.  its out of our hands now, has been since biden became president.

I'm beginning to think you are actually an imbecile if you truly believe what you say.

40 minutes ago, Masshole said:

Bill Clinton's NSA head (Sandy Berger) literally stuffed classified documents in his pants to smuggle them out of the whitehouse.     No raid.     

Hillary intentionally set up a separate server and email system to bypass the gov't system where everything she communicated would be recorded and then she nuked over 30K of those emails when the story broke.   No raid.  

And yet the "centrists" on this board will say that the DOJ and FBI aren't selectively targeting Trump and Trump admin people.     

Berger- the Justice Department determined that the copies were taken to be destroyed and no original material was lost.

Hillary's stuff- when it came out the left cried about the timing of it all and how unfair it was while the right celebrated. Also, the FBI chose not to press charges for whatever reason. 

Again- not sure what the FBI and DOJ have here yet but there must be something. And Trump has been shown to be getting rid of documents and from what I saw so far they are addressing this all to make sure that the originals are still there. 

16 minutes ago, Masshole said:

Yup, this is correct:
 

 

No- that's just stupid. Besides- if the White House knew it would look far more politically motivated. So Bob Weave is arguing that it should've been more political....to I guess discredit it more? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

They knew. Maybe not sleepy Joe, but his handlers did.  They ordered it.  

You guys need to get out of your MAGA/far right bubble. 

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

Does the White House need to know about it ahead of time?

Your stupidity is dangerous. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

They knew. Maybe not sleepy Joe, but his handlers did.  They ordered it.  

Of course they knew. You can't raid a former President's house without permission. But they can't say, "we knew".  It will come out that they knew, and the libs won't even acknowledge the original lie. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, TimmySmith said:

Of course they knew. You can't raid a former President's house without permission. But they can't say, "we knew".  It will come out that they knew, and the libs won't even acknowledge the original lie. 

Ummm… I’m gonna have to wait for Hawkeye to weigh in here. Lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, iam90sbaby said:

Your stupidity is dangerous. 

Combination of stupidity and naivety, it's childlike. Very odd.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

Berger- the Justice Department determined that the copies were taken to be destroyed and no original material was lost.

Hillary's stuff- when it came out the left cried about the timing of it all and how unfair it was while the right celebrated. Also, the FBI chose not to press charges for whatever reason. 

Again- not sure what the FBI and DOJ have here yet but there must be something. And Trump has been shown to be getting rid of documents and from what I saw so far they are addressing this all to make sure that the originals are still there. 

No- that's just stupid. Besides- if the White House knew it would look far more politically motivated. So Bob Weave is arguing that it should've been more political....to I guess discredit it more? 

Good god, for your sake I hope you are just trolling and not just an absolute moron.  

So - how did the DOJ determine the copies were not original material and of no value - thru a raid of Berger's home or did they work with Berger's legal counsel to figure that out? 

"FBI chose not to press charges for whatever reason".   Ummm, yah - that "whatever reason" is kind of important and "bigly" relevant to the present situation, don't ya think?

"Not sure what the FBI and DOJ have here yet but there must be something".    I bet you said the same thing about "Trump colluded with Russia" didn't you?    Do you learn any lessons from history or are you just content to condemn yourself to endlessly repeating it?  

Your last point.  Wow, just wow.    Do you have any idea how an organization operates?    Either they told the Biden admin what was going on and then that admin lied about it or this admin is as clueless and dysfunctional as we suspected.    Which one is it?   

And you are accusing us of being in a bubble????     But thank you any way - the humor of your posts was actually enjoyable.  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

You guys need to get out of your MAGA/far right bubble. 

Biden never talked to Hunter or anyone in his family about his overseas business dealings. So I’m thinking we won’t get the truth on this either. He has no issue lying right to Americas face. He has to. Most corrupt president ever. Lots to cover up. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, avoiding injuries said:

Ummm… I’m gonna have to wait for Hawkeye to weigh in here. Lol

Maybe he thinks the WH answers to the FBI?  And maybe he's right? The Obama WH did. :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Reality said:

Combination of stupidity and naivety, it's childlike. Very odd.

Yep. He thinks it's funny a former presidents resident got raided. Crossing lines we've never crossed before. This is actually a huge moment in American history. We are now a banana republic.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Masshole said:

Good god, for your sake I hope you are just trolling and not just an absolute moron.  

So - how did the DOJ determine the copies were not original material and of no value - thru a raid of Berger's home or did they work with Berger's legal counsel to figure that out? 

"FBI chose not to press charges for whatever reason".   Ummm, yah - that "whatever reason" is kind of important and "bigly" relevant to the present situation, don't ya think?

"Not sure what the FBI and DOJ have here yet but there must be something".    I bet you said the same thing about "Trump colluded with Russia" didn't you?    Do you learn any lessons from history or are you just content to condemn yourself to endlessly repeating it?  

Your last point.  Wow, just wow.    Do you have any idea how an organization operates?    Either they told the Biden admin what was going on and then that admin lied about it or this admin is as clueless and dysfunctional as we suspected.    Which one is it?   

And you are accusing us of being in a bubble????     But thank you any way - the humor of your posts was actually enjoyable.  

 

They can troll and be morons simultaneously.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, iam90sbaby said:

Yep. He thinks it's funny a former presidents resident got raided. Crossing lines we've never crossed before. This is actually a huge moment in American history. We are now a banana republic.

And this coming on the heels of the Jan 6th hearing - which is a line that's never been crossed before - one party not allowed to pick its members for a "bi-partisan" committee?    Never been done before.  

For the party of "Trump broke all of the norms" - they sure seem to not care a lot about maintaining "norms". . .   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How come you don’t see Hillary or Biden out there endorsing numerous candidates? People beg for Trumps. They know this. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, TimmySmith said:

Maybe he thinks the WH answers to the FBI?  And maybe he's right? The Obama WH did. :dunno:

The FBI can carry out actions without permission from the White House.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Hawkeye21 said:

The FBI can carry out actions without permission from the White House.

You should sit this one out. Saying that as a friend. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Masshole said:

Good god, for your sake I hope you are just trolling and not just an absolute moron.  

So - how did the DOJ determine the copies were not original material and of no value - thru a raid of Berger's home or did they work with Berger's legal counsel to figure that out? 

"FBI chose not to press charges for whatever reason".   Ummm, yah - that "whatever reason" is kind of important and "bigly" relevant to the present situation, don't ya think?

"Not sure what the FBI and DOJ have here yet but there must be something".    I bet you said the same thing about "Trump colluded with Russia" didn't you?    Do you learn any lessons from history or are you just content to condemn yourself to endlessly repeating it?  

Your last point.  Wow, just wow.    Do you have any idea how an organization operates?    Either they told the Biden admin what was going on and then that admin lied about it or this admin is as clueless and dysfunctional as we suspected.    Which one is it?   

And you are accusing us of being in a bubble????     But thank you any way - the humor of your posts was actually enjoyable.  

 

So tell us Internet detective- how deeply were you involved in the work surrounding the investigation of what Berger had? What makes you so privy to everything that no one else on the GC message board knows. The DOJ said they were copies. Prove otherwise.

Tell us also Internet sleuth why did the FBI choose not to press charges against Hillary? 

Why is Russia a part of this? Have nothing so you have to try to change topics or draw a false comparison?

The entire thought process of "If Biden didn't know, then Garland should be fired" is just stupid biased logic so of course you'd sit at your computer and nod away at the Twitter dopes posting that stuff. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, iam90sbaby said:

Your stupidity is dangerous. 

He's got a serious case of ShoNuff disease.  

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

How come you don’t see Hillary or Biden out there endorsing numerous candidates? People beg for Trumps. They know this. 

What does this have to do with Mar a Lago being raided?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

You should sit this one out. Saying that as a friend. 

If you are all such experts then why don't you explain how the whole process works?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Sean Mooney said:

So tell us Internet detective- how deeply were you involved in the work surrounding the investigation of what Berger had? What makes you so privy to everything that no one else on the GC message board knows. The DOJ said they were copies. Prove otherwise.

Tell us also Internet sleuth why did the FBI choose not to press charges against Hillary? 

Why is Russia a part of this? Have nothing so you have to try to change topics or draw a false comparison?

The entire thought process of "If Biden didn't know, then Garland should be fired" is just stupid biased logic so of course you'd sit at your computer and nod away at the Twitter dopes posting that stuff. 

We know because we've seen this movie before, many times.  It always ends the same.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

If you are all such experts then why don't you explain how the whole process works?

You are acting as if they raided one of our houses. :lol: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, TimmySmith said:

You are acting as if they raided one of our houses. :lol: 

So how does the process work in this instance?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Hawkeye21 said:

So how does the process work in this instance?

See- this is where the thought process breaks down for them.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×