FantasyRetard 49 Posted December 6, 2022 This comes as a shock, especially in the middle of the season. I'm not privy to the inside of the Titans, so if someone could explain the logic of this, I'd appreciate it. This can't be just about the AJ Brown trade. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AxeElf 787 Posted December 6, 2022 Hopefully he was the one responsible for Henry having only 11 carries on Sunday. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bills04 45 Posted December 6, 2022 "This can't be just about the AJ Brown trade." Why CAN'T it?? In the offseason, AJ commented that he was the ONLY stud WR from his class who wasn't extended.. Also, the writing was on the wall before they signed ex-ATL WR J. Jones. And, ex-LAR WR R. Woods has also been a disaster. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Showboat 142 Posted December 6, 2022 Seems like a case where the owners can't fire themselves, but somebody needs to be the scapegoat. No GM makes a move like that without a blessing from the top. I imagine that the GM was given an absolute maximum $ amount that the owners would be willing to invest for the Brown extension so his hands were probably tied to a certain extent. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ray_T 587 Posted December 6, 2022 4 hours ago, FantasyRetard said: This comes as a shock, especially in the middle of the season. I'm not privy to the inside of the Titans, so if someone could explain the logic of this, I'd appreciate it. This can't be just about the AJ Brown trade. I think the AJ brown trade certainly played a role. hes a young stud that they chose to let go. he also signed WR over the last couple years that did not work out and let key members of the O line go. so this wasnt exactly a great performance. I didnt think theyd fire him over it, but at the same time I did not think he was one of the higher performing GM's in the NFL Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 2,450 Posted December 7, 2022 3 hours ago, Showboat said: Seems like a case where the owners can't fire themselves, but somebody needs to be the scapegoat. No GM makes a move like that without a blessing from the top. I imagine that the GM was given an absolute maximum $ amount that the owners would be willing to invest for the Brown extension so his hands were probably tied to a certain extent. Agreed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
