Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
The Real timschochet

It’s Trump’s ideas that are the embarrassment.

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Mike Hunt said:

 

China emission's or pollution rate is 30%, India, 7%, Russia, 5%     So 42%.  Those numbers are expected to rise until the early 2030s before and if they decline.

USA is 14%, Canada, 2%, Mexico 1.5%  So around 18% total of the world emission/pollution.

Science has shown that if the USA and Canada went to almost zero combined today it would have very little impact on the globe for the next 20-30 years. 

The EVs are all good as I have one myself, but they are very little help in the big picture.

Just so you know if everyone went to zero it would have little impact on global warming.

The hubris of man thinking they can change the weather is fascinating. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Cdub100 said:

Just so you know if everyone went to zero it would have little impact on global warming.

The hubris of man thinking they can change the weather is fascinating. 

The hubris of man thinking they can pump zillions of tons of smoke into the atmosphere for over a hundred years and have it have no effect is fascinating.

Let's see.  We've killed most of our forests.  Our oceans are being depleted left and right.  Snowcaps melting.  Water running out.

Yea, man really can't impact the earth I guess...stupid phuking cultist. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Cdub100 said:

Just so you know if everyone went to zero it would have little impact on global warming.

The hubris of man thinking they can change the weather is fascinating. 

There was a CDub100 years ago who used to post on Hugh Hewitt’s website: a mormon supporter of Mitt Romney (in 2008). Is this the same guy? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said:

I’ve been told you’re not worth responding to, and I can tell that’s true. So I suggest you look up man made climate change for yourself. 

The good little liberal was "told" and obeys. Something not new in this country. 😆

Believe me, you don't need to respond. I'm just calling you out for your lack of living in reality. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

Not here it isn’t. It’s bad for Israel as well, but that’s a very different topic. 
 

Trump’s ideas are new to the extent that they haven’t been allowed in the past to rise to the forefront of the conservative movement. Now they have. They’re Trump’s because he has been their foremost exponent. 

It's not really a different topic, LOL.  You answered as expected.  "Trump's ideas" were mainstream for a long time.  Sounds like JFK's platform, who I dare say was more conservative than Trump.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, Raven Fan said:

The hubris of man thinking they can pump zillions of tons of smoke into the atmosphere for over a hundred years and have it have no effect is fascinating.

Let's see.  We've killed most of our forests.  Our oceans are being depleted left and right.  Snowcaps melting.  Water running out.

Yea, man really can't impact the earth I guess...stupid phuking cultist. 

:lol: look at this eco-extremist :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Cdub100 said:

:lol: look at this eco-extremist :lol:

How's the crabbing looking in Alaska this year?  How about crabs and oysters on the coasts?  Alaskan salmon?

Why are there so many moron cultist in the world?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Raven Fan said:

How's the crabbing looking in Alaska this year?  How about crabs and oysters on the coasts?  Alaskan salmon?

Why are there so many moron cultist in the world?

Did you know there was a rainforest in Antarctica? Probably from all those factories the dinosaurs built. As for your last question, you tell me. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Cdub100 said:

Did you know there was a rainforest in Antarctica? Probably from all those factories the dinosaurs built. As for your last question, you tell me. 

LOL

Hey, did you know man didn't evolve from apes because there are still apes?

Cultist...SMH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Raven Fan said:

LOL

Hey, did you know man didn't evolve from apes because there are still apes?

Cultist...SMH

What kind of cars did the dinosaurs build with those huge C02 factories?

I'm super worried because the earth temp has increased one full degree.

WON'T SOMEONE THINK OF THE BABY SEALS!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Cdub100 said:

What kind of cars did the dinosaurs build with those huge C02 factories?

I'm super worried because the earth temp has increased one full degree.

WON'T SOMEONE THINK OF THE BABY SEALS!!!!

How's that water out west working?  How about the massive droughts in other countries?  How about the hottest years on record all being in the last 25?

Holy chit son wakeup.  WTF do you think happens to all the smoke we throw into the atmosphere?  It just disappears?  All the polluting, over fishing, over killing, cutting down trees does?  No impact at all?

It's hard to believe that people can possibly still think this way in this day and age.

SAD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Cdub100 said:

What kind of cars did the dinosaurs build with those huge C02 factories?

I'm super worried because the earth temp has increased one full degree.

WON'T SOMEONE THINK OF THE BABY SEALS!!!!

I'm throwing paint on them now. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Casual Observer said:

It's not really a different topic, LOL.  You answered as expected.  "Trump's ideas" were mainstream for a long time.  Sounds like JFK's platform, who I dare say was more conservative than Trump.

JFK was not isolationist, or pro-tariff, or anti-immigrant. JFK’s father, Joseph Kennedy, was all of those things, so he would be much closer to Trump. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/3/2023 at 9:14 AM, zsasz said:

 

The disdain for the Ukraine aid is baffling.  We're destroying the worlds third greatest military for pennies on the dollar while not losing American lives.  We're cycling thru our old stock of military gear while showcasing newer tech AND we're getting military info about the Russians.  This is also giving putting the kernel of truth in the Russian societies public that the "strongman philosophy" of government MIGHT not be the best thing for them.  

My issue is, (peruse if you'd like), that with the massive advantage Russia has over Ukraine, how come the invasion didn't end before we even gave Ukraine $1?  Putin invaded Ukraine on February 24th.  We didn't even pass a bill to help Ukraine until May.  Are you telling me that "the worlds third greatest military" isn't strong enough to meet their goals in less than 2 months?  Seriously?  Wars only last long enough for governments to launder money for selfish needs.  If the US truly wanted to invade and take of Ukraine, and we started on February 24, we would have completed our goal by March 1st.  Russia isn't as powerful as us, so they should've been done by April 1st.  Why are they still going at 10+ months?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Cdub100 said:

What kind of cars did the dinosaurs build with those huge C02 factories?

I'm super worried because the earth temp has increased one full degree.

WON'T SOMEONE THINK OF THE BABY SEALS!!!!

The planet has a fever. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/3/2023 at 8:34 AM, The Real timschochet said:

The real problem is institutionalized racism. We need, as a society, to solve that.

All we have to do is stop voting for Democrats.  Good luck getting that to happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/3/2023 at 1:12 PM, iam90sbaby said:

Its funny watching TB and others attempt to have a genuine conversation with him. This is the kinda person you call focking retarded and move on.

I gave it a shot.  :dunno:

 

I'm getting better... I only made 3 posts in this thread and one of them wasn't a response to him.  I tried using the laughing emoji to laugh at his posts, but I ran out and can't use anymore. :angry:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

All we have to do is stop voting for Democrats.  Good luck getting that to happen.

You could easily get me to stop voting for Democrats. All Republicans have to do is 3 things: 

1. Stop the MAGA insanity. Not just Trump, but his nationalist ideas as well. 
 

2. Acknowledge man made climate change and come up with market based solutions (as opposed to the Green New Deal) to fight it. 
 

3. Stop around with peoples rights. Give all women and girls the right to an abortion. Treat LGBT with dignity and respect. 
 

Do these things and I’m your huckleberry. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, TBayXXXVII said:

My issue is, (peruse if you'd like), that with the massive advantage Russia has over Ukraine, how come the invasion didn't end before we even gave Ukraine $1?  Putin invaded Ukraine on February 24th.  We didn't even pass a bill to help Ukraine until May.  Are you telling me that "the worlds third greatest military" isn't strong enough to meet their goals in less than 2 months?  Seriously?  Wars only last long enough for governments to launder money for selfish needs.  If the US truly wanted to invade and take of Ukraine, and we started on February 24, we would have completed our goal by March 1st.  Russia isn't as powerful as us, so they should've been done by April 1st.  Why are they still going at 10+ months?

 

Per your link, Russia v. Ukraine isn't exactly U.S. versus Grenada in terms of lopsidedness.  Plus, the Ukrainans were fighting a defensive front, had more of a total mobilization and a HISTORICALLY bad taste in their mouth as to what happens when Russia wants to take over Ukraine.  Even with that being said, Russians made huge in-roads before seemingly running out of gas/resources.  Why did that happen?

Because they're corrupt as fuch. They've played a shell game with their conventional forces for years.  They've robbed Peter to pay Paul in an effort to keep up with the U.S.  It happened beofre with Reagan and SDI (Star Wars).  One of his Administrations great moves was realizing that the USSR couldn't spend dollar for dollar on the military with the US....so they hyped the ability of SDI to destroy nuclear weapons before impact (thus putting the USSR at a huge disadvantage when it came to Mutually Assured Destruction).

I'd imagine that when the historians look at this a bit further; they'll find that that country is so corrupt....military leaders THOUGHT (because it was inventoried as being there) they had more conventional weapons/supplies than they did.  It (probably the actual money that was SUPPOSED to go to supplies) was all stolen by the Oligarchy/Government/Putin.   This is all exposing that.  

 I get it....Biden = Pervert/Hates America/Sniffs Kids/Dementia/Loves Illegal Immigrants etc. etc........but THIS...this Ukraine thing is straight GOLD for the U.S....and it wouldn't have happened under Trump.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, zsasz said:

 

Per your link, Russia v. Ukraine isn't exactly U.S. versus Grenada in terms of lopsidedness.  Plus, the Ukrainans were fighting a defensive front, had more of a total mobilization and a HISTORICALLY bad taste in their mouth as to what happens when Russia wants to take over Ukraine.  Even with that being said, Russians made huge in-roads before seemingly running out of gas/resources.  Why did that happen?

Because they're corrupt as fuch. They've played a shell game with their conventional forces for years.  They've robbed Peter to pay Paul in an effort to keep up with the U.S.  It happened beofre with Reagan and SDI (Star Wars).  One of his Administrations great moves was realizing that the USSR couldn't spend dollar for dollar on the military with the US....so they hyped the ability of SDI to destroy nuclear weapons before impact (thus putting the USSR at a huge disadvantage when it came to Mutually Assured Destruction).

I'd imagine that when the historians look at this a bit further; they'll find that that country is so corrupt....military leaders THOUGHT (because it was inventoried as being there) they had more conventional weapons/supplies than they did.  It (probably the actual money that was SUPPOSED to go to supplies) was all stolen by the Oligarchy/Government/Putin.   This is all exposing that.  

 I get it....Biden = Pervert/Hates America/Sniffs Kids/Dementia/Loves Illegal Immigrants etc. etc........but THIS...this Ukraine thing is straight GOLD for the U.S....and it wouldn't have happened under Trump.  

First off, who said anything about Grenada?

Secondly, this war didn't need to happen for us to find out what we did about Russia... I'm pretty sure we all knew. 

Lastly, you're right, this wouldn't have happened under Trump because he didn't have a need to launder money to Ukraine like Biden did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, TBayXXXVII said:

First off, who said anything about Grenada?

Secondly, this war didn't need to happen for us to find out what we did about Russia... I'm pretty sure we all knew. 

Lastly, you're right, this wouldn't have happened under Trump because he didn't have a need to launder money to Ukraine like Biden did.

So Russia wouldn't have invaded Ukraine under Trump because Trump didn't have a need to launder money to Ukraine........... Gotcha.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, zsasz said:

So Russia wouldn't have invaded Ukraine under Trump because Trump didn't have a need to launder money to Ukraine........... Gotcha.

ALL wars start because of money.  ALL wars last, because of money.  This can't be proven, of course, but I have no doubt that Russia does not invade Ukraine had Trump won.  Also, I have some doubt that this happens if a different Democrat had won.  I think that had Bernie won, there's no invasion either.  Also pretty confident that it doesn't happen had Buttigieg or Klobuchar won.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×