Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Blue Horseshoe

Congresswoman Linda Sanchez (HOR-D/CA38) Attempts To "Cancel" The Wrong "Marcus Allen"

Recommended Posts

 

Democratic Representative Attempts to Tie Twitter Account To Witness During Weaponization Committee Meeting

Marcus Allen: 'That Is Absolutely Not My Account'...California representative Linda Sanchez attempted to attribute a Twitter account to a witness during a Thursday Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government meeting....The meeting featured testimony from three FBI whistleblowers claiming the agency targeted pro-life groups along with practicing Catholics and parents attending school board meetings by identifying them as a domestic (terrorism) threats.

Sanchez asked suspended FBI staff operations specialist Marcus Allen if he used Twitter, to which Allen responded he had “utilized” the platform.

The California representative continued by asking Allen if his Twitter handle was XX@XXMarcusA97050645.

“That is absolutely not my account,” ..... FBI staff operations specialist responded.

Sanchez.... “On December 5, 2022, an account under the name Marcus Allen retweeted a tweet that said quote —”

“That’s not my account, ma’am,” Allen repeated.

“You haven’t let me finish the question, sir,” Sanchez contested. “The time is mine.”

“On December 5, 2022, an account under the name of Marcus Allen retweeted a tweet that said, quote, ‘Nancy Pelosi staged January 6. Retweet if you agree,'” she continued, asking Allen if he agreed with the statement. Allen attempted to reiterate the account did not belong to him though was cut off by Sanchez who said, “I’m asking whether you agree with that statement, yes or no.”

A number of lawmakers jokingly associated Sanchez with a user by the same name — who tweeted “Donald Trump is the greatest President of my lifetime” — in an attempt to demonstrate Twitter account owners may share the same name.

https://timcast.com/news/democratic-representative-attempts-to-tie-twitter-account-to-witness-during-weaponization-committee-meeting/

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

The "Streisand Effect" is in play here. The overall American public didn't pay attention to this issue, because it's been mostly suppressed in the national daily media cycle by the activist complicit hard left leaning MSM. 

However Linda Sanchez (D) made a huge mistake in highlighting the entire hearing and testimony of these FBI Agents by taking a cheap shot and attempting to smear "Marcus Allen" with a social media account that did not belong to him. Now Allen and the entire controversy/hearing have all gone viral. Sanchez played stupid games and now the entire DNC has to reap the clear stupid prizes that comes with it. 

Here is his testimony, along with the statements of the other two FBI Agents 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Liberals are ok with all of this. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

(Sanchez) supports gay rights and opposes discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender.[18] On October 4, 2011, Sánchez made a statement on LGBT History Month, saying: "We must continue to strive to end discrimination in the workplace based on sexual orientation and fight so that all Americans have the right to marry and start families with those they love. I remain committed to supporting marriage equality, investments in HIV/AIDS care, treatment and research, and campaigns that take action against bullying in schools."[24]

Sánchez married Jim Sullivan on April 13, 2009, in the district office of Congressman John B. Larson, who introduced the two about two years before the wedding.[37] The marriage is Sánchez's second, and Sullivan has three sons from a previous marriage.[38] On May 13, 2009, she became the eighth woman to give birth while serving in Congress when she had her first son.[39]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linda_S%C3%A1nchez

 

 

 

******

Linda Sanchez is one of a very small handful of women who have given birth while as a sitting member of Congress. 

It is common etiquette in Congressional hearings to call her and many others as "Congresswoman" 

The question becomes why is this acceptable and why is this not seen as an attack on the LGBT community? 

Shouldn't Linda Sanchez ask, based on her clear record of LGBT activism, to be called a "Congressional Birthing Person" instead?  Wouldn't it indicate that she's clearly a bigot if she refuses to do so and because she has not yet done so? 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Congresswoman Linda Sanchez (HOR-D/CA38)"

That's commentary is all you need to know about the OP, Blue Horseshoe (aka GordonGekko) and the value of the threads he starts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Liberals are so stupid.

Sanchez is so fat. Of course she is, she’s stupid, pissed and has blue or purple hair.  Every time. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Liberals are so stupid.

But entertaining.....  you have to admit.  Democrats are a living SNL skit man 🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, squistion said:

"Congresswoman Linda Sanchez (HOR-D/CA38)"

That's commentary is all you need to know about the OP, Blue Horseshoe (aka GordonGekko) and the value of the threads he starts.

The fact that you try to belittle OP instead of addressing the issue tells us all we need to know about your retarded ass :doh: Bet you thought she had a good point too didn’t you? 😂

  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, BillyKing said:

The fact that you try to belittle OP instead of addressing the issue tells us all we need to know about your retarded ass :doh: Bet you thought she had a good point too didn’t you? 

It is impossible for anyone to seriously address the issue when the OP refers to the Congresswoman as (HOR-D/CA38).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, squistion said:

It is impossible for anyone to seriously address the issue when the OP refers to the Congresswoman as (HOR-D/CA38).

No, its not, but use any means available to avoid the truth of course.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, squistion said:

It is impossible for anyone to seriously address the issue when the OP refers to the Congresswoman as (HOR-D/CA38).

Sure you can. You just don’t want to. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, squistion said:

It is impossible for anyone to seriously address the issue when the OP refers to the Congresswoman as (HOR-D/CA38).

Am I missing something?  Is the congresswoman not a Democrat in the House of Representatives representing the 38th district of California? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, DonS said:

Am I missing something?  Is the congresswoman not a Democrat in the House of Representatives representing the 38th district of California? 

Yes, but that designation is redundant, since he already said that she is a "congresswoman" 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, squistion said:

Yes, but that designation is redundant, since he already said that she is a "congresswoman" 

Oh is that why you can't take it "seriously"?   That's pretty focking lame if true. :rolleyes:

Thank God he didn't say anything ridiculous like not needing to know basic math because of muh phone has a calculator. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I’ve met Linda Sanchez. I’ve helped her with the YMCA in Lakewood. She’s a great woman, very pro-business. I like her and trust her. 

She’s a scum bag and a crook. Figures toy would like and trust her.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/11/08/linda-sanchez-house-democrats-978770

“Sources close to the 49-year-old Sanchez said she has no thoughts of resigning or retiring from office. However, the allegations against Sullivan directly involve Sanchez, a former ranking member of the House Ethics Committee.”

“Sullivan is alleged to have improperly charged personal expenses to the Connecticut Municipal Electric Energy Cooperative, a consortium of six municipal electric utilities. These alleged improper expenses included taking Sanchez to the Kentucky Derby in 2013 and 2014. Those trips were first reported by the Norwich Bulletin in early 2017.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I understand the confusion regarding the topic stating "Congresswoman" followed by HOR. 

I think the OP meant to type WH0RE but his phone probably autocorrected.  Hate when that happens. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Disgusting pigs. Her, Nadler and Porter.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/20/2023 at 1:28 PM, Dizkneelande said:

She’s a scum bag and a crook. Figures toy would like and trust her.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/11/08/linda-sanchez-house-democrats-978770

“Sources close to the 49-year-old Sanchez said she has no thoughts of resigning or retiring from office. However, the allegations against Sullivan directly involve Sanchez, a former ranking member of the House Ethics Committee.”

“Sullivan is alleged to have improperly charged personal expenses to the Connecticut Municipal Electric Energy Cooperative, a consortium of six municipal electric utilities. These alleged improper expenses included taking Sanchez to the Kentucky Derby in 2013 and 2014. Those trips were first reported by the Norwich Bulletin in early 2017.”

She’s not a scumbag and I don’t think she’s a crook either .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

She’s not a scumbag and I don’t think she’s a crook either .

She married a fraudster, she's pro immigration, she's anti gun and she's fat and ugly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

She’s not a scumbag and I don’t think she’s a crook either .

I just showed proof of being a crook are you this much of a partisan hack? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Dizkneelande said:

I just showed proof of being a crook are you this much of a partisan hack? 

No. You linked to an unproven allegation. 
 

I think you’re the partisan hack in that you tend to demonize those you disagree with. You’re not the only one here who does that, 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, iam90sbaby said:

She married a fraudster, she's pro immigration, she's anti gun and she's fat and ugly.

Her views on immigration and guns tend to match my own: Your sexism about her looks is irrelevant though it’s telling about you. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

No. You linked to an unproven allegation. 
 

I think you’re the partisan hack in that you tend to demonize those you disagree with. You’re not the only one here who does that, 

You’re a total douche bag. Her husband went to prison for something she was directly involved in. 
 

https://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/wireStory/california-congresswomans-husband-sentenced-prison-connecticut-fraud-case-99414345

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another thread where Tim fawns over a total crap bag Democrat. What’s the count of how many of these crap bags Tim has fawned over? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Dizkneelande said:

Another thread where Tim fawns over a total crap bag Democrat. What’s the count of how many of these crap bags Tim has fawned over? 

Then he Pearl clutches over anything Trump does. Zero credibility.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

You’re a total douche bag. Her husband went to prison for something she was directly involved in. 
 

https://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/wireStory/california-congresswomans-husband-sentenced-prison-connecticut-fraud-case-99414345

I wasn’t aware of this. 
 

It’s upsetting to read. I really liked her personally. I don’t know very many politicians. I hope she’s not a criminal herself. If she is then I feel betrayed. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I wasn’t aware of this. 
 

It’s upsetting to read. I really liked her personally. I don’t know very many politicians. I hope she’s not a criminal herself. If she is then I feel betrayed. 

I might suggest that you should not feel anything about this person.  Politicians are not worthy of our feelings in this way.  They are not heroic.   They are just people, and people who sought power.  That alone should ensure our cautious allowance for them.

We need to stop elevating government, and the people in it, to some celebratory status. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I might suggest that you should not feel anything about this person.  Politicians are not worthy of our feelings in this way.  They are not heroic.   They are just people, and people who sought power.  That alone should ensure our cautious allowance for them.

We need to stop elevating government, and the people in it, to some celebratory status. 

I would think pretty much all of them are dirty in some way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol: at the Marcus Allen line of questioning from the same dingbat from the Congressional Baseball game flap. That's embarassing.

Giving Maxine Waters a run for the money as the Congressional Democrat's ding-dong clown.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

No. You linked to an unproven allegation. 
 

I think you’re the partisan hack in that you tend to demonize those you disagree with. You’re not the only one here who does that, 

LOL, the irony.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

LOL, the irony.

He’s the ultimate dogmatist. Here’s true irony. I despise the Republican Party but I’m the partisan hack. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/20/2023 at 3:16 PM, squistion said:

It is impossible for anyone to seriously address the issue when the OP refers to the Congresswoman as (HOR-D/CA38).

Why?  When I read that, I saw it as "House Of Representatives".  I mean, Congresswomen can be Senators too, can they not?

Wait... I get it.  It's you projecting how you feel onto others.  My bad.  Now I get it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

He’s the ultimate dogmatist. Here’s true irony. I despise the Republican Party but I’m the partisan hack. 

Yeah, I mean the audacity of someone from the left to say that after the 2016-2020 time frame in this country is pretty astounding.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Voltaire said:

:lol: at the Marcus Allen line of questioning from the same dingbat from the Congressional Baseball game flap. That's embarassing.

Giving Maxine Waters a run for the money as the Congressional Democrat's ding-dong clown.

Predictable......it is the goto.   They cannot argue the facts so instead they have to denigrate the person.  Liberlism in action. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Voltaire said:

:lol: at the Marcus Allen line of questioning from the same dingbat from the Congressional Baseball game flap. That's embarassing.

Giving Maxine Waters a run for the money as the Congressional Democrat's ding-dong clown.

I vaguely remember some congresswoman (HOR - (D)umb b1tch) complaining about something during the baseball game.  What were the details again? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×