Trump's Cognitive Decline and Health

[Ron_Artest]

DARK BRANDON

[Maximum Overkill]

 

[Maximum Overkill]

 

[ROCK BOTTOM]

 

[Ron_Artest]

 

[Ron_Artest]

[Hardcore troubadour]

Putin threatening to use nukes. Good times. 

[wiffleball]

Heard a guy who worked with Don on the Apprentice. He said it's a badly kept secret that the Adderall and other drugs make Trump explosively shat without control.   One of the reason he looks puffy is he's worm diapers for years. 

[Horseman]

Food drops for Ukraine!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Ron_Artest]

 

[Ron_Artest]

 

[thegeneral]

52 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

 

*poll taken within the Trump family

[squistion]

Oh, my. 

 

[Ron_Artest]

 

[squistion]

 

[seafoam1]

If Trump has cognitive decline, that means creepy joe is officially pronounced dead. 

[Ron_Artest]

 

[Maximum Overkill]

 

[Maximum Overkill]

1 hour ago, Ron_Artest said:

 

 

[squistion]

 

[Reality]

Lol, the, 'I know you are but l, what am I?' defense isn't working. Good effort though.

[Reality]

1 hour ago, squistion said:

 

This post has 1 like, should I assume that's you?

My God you're a loser.

[squistion]

37 minutes ago, Reality said:

This post has 1 like, should I assume that's you?

My God you're a loser.

Thank you! 

[Maximum Overkill]

4 minutes ago, squistion said:

Thank you! 

 

[Hardcore troubadour]

39 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

 

Nailed it. GAG are great Americans. 

[MDC]

1 hour ago, Maximum Overkill said:

 

Another tranny thread!  

[squistion]

42 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Nailed it. GAG are great Americans. 

Gays Against Groomers is an anti-gay, anti-LGBTQ organization that has no gays in it.

[Hardcore troubadour]

46 minutes ago, squistion said:

Gays Against Groomers is an anti-gay, anti-LGBTQ organization that has no gays in it.

Prove it. I don’t believe you. 

[squistion]

11 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Prove it. I don’t believe you. 

I can't if they don't have any LGBTQ members. One can't prove a negative. If they got some member or spokesman who is gay, that should be easy to find if they have publicly identified as such. 

Look it up, they are described as an anti-LGBTQ group (the "G" in that standing for "gay). 

[Hardcore troubadour]

1 hour ago, squistion said:

I can't if they don't have any LGBTQ members. One can't prove a negative. If they got some member or spokesman who is gay, that should be easy to find if they have publicly identified as such. 

Look it up, they are described as an anti-LGBTQ group (the "G" in that standing for "gay). 

The founder, Jaimmie Mitchell, is a lesbian. The L part of Lgbtq.  She’s been called the “Candace Owens of Lesbians “.   

[Pimpadeaux]

https://www.yahoo.com/news/looks-lost-alarm-trumps-mind-141056839.html

[Hardcore troubadour]

Another busy weekend for the Boss. Biden was in the basement. 

[The Psychic Observer]

2 hours ago, squistion said:

I can't if they don't have any LGBTQ members. One can't prove a negative. If they got some member or spokesman who is gay, that should be easy to find if they have publicly identified as such. 

Look it up, they are described as an anti-LGBTQ group (the "G" in that standing for "gay). 

They're probably gay, but their primary goal is money and politics.  They're using their gayness to exploit people and separate idiots from their money.  They are right wing political hacks.

They're not a bunch of gay people that decided that they want to protect kids from abuse.  They are a group of right wing con artists who happen to be gay and this is their latest grift.

https://www.advocate.com/news/gays-against-groomers-exposed

[Hardcore troubadour]

The Advocate. Lol. 

[Horseman]

2 hours ago, squistion said:

I can't if they don't have any LGBTQ members. One can't prove a negative. If they got some member or spokesman who is gay, that should be easy to find if they have publicly identified as such. 

Look it up, they are described as an anti-LGBTQ group (the "G" in that standing for "gay). 

You need to stop saying that.  It's an incorrect way to assign burden of proof. You look incredibly stupid every time you say it.

You are making the claim that there are not any gay members of Gays Against Groomers.  If you're the one making that claim the burden of proof is on you.

But either way: They don't have gay members OR they do have gay members. They're opposite claims, not negative.  You can prove one and disprove the other by simply listing out all their members and their sexual orientation.  

[squistion]

2 hours ago, Horseman said:

You need to stop saying that.  It's an incorrect way to assign burden of proof. You look incredibly stupid every time you say it.

You are making the claim that there are not any gay members of Gays Against Groomers.  If you're the one making that claim the burden of proof is on you.

But either way: They don't have gay members OR they do have gay members. They're opposite claims, not negative.  You can prove one and disprove the other by simply listing out all their members and their sexual orientation.  

So all of the members have listed their sexual orientation on line? 

[Horseman]

7 minutes ago, squistion said:

So all of the members have listed their sexual orientation on line? 

If the information isn't available then you have no basis for your claim.  

[squistion]

Just now, Horseman said:

If the information isn't available then you have no basis for your claim.  

Oh, yes I do. If you can't find any LGBTQ folks (except one lesbian and I haven't looked into that) that you can't claim that the organization is comprised of "gays" (like the name suggests). What this is, is an anti-LGBTQ group that calls itself Gays Against Groomers to give itself a false legitimacy so as to appeal to homophobic, transphobic  folks here like Hardcore, Maximum (aka League Champion) or Seafoam. 

[Horseman]

16 minutes ago, squistion said:

Oh, yes I do. If you can't find any LGBTQ folks (except one lesbian and I haven't looked into that) that you can't claim that the organization is comprised of "gays" (like the name suggests). What this is, is an anti-LGBTQ group that calls itself Gays Against Groomers to give itself a false legitimacy so as to appeal to homophobic, transphobic  folks here like Hardcore, Maximum (aka League Champion) or Seafoam. 

It's your claim, the burden of proof is on you. 

17 hours ago, squistion said:

Gays Against Groomers is an anti-gay, anti-LGBTQ organization that has no gays in it.

If you can't prove it like HT asked you to then Hitchens's razor applies, what is asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence.

You lose. 

[squistion]

20 minutes ago, Horseman said:

It's your claim, the burden of proof is on you. 

If you can't prove it like HT asked you to then Hitchens's razor applies, what is asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence.

You lose. 

From Wiki:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gays_Against_Groomers

Gays Against Groomers is an American far-right and anti-LGBT organization known for campaigning against gender-affirming care for minors, protesting school curriculum content with LGBT themes, and criticizing Drag Queen Story Hour events.

[...]

A spokesperson for the LGBT advocacy group GLAAD has claimed that the group uses the slur "groomer" along with ambiguous messaging to perpetuate the LGBT grooming conspiracy theory. GAG helped organize an anti-LGBTQ rally in Florida that was attended by other far-right and anti-LGBTQ organizations such as Moms for Liberty and the Proud Boys.