Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, cyclone24 said:

Lol… I don’t know which I enjoy more the fake outrage or the hypocrisy 

In their defense, it’s hard to keep track of your outrage when you’re flying a different flag every week supporting any other country but America 

Class Liberal 101.

Spot on.

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Stupid Rusty posted another story that he didn’t bother to read. What a maroon! 

Don't forget the follow up outrage. That's key.

Posted

Who knows?  I hate war, I hate any American lives in danger, hell my own kids are close to military age.  However it’s 2026. I do not trust Iran. They lie and steal and cheat and prey on the weak and do not negotiate. Boom, Shake the Room!

  • Sad 1
Posted

Diplomats claim Trump’s special envoy undermined Iran talks A Persian Gulf diplomat with direct knowledge of the talks told MS NOW exclusively that Steve Witkoff’s description of a key conversation was false.

>>>President Donald Trump’s special envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, said Monday on Fox News that Iranian negotiators bragged to him that Iran had enough enriched uranium to make nearly a dozen nuclear bombs.

The account fits a key piece of the administration’s evolving rationale for joining with Israel to preemptively strike Iran: Trump himself has said he believes the Iranian regime was close to having nuclear weapons, as well as missiles capable of carrying them to the United States.

“In that first meeting, both the Iranian negotiators said to us directly, with no shame, that they controlled 460 kilograms of 60%,” Witkoff said in the Fox interview, referring to the uranium’s level of enrichment. “And they’re aware that that could make 11 nuclear bombs, and that was the beginning of their negotiating stance.”

“They were proud of it,” Witkoff added. “They were proud that they had evaded all sorts of oversight protocols to get to a place where they could deliver 11 nuclear bombs.”

However, a Persian Gulf diplomat with direct knowledge of the talks told MS NOW that Witkoff’s description of the conversation was false. 

The Iranians told Witkoff that Iran was willing to give up the enriched uranium as part of a new agreement with Trump, according to the Persian Gulf diplomat, who spoke on condition of anonymity. The Iranians also told Witkoff that Iran enriched the uranium after Trump pulled out of a 2017 nuclear agreement brokered by the Obama administration.

“I can categorically state that this is inaccurate,” said the diplomat, referring to Witkoff’s account. “He was explaining that all of this material can all go away should we have a deal and Iran can be relieved from sanctions.” 

Anna Kelly, a White House spokesperson, dismissed the claims. 

… “The President and special envoy Witkoff have always worked in good faith in order to eliminate threats posed to our homeland.

“Unfortunately, Iran refused to participate in serious negotiations with the United States,” Kelly added, “so the President took courageous action to destroy their ability to have a nuclear weapon, launch or produce ballistic missiles, or arm terrorist proxies.”

The starkly different accounts of how the negotiations unfolded appear to reflect long-running tensions and mistrust between Witkoff and Iranian officials. The public airing of the dispute could also complicate efforts to negotiate a ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran in a conflict that has now spread to a dozen countries in the Middle East.

In a call with reporters Tuesday, senior Trump administration officials speaking on condition of anonymity said the Iranians never offered to significantly compromise. Their proposals would have allowed Iran to continue to pursue a nuclear bomb, the U.S. officials said, and Iranian negotiators refused to discuss their country’s ballistic missiles and its funding of proxy groups, two vital issues for the Trump administration.

A second person with knowledge of the talks confirmed that Iranian officials declined to discuss their country’s ballistic missiles and its funding of proxy groups with Witkoff and Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law, and said those issues could be discussed in regional talks.

The first round of talks, held on Feb. 6 in Muscat, Oman, was primarily conducted indirectly, according to the Persian Gulf diplomat. Omani intermediaries held separate meetings with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and then with Witkoff and Kushner.

The Omanis later brought Witkoff, Kushner and Araghchi together in person at the end of the day, and they briefly exchanged pleasantries.

“The Iranian and U.S. delegations met for approximately 4 to 5 minutes together,” the Persian Gulf diplomat said. “The subject matter that Mr. Wikoff referred to did absolutely not come up during that brief meeting between the two delegations.”

“Mr. Witkoff conducted himself in a manner not befitting the office he represented,” the Persian Gulf diplomat said.

The Persian Gulf diplomat added that Araghchi said he was prepared to stay in Oman and continue talking with Witkoff and Kushner for as long as it took, “even if it’s one to two weeks.” But Witkoff and Kushner said they needed to leave the following day to visit the U.S. aircraft carrier Abraham Lincoln.

The episode highlights a central challenge of efforts to avert war through negotiations: Some of the people involved in the talks did not view Witkoff as an honest broker, according to sources with direct knowledge of the U.S.-Iranian discussions.

In December, the same Persian Gulf diplomat criticized Witkoff’s conduct in five rounds of negotiations that took place with Iranian officials last year, telling MS NOW that Witkoff presented a “bogus misrepresentation of himself as a ‘man of peace’” during the five rounds of talks, which ended when Israel, and then the U.S., carried out surprise air strikes on Iran in June 2025.

“Mr. Witkoff conducted himself in a manner not befitting the office he represented,” the Persian Gulf diplomat said.

Another person with knowledge of the 2025 talks who is not from Iran told MS NOW in December that Iranian officials came to believe they were misled by the U.S. Tehran viewed the talks with Witkoff as a ruse designed to keep Iran from expecting and preparing for the surprise June 2025 Israeli and U.S. strikes.

“It’s seen by the Iranians as an insult,” the second person with direct knowledge of the talks said.

The person said they were surprised that Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who also serves as national security adviser, did not participate in the talks. 

“We were surprised, given the importance of the talks, that Secretary Rubio, as America’s most senior diplomat and national security advisor, wasn’t diverted to Geneva to participate in the talks,” the person said.

During the first round of talks in Oman on Feb. 6, Rubio attended the Winter Olympics in Milan. During the second round of talks in Geneva on Feb. 17, he attended meetings and briefings at the State Department and the White House, per his official schedule. And during the final round of talks in Geneva on Feb. 26, two days before the airstrikes began, Rubio was at the White House meeting with the Greek foreign minister.<<<

Posted
1 hour ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

No name, no unit, no rank. How does that foot in your mouth taste? lol. 😂 💯🤡🌮

What always cracks me up about these ‘Journalism, What the hell is that?!?” discussions (no I don’t want to discuss) is that maga folks never read the articles. They won’t look at original documentation either if they challenge the reporting. It’s like the movement for this kind of “Alternative” politics means specifically avoiding being informed. Thus links are treated like poison Ivy or a radioactive isotope. Click it? Read it? No way!

  • Like 1
Posted

Assigning a Jersey real estate developer, while locking out & purging professional diplomatic & military & intelligence personnel, to all of Gaza, Ukraine & Iran has yielded catastrophic results. 

Surprisingly the guy who does parking lots & pass-through LLCs didn’t know what to make of explanations of nuclear testing protocols.

Posted
1 minute ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Assigning a Jersey real estate developer, while locking out & purging professional diplomatic & military & intelligence personnel, to all of Gaza, Ukraine & Iran has yielded catastrophic results. 

Surprisingly the guy who does parking lots & pass-through LLCs didn’t know what to make of explanations of nuclear testing protocols.

And yet things are going great in my world. :dunno:

3 more years. My vote won and I'm going to enjoy the term. :thumbsup:

Posted

>>>

However, a Persian Gulf diplomat with direct knowledge of the talks told MS NOW that Witkoff’s description of the conversation was false. 

The Iranians told Witkoff that Iran was willing to give up the enriched uranium as part of a new agreement with Trump, according to the Persian Gulf diplomat, who spoke on condition of anonymity. The Iranians also told Witkoff that Iran enriched the uranium after Trump pulled out of a 2017 nuclear agreement brokered by the Obama administration.

“I can categorically state that this is inaccurate,” said the diplomat, referring to Witkoff’s account. “He was explaining that all of this material can all go away should we have a deal and Iran can be relieved from sanctions.” <<<

Posted
23 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

What always cracks me up about these ‘Journalism, What the hell is that?!?” discussions (no I don’t want to discuss) is that maga folks never read the articles. They won’t look at original documentation either if they challenge the reporting. It’s like the movement for this kind of “Alternative” politics means specifically avoiding being informed. Thus links are treated like poison Ivy or a radioactive isotope. Click it? Read it? No way!

Can you read it for me  and tell me the name unit and rank of the soldier that said all of this? Thanks. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

When the grotesque national-socialist tip of the influencing spear refuse to take their morning red pill.

Biden released all those files under your demands. Why is this an issue with you now?

Posted
15 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

When the grotesque national-socialist tip of the influencing spear refuse to take their morning red pill.

Support by votes  

Posted
30 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Can you read it for me  and tell me the name unit and rank of the soldier that said all of this? Thanks. 

Guess not. 

Posted
9 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Just looked it up. You have never mentioned a soldiers death since you began posting here. 

 

9 hours ago, TimHauck said:

You mean in the last 2 years because that’s as far back as FFT lets you search?

Guess so

Posted
3 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

When the grotesque national-socialist tip of the influencing spear refuse to take their morning red pill.

Until now Democrats were a collection of every turd faction in the country under their umbrella except one. We were stuck with the Groypers, so we kept locked in the basement, face pressed against the glass, licking the window.

I guess they didn't like that too much.

Well now the Dems have the Groypers too. Hopefully the Groypers take over the Democratic Party; at least they don't hate the country, although I don't know why the Dems would want them. Groypers have now strategically positioned themselves to shine the shoes of the DEI crowd. Maybe Nick Fuentes can offer Rashida Tlaib a foot massage. Good luck with that.

Posted
3 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

When the grotesque national-socialist tip of the influencing spear refuse to take their morning red pill.

 

2 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

Until now Democrats were a collection of every turd faction in the country under their umbrella except one. We were stuck with the Groypers, so we kept locked in the basement, face pressed against the glass, licking the window.

I guess they didn't like that too much.

Well now the Dems have the Groypers too. Hopefully the Groypers take over the Democratic Party; at least they don't hate the country, although I don't know why the Dems would want them. Groypers have now strategically positioned themselves to shine the shoes of the DEI crowd. Maybe Nicj Fuentes can offer Rashida Tlaib a foot massage. Good luck with that.

@cyclone24 will probably say he knows who Fuentes is now if he can accuse him of being a Democrat 

Posted
20 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

 

@cyclone24 will probably say he knows who Fuentes is now if he can accuse him of being a Democrat 

Personally I love being able to point out that Nick Fuentes supports Democrats. That negates a primary tactic the left uses. "Look at that racist freak over there with turds dangling from his unwashed ass. See what he says? All Trump voters are like that." 

The Groypers have joined hands in unity with race hustlers on the left, so now every racist of every color is a Democrat. Groypers new buddies are the Communists, trannies, criminal cuddlers, welfare cheats, and open borders advocates.

We're the inheritors of Martin Luther King's dream and we're going after the working and middle class black and brown vote. Hard working people of any decency who love the country should not be Democrats. We don't need Gropers sullying the message, go join the Democrats then as$holes. 

Nicole Hannah Jones needs her drink refilled, Nick. Al Sharpton needs his reading glasses. Get to it.

Posted
1 minute ago, Voltaire said:

Personally I love being able to point out that Nick Fuentes supports Democrats. That negates a primary tactic the left uses. "Look at that racist freak over there with turds dangling from his unwashed ass. See what he says? All Trump voters are like that." 

The Groypers have joined hands in unity with race hustlers on the left, so now every racist of every color is a Democrat. Groypers new buddies are the Communists, trannies, criminal cuddlers, welfare cheats, and open borders advoates.

Nicole Hannah Jones needs her drink refilled, Nick. Get to it.

Lol has he said he supports Democrats?  Certainly not in that clip.  Their criticism seems directed at Trump and the current administration, not Republicans.  One can support Republicans but not support Trump.  Which is one possibility for Thomas Crooks’s views for example.

Posted
5 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Lol has he said he supports Democrats?  Certainly not in that clip.  Their criticism seems directed at Trump and the current administration, not Republicans.  One can support Republicans but not support Trump.  Which is one possibility for Thomas Crooks’s views for example.

Dude is homeless. You don't want him either? I thought you were all about compassion for scumbags and turds?

Posted
6 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

Dude is homeless. You don't want him either? I thought you were all about compassion for scumbags and turds?

His comments like “saving America” in that clip sound more like typical Republican rhetoric to me, but that he just thinks Trump was the wrong choice among Republicans.

Posted
7 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

When the grotesque national-socialist tip of the influencing spear refuse to take their morning red pill.

Wait, we can get these two weirdos out of MAGA,... #Winning!!!! This is even more reason to know Trump's actions are correct.

Posted
15 hours ago, dogcows said:

I worry that this is what Iran wants. American ships trapped in a narrow strait to be targeted by as-yet-undiscovered missile launch sites.

I'm not all that concerned.

Posted
12 hours ago, nobody said:

Too bad the higher power guiding this force for good was on vacation when Trump was banging minors on Epstein island.

He wasn't. That's all made up. Go vote super hard for a liberal if you can't see that.

Posted
1 hour ago, Gepetto said:

Wait, we can get these two weirdos out of MAGA,... #Winning!!!! This is even more reason to know Trump's actions are correct.

Nick Fuentes is a complete fraud. Also gay af.

Jones used to be legit. Then he was either threatened or paid to change his tune. Maybe both.

Posted
9 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

>>>

However, a Persian Gulf diplomat with direct knowledge of the talks told MS NOW that Witkoff’s description of the conversation was false. 

The Iranians told Witkoff that Iran was willing to give up the enriched uranium as part of a new agreement with Trump, according to the Persian Gulf diplomat, who spoke on condition of anonymity. The Iranians also told Witkoff that Iran enriched the uranium after Trump pulled out of a 2017 nuclear agreement brokered by the Obama administration.

“I can categorically state that this is inaccurate,” said the diplomat, referring to Witkoff’s account. “He was explaining that all of this material can all go away should we have a deal and Iran can be relieved from sanctions.” <<<

name of Persian diplomat?

That is what I thought.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Voltaire said:

Until now Democrats were a collection of every turd faction in the country under their umbrella except one. We were stuck with the Groypers, so we kept locked in the basement, face pressed against the glass, licking the window.

I guess they didn't like that too much.

Well now the Dems have the Groypers too. Hopefully the Groypers take over the Democratic Party; at least they don't hate the country, although I don't know why the Dems would want them. Groypers have now strategically positioned themselves to shine the shoes of the DEI crowd. Maybe Nick Fuentes can offer Rashida Tlaib a foot massage. Good luck with that.

Oooof. Did you watch the video? Fuentes and Jones aren't supporting democrats. Jones nearly lost his shlt (again) explaining he was being called a liberal for speaking out against the current regime.

And MAGA completely owns the Groypers. The GOP is infested with those vermin right now. They ain't gonna start voting dem just because the cockwomble decided to start a war in the ME. There's trannies to hate on, FFS!

  • Thanks 1
Posted
Just now, shadrap said:

name of Persian diplomat?

That is what I thought.

Do you know who ISN'T a diplomat? Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner. Who's been doing the negotiating? Witkoff and Kushner. Why? Business interests intertwined with the Trump family. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, shadrap said:

name of Persian diplomat?

That is what I thought.

Yeah, they’re doing this anonymous shitt all over the place, even in a time of war. Pure garbage. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Fnord said:

Do you know who ISN'T a diplomat? Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner. Who's been doing the negotiating? Witkoff and Kushner. Why? Business interests intertwined with the Trump family. 

So no name?

Posted

It is so hard to know what the hell is going on anymore.  With all the "journalists," news outlets, social media bots and AI, it's damn near impossible to follow along.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...