Trump talk only- no Eagles talk allowed (Steelers talk is OK though)

[Mike Honcho]

13 hours ago, Strike said:

What do you mean not verified?  They absolutely edited it.  Not the first time theyve done similar.  Catherine Herridge called them out big time for it.

Of course they edited it. When has 60 minutes or any news program ever shown you an unedited package? 

[The Real timschochet]

2 minutes ago, Horseman said:

I was wondering how you were going to avoid admitting Trump is leading in both polls and betting markets.  

He’s not leading in most polls. He is leading in betting markets (though not all.) 

[Bill E.]

3 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

See my above comment. 

I saw.  You guys were all three steps ahead of me.   I need to just stay out of it and keep working.

[Strike]

Just now, Mike Honcho said:

Of course they edited it. When has 60 minutes or any news program ever shown you an unedited package? 

No.  They released a clip prior to the full show and then edited it to make Kamalatoe's word salad more palatable when the prerelesse clip was mocked.

[RLLD]

4 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Well Axios is much more fair. They note that these are comments by a few stray Dems and that the leadership (led by Jeffries) have no intention of challenging anything. Gateway Pundit on the other hand implies that it’s all Democrats and @RLLD made the same assumption in his commentary. 

Have to call this out for the untruth that it is, I did no such thing.  I will assume this was just an honest mistake and did not have intent.

[edjr]

12 hours ago, jerryskids said:

I'd like to be a fly on the wall when he found out that Kamala did an interview with a podcaster who discusses topics like best blow job techniques.   

Why don’t you tell us some of the favorites you use.

[Strike]

1 minute ago, Bill E. said:

I saw.  You guys were all three steps ahead of me.   I need to just stay out of it and keep working.

Are you posting while diving?

[The Real timschochet]

Just now, RLLD said:

Have to call this out for the untruth that it is, I did no such thing.  I will assume this was just an honest mistake and did not have intent.

Sorry that’s how I read your post. 

[RLLD]

Just now, The Real timschochet said:

Sorry that’s how I read your post. 

You did not ask, you inferred.  I get that, you have a perception of those who do not follow your ideological stances and apply it where dissention arises.

No biggie, I will comment on what is provided, based on reality, simple common sense and a voracious appetite for reading as much as possible

[Hardcore troubadour]

7 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

Of course they edited it. When has 60 minutes or any news program ever shown you an unedited package? 

Look at this Toadie. 

[The Real timschochet]

7 minutes ago, RLLD said:

You did not ask, you inferred.  I get that, you have a perception of those who do not follow your ideological stances and apply it where dissention arises.

No biggie, I will comment on what is provided, based on reality, simple common sense and a voracious appetite for reading as much as possible

It was easy to infer. You wrote “Democrats have shown us who they are.” Later on you wrote “Democrats are terrified”. You never wrote “A few Democrats” or “some Democrats”; you made a blanket statement. And IMO a completely false one which lacks the common sense that you claim to be relying on. 

[Mike Honcho]

9 minutes ago, Strike said:

No.  They released a clip prior to the full show and then edited it to make Kamalatoe's word salad more palatable when the prerelesse clip was mocked.

I know what happened---the clip prior to the full show was also an excerpt from a larger answer. After that, they took a different portion of her response to the question and used it in the show.  That is not unusual, nor is two different clips being shown is unusual as the show edit probably wasn't locked down at the time. Do you really want to explain to me how television production works? 

[jerryskids]

13 minutes ago, edjr said:

Why don’t you tell us some of the favorites you use.

I liked when your mom licked that spot between my balls while she massaged my rod.   

[Hardcore troubadour]

I find it hard to believe that Trump will be taking office in January. Too much power has too much to lose.  One way or another I don’t see him as 47. 

[RLLD]

1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

It was easy to infer. You wrote “Democrats have shown us who they are.” Later on you wrote “Democrats are terrified”. You never wrote “A few Democrats” or “some Democrats”; you made a blanket statement. And IMO a completely false one which lacks the common sense that you claim to be relying on. 

I see your point.  If you can highlight for me Democrats who are not falling in line with the leftist doctrine that dominates modern liberalism then perhaps there is reason to amend my statement to instead say "the majority of Democrats"

[jonmx]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

I find it hard to believe that Trump will be taking office in January. Too much power has too much to lose.  One way or another I don’t see him as 47. 

Trump has already dodge every bullet (literally and figuratively) they could fire.   Not sure what else they could have in the chamber, but unless they do something like sabbatage his plane, he will be sworn in on January 20, 2025.  

[Hardcore troubadour]

3 minutes ago, jonmx said:

Trump has already dodge every bullet (literally and figuratively) they could fire.   Not sure what else they could have in the chamber, but unless they do something like sabbatage his plane, he will be sworn in on January 20, 2025.  

Well, to start he can actually lose.  If not, I put nothing past the left.   Nothing. I’d say it’s more likely some sort of lawfare. People don’t seem to realize that the power brokers can’t have him back in charge focking things up for them for real this time. I don’t see any lightweights like Jeff Sessions having a place this time. More like Mike Flynn. 

[HellToupee]

Oof this is bad. I do recognize a few geeks 

[edjr]

8 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

I liked when your mom licked that spot between my balls while she massaged my rod.   

good job avoiding my question

[Hardcore troubadour]

6 minutes ago, HellToupee said:

Oof this is bad. I do recognize a few geeks 

Holy fock. I thought it was a skit. It wasn’t. 

[Horseman]

40 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

 There is no serious person claiming this isn’t going down to the wire. 

 Big mouth isn't a serious person.

On 10/10/2024 at 7:48 AM, The Real timschochet said:

gives Harris a 95%+ chance of winning the election. 

 

On 7/23/2024 at 8:42 AM, The Real timschochet said:

Now I think Harris will beat Trump. I feel pretty good about it.

 

On 7/23/2024 at 9:27 AM, The Real timschochet said:

$3000 says Kamala wins the election. 

 

On 8/9/2024 at 6:30 PM, The Real timschochet said:

Your post here is one of the main reasons why Harris will win. 

 

On 8/12/2024 at 12:26 PM, The Real timschochet said:

I think you realize Kamala is going to win.

He’s the reason Kamala will win. 

 

On 9/4/2024 at 8:34 AM, The Real timschochet said:

I fully believe Kamala will win

 

On 9/18/2024 at 12:49 PM, The Real timschochet said:

Harris will win but it will work out OK for the Teamsters anyhow. 

 

On 9/25/2024 at 9:40 PM, The Real timschochet said:

 In fact she pretty much knows she’s going to win at this point. 

 

On 9/26/2024 at 7:44 AM, The Real timschochet said:

I believe Kamala Harris will win Wisconsin and Pennsylvania and Michigan and 1 vote in Nebraska, giving her 270. 

 

On 9/26/2024 at 8:08 AM, The Real timschochet said:

I predict that on election night we will know early on that Kamala has it in the bag

 

[Sean Mooney]

The real story of the 60 Minutes thing should be they edited down a longer answer into a shorter one and it still wasn't a good answer. But no- the story is "OMG the MEDIA IS BIASED!!!"

And I do love the handwringing of Trump supporters who are already saying "OH NOES! IF HE DOESN'T WIN IT'S THE CONSPIRACY!!" I already told people weeks ago in the Mooney Lock- Trump is winning the election. And if by some chance he doesn't- it won't be because of a conspiracy. it will be because he is an unlikable candidate who couldn't do enough to make people in the middle forego those concerns. Nikki Haley (who I supported) would be up huge right now and running away with this. 

[Horseman]

38 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

He’s not leading in most polls. He is leading in betting markets (though not all.) 

Link one betting market that still has Kackala as the favorite.  

[Hardcore troubadour]

1 minute ago, Sean Mooney said:

The real story of the 60 Minutes thing should be they edited down a longer answer into a shorter one and it still wasn't a good answer. But no- the story is "OMG the MEDIA IS BIASED!!!"

And I do love the handwringing of Trump supporters who are already saying "OH NOES! IF HE DOESN'T WIN IT'S THE CONSPIRACY!!" I already told people weeks ago in the Mooney Lock- Trump is winning the election. And if by some chance he doesn't- it won't be because of a conspiracy. it will be because he is an unlikable candidate who couldn't do enough to make people in the middle forego those concerns. Nikki Haley (who I supported) would be up huge right now and running away with this. 

It’s a good thing you remind us of what you have stated earlier. Most of us missed it the first time. Or forgot.  What were you saying again? 

[supermike80]

28 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I see your point.  If you can highlight for me Democrats who are not falling in line with the leftist doctrine that dominates modern liberalism then perhaps there is reason to amend my statement to instead say "the majority of Democrats"

LOL squish will pull this lame tactic.  If he finds ONE democrat that goes against what someone is saying he will pull out the "see? Not all democrats think tis way"

Meanwhile Tim can blanket republicans and MAGA supporters all day.  That part is OK I guess.

[TimHauck]

23 minutes ago, HellToupee said:

Oof this is bad. I do recognize a few geeks 

It says she didn’t endorse that ad

[RLLD]

Just now, supermike80 said:

LOL squish will pull this lame tactic.  If he finds ONE democrat that goes against what someone is saying he will pull out the "see? Not all democrats think tis way"

Meanwhile Tim can blanket republicans and MAGA supporters all day.  That part is OK I guess.

Well yes.  The left allows itself the luxury to do that which it might tend to call out in others.  This is the norm.  Modern liberalism has effectively become the lunch table of b!tchy girls in middle school

[Horseman]

53 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

He’s not leading in most polls. He is leading in betting markets (though not all.) 

 

14 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Link one betting market that still has Kackala as the favorite.  

C'mon @The Real timschochet stop screwing around.  This is important.  You do realize that if I bet both Trump +115 and Kackala +115 at the same time that is free money?  Turn on the money printing press!  I need to know where this betting market is that I can still bet Trump +115!!!!!!

 

Or, wait a second.......you just didn't realize how dumb that would be when you decided to LIE about it.  

[Fnord]

27 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

The real story of the 60 Minutes thing should be they edited down a longer answer into a shorter one and it still wasn't a good answer. But no- the story is "OMG the MEDIA IS BIASED!!!"

And I do love the handwringing of Trump supporters who are already saying "OH NOES! IF HE DOESN'T WIN IT'S THE CONSPIRACY!!" I already told people weeks ago in the Mooney Lock- Trump is winning the election. And if by some chance he doesn't- it won't be because of a conspiracy. it will be because he is an unlikable candidate who couldn't do enough to make people in the middle forego those concerns. Nikki Haley (who I supported) would be up huge right now and running away with this. 

Trump projects all of the shlt he does onto his opponents. I'm not at all convinced he won't cheat. In fact, I'd be shocked if he didn't at least attempt it. He's completely surrounded by people lacking in principles, just like him. Would it surprise anyone if they found out he had tried?

[squistion]

20 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

It says she didn’t endorse that ad

I am sure she had nothng to do with it. 

[Hardcore troubadour]

2 minutes ago, Fnord said:

Trump projects all of the shlt he does onto his opponents. I'm not at all convinced he won't cheat. In fact, I'd be shocked if he didn't at least attempt it. He's completely surrounded by people lacking in principles, just like him. Would it surprise anyone if they found out he had tried?

How do you think he can cheat? Have Russia! Hack the voting machines? This should be good. 

[IGotWorms]

13 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Surrender? So Russia takes over Ukraine? 

Nearly, yes.

You are so gullible  

[Fnord]

7 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

How do you think he can cheat? Have Russia! Hack the voting machines? This should be good. 

All the same ways he accuses others of cheating, of course. There are others, like wanting to have armed guards at polling places, etc. You are not good at this. You should find a better retirement hobby.

[Horseman]

13 minutes ago, squistion said:

I am sure she had nothng to do with it. 

I thought that you'd like that ad. Especially the not afraid of bears and crying parts.  

[TimHauck]

Is there an electoral college point spread on the betting markets?  I’d still take Trump to win but if every betting market has him as the favorite there’s probably a point spread she can cover.

[Hardcore troubadour]

12 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Nearly, yes.

You are so gullible  

And how would they administrate that? At gunpoint? Forced labor? Confiscation of all goods and industry? 

[HellToupee]

Very telling for kamala 

 

[jonmx]

56 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Is there an electoral college point spread on the betting markets?  I’d still take Trump to win but if every betting market has him as the favorite there’s probably a point spread she can cover.

I would take Trump over 310 EVs all day.  

[Horseman]

4 minutes ago, HellToupee said:

Very telling for kamala 

 

The far left of the party doesn't want Kamala.  They're backing Jill Stein in Michigan and other places just to sabotage Kamala.

[Horseman]

13 minutes ago, jonmx said:

I would take Trump over 310 EVs all day.  

Trump

Under 210 +550

210-239 +425

240-269 +275

270-299 +250

300-329 +275

330 and above +1000