WhiteWonder Posted June 2 Posted June 2 1 minute ago, HellToupee said: I’m not sure if you’re aware that he exploits them for day work . One of the main reasons he loves them I am aware. It's a big contribution to the problem. If smaller businesses would stop using cheap slave labor to improve their bottom line, we'd be looking at a whole different landscape. Instead, we have the argument that getting rid of the cheap slave labor will cause costs to rise for consumers as businesses pass along their "burden" of hiring citizens and paying minimum wage and having them on the books. Which they will really only feel compelled to do because they have become used to the increased profit from said slave labor. It's not like they literally can't function and prosper with minimum wage workers. Quote
Caine Mutiny Posted June 2 Posted June 2 1 hour ago, WhiteWonder said: I am aware. It's a big contribution to the problem. If smaller businesses would stop using cheap labor to improve their bottom line, we'd be looking at huge inflation that nobody could afford. FYP Quote
WhiteWonder Posted June 2 Posted June 2 47 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said: FYP You mean FMPTFYN (To Fit Your Narrative) businesses that currently “employ” illegals were turning profits before. Greed had them seek out cheaper labor for larger profit margins. Just because they don’t want to go back to prior profit margins is not an excuse to scream inflation as a reason to keep illegals . They can go back to driving the BMW x5 instead of that Range Rover. The costs will get passed along to the customer so they can keep the Rover. 1 Quote
JuneJuly Posted June 2 Posted June 2 2 hours ago, Caine Mutiny said: There are no such things as “illegals”. Liar Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) (Title 8 of the U.S. Code) uses "illegal alien" to describe noncitizens who lack lawful status. Quote
Strike Posted June 2 Posted June 2 2 minutes ago, JuneJuly said: Liar Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) (Title 8 of the U.S. Code) uses "illegal alien" to describe noncitizens who lack lawful status. Tim caught lying again. Quote
WhiteWonder Posted June 2 Posted June 2 Guy in NJ kicks and bites ICE agents in Newark peaceful protests. Had prior arrest on PA 7 years ago for child pornography he also “has his own website, where he describes himself as a "lazy" pop culture enthusiast who spends countless hours in his room.” Quote
TimHauck Posted June 2 Posted June 2 5 hours ago, Strike said: Of course it's practical. It's happening right now, Nick Fuentes doesn’t think so. And @Voltaire and @JuneJuly / @Horseman / @jose m (banned) / @rogerdodger (banned) thinks that makes Fuentes a democrat. lol. Quote
TimHauck Posted June 2 Posted June 2 1 hour ago, WhiteWonder said: You mean FMPTFYN (To Fit Your Narrative) businesses that currently “employ” illegals were turning profits before. When? In like the 70’s? Quote
seafoam1 Posted June 2 Posted June 2 41 minutes ago, JuneJuly said: Liar Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) (Title 8 of the U.S. Code) uses "illegal alien" to describe noncitizens who lack lawful status. The tims on this site are very, very, low IQ. Quote
WhiteWonder Posted June 2 Posted June 2 1 minute ago, TimHauck said: When? In like the 70’s? You think a solidly run business NEEDS illegal immigrant workers in order to turn a comfortable profit? lol. Maybe really poorly run ones. Quote
easilyscan Posted June 2 Posted June 2 56 minutes ago, WhiteWonder said: You mean FMPTFYN (To Fit Your Narrative) businesses that currently “employ” illegals were turning profits before. Greed had them seek out cheaper labor for larger profit margins. Just because they don’t want to go back to prior profit margins is not an excuse to scream inflation as a reason to keep illegals . They can go back to driving the BMW x5 instead of that Range Rover. The costs will get passed along to the customer so they can keep the Rover. Well done! Quote
Caine Mutiny Posted June 2 Posted June 2 Just now, easilyscan said: Well done! It’s well done nonsense. The main industries that use undocumented labor: agriculture, food service, construction, hospitality, etc, have been using them forever. There’s no jacking of profits going on. 1 Quote
seafoam1 Posted June 2 Posted June 2 4 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said: The main industries that use undocumented labor. Illegal labor. There is no reason to read past your first lie. Quote
Strike Posted June 2 Posted June 2 35 minutes ago, TimHauck said: Nick Fuentes doesn’t think so. And @Voltaire and @JuneJuly / @Horseman / @jose m (banned) / @rogerdodger (banned) thinks that makes Fuentes a democrat. lol. I have no idea who that is and, even if I did, I wouldn't care what he thinks. I'm just waiting for this war in Venezuela to end!!!! Quote
TimHauck Posted June 2 Posted June 2 17 minutes ago, WhiteWonder said: You think a solidly run business NEEDS illegal immigrant workers in order to turn a comfortable profit? lol. Maybe really poorly run ones. No. @Strike does though, he once claimed he had a friend in the construction industry who “had” to hire illegals because everyone else did. Quote
seafoam1 Posted June 2 Posted June 2 Just now, Strike said: I have no idea who that is and, even if I did, I wouldn't care what he thinks. I'm just waiting for this war in Venezuela to end!!!! The selfie fest is still going on as far as liberals are concerned. Quote
seafoam1 Posted June 2 Posted June 2 1 minute ago, TimHauck said: No. @Strike does though, he once claimed he had a friend in the construction industry who “had” to hire illegals because everyone else did. Good companies don't hire illegals. Crappy restaurants do. Quote
Strike Posted June 2 Posted June 2 1 minute ago, TimHauck said: No. @Strike does though, he once claimed he had a friend in the construction industry who “had” to hire illegals because everyone else did. In today's climate that true. Get rid of the illegals and it levels the playing field. Is that so hard to understand? Quote
WhiteWonder Posted June 2 Posted June 2 6 minutes ago, TimHauck said: No. @Strike does though, he once claimed he had a friend in the construction industry who “had” to hire illegals because everyone else did. that's actually not even close to the same thing as saying a well run business needs to hire them to be profitable. In fact, it goes to show that these businesses all do it because they have forced each other to in order to remain competitive. Of course it's more nuanced. Some business do/did it so they could make more profit, some did it so they could lower their prices and steal more market share. I just look at restaurants. The prices on the menu don't need to go up if Jose and Juan are not in the back cleaning the dishes. They will go up because the business owners are greedy and don't want smaller but still perfectly reasonable profits. I don't blame them for exploiting what they can exploit. I would blame them for crying that they can't sustain their business without slave labor. Quote
TimHauck Posted June 2 Posted June 2 43 minutes ago, Strike said: In today's climate that true. Get rid of the illegals and it levels the playing field. Is that so hard to understand? No it’s not true. Whitewonder clearly disagrees with you even though he’s now backtracking. Even if we don’t get rid of all the illegals, a business should be able to charge a premium by advertising that they don’t hire illegals if competitors do. And although I disagree with Tim about giving illegals a path to citizenship, I agree with him that it’s not reasonable to expect that we’ll get rid of all of them, so it’s dumb to make up scenarios where illegals don’t exist. 34 minutes ago, WhiteWonder said: that's actually not even close to the same thing as saying a well run business needs to hire them to be profitable. In fact, it goes to show that these businesses all do it because they have forced each other to in order to remain competitive. Of course it's more nuanced. Some business do/did it so they could make more profit, some did it so they could lower their prices and steal more market share. I just look at restaurants. The prices on the menu don't need to go up if Jose and Juan are not in the back cleaning the dishes. They will go up because the business owners are greedy and don't want smaller but still perfectly reasonable profits. I don't blame them for exploiting what they can exploit. I would blame them for crying that they can't sustain their business without slave labor. How is it not even close to the same thing? You said a business doesn’t need to hire illegals to “turn a comfortable profit,” he literally just confirmed he thinks his friend “had to” hire illegals. Either you’re saying his friend’s business isn’t solidly run, or you’re trying to argue weird semantics and say “well they’d still make a comfortable profit just not as much as competitors!” But if they can make a comfortable profit then they don’t “have to” do it. Or are you being like him and imagining a utopia where all the illegals disappeared? Quote
WhiteWonder Posted June 3 Posted June 3 5 minutes ago, TimHauck said: No it’s not true. Whitewonder clearly disagrees with you even though he’s now backtracking. Even if we don’t get rid of all the illegals, a business should be able to charge a premium by advertising that they don’t hire illegals if competitors do. And although I disagree with Tim about giving illegals a path to citizenship, I agree with him that it’s not reasonable to expect that we’ll get rid of all of them, so it’s dumb to make up scenarios where illegals don’t exist. How is it not even close to the same thing? You said a business doesn’t need to hire illegals to “turn a comfortable profit,” he literally just confirmed he thinks his friend “had to” hire illegals. Either you’re saying his friend’s business isn’t solidly run, or you’re trying to argue weird semantics and say “well they’d still make a comfortable profit just not as much as competitors!” But if they can make a comfortable profit then they don’t “have to” do it. Or are you being like him and imagining a utopia where all the illegals disappeared? Last time I’m going to bother responding to you because you’re just not bright and clearly don’t understand business. the fake quotes you just gave me is exactly what I’m saying and it’s not “weird semantics”. it’s legitimate business concepts. If your competition is using slave labor to pocket more money for themselves, you’d never really know. If they were doing it in order to lower their prices in order to steal market share, it may impact you a bit and you may feel compelled to follow suit. most business want to make as much money and have as much business as possible. I don’t fault them for that. Again, I fault them for crying that they won’t be able to operate without slave labor unless they dramatically raise their prices what a load of horse Quote
CaptainObvious1 Posted June 3 Posted June 3 6 hours ago, Caine Mutiny said: It’s never Ok to break the law. We simply disagree on the punishment. I’m for fining them. You’re for deporting them. I don’t see that as practical. You want to fine them? You don't even pay them. Quote
TimHauck Posted June 3 Posted June 3 6 minutes ago, WhiteWonder said: Last time I’m going to bother responding to you because you’re just not bright and clearly don’t understand business. the fake quotes you just gave me is exactly what I’m saying and it’s not “weird semantics”. it’s legitimate business concepts. If your competition is using slave labor to pocket more money for themselves, you’d never really know. If they were doing it in order to lower their prices in order to steal market share, it may impact you a bit and you may feel compelled to follow suit. most business want to make as much money and have as much business as possible. I don’t fault them for that. Again, I fault them for crying that they won’t be able to operate without slave labor unless they dramatically raise their prices what a load of horse If they can still make a comfortable profit, they don’t “have to” do it. You disagree with Strike, I know your partisan bias is preventing you from admitting it, but you can do it. Quote
WhiteWonder Posted June 3 Posted June 3 You snuck in and went undetected for a bit... and you didn't kill or assault anyone!, congratulations! you are now legal! Quote
Maximum Overkill Posted June 7 Posted June 7 Bisaam Ghafoor, 21, of Leawood, Kansas; Elias Shamsaldeen, 21, of Porterville, California; and Bereen Dzayee, 25, of Lakeside, California, were each charged with conspiring to provide material support to a foreign terrorist organization, according to a DOJ news release Quote
Hardcore troubadour Posted June 8 Posted June 8 4 hours ago, Maximum Overkill said: Bisaam Ghafoor, 21, of Leawood, Kansas; Elias Shamsaldeen, 21, of Porterville, California; and Bereen Dzayee, 25, of Lakeside, California, were each charged with conspiring to provide material support to a foreign terrorist organization, according to a DOJ news release The IRA? Quote
Strike Posted Monday at 08:04 PM Posted Monday at 08:04 PM Illegal sentenced to 100 years for repeatedly raping his GF's 11 year old daughter and then trying to feel to Mexico after being convicted: https://www.cbsnews.com/colorado/news/100-year-prison-sentence-undocumented-immigrant-fled-u-s-border-colorado-verdict/ Quote
easilyscan Posted Monday at 08:15 PM Posted Monday at 08:15 PM 10 minutes ago, Strike said: Illegal sentenced to 100 years for repeatedly raping his GF's 11 year old daughter and then trying to feel to Mexico after being convicted: https://www.cbsnews.com/colorado/news/100-year-prison-sentence-undocumented-immigrant-fled-u-s-border-colorado-verdict/ Execute him. 1 Quote
HellToupee Posted Monday at 08:27 PM Author Posted Monday at 08:27 PM 11 minutes ago, easilyscan said: Execute him. Yes and these family members as well. Quote The victim also endured other family members declaring in court that Campos was not guilty of the crimes, one prosecutor later said. "Frankly, I was doing everything I could not to jump up and scream, because it made my blood boil," Deputy DA Brynn Chase said after the sentencing. "That victim had to sit there...and listen to herself get put on trial yet again...Having to be subjected to that, and a lengthy presentation of the defendant's innocence, that was difficult to sit through without reacting." 1 Quote
Hardcore troubadour Posted Monday at 08:35 PM Posted Monday at 08:35 PM Democrats will allow citizens to be victims if it means more power. Obviously. They have to replace all the voters they have driven away. Quote
HellToupee Posted Wednesday at 01:52 PM Author Posted Wednesday at 01:52 PM 18 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said: Makes me sick just reading this. Such a shame Quote
Maximum Overkill Posted Wednesday at 02:01 PM Posted Wednesday at 02:01 PM 8 minutes ago, HellToupee said: Makes me sick just reading this. Such a shame @squistion thinks these are not news worthy. Americans are dying at the hands of Illegal Aliens and he acts like it's not happening. Quote
squistion Posted Wednesday at 03:07 PM Posted Wednesday at 03:07 PM 1 hour ago, Maximum Overkill said: @squistion thinks these are not news worthy. Americans are dying at the hands of Illegal Aliens and he acts like it's not happening. I think anyone killed by a drunk driver is newsworthy and a tragedy. I should start a thread about whites killing other people in this country...but it would prove as much this thread does about the race of the person who did it, which is nothing. Quote
TimHauck Posted Wednesday at 03:21 PM Posted Wednesday at 03:21 PM On 6/8/2026 at 3:30 PM, Maximum Overkill said: Why is DHS sharing stuff with Libs of Tik Tok before the public…is this real life? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.