Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Anyone else find it hilarious that the loons are pointing fingers and calling someone else a loon?  :lol:

Seriously? This from you? Calling out others is literally the only thing you do here. I'm still waiting for Mooney to support his claims that you occasionally think for yourself or add value to a conversation. I've never seen it.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Strike said:

The case is that the constitutional requirements for President say nothing about who you associate with as qualifying or disqualifying.  /Thread.

This would be a good argument if I had stated that this association was LEGALLY disqualifying. But I didn’t. 

  • Sad 1
Posted

The only thing I know about her was that curry tweet, which I found disgusting.  I just checked her out on X and she looks like a conservative reporter, no other disgusting tweets in sight.  Nevertheless, it doesn't seem like a good idea for Trump to associate himself with somebody who may alienate Indian America voters.  

Posted
26 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

This would be a good argument if I had stated that this association was LEGALLY disqualifying. But I didn’t. 

Then it's not disqualifying.  If he wins the electoral college he gets to be President.  Being a vegetable should be disqualifying but we elected one and continue to allow it to be President right now.

  • Thanks 3
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said:

Associating with Laura Loomer should, by itself, disqualify Donald Trump from the Presidency. If you disagree make your case. I don’t think there is one. 

Having been proven to have gone down on someone to get a promotion should disqualify you as well. Not only that, if no one voted for you to become the party candidate then barring death, you shouldn’t be able to run. 
 

state your defense to this 

Posted
46 minutes ago, F1erce said:

Having been proven to have gone down on someone to get a promotion should disqualify you as well. Not only that, if no one voted for you to become the party candidate then barring death, you shouldn’t be able to run. 
 

state your defense to this 

“Having been proven” lol 

Posted

So, Tim is upset that Trump shouldn't associate with someone like Loomer, yet he's ok with voting for a vegetable.  On top of that, he was prepared to do it again, until his party subverted democracy and they just picked a candidate who's never received a vote from the public.  Interesting. 🤔

  • Thanks 1
Posted

I think the fact that Grandpa repeats racist and potentially dangerous made up theories because “the TV people said it” is more disqualifying.

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, MDC said:

I think the fact that Grandpa repeats racist and potentially dangerous made up theories because “the TV people said it” is more disqualifying.

He’s “authentic.” :rolleyes:

Posted

Lets judge people by the worst person they ever met. 

A good reason not to vote for Donald Trump is because he shook hands with Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Vladimir Putin, Kim Jong Un, Kanye, and some chick nobody heard of but leftoids don't like.

  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
18 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

“Having been proven” lol 

It has :lol: notice how he didn’t say a WORD about it & instead tries to refute it. Just like a good little slave. How’s Massa Candy treating ya Stephen? :lol: 

Posted
18 hours ago, TBayXXXVII said:

So, Tim is upset that Trump shouldn't associate with someone like Loomer, yet he's ok with voting for a vegetable.  On top of that, he was prepared to do it again, until his party subverted democracy and they just picked a candidate who's never received a vote from the public.  Interesting. 🤔

I know you know this but when the options are senile, ineffectual old man vs. megalomaniacal fraudster who tried to steal the last election, works to remove personal freedoms (like voting), and demonizing literally everyone that isn’t in agreement, senile old man looks pretty appealing. 

You'd think people that appreciate the constitution could understand that. We've seen that clearly you don't. 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...