Jump to content
jonmx

Mass-Murderer Fauci set to Receive Pardon

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

1. So you’re saying he personally controlled the money without consultation from anyone else in government? 
 

2. If so how did he get such authority? From whom? 

He is the head of the agency, by his position he has the ability to personally direct spending.   I have personally directed millions of dollars of spending and I was never in high level position.   

 

NIH admits Fauci lied about funding Wuhan gain-of-function experiments

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Patented Phil said:

And I strongly suspect you haven’t read jack shitt about this issue, because, well - Lazy.

Fauci didn’t personally Venmo the money directly to the lab. That’s all he needs to believe. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Dizkneelande said:

Fauci didn’t personally Venmo the money directly to the lab. That’s all he needs to believe. 

So kinda like Matt Gaetz?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

He could have used PayPal I guess. 

Why is he getting Pardoned if innocent? 

Because you know it's coming 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/14/2024 at 10:35 AM, Engorgeous George said:

I am unclear how this assumption can be made.  To my understanding that lab had many projects being run and when they got the funding they added yet another project. I suppose it is possible others may have funded this new effort, or they may have gotten there themselves without the funding which is really a nothing more than a request to undertake a new project, but to presume that seems a bridge too far. 

I believe the amount sent to the WIV that came from US government funds was $1.4 million over a span of like 6 years.

I guess I don’t know the total funding of the WIV, but Shi Zhengli was literally called the “Bat Woman” and was studying bat coronaviruses since 2004.   So I’m pretty sure she’d be studying bat coronaviruses with or without US funding. In order to call Fauci a murderer, it’d need to be proven that the leak specifically came from a project the US was funding.

But hey, at least @jonmx is admitting that Covid was real.  That’s progress.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, TimHauck said:

I believe the amount sent to the WIV that came from US government funds was $1.4 million over a span of like 6 years.

I guess I don’t know the total funding of the WIV, but Shi Zhengli was literally called the “Bat Woman” and was studying bat coronaviruses since 2004.   So I’m pretty sure she’d be studying bat coronaviruses with or without US funding. In order to call Fauci a murderer, it’d need to be proven that the leak specifically came from a project the US was funding.

But hey, at least @jonmx is admitting that Covid was real.  That’s progress.

Wonder why we don't know all these details of how much and what projects were funded?  Because the SOB has lied and covered everything up.  When know for a fact he conspired with co-workers to lie about the origins of Covid and we know he perpetrated the lie of its natural origins.  We kmow the Cinese punished those involved at Wuhan, probably with death.  

Oh but hey, Fauci just constantly lies and is cagey with all of his answers because he is not guilty.  The bastard somehow built a wealth of well over $10 million on a civil servant salary.  The dude has a whole history of shady activities which has greatly benefited big Pharma at the expense of the safety of Americans.   But let's give the lying MFer the benefit of the doubt because we are a bunch of stupid effing bootlicking idiots who love corrupt authoritarian bastards. Fauci is our MFing hero!.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, jonmx said:

Wonder why we don't know all these details of how much and what projects were funded?  Because the SOB has lied and covered everything up.  When know for a fact he conspired with co-workers to lie about the origins of Covid and we know he perpetrated the lie of its natural origins.  We kmow the Cinese punished those involved at Wuhan, probably with death.  

Oh but hey, Fauci just constantly lies and is cagey with all of his answers because he is not guilty.  The bastard somehow built a wealth of well over $10 million on a civil servant salary.  The dude has a whole history of shady activities which has greatly benefited big Pharma at the expense of the safety of Americans.   But let's give the lying MFer the benefit of the doubt because we are a bunch of stupid effing bootlicking idiots who love corrupt authoritarian bastards. Fauci is our MFing hero!.

There is a middle ground between mass murderer and hero

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/12/2024 at 3:41 PM, jonmx said:

Dementia Joe is contemplating pardoning the man responsible for more deaths than anyone since Adolph Hitler.   Anthony Fauci who illegally funded gain of function research in a lab in Wuhan China after such research was rightfully banned in the US, will likely recieve a pardon for his role in the deaths of over 7,000,000 people.   Fauci is a national hero to authoritarian bastards on the left for his role in demanding excessively long and stringent lockdowns which caused massive damage to economies across the world and has irreparably harmed millions of children who are now struggling to advance in schools and universities.   

Can you let us know which public space you plan on shooting up in the next week or so?.....I'd think all of us here would like to avoid that area. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

There is a middle ground between mass murderer and hero

Yeah. Sure there is. But Fauci is not in the middle. He's a mass murderer. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, jonmx said:

Wonder why we don't know all these details of how much and what projects were funded?  Because the SOB has lied and covered everything up.  When know for a fact he conspired with co-workers to lie about the origins of Covid and we know he perpetrated the lie of its natural origins.  We kmow the Cinese punished those involved at Wuhan, probably with death.  

 

So you’re saying the “Bat Woman” wasn’t involved, considering she’s still alive (and I believe still in her same role)? I thought she was the main person that Ecohealth was working with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, TimHauck said:

So you’re saying the “Bat Woman” wasn’t involved, considering she’s still alive (and I believe still in her same role)? I thought she was the main person that Ecohealth was working with.

Fauci loved Bat Lady long time.

 

Wuhan Lab’s ‘Bat Lady’ Visited Fauci, NIH in 2017, Emails Reveal

Scientists at the center of the “lab leak” controversy visited Dr. Anthony Fauci’s institute at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in 2017 to discuss their research — just months before NIH lifted a pause on high-risk virology, and two years before a novel coronavirus emerged near their lab in Wuhan.

Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) Senior Scientist Shi Zhengli passed a security screening to visit National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) staffers in June 2017, where she gave a presentation about novel coronaviruses, emails obtained by U.S. Right to Know show.

Shi is known internationally as the “Bat Lady” for her work with bats and their coronaviruses. Though ostensibly a civilian lab, the WIV has conducted research projects “for defensive and biosecurity needs of the military” since at least 2017, according to U.S. intelligence.

EcoHealth Alliance, a U.S. research organization, partnered closely with the WIV, subcontracting NIAID funding to Shi’s lab, and arranged the meeting.

“Zhengli and I will do a double act,” EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak, Ph.D. said of their June 2017 meeting with NIAID’s Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Respiratory Diseases.

Fauci himself met with Daszak four months later, in October 2017. The subject of the meeting may have been an outbreak of an animal coronavirus called Swine Acute Diarrheal Syndrome.

By December 2017, NIH had resumed funding for gain-of-function research that generates new viruses in the lab following a three-year pause and debate about the possibility that such research could cause a pandemic.

Daszak arranged the meetings at NIH with the program officer overseeing his research there, Erik Stemmy, who managed coronavirus research at NIAID’s Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

U.S. Right to Know obtained the emails in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the NIH.

Together with other emails obtained through FOIA, the email demonstrates the awareness of Fauci and his top aides of the novel coronavirus research underway at the pandemic’s epicenter.

Fauci did not mention this 2017 meeting with Daszak in a 2022 sworn deposition with the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana.

“I don’t even remember meeting him, but I do know that someone showed me a picture at a meeting where somebody said, here, take a picture with him,” Fauci said of Daszak.

“But that is not unusual, when you go to a scientific meeting, you run into hundreds of people. And I believe that this Dr. Daszak is one of the people that I almost — well, I did run into him because I believe I’ve seen a photograph of he and I together at a meeting.”

NIAID did not respond to questions.

The revelation comes just days before Fauci will give sworn testimony to congressional investigators. Fauci is slated to testify in a closed-door transcribed interview on Jan. 8 and 9.

Shi’s visit

“Our Chinese Co-investigator, Zhengli Shi from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, will be visiting the US in June to give a talk at a conference here. I’d really like to come and visit you and your colleagues at NIH with her while she’s here,” Daszak wrote on April 24, 2017.

Shi’s security screening to visit the NIAID was not included in the documents provided to U.S. Right to Know, and it’s not clear what it entailed.

A May 24, 2017, email shows Daszak seeking a security clearance for Shi as well as Peng Zhou, an associate professor at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, ahead of a June visit to the U.S.

The title of a joint talk by Daszak and Shi was billed as “SARS [severe acute respiratory syndrome], MERS [Middle East respiratory syndrome] and the risk of novel viral emergence from bats,” the email shows.

A June 16, 2017, email shows an EcoHealth Alliance staffer sharing security screening information with Stemmy.

A June 29, 2017, email from Daszak suggests that Chinese collaborators on the project were present at the NIAID.

“Thanks for hosting us as NIAD [sic] today … nice to have a chance to introduce our collaborators to you personally,” Daszak said.

It’s unclear whether ties between the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Chinese military factored into Shi’s security screening.

Highly redacted U.S. Department of State cables obtained by U.S. Right to Know last year show that the U.S. possesses “cyber evidence” of military “shadow labs” at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

A 2021 State Department fact sheet stated that “despite the WIV presenting itself as a civilian institution,” it has conducted classified research on behalf of the Chinese military “since at least 2017.”

The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) researchers conducted virological research at the Wuhan lab, and the lab’s civilian scientists have worked alongside scientists associated with the PLA, according to a declassified assessment released by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence last year.

Biosecurity concerns

The emails raise yet more questions about the rigor of U.S. regulations on virology experiments that may generate new pandemic viruses, including how and why high-risk research was outsourced to a rival nation.

The year before, in 2016, Stemmy and Daszak carved out an exemption to a pause on gain-of-function research, allowing EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan Institute of Virology to move forward with research that generated new SARS-related coronaviruses with enhanced transmissibility and virulence, according to reporting by The Intercept.

EcoHeath would run afoul of even these ad hoc rules with gain-of-function experiments that enhanced the transmissibility and virulence of SARS-related coronaviruses, including a tweak that increased the viral load of a virus by up to 10,000 times, NIH acknowledged in 2021.

Last month, U.S. Right to Know revealed that Daszak misled the Pentagon about planned research to generate new coronaviruses with furin cleavage sites, a genetic motif shown to make viruses more transmissible. SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, is the only sarbecovirus with a furin cleavage site.

A formal research proposal submitted by Daszak and Shi in 2018 stated that this research would occur in the U.S. in a biosafety level three lab, a relatively rigorous level.

But private drafts indicated this language was designed to placate grantmakers at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, and that key tests would in fact occur in Wuhan at a biosafety level two lab, an inadequate biosafety level, apparently to save on costs.

What Fauci knew

Fauci has dismissed the relevance of this research to the worst pandemic in a century. He falsely claimed in Senate testimony in 2021 that NIAID did not fund gain-of-function research in Wuhan.

In an interview last year with Australian media, Fauci downplayed the significance of NIAID’s funding to EcoHealth and its collaborators in Wuhan.

But emails obtained through FOIA show that Fauci was alerted by Jan. 27, 2020, that his institute had funded “among the biggest players in coronavirus work,” namely EcoHealth Alliance and its collaboration with the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Fauci had been alerted by Feb. 1, 2020, that this research included gain-of-function experiments.

In the very early hours of Feb. 1, 2020, Fauci dispatched his aide Hugh Auchincloss to investigate whether his institute had funded the gain-of-function collaboration. It had.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, jonmx said:

Fauci loved Bat Lady long time.

 

Wuhan Lab’s ‘Bat Lady’ Visited Fauci, NIH in 2017, Emails Reveal

Scientists at the center of the “lab leak” controversy visited Dr. Anthony Fauci’s institute at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in 2017 to discuss their research — just months before NIH lifted a pause on high-risk virology, and two years before a novel coronavirus emerged near their lab in Wuhan.

Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) Senior Scientist Shi Zhengli passed a security screening to visit National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) staffers in June 2017, where she gave a presentation about novel coronaviruses, emails obtained by U.S. Right to Know show.

Shi is known internationally as the “Bat Lady” for her work with bats and their coronaviruses. Though ostensibly a civilian lab, the WIV has conducted research projects “for defensive and biosecurity needs of the military” since at least 2017, according to U.S. intelligence.

EcoHealth Alliance, a U.S. research organization, partnered closely with the WIV, subcontracting NIAID funding to Shi’s lab, and arranged the meeting.

“Zhengli and I will do a double act,” EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak, Ph.D. said of their June 2017 meeting with NIAID’s Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Respiratory Diseases.

Fauci himself met with Daszak four months later, in October 2017. The subject of the meeting may have been an outbreak of an animal coronavirus called Swine Acute Diarrheal Syndrome.

By December 2017, NIH had resumed funding for gain-of-function research that generates new viruses in the lab following a three-year pause and debate about the possibility that such research could cause a pandemic.

Daszak arranged the meetings at NIH with the program officer overseeing his research there, Erik Stemmy, who managed coronavirus research at NIAID’s Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

U.S. Right to Know obtained the emails in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the NIH.

Together with other emails obtained through FOIA, the email demonstrates the awareness of Fauci and his top aides of the novel coronavirus research underway at the pandemic’s epicenter.

Fauci did not mention this 2017 meeting with Daszak in a 2022 sworn deposition with the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana.

“I don’t even remember meeting him, but I do know that someone showed me a picture at a meeting where somebody said, here, take a picture with him,” Fauci said of Daszak.

“But that is not unusual, when you go to a scientific meeting, you run into hundreds of people. And I believe that this Dr. Daszak is one of the people that I almost — well, I did run into him because I believe I’ve seen a photograph of he and I together at a meeting.”

NIAID did not respond to questions.

The revelation comes just days before Fauci will give sworn testimony to congressional investigators. Fauci is slated to testify in a closed-door transcribed interview on Jan. 8 and 9.

Shi’s visit

“Our Chinese Co-investigator, Zhengli Shi from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, will be visiting the US in June to give a talk at a conference here. I’d really like to come and visit you and your colleagues at NIH with her while she’s here,” Daszak wrote on April 24, 2017.

Shi’s security screening to visit the NIAID was not included in the documents provided to U.S. Right to Know, and it’s not clear what it entailed.

A May 24, 2017, email shows Daszak seeking a security clearance for Shi as well as Peng Zhou, an associate professor at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, ahead of a June visit to the U.S.

The title of a joint talk by Daszak and Shi was billed as “SARS [severe acute respiratory syndrome], MERS [Middle East respiratory syndrome] and the risk of novel viral emergence from bats,” the email shows.

A June 16, 2017, email shows an EcoHealth Alliance staffer sharing security screening information with Stemmy.

A June 29, 2017, email from Daszak suggests that Chinese collaborators on the project were present at the NIAID.

“Thanks for hosting us as NIAD [sic] today … nice to have a chance to introduce our collaborators to you personally,” Daszak said.

It’s unclear whether ties between the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Chinese military factored into Shi’s security screening.

Highly redacted U.S. Department of State cables obtained by U.S. Right to Know last year show that the U.S. possesses “cyber evidence” of military “shadow labs” at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

A 2021 State Department fact sheet stated that “despite the WIV presenting itself as a civilian institution,” it has conducted classified research on behalf of the Chinese military “since at least 2017.”

The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) researchers conducted virological research at the Wuhan lab, and the lab’s civilian scientists have worked alongside scientists associated with the PLA, according to a declassified assessment released by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence last year.

Biosecurity concerns

The emails raise yet more questions about the rigor of U.S. regulations on virology experiments that may generate new pandemic viruses, including how and why high-risk research was outsourced to a rival nation.

The year before, in 2016, Stemmy and Daszak carved out an exemption to a pause on gain-of-function research, allowing EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan Institute of Virology to move forward with research that generated new SARS-related coronaviruses with enhanced transmissibility and virulence, according to reporting by The Intercept.

EcoHeath would run afoul of even these ad hoc rules with gain-of-function experiments that enhanced the transmissibility and virulence of SARS-related coronaviruses, including a tweak that increased the viral load of a virus by up to 10,000 times, NIH acknowledged in 2021.

Last month, U.S. Right to Know revealed that Daszak misled the Pentagon about planned research to generate new coronaviruses with furin cleavage sites, a genetic motif shown to make viruses more transmissible. SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, is the only sarbecovirus with a furin cleavage site.

A formal research proposal submitted by Daszak and Shi in 2018 stated that this research would occur in the U.S. in a biosafety level three lab, a relatively rigorous level.

But private drafts indicated this language was designed to placate grantmakers at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, and that key tests would in fact occur in Wuhan at a biosafety level two lab, an inadequate biosafety level, apparently to save on costs.

What Fauci knew

Fauci has dismissed the relevance of this research to the worst pandemic in a century. He falsely claimed in Senate testimony in 2021 that NIAID did not fund gain-of-function research in Wuhan.

In an interview last year with Australian media, Fauci downplayed the significance of NIAID’s funding to EcoHealth and its collaborators in Wuhan.

But emails obtained through FOIA show that Fauci was alerted by Jan. 27, 2020, that his institute had funded “among the biggest players in coronavirus work,” namely EcoHealth Alliance and its collaboration with the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Fauci had been alerted by Feb. 1, 2020, that this research included gain-of-function experiments.

In the very early hours of Feb. 1, 2020, Fauci dispatched his aide Hugh Auchincloss to investigate whether his institute had funded the gain-of-function collaboration. It had.

Yes I know she worked with Fauci, but you just said China probably killed those involved, so which is it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Yes I know she worked with Fauci, but you just said China probably killed those involved, so which is it?

 

My bad.  The Chinese government operates much like the US deep state government.   It is not the actual guilty players who get convicted and destroyed but those whistleblowers who shed light on the corruption deep inside the workings of the evil state.  It is these poor souls who most certainly had their organs harvested.  

 

How China’s Response to the COVID-19 Lab Leak Theory Means It Will Rumble On and On

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's pretty convenient that all the people who can provide evidence get killed off. It's almost as if someone says something stupid but they can just never prove it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

It's pretty convenient that all the people who can provide evidence get killed off. It's almost as if someone says something stupid but they can just never prove it

 

Yeah it is pretty stupid to suggest that the $9 billion organ business run by the Chinese government may be dipping into the prison population.   Authoritarian government which operates in deep secrecy are always a beacon of outstanding human rights.  No way are they cutting out livers of healthy inmates and selling them off to the highest bidder.   Hopefully one day you wake up and discover the pure evil you have spent your life bootlicking for.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jonmx said:

 

Yeah it is pretty stupid to suggest that the $9 billion organ business run by the Chinese government may be dipping into the prison population.   Authoritarian government which operates in deep secrecy are always a beacon of outstanding human rights.  No way are they cutting out livers of healthy inmates and selling them off to the highest bidder.   Hopefully one day you wake up and discover the pure evil you have spent your life bootlicking for.   

Can you tell us how you prepare the boots you lick?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Sean Mooney said:

Can you tell us how you prepare the boots you lick?

Lol....I am done responding to complete lying idiots.   Good-bye.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was told by the GC that Covid is basically the flu and no vaccine is necessary. Now I learn that it’s a plague Fauci used to murder millions. 

:cornfused: :unsure: 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, MDC said:

I was told by the GC that Covid is basically the flu and no vaccine is necessary. Now I learn that it’s a plague Fauci used to murder millions. 

:cornfused: :unsure: 

 

Yup, I believe jon even quoted 7 million deaths, which is the number cited by worldometers, so he’s not even claiming the deaths were inflated

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, MDC said:

I was told by the GC that Covid is basically the flu and no vaccine is necessary. Now I learn that it’s a plague Fauci used to murder millions. 

:cornfused: :unsure: 

 

 

They are not mutually exclusive.  Covid had a mortality rate of around 1 percent, and that 1 percent were almost exclusively older people or in people with compromised immune system.  To the vast majority of working people and children in school, it was basically the flu.   But you knew all that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, jonmx said:

 

They are not mutually exclusive.  Covid had a mortality rate of around 1 percent, and that 1 percent were almost exclusively older people or in people with compromised immune system.  To the vast majority of working people and children in school, it was basically the flu.   But you knew all that. 

I’d be interested in a link to your source that Fauci illegally funded gain of function research on Covid in Wuhan. But I’d be a little afraid that clicking whatever moonbat blog you got that idea from will crash my laptop. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, MDC said:

I’d be interested in a link to your source that Fauci illegally funded gain of function research on Covid in Wuhan. But I’d be a little afraid that clicking whatever moonbat blog you got that idea from will crash my laptop. 

Probably Internet COVID.....it is an epidemic that we were going to blow the cover off of but the whistleblower was murdered and it's a big tech conspiracy to cover it up.

jonmx has been licking boots over it for weeks now. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MDC said:

I’d be interested in a link to your source that Fauci illegally funded gain of function research on Covid in Wuhan. But I’d be a little afraid that clicking whatever moonbat blog you got that idea from will crash my laptop. 

To be fair to jon, there is at least one US Senator (Rand Paul) who is making this crazy claim as well. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

To be fair to jon, there is at least one US Senator (Rand Paul) who is making this crazy claim as well. 

You mean the guy who’s a licensed physician who went to Duke Med School?  That crazy idiot?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

To be fair to jon, there is at least one US Senator (Rand Paul) who is making this crazy claim as well. 

Jon believes whatever crackpot BS he reads online. If you don’t, you’re a “bootlicker.” 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Patented Phil said:

You mean the guy who’s a licensed physician who went to Duke Med School?  That crazy idiot?

He's an ophthalmologist. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, MDC said:

I’d be interested in a link to your source that Fauci illegally funded gain of function research on Covid in Wuhan. But I’d be a little afraid that clicking whatever moonbat blog you got that idea from will crash my laptop. 

I provided those links upthread.  It’s not hard to research this subject and arrive at the proper conclusion.  It’s a lot easier though, to swallow the party line and distort the truth as moonbat conspiracy theories.  Kinda like you clowns did with the lab leak theory, which is now accepted as fact.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Patented Phil said:

I provided those links upthread.  It’s not hard to research this subject and arrive at the proper conclusion.  

It actually is hard to draw the proper conclusion. In the link you provided, some doctor from Rutgers says research NIH was conducting was GOF and NIH says it wasn’t. Unless you’re a virologist, how would you know the Rutgers guy is right? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, MDC said:

It actually is hard to draw the proper conclusion. In the link you provided, some doctor from Rutgers says research NIH was conducting was GOF and NIH says it wasn’t. Unless you’re a virologist, how would you know the Rutgers guy is right? 

Fauci tried to weasel out of it by playing word games, much like many of the liberals in here do. I explained it all in my posts.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Patented Phil said:

Fauci tried to weasel out of it by playing word games, much like many of the liberals in here do. I explained it all in my posts.  

No it’s more like you’re trying to weasel INTO it. You’re the ones using word games not him. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, MDC said:

It actually is hard to draw the proper conclusion. In the link you provided, some doctor from Rutgers says research NIH was conducting was GOF and NIH says it wasn’t. Unless you’re a virologist, how would you know the Rutgers guy is right? 

There is an NIH employee which called it gain of function research in an email before they funded it.   But officially it was not since they were skirting the law with a supposed loophole. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

No it’s more like you’re trying to weasel INTO it. You’re the ones using word games not him. 

Whatever your god Fauci says is gospel.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Patented Phil said:

Fauci tried to weasel out of it by playing word games, much like many of the liberals in here do. I explained it all in my posts.  

I see. So you like what the Rutgers guy had to say so you choose to believe that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MDC said:

I see. So you like what the Rutgers guy had to say so you choose to believe that. 

Or we already have it documented that Fauci conspired to cover up and lie about the origins of Covid and lied about NIH funding thd Wuhan research, but now Fauci is tge guy we can trust.   Rrrriiiiigggghhhttttt. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jonmx said:

There is an NIH employee which called it gain of function research in an email before they funded it.   But officially it was not since they were skirting the law with a supposed loophole. 

Is this the letter you’re referring to?  The same letter said definitively that that work could not have caused Covid.  Do you believe that?

https://twitter.com/R_H_Ebright/status/1450947395508858880

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, jonmx said:

Or we already have it documented that Fauci conspired to cover up and lie about the origins of Covid and lied about NIH funding thd Wuhan research, but now Fauci is tge guy we can trust.   Rrrriiiiigggghhhttttt. 

I’d ask for links but I don’t have the time to play whack-a-mole with your half truths and creative misinterpretations today. Hitler! :o 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×