Dept of Education going BYE BYE!

[HB Localboy]

Don't let the door hit you in the arse!

 

We were 1st in the world in Education before Jimmy Peanut created the Dept of Ed and now we are 40th despite spending the most $$$$

 

Libtards have used the Dept of Education as Indoctrination Centers to destroy the minds of our children instead of teaching how to read, write and do math.

 

TRUMP WINNING!

AMERICANS WINNING!

 

[Ron_Artest]

10 minutes ago, HB Localboy said:

Don't let the door hit you in the arse!

 

We were 1st in the world in Education before Jimmy Peanut created the Dept of Ed and now we are 40th despite spending the most $$$$

 

Libtards have used the Dept of Education as Indoctrination Centers to destroy the minds of our children instead of teaching how to read, write and do math.

 

TRUMP WINNING!

AMERICANS WINNING!

 

We're not ranked 40th in education, that's a lie.  Depends on the criteria you're using but we're usually #1 but no less than 18.

Regardless, removing education funding and initiatives will not make it better.

[Hardcore troubadour]

How is the funding being removed ? You just sending funds to DC so they can send them back to you but tell your what to do. The teachers union are to blame for this 

[supermike80]

You all realize that the libs believe that eliminating the department of education means that there will be no more funding for schools right?  Or somehow less?

What they are basing this n I don't know...But again....feelings and off the cuff reactions

[HB Localboy]

7 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

We're not ranked 40th in education, that's a lie.  Depends on the criteria you're using but we're usually #1 but no less than 18.

Regardless, removing education funding and initiatives will not make it better.

Your whole life is a lie!

Education is going back to the States and local school districts!

No more DRAG QUEENS telling kids they are gay while exposing their gentials during story book hour.

No more tampons in 4th grade boys bathrooms!

No more teaching kids that America is evil and racist!

No more LBGQT++++++++ indoctrination!

 

WINNING X INFINITY! 

[TheNewGirl]

1 minute ago, supermike80 said:

You all realize that the libs believe that eliminating the department of education means that there will be no more funding for schools right?  Or somehow less?

What they are basing this n I don't know...But again....feelings and off the cuff reactions

I believe that's what they equate it with. 

He's sending it back to the states, from what I am reading.

[Ron_Artest]

5 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

He's sending it back to the states, from what I am reading.

And you believe him.

[Mike Honcho]

8 minutes ago, supermike80 said:

You all realize that the libs believe that eliminating the department of education means that there will be no more funding for schools right?  Or somehow less?

What they are basing this n I don't know...But again....feelings and off the cuff reactions

Instead of telling us what you think libs believe, why don't you tell us what conservatives think how eliminintating the Dept. of Education will improve education in this country. And maybe tell us what the conservatives think the DoE does.  Thanks

[Mike Honcho]

6 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

I believe that's what they equate it with. 

He's sending it back to the states, from what I am reading.

Sending what back to the states? The states and local boards are already in charge of curriculum, the DoE doesn't set that. 

[TheNewGirl]

Just now, Ron_Artest said:

And you believe him.

I love it when people here tell me what I believe or don't believe. 

I merely made a statement about what I read, nothing more, no opinion at all of what I think of what he's doing/done. 

The only thing I think I misunderstood were the cuts to VA, and I am against those. 

 

[TheNewGirl]

2 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

Sending what back to the states? The states and local boards are already in charge of curriculum, the DoE doesn't set that. 

Again, merely stating what I read in an article. 

 

[Ron_Artest]

Hey guys this is gonna make america great again.  I read that somewhere.

[Mike Honcho]

14 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

I believe that's what they equate it with. 

He's sending it back to the states, from what I am reading.

 

5 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

Again, merely stating what I read in an article. 

 

So you believe the libs think it means that funding for education will be eliminated, and all you know is he's sending "it" back to the states, but don't know what it is.  

Am I in the  upside down? 

[Hardcore troubadour]

21 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

Instead of telling us what you think libs believe, why don't you tell us what conservatives think how eliminintating the Dept. of Education will improve education in this country. And maybe tell us what the conservatives think the DoE does.  Thanks

I think it fails. Your turn. 

[TheNewGirl]

15 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

 

So you believe the libs think it means that funding for education will be eliminated, and all you know is he's sending "it" back to the states, but don't know what it is.  

Am I in the  upside down? 

Jeezus. 

He's downsizing, from what I read. He wants the states to take more responsibility. Several Pres before him have tried to do the same thing, however it takes Congress to make it happen. No one seemed to care when others tried it. 

 

 

 

[TheNewGirl]

23 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

Instead of telling us what you think libs believe, why don't you tell us what conservatives think how eliminintating the Dept. of Education will improve education in this country. And maybe tell us what the conservatives think the DoE does.  Thanks

I don't think he's going to be able to make it happen. And I don't think it will "improve education" if it's eliminated - but to be eliminated it takes Congress. 

Like a lot of the crap he's trying to do...he's going to be fought against and rightfully so. 

[Hardcore troubadour]

So, the fascist/ authoritarian is giving up control?  Hmmm. Weird.  

[supermike80]

29 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

Instead of telling us what you think libs believe, why don't you tell us what conservatives think how eliminintating the Dept. of Education will improve education in this country. And maybe tell us what the conservatives think the DoE does.  Thanks

I dont have the first idea what the DOE does.   And if you think I am wrong for saying libs believe it will end funding, or reduce it, read earlier when Ron Artest said that exact thing

[TheNewGirl]

19 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

Hey guys this is gonna make america great again.  I read that somewhere.

I also read a lot of "Build Back Better." 

[squistion]

39 minutes ago, supermike80 said:

You all realize that the libs believe that eliminating the department of education means that there will be no more funding for schools right?  Or somehow less?

What they are basing this n I don't know...But again....feelings and off the cuff reactions

Yes, there would be less if what I got from a Google search is accurate:

The U.S. Department of Education is involved in school funding. It provides federal funds and programs for schools at all levels, from early childhood through postsecondary education. The department also oversees federal student aid and ensures that schools comply with federal laws. 

[supermike80]

1 minute ago, squistion said:

Yes, there would be less if what I got from a Google search is accurate:

The U.S. Department of Education is involved in school funding. It provides federal funds and programs for schools at all levels, from early childhood through postsecondary education. The department also oversees federal student aid and ensures that schools comply with federal laws. 

See Honcho?  So I appear to be right when I said the libs believe it will reduce funding.  Win for me

[squistion]

1 minute ago, supermike80 said:

See Honcho?  So I appear to be right when I said the libs believe it will reduce funding.  Win for me

Well, if  the DOE "provides federal funds and programs for schools at all levels" then if it were eliminated how would that not reduce funding?

[Ron_Artest]

7 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

I also read a lot of "Build Back Better." 

Yeah and I we had 3 years of growth and prosperity until Trump took over.  Now we're in a recession.  Thanks.

[HB Localboy]

This topic is proof that you can't explain logic to a libtard.  

Libtards are retarded.  

[Hardcore troubadour]

Just now, squistion said:

Well, if  the DOE "provides federal funds and programs for schools at all levels" then if it were eliminated how would that not reduce funding?

What a clown.  How does the DOE provide funding? That’s impossible. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome]

4 minutes ago, supermike80 said:

See Honcho?  So I appear to be right when I said the libs believe it will reduce funding.  Win for me

And by "Google search" he means he ran to his latest far left sources and only his far left sources to confirm his bias.  And lo and behold, they told him it was going to end funding for education.

[TheNewGirl]

Just now, Ron_Artest said:

Yeah and I we had 3 years of growth and prosperity until Trump took over.  Now we're in a recession.  Thanks.

Well, good thing you're well off and can afford it. 

[supermike80]

1 minute ago, squistion said:

Well, if  the DOE "provides federal funds and programs for schools at all levels" then if it were eliminated how would that not reduce funding?

I didnt say it wouldn't squish

[Ron_Artest]

One of the largest expenditures for the DOE is helping students afford college. Eliminating this supports the republican belief that college is useless.

[Ron_Artest]

1 minute ago, TheNewGirl said:

Well, good thing you're well off and can afford it. 

True, but I feel bad for people like you that can't.

[supermike80]

20 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

And by "Google search" he means he ran to his latest far left sources and only his far left sources to confirm his bias.  And lo and behold, they told him it was going to end funding for education.

Appears he struggles with google searches since he couldn't find the NBC article.

[RaiderHaters Revenge]

libtards think that spending taxes to send it to washington for them to take their administration cuts then send it back to the states is the right way 

how about this, if I pay taxes in california for schools it ALL goes to the California fund

its really simple

 

[squistion]

3 minutes ago, supermike80 said:

I didnt say it wouldn't squish

So...are you saying that liberals believe that funding would be reduced and what they believe is true?

[supermike80]

2 minutes ago, squistion said:

So...are you saying that liberals believe that funding would be reduced and what they believe is true?

I don't know if it's true, but I did say liberals believe it.  I think that's been proven

 

[Ron_Artest]

9 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

libtards think that spending taxes to send it to washington for them to take their administration cuts then send it back to the states is the right way 

how about this, if I pay taxes in california for schools it ALL goes to the California fund

its really simple

 

The federal govt only funds about 15% of funding for k-12 schools.  85% of school funding comes from state or local taxes.  So it's already happening.

Besides, eliminating the DOE is not going to lower anyone's taxes.  It's not like we're all gonna get a tax cut.  The Federal govt is gonna take the same amount of money and just use the DOE money for something else.

[seafoam1]

2 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

The federal govt only funds about 15% of funding for k-12 schools.  85% of school funding comes from state or local taxes.  So it's already happening.

Besides, eliminating the DOE is not going to lower anyone's taxes.  It's not like we're all gonna get a tax cut.  The Federal govt is gonna take the same amount of money and just use the DOE money for something else.

What are they going to use it for? You seem to know all that is going to happen. Go ahead and educate all of those on this site.

[supermike80]

1 minute ago, Ron_Artest said:

The federal govt only funds about 15% of funding for k-12 schools.  85% of school funding comes from state or local taxes.  So it's already happening.

Besides, eliminating the DOE is not going to lower anyone's taxes.  It's not like we're all gonna get a tax cut.  The Federal govt is gonna take the same amount of money and just use the DOE money for something else.

So I understand.   Are you saying of the 15% being currently sent to the feds---none of it will go to the states?  The feds will just keep it all and cut funding to schools by 15%?  

[squistion]

5 minutes ago, supermike80 said:

I don't know if it's true, but I did say liberals believe it.  I think that's been proven

Um...why wouldn't liberals believe it, if funding to schools from the DOE has been documented (which I'm sure it has, unless what we have been told is some sort of fiction). So, ending the DOE would logically reduce funding to schools that the DOE provides, no?

[patweisers44]

@Hardcore troubadour

Can you elaborate on the teachers union being to blame? Not trolling or arguing, just trying to understand.

[supermike80]

Just now, squistion said:

Um...why wouldn't liberals believe it, if funding to schools from the DOE has been documented (which I'm sure it has, unless what we have been told is some sort of fiction). So, ending the DOE would logically reduce funding to schools that the DOE provides, no?

Not necessarily.   Why can't the feds have that $$ go directly to the states and bypass the feds and the salaries and bureaucracy that comes with another department?