Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Engorgeous George

Letitia James

Recommended Posts

Did she do essentially what she accused Trump of doing?  There are allegations only at this point, and so I don't know their veracity, but they are that she claimed a Virginia residence as her primary residence to obtain a loan.  She did so while living 500 miles away in New York and while serving in a New York Elected Office which requires her to have residency in N.Y.  Further it is alleged she misrepresented the number of units in an investment property to obtain a more favorable loan rate. Finally, and it would have little bearing due to the statute of limitation, though she had little use for it when prosecuting Trumpo, she seems to have listed her father as her husband on loans to include his income and wealth so that she might obtain the loan.  The statute of limitations having run on the latter matter that allegation is not criminally relevant, but it may be of interest to her State Bar as it shows a lack of proper character and respect for the law to then be allowed to practice law.

 

Just as Ceasar's wife needs to be beyond reproach, so too I would argue Prosecutors.

 

Seems the chickens may come home to roost.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said:

The statute of limitations having run that is not criminally relevant, but it may be of interest to her State Bar as it shows a lack of proper character and respect for the law to then be allowed to practice law.

I don't know thing 1 about this right now but if SOL has run that's highly relevant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said:

Did she do essentially what she accused Trump of doing?  Allegations, and so I don't know their veracity, are that she claimed a virginia residence as her primary residence to obtain a loan.  She did so while living 500 miles away in New York and While serving in a new york Ofice which requires her to have residency in N.Y.  Further it is alleged she misrepresented the number of units in an investment property to obtain a more favorable loan rate. Finally, and it would have little bearing due to the statute of limitation, though she had little use for it when prosecuting Trumpo, she seems to ahve listed her father as her husband on loans to include his income and wealth so that she might obtain the loan.  The statute of limitations ahving run that is not criminally relevant, but it may be of interst to her State Bar as it shows a lack of proper cahracter and respect for the law to then be allowed to practice law.

 

Just as Ceasar's wife needs to be beyond reproach, so too I would argue Prosecutors.

 

Seems the chickens may come home to roost.

Do prosecutors take drug tests?  I’m guessing plenty aren’t squeaky clean.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They tried so hard to get Trump behind bars. They tried so hard to assassinate him.

How did Trump escape jail if liberals think he's so guilty? The entire system wanted him put away.

I bet she wishes she didn't mess with him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fat Fannie or Jack Smith next? Both are on the list. Fannie will be easy. She’s dumber than dirt. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She apparently applied for a mortgage listing her father as her husband on two occasions.  Mortgage fraud anyone?

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

I don't know thing 1 about this right now but if SOL has run that's highly relevant.

Only on two matters. It is also intersting to me in that she prosecuted Trump under novel theories that the SOL could be extended.  Also, if her primary residence is in Virginia, 500 miles from her Albany office there is a question of whether she is qualified to be N.Y.'s A.G.  Now I suspect this will all get resolved without her losing office or going to jail.  I just find it interesting in that she has apparently engaged in behavior highly analogous to that for which she prosecuted Trump.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some big titays on her. She do aight in prison. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Alias Detective said:

Do prosecutors take drug tests?  I’m guessing plenty aren’t squeaky clean.

I was subject to random testing.  Additionally my work computer had a key stroke logger for random audits and my phone was subject to inspection.  That said, certainly there are Prosecutors who are not squeaky clean.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This story is incredible... 

Liberals never cease to amaze, ever.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Reality said:

This story is incredible... 

Liberals never cease to amaze, ever.

Truely amazing.  Still, just allegations at this time.  Or reports of allegations.  Who knows how it will develope, how it will be fleshed out in the end?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, Reality said:

This story is incredible... 

Liberals never cease to amaze, ever.

Shamelessness is their superpower. Look at some of the cucks here whining about lawfare and ignoring judges. They ought to lay off the psych meds. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Engorgeous George said:

Only on two matters. It is also intersting to me in that she proscuted Trump under novel theories that the SOL could be extended.  Also, if her primary residence is in Virginia, 500 miles from her Albany office there is a question of whether she is qualified to be N.Y.'s A.G.  Now I suspect this will all get resolved without her losing office or going to jail.  I just find it interesting in that she has apparently engaged in behavior highly analogous to that for which she prosecuted Trump.

Why would this get resolved without her losing office or going to jail?  The DOJ is under Trump now.  They have no reason to plea bargain or negotiate if the evidence is solid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She will claim that the indictment is motivated solely by racism.  She will invoke Saint George Floyd and take on Jasmine Crockett's affected accent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

She will claim that the indictment is motivated solely by racism.  She will invoke Saint George Floyd and take on Jasmine Crockett's affected accent.

yes, she will.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im sure our completely non-partisan corporate media will give this fair coverage and not in unison, label this a a witch hunt. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, shadrap said:

yes, she will.

She will claim these were trivial administrative errors that she made only because she was so distracted by her noble, devout, nation-saving quest for impartial justice against the bad Orangeman.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Strike said:

Why would this get resolved without her losing office or going to jail?  The DOJ is under Trump now.  They have no reason to plea bargain or negotiate if the evidence is solid.

Just as Trump was able to make his arguments, motions, and appeals for these offenses, she will as well.  Now if convicted the reality is that some do go to jail, repeat offenders mostly, most, however, do not  Nope, the DOJ can pursue this vigorously but it will take time.  The DOJ can refuse any plea bargain, but if found guilty and going to sentencing that will be up to a Judge.  Prior to sentencing she will say she was under stress.  She may claim alcholism or a drug dependancy.  She will suggest she recieve treatment, disgorge a punitive amount to some worthwhile charity, and relinguish her law license and the Court will likely be satisfied.  Even though she can afford to lose a quarter ton of flesh the Court will likely be satisfied with only a pound of flesh.  The DOJ may well win their case, ultimately, but sentencing will be in the ahnds of the Court.

 

Just my take.  I could well be wrong.  I am not saying she should get off so lightly, just that I suspect she will.  Also, as of now the details are still coming out so for all I know she may have a defense to the charges if not to the hypocrisy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's an unhinged rant from her. "Donald Trump, we're coming for you."

No Letitia, you already tried that. You failed. Because you failed, the tables have turned. Enjoy your time in prison. It doesn't pay to be on the side of pro war pedos

You can tell by her body language that she is terrified.

https://x.com/Ultrafrog17/status/1912548822401823127?s=19

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, lickin_starfish said:

Why are her eyes so far apart? She's a nasty creature.

She looks like The Swamp Thing 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

If true(certainly seems to be) it would be ironic. 

That she is indeed the Swamp Thing? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

Here's an unhinged rant from her. "Donald Trump, we're coming for you."

No Letitia, you already tried that. You failed. Because you failed, the tables have turned. Enjoy your time in prison. It doesn't pay to be on the side of pro war pedos

You can tell by her body language that she is terrified.

https://x.com/Ultrafrog17/status/1912548822401823127?s=19

That’s someone pissing her pants.   
 

Also, Howard University?  May as well be hyping a University of Phoenix degree.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

That’s someone pissing her pants.   
 

Also, Howard University?  May as well be hyping a University of Phoenix degree.  

What liberals fail to realize is people like Letitia James play a role to increase tensions. Like what happened with Daniel Penny. It had nothing to do with justice and everything to do with increasing tension between races.

These people are the ones responsible for militant Muslims gaining so much strength and South American and Mexican gangs gaining strength. They want us at war and at each other's throats.

Donald Trump is a wartime president. He's at war with the deep state. James is a part of that mess. Someone who doesn't deserve to be an attorney yet was propped up for her divisive views. Perfect for the democrat party.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

Do you have to 🪓 

I'm finna axing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She made up a crime to prosecute DJT. It had never been done before. Liberals are ok with this. They also think that Trumps resort in palm beach Florida is worth 18 million dollars. Ignorance abounds on the left. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Strike said:

Why would this get resolved without her losing office or going to jail?

Probably because it was all a dog and pony show when it was about Trump and a slap on the wrist was all that was required.  The whole Trump thing was purely about election interference in trying to sway public opinion about Trump, among the "undecided" or "independents".  It was never actually about the law or Trump going to jail, it was only about winning the election.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×