Does religion deny science?

[TimHauck]

36 minutes ago, BudBro said:

Meh.  There are written accounts from witnesses to the birth, to include the mother and the earthly father of Jesus.  It isn't something we can recount for you outside of your interest in pursuing the case.  I think you were a believer that the covid jabs were actual vaccinations.  So, it's wise we not spend too much time indulging your inner troll.

Are you saying Mary wasn’t actually a virgin? I was raised Jewish, I really don’t know the story here.

[seafoam1]

25 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Are you saying Mary wasn’t actually a virgin? I was raised Jewish, I really don’t know the story here.

Well, everyone knows you are a virgin. 

[BudBro]

3 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Are you saying Mary wasn’t actually a virgin? I was raised Jewish, I really don’t know the story here. 

Lol...I wasn't there, so can't really vouch.  Also, are you high?  Nothing about my 2 interactions with you said Mary wasn't actually a virgin.  Catholics believe she was a virgin throughout her life, though the Bible says Jesus had brothers and sisters.  They (the RCC) attribute those to being step brothers and sisters from a previous marriage of a widowered Joseph.  Everyone alive on the planet of Earth knows the birth story of Jesus.

[TimHauck]

Just now, BudBro said:

Lol...I wasn't there, so can't really vouch.  Also, are you high?  Nothing about my 2 interactions with you said Mary wasn't actually a virgin.  Catholics believe she was a virgin throughout her life, though the Bible says Jesus had brothers and sisters.  They (the RCC) attribute those to being step brothers and sisters from a previous marriage of a widowered Joseph.  Everyone alive on the planet of Earth knows the birth story of Jesus.

Well wtf is an “earthly father”?  Honestly had never heard that term before, I was assuming you were saying that was the guy that focked Mary to make her get pregnant with Jesus

[supermike80]

6 hours ago, BudBro said:

 

Dark matter that holds the universe together is unexplainable.

And in my opinion, a bunch of hooey.  Dont get me started on that crap

[TimHauck]

Soooo…

Does anyone have any believable explanations for how Mary got pregnant without someone focking her?

[TimHauck]

Here’s a couple interesting articles that list some of the possibilities, IMO in order of likelihood:

https://www.popsci.com/blog-network/ladybits/scientific-miracle-theories-marys-virgin-birth/

https://www.vice.com/en/article/the-science-behind-the-virgin-birth/
 

TL/DR:

1) Mary lied and wasn’t actually a virgin.  Wait, she was only 12-13 years old?  If the divine intervention is true, was God a pedo?

2) Got pregnant via dry humping.  Wait, how old was Joseph?  Was he a pedo?

…big gap…

3) Got pregnant via semen getting through an open wound in her stomach

…big gap…

4) Got herself pregnant through parthenogenesis.  Apparently this can happen with insects, but not mammals (although there apparently is one sorta case but not really).  Although it kinda sounds like for that to happen either Jesus or Mary might have been trannies.  Now that would be ironic…

Of course, only #4 if any could IMO be considered “divine intervention”…

[seafoam1]

1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

Here’s a couple interesting articles that list some of the possibilities, IMO in order of likelihood:

https://www.popsci.com/blog-network/ladybits/scientific-miracle-theories-marys-virgin-birth/

https://www.vice.com/en/article/the-science-behind-the-virgin-birth/
 

TL/DR:

1) Mary lied and wasn’t actually a virgin.  Wait, she was only 12-13 years old?  If the divine intervention is true, was God a pedo?

2) Got pregnant via dry humping.  Wait, how old was Joseph?  Was he a pedo?

…big gap…

3) Got pregnant via semen getting through an open wound in her stomach

…big gap…

4) Got herself pregnant through parthenogenesis.  Apparently this can happen with insects, but not mammals (although there apparently is one sorta case but not really).  Although it kinda sounds like for that to happen either Jesus or Mary might have been trannies.  Now that would be ironic…

Of course, only #4 if any could IMO be considered “divine intervention”…

Leave it up to you to look up articles labeled "lady.bits". 

Take a break dude. 

[TimHauck]

On 7/10/2025 at 5:45 PM, TimHauck said:

Well wtf is an “earthly father”?  Honestly had never heard that term before, I was assuming you were saying that was the guy that focked Mary to make her get pregnant with Jesus

OK I’m not the only one skeptical that Mary was actually a virgin

 

[lickin_starfish]

Looks like TittyBaby had my metzitzah b'peh comment removed from the thread. I'd be ashamed of that too, so I don't blame him.

[Voltaire]

On 7/11/2025 at 7:18 PM, TimHauck said:

Here’s a couple interesting articles that list some of the possibilities, IMO in order of likelihood:

https://www.popsci.com/blog-network/ladybits/scientific-miracle-theories-marys-virgin-birth/

https://www.vice.com/en/article/the-science-behind-the-virgin-birth/
 

TL/DR:

1) Mary lied and wasn’t actually a virgin.  Wait, she was only 12-13 years old?  If the divine intervention is true, was God a pedo?

2) Got pregnant via dry humping.  Wait, how old was Joseph?  Was he a pedo?

…big gap…

3) Got pregnant via semen getting through an open wound in her stomach

…big gap…

4) Got herself pregnant through parthenogenesis.  Apparently this can happen with insects, but not mammals (although there apparently is one sorta case but not really).  Although it kinda sounds like for that to happen either Jesus or Mary might have been trannies.  Now that would be ironic…

Of course, only #4 if any could IMO be considered “divine intervention”…

If you're already down with the notion of an all-powerful, omniscient God that can create the universe with the snap of his fingers, then the notion that he can get a woman pregnant under a non-standard procedure is easy by comparison and already comes baked in.

[TimHauck]

1 hour ago, lickin_starfish said:

Looks like TittyBaby had my metzitzah b'peh comment removed from the thread. I'd be ashamed of that too, so I don't blame him.

Not sure if this is supposed to refer to me, but no I did not report that post

[Hardcore troubadour]

Hauck is such an idiot 

[Big Guy]

imo anybody that knows anything about life and can deny a creator is an absolute moron

 

[TimHauck]

On 6/14/2026 at 3:53 PM, Voltaire said:

If you're already down with the notion of an all-powerful, omniscient God that can create the universe with the snap of his fingers, then the notion that he can get a woman pregnant under a non-standard procedure is easy by comparison and already comes baked in.

This is a fair argument, but I’d still say that denies science.

[League Champion]

6 hours ago, TimHauck said:

This is a fair argument, but I’d still say that denies science.

Democrats think Men can be Women. 

Does that deny science? 

[League Champion]

SCIENCE!!!! @TimHauck

 

 

[TimHauck]

9 minutes ago, League Champion said:

Democrats think Men can be Women. 

Does that deny science? 

Yes

[League Champion]

Just now, TimHauck said:

Yes

So science is only science when it's convenient? 

[Baker Boy]

“To one who has faith, no explanation is necessary. To one without faith, no explanation is possible,”

[seafoam1]

2 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Yes

You don't know science and you don't know religion. You may want to step aside on this topic. 

[Fnord]

38 minutes ago, Baker Boy said:

“To one who has faith, no explanation is necessary. To one without faith, no explanation is possible,”

As an agnostic, I completely agree with this and I'm comfortable with the fact that I won't know the truth until I die, if ever. Humans are awfully full of themselves, yet we are completely clueless about higher levels of energy and existence.