weepaws Posted August 25, 2025 Posted August 25, 2025 Now the pressure for a thirty yr old wr to show that he is worthy of this new contract. Quote
Ray_T Posted August 25, 2025 Posted August 25, 2025 On 7/31/2025 at 5:56 AM, LaChup said: Not blaming the player. I'm blaming the owners. For reference, Christian Kirk makes roughly the same amount as Barkley. That's a crime. hes been likely the most overpaid WR in the NFL over the last few years. dont get me wrong, hes a decent player, but not worth the money hes been thrown at him(which is very significant) Quote
crackills Posted August 25, 2025 Posted August 25, 2025 UP to 96mil... more likely around 50mil in guarantees and the last year is voidable w no guarantees Quote
nobody Posted August 25, 2025 Posted August 25, 2025 Just now, crackills said: UP to 96mil... more likely around 50mil in guarantees and the last year is voidable w no guarantees No doubt. Same thought crossed my mind after I got over the initial shock and awe from the misconception that Budda Baker was somehow McClaurin's agent. Quote
Maximum Overkill Posted August 26, 2025 Posted August 26, 2025 Washington had zero choice but to make this deal. Quote
Showboat Posted September 9, 2025 Author Posted September 9, 2025 Not sure why Washington signed the extension. Most teams at least try to feature a player after a big extension like that (even when the holdout ends the day before gameday). Is McLaurin just going to be an expensive decoy? Quote
crackills Posted September 9, 2025 Posted September 9, 2025 Terry will get his, JD missed him on a bomb which would have made his stat line much better. ... but he is definitely a regression candidate. Reality is that there are a lot more mouth to feed now, and Kingsbury wants to feature his new toy Debo and Bill looks solid. Terry will still have his 25pt weeks and will finish with +/- 950yds and 8-11tds but he will also sprinkle in more 5pt games as well (those are going to hurt) 1 Quote
TBayXXXVII Posted September 9, 2025 Posted September 9, 2025 3 hours ago, Showboat said: Not sure why Washington signed the extension. Most teams at least try to feature a player after a big extension like that (even when the holdout ends the day before gameday). Is McLaurin just going to be an expensive decoy? I think this belongs in the "Week 1 Overreaction" thread. Quote
weepaws Posted September 9, 2025 Posted September 9, 2025 Debo Is going to get more and more looks. I always viewed Mclaurin has a ff wr2, I think that’s what he is. Quote
crackills Posted September 26, 2025 Posted September 26, 2025 ... and now that he is out for a few weeks at least due to his hold out and being on the older side... thats why he was a DND for me. Sucks for Wash.. but good if you're Debo owner (which i am ) Quote
Ray_T Posted September 26, 2025 Posted September 26, 2025 27 minutes ago, crackills said: ... and now that he is out for a few weeks at least due to his hold out and being on the older side... thats why he was a DND for me. Sucks for Wash.. but good if you're Debo owner (which i am ) Deebo is also injury prone. it seems like he misses a couple games every year. granted its usually only a couple. so maybe a bit less risky as far as players prone to injury Quote
weepaws Posted September 26, 2025 Posted September 26, 2025 29 minutes ago, crackills said: ... and now that he is out for a few weeks at least due to his hold out and being on the older side... thats why he was a DND for me. Sucks for Wash.. but good if you're Debo owner (which i am ) Doesn’t always happen, but seems like often times when a player sits for contract issues, he has a tough season battling injuries. Quote
Showboat Posted February 14 Author Posted February 14 Saw this blurb: Commanders offensive coordinator David Blough said the Washington offense will be “built around” getting Terry McLaurin 10 targets a game. May just be coach-speak, but seems like Washington may finally try to get some return on their investment. Quote
weepaws Posted February 14 Posted February 14 I don’t know if that’s coach speak or not, but watch them draft a wr. Quote
GobbleDog Posted February 15 Posted February 15 On 2/13/2026 at 7:25 PM, Showboat said: Saw this blurb: Commanders offensive coordinator David Blough said the Washington offense will be “built around” getting Terry McLaurin 10 targets a game. May just be coach-speak, but seems like Washington may finally try to get some return on their investment. Finished Wr 34 ppg. Currently ranked Wr 24 and probably higher by August. That coach speak is gonna get McLaurin over-drafted again. Quote
JagFan Posted February 16 Posted February 16 4 hours ago, GobbleDog said: Finished Wr 34 ppg. Currently ranked Wr 24 and probably higher by August. That coach speak is gonna get McLaurin over-drafted again. I don’t know, I could definitely see low end WR1 - high end WR2 out of scary Terry next year if he and Daniels are healthy. I’d take him as a WR2 with upside if he stays at this price. A repeat of 2024 or better isn’t out of the question. Quote
GobbleDog Posted February 16 Posted February 16 18 hours ago, JagFan said: I don’t know, I could definitely see low end WR1 - high end WR2 out of scary Terry next year if he and Daniels are healthy. I’d take him as a WR2 with upside if he stays at this price. A repeat of 2024 or better isn’t out of the question. That would be Wr 10 to 15 range. McLaruin had his best fantasy year in '24 finishing Wr 7 overall (wr 16 ppg) mainly due to an insane 13 Tds, far exceeding his previous best of 7. Let's say he finishes with similar stats, but a more realistic 7 Tds.... that's about Wr 17 overall. And that's assuming he doesn't miss games ... unlike last year where he missed several due to ankle and quad strains. Not to mention assuming Daniels stays healthy. McLaurin is about to turn 31. Your projection seems optimistic. Quote
weepaws Posted February 16 Posted February 16 He’s a low wr2, who I would like to be able to draft in the wr3 range. Quote
Showboat Posted February 16 Author Posted February 16 With McLaurin, I'm still trying to figure out if he is a WR1 talent who has mostly been victimized by scheme and poor QB play or if he is really just a WR2 talent. Even in the '24 season (really his only season with above average QB play), he would often disappear for long periods and usually hovered around 6 targets or less per game. But when they turned to him in crunch time, he usually came through with the big play needed (as 13 TDs would imply). He could be a league winner if the coaching staff really attempts to scheme him a consistent 10 targets per game, but that probably won't work out too well if he is really only a WR2-level talent. Quote
GobbleDog Posted February 17 Posted February 17 1 hour ago, Showboat said: With McLaurin, I'm still trying to figure out if he is a WR1 talent who has mostly been victimized by scheme and poor QB play or if he is really just a WR2 talent. Even in the '24 season (really his only season with above average QB play), he would often disappear for long periods and usually hovered around 6 targets or less per game. But when they turned to him in crunch time, he usually came through with the big play needed (as 13 TDs would imply). He could be a league winner if the coaching staff really attempts to scheme him a consistent 10 targets per game, but that probably won't work out too well if he is really only a WR2-level talent. McLaurin held out the start of training camp last year trying to parlay that big '24 season into a monster payday (probably the last of his career). It worked - the Redskins gave him a 3-year $96 mil contract making him a top 10 paid Wr. Last year his stats over a full season projected to.... 65 rec, 989 yds, 5 Tds. Barely played with Daniels, but wonder if the Skins are having second thoughts about that contract. Now he's 31 yo, a year removed from his one (and only) great season, and already got paid a ginormous contract. And fantasy wise, we still don't know if Daniels is the real deal. He threw 25 Tds as a rook (with an unsustainable half going to Terry). So how many Tds are we projecting this year? Who knows, but I see a whole lot of red flags around McLaurin at that adp. Quote
weepaws Posted February 17 Posted February 17 Maybe the Redskins will be the team that picks up T Hill. Or, not. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.