Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 hours ago, Engorgeous George said:

I recall my social studies teacher having a segment on gerrymandering back in 1971.  I seem to recall the term and the concept went back to teh early 1800's out in Boston or New York, not sure which anymore as memory fades for matters from 55 years ago..

It was the Merrimack Valley/North Shore area of Massachusetts 

Posted
12 hours ago, BrahmaBulls said:

It's MDCack

I should have known, that dude truly lives a miserable existence.

He truly needs this place, he gets a pass.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, Thornton Melon said:

It was the Merrimack Valley/North Shore area of Massachusetts 

Interesting history in looking it up, but again Massachusetts isn’t really gerrymandered in terms of US house seats (maybe for state seats though according to a quick search, and looks like that is actually the reason for the name)  - https://mggg.org/uploads/Massachusetts.pdf

There are of course blue states that are gerrymandered, and it’s bad when they do it too.  But sheep like @Reality are often incapable of understanding nuance.

Posted
16 minutes ago, Reality said:

I should have known, that dude truly lives a miserable existence.

He truly needs this place, he gets a pass.

Says the guy that fake quit the board but couldn't even make it stick for a day. 

🤣

  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Interesting history in looking it up, but again Massachusetts isn’t really gerrymandered in terms of US house seats (maybe for state seats though according to a quick search, and looks like that is actually the reason for the name)  - https://mggg.org/uploads/Massachusetts.pdf

There are of course blue states that are gerrymandered, and it’s bad when they do it too.  But sheep like @Reality are often incapable of understanding nuance.

Reality is an idiot. Dude never has any of his own thoughts to add. Even utilt99 and HT can sputter out some idiotic original thought occasionally. Reality just looks through X to find something to parrot and then comes here and does it. 

  • Thanks 4
Posted
10 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

Reality is an idiot. Dude never has any of his own thoughts to add. Even utilt99 and HT can sputter out some idiotic original thought occasionally. Reality just looks through X to find something to parrot and then comes here and does it. 

He does seem to have a lot of original thoughts on how other posters are [insert expletive/personal attack here]

Posted
12 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

Says the guy that fake quit the board but couldn't even make it stick for a day. 

🤣

Look at Mr. Originality. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Reality said:

Now we're gonna argue New England isn't really gerrymandered...

Oh boy...

My fan club active early, appreciate the love fellas.

Massachusetts is not.  HTH

Posted
52 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

Says the guy that fake quit the board but couldn't even make it stick for a day. 

🤣

I changed my mind, it's not like I was banned and created a new alias just so I could post here, that would truly be pathetic. Right? 

Also, bud, no matter how much you follow me around and and beg for my attention, I'm not gonna let you suck my dlck, I don't swing that way.

Sorry. 

:dunno:

Posted
15 hours ago, cyclone24 said:

Yep, which actually makes it more ridiculous. You guys have maxed out liberal states and then because Texas does it now you’re like oh you guys are so wrong for this. Lol

I think it's funny (or sad), that they don't realize that Texas did what they did, because of California.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

Data says that gerrymandering has favored republicans more than democrats.

https://www.factcheck.org/2024/12/speaker-johnsons-partisan-spin-on-gerrymandering-in-the-2024-election/#:~:text=Employing a similar methodology%2C a,In particular%2C Li told us

It should all stop and be an independent process.  It's all wrong.

Yup.  Not sure who is more dumb between @cyclone24 just blurting stuff out with nothing backing it up, or @Reality thinking that 0 seats automatically = gerrymandered

Posted
5 minutes ago, Reality said:

I changed my mind, it's not like I was banned and created a new alias just so I could post here, that would truly be pathetic. Right? 

Also, bud, no matter how much you follow me and and beg for my attention, I'm not gonna let you suck my dlck, I don't swing that way.

Sorry. 

:dunno:

I mean I'm not interested in that either but I'm flattered that's where your mind goes with me. 

But you shouldn't be turning that stuff down so easily. Halley's Comet appears more frequently than sexual opportunities for you. 

Posted
1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

Interesting history in looking it up, but again Massachusetts isn’t really gerrymandered in terms of US house seats (maybe for state seats though according to a quick search, and looks like that is actually the reason for the name)  - https://mggg.org/uploads/Massachusetts.pdf

Yeah, I was simply providing EG with the info on where the original Gerrymander was. 

But you could say MA is currently gerrymandered into a flaming blue gerrymander shaped like the state of Massachusetts. 

 

Posted
15 hours ago, TimHauck said:

@Meglamaniac, curious if you agree with this claim.  I know you like calling out people for making sweeping generalizations 

🤣🤣🤣 he called you a Chihuahua. Again you and Ron have this weird thing where you like to call to the board to come help you for your terrible takes. And they never do.

You’d think at some point there’d be some self reflection but nope

  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, cyclone24 said:

🤣🤣🤣 he called you a Chihuahua. Again you and Ron have this weird thing where you like to call to the board to come help you for your terrible takes. And they never do.

You’d think at some point there’d be some self reflection but nope

I’ll take that as a no you don’t have data backing up your claim that Democrats gerrymander “far far more”?

It’s okay, you can admit you lied.  We know @Meglamaniac will never call out anyone from the right for lying.

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I’ll take that as a no you don’t have data backing up your claim that Democrats gerrymander “far far more”?

It’s okay, you can admit you lied.  We know @Meglamaniac will never call out anyone from the right for lying.

 

Hey Yip Yip…

I went out last night. It wasn’t on here. You should try it sometime. Try not to bite my ankles over it.

Posted
8 minutes ago, cyclone24 said:

Ron have this weird thing where you like to call to the board to come help you for your terrible takes.

Never done this.  You can't make a post without lying can you?

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 minute ago, cyclone24 said:

Hey Yip Yip…

I went out last night. It wasn’t on here. You should try it sometime. Try not to bite my ankles over it.

Should we be expecting anything to back up your claim that Democrats gerrymander “far far more,” ever?

Posted
Just now, TimHauck said:

Thanks for proving my point.

You voted for Trump 3 times, that makes you about as 'from the right' as anyone

At least that's what you keep telling everyone

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Thanks for proving my point.

That you’re an ankle biting liar? I’d pretty much agree with that. Or do you wanna call on the board again?

Posted
9 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I’ll take that as a no you don’t have data backing up your claim that Democrats gerrymander “far far more”?

It’s okay, you can admit you lied.  We know @Meglamaniac will never call out anyone from the right for lying.

 

And you don't call out anyone from the left for lying.  You don't admit when you lie.  You're also a hypocrite. It's okay, you can admit that you are a liar and hypocrite.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Meglamaniac said:

You voted for Trump 3 times, that makes you about as 'from the right' as anyone

At least that's what you keep telling everyone

I’ve never claimed to be on the right.  Not my fault Dems have had crappy Presidential candidates in the last 3 elections, I have however voted for plenty of Dems in other races.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Gladiators said:

And you don't call out anyone from the left for lying.  You don't admit when you lie.  You're also a hypocrite. It's okay, you can admit that you are a liar and hypocrite.

I don’t lie.  

Posted
1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

I’ve never claimed to be on the right.  Not my fault Dems have had crappy Presidential candidates in the last 3 elections, I have however voted for plenty of Dems in other races.

LOL

OK

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...