Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Ron_Artest

Renee Good had a pulse when paramedics arrived, 3rd shot killed her

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

I don’t have a party.  But being tolerant doesn’t mean you should necessarily be tolerant of people that are pieces of shiz

And look at you fighting for an attempted murderer. 😆

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

This.  Strike mocked Pretti’s death like 10 minutes after it happened.  He’s a POS that doesn’t deserve empathy

Wow. You got it bad for him. It’s only a message board.  Chill out. Go hit the showers. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

Wow. You got it bad for him. It’s only a message board.  Chill out. Go hit the showers. 

You should’ve seen how berserk he went in the Charlie Kirk thread over posts on a message board 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

He wasn’t violent

Well Pretti was violent, so don't compare this scumbag to Charlie Kirk who used WORDS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Laken Riley had a pulse too. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

Strike mocked Pretti’s death like 10 minutes after it happened.  He’s a POS that doesn’t deserve empathy

This was confusing at first.

I'd recommend taking out the period, replacing it with a "because," and making the "H" lower case.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Voltaire said:

This was confusing at first.

I'd recommend taking out the period, replacing it with a "because," and making the "H" lower case.

Well even if that’s true he didn’t know it 10 minutes after it happened 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, TimHauck said:

Well even if that’s true he didn’t know it 10 minutes after it happened 

I didn't reach that conclusion until later, when the kicking video emerged.

As for Preti's death, I'm still hoping a bodycam video emerges showing he had a hand free and reaching to where his gun had been. If that ever happens, I'll gladly defend the officers and hope that the investigation exonerates them. I'm increasingly worried with each passing day, that such footage does not exist.

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The late Ms. Good’s brothers spoke to Congress today.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/29/2026 at 6:58 PM, League Champion said:

Renee Good had a hole in her face when paramedics arrived 

The paramedics might have gotten there faster, but a lot of morons on the scene had positioned their cars strategically to block traffic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

The paramedics might have gotten there faster, but a lot of morons on the scene had positioned their cars strategically to block traffic.

The REAL reasons have been extensively discussed here. ICE blocked a doctor on the scene from rendering aid. Then blocked traffic and didn’t let an ambulance through, requiring people to carry Ms. Good’s body from her SUV to the ambulance.

If you didn’t know before, NOW you know :thumbsup:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, dogcows said:

 

No

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, dogcows said:

 

Only liberals buy this crap. Have fun with it. :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MINNEAPOLIS — Hours after an immigration agent fatally shot Renee Good inside her SUV on a Minneapolis street last month, a senior federal prosecutor in Minnesota sought a warrant to search the vehicle for evidence in what he expected would be a standard civil rights investigation into the agent’s use of force.

The prosecutor, Joseph H. Thompson, wrote in an email to colleagues that the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, a state agency that specializes in investigating police shootings, would team up with the FBI to determine whether the shooting had been justified and lawful or had violated Good’s civil rights.

But later that week, as FBI agents equipped with a signed warrant prepared to document blood spatter and bullet holes in Good’s SUV, they received orders to stop, according to several people with knowledge of the events who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly.

The orders, they said, came from senior officials, including FBI Director Kash Patel, several of whom worried that pursuing a civil rights investigation — by using a warrant obtained on that basis — would contradict President Donald Trump’s claim that Good “violently, willfully, and viciously ran over the ICE Officer” who fired at her as she drove her vehicle.

https://gvwire.com/2026/02/07/prosecutors-began-investigating-renee-goods-killing-washington-told-them-to-stop

So they stopped the investigation so it wouldn't contradict dear leader and hurt his feelings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

MINNEAPOLIS — Hours after an immigration agent fatally shot Renee Good inside her SUV on a Minneapolis street last month, a senior federal prosecutor in Minnesota sought a warrant to search the vehicle for evidence in what he expected would be a standard civil rights investigation into the agent’s use of force.

The prosecutor, Joseph H. Thompson, wrote in an email to colleagues that the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, a state agency that specializes in investigating police shootings, would team up with the FBI to determine whether the shooting had been justified and lawful or had violated Good’s civil rights.

But later that week, as FBI agents equipped with a signed warrant prepared to document blood spatter and bullet holes in Good’s SUV, they received orders to stop, according to several people with knowledge of the events who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly.

The orders, they said, came from senior officials, including FBI Director Kash Patel, several of whom worried that pursuing a civil rights investigation — by using a warrant obtained on that basis — would contradict President Donald Trump’s claim that Good “violently, willfully, and viciously ran over the ICE Officer” who fired at her as she drove her vehicle.

https://gvwire.com/2026/02/07/prosecutors-began-investigating-renee-goods-killing-washington-told-them-to-stop

So they stopped the investigation so it wouldn't contradict dear leader and hurt his feelings.

I'm going to guess that a person's OPINION (the part you emboldened), was where you stopped reading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

I'm going to guess that a person's OPINION (the part you emboldened), was where you stopped reading.

Read more carefully. It says “they said” - so you know everything after that is based on what anonymous sources said. So you, the reader, have to determine how much those sources might know about those internal deliberations or not. It wasn’t the opinion of the author, but something reported by the sources.

Leave that part out, and you still have this basic fact: A federal officer-involved shooting is NOT being investigated by the FBI. That is simply inexcusable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, dogcows said:

Read more carefully. It says “they said” - so you know everything after that is based on what anonymous sources said. So you, the reader, have to determine how much those sources might know about those internal deliberations or not. It wasn’t the opinion of the author, but something reported by the sources.

Leave that part out, and you still have this basic fact: A federal officer-involved shooting is NOT being investigated by the FBI. That is simply inexcusable.

Sorry we’re calling out your usage of words. Can you provide me a link that this investigation has been officially closed. 
Please stop spreading falsehoods

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Anyone find that doctor? 

It’s on video.  Or are you saying that person was lying about being a physician?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, cyclone24 said:

Sorry we’re calling out your usage of words. Can you provide me a link that this investigation has been officially closed. 
Please stop spreading falsehoods

These reports have been out there for weeks. Local news from Jan. 23

Nothing personal dude, but a startling lack of knowledge about these events is endemic among those that only get their news from right wing media. Y'all are being gaslit. Badly. And it makes you look like stooges that support authoritarianism.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Fnord said:

These reports have been out there for weeks. Local news from Jan. 23

Nothing personal dude, but a startling lack of knowledge about these events is endemic among those that only get their news from right wing media. Y'all are being gaslit. Badly. And it makes you look like stooges that support authoritarianism.

There’s a vast difference between not giving a crap about the story and you guys nonstop yammering about it and defending her and wanting this to be a story. That doesn’t mean somebody gets their news exclusively from right wing MEDIA goofball.
No, there is no link that it has actually been closed. They’ve shut down parts of it, but there’s not a whole hell of a lot to investigate. She screwed up, wanted to play a tough guy and she got shot for it. But no, the FBI has not officially said it is closed. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, cyclone24 said:

There’s a vast difference between not giving a crap about the story and you guys nonstop yammering about it and defending her and wanting this to be a story. That doesn’t mean somebody gets their news exclusively from right wing MEDIA goofball.
No, there is no link that it has actually been closed. They’ve shut down parts of it, but there’s not a whole hell of a lot to investigate. She screwed up, wanted to play a tough guy and she got shot for it. But no, the FBI has not officially said it is closed. 

If you’re ignorant of it, fine. But when you claim to be right despite not knowing anything about it? I think that’s worth a mention by @Fnord

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, dogcows said:

If you’re ignorant of it, fine. But when you claim to be right despite not knowing anything about it? I think that’s worth a mention by @Fnord

Sorry your words are important. Do you have a link to show me where the FBI said it is officially closed? 
If you’re going to be a smarmy jerkoff and hang on every word, I’m gonna hang on every word of yours on every post. I promise you. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

I'm going to guess that a person's OPINION (the part you emboldened), was where you stopped reading.

What else did I miss?  The head of the FBI stopped an investigation because he didn't want to upset Trump.  You're ok with that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, cyclone24 said:

No, there is no link that it has actually been closed. They’ve shut down parts of it, but there’s not a whole hell of a lot to investigate. She screwed up, wanted to play a tough guy and she got shot for it. But no, the FBI has not officially said it is closed. 

Wut?

Kash Patel stopped Renee Good investigation in order to protect Trump’s assessment on the shooting: Report

MN Oversight Report

MN Bureau of Criminal Apprehension has withdrawn from the case, alleging federal authorities have restricted its access to evidence.

FBI Investigation Into Renee Good Shooting Stalled Over Key Concern—Report

I've got more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Fnord said:

Sorry, can I get an FBI link that says it was closed please? I mean words are really, really important. 
 

I’m just holding you to the same standard you hold conservatives on this board
 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, cyclone24 said:

Sorry, can I get an FBI link that says it was closed please? I mean words are really, really important. 
 

I’m just holding you to the same standard you hold conservatives on this board
 

 

Are you new here? Most of the MAGA around here refuse to share links and if they do, they go with garbage from Red State, pjmedia, Breitbart or some other well known right wing outlet. If you think we're holding you to some kind of standard, you're failing miserably.

Shockingly, our esteemed FBI has not admitted to closing the investigation. That would require them disclosing that they have completely deviated from established procedure and law. For some reason, they don't wanna admit that.

One might ask why that's the case. That is if one didn't already know the answer, which is explicitly stated within the links I provided.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Fnord said:

Are you new here? Most of the MAGA around here refuse to share links and if they do, they go with garbage from Red State, pjmedia, Breitbart or some other well known right wing outlet. If you think we're holding you to some kind of standard, you're failing miserably.

Shockingly, our esteemed FBI has not admitted to closing the investigation. That would require them disclosing that they have completely deviated from established procedure and law. For some reason, they don't wanna admit that.

One might ask why that's the case. That is if one didn't already know the answer, which is explicitly stated within the links I provided.

Thank you for confirming that the FBI has not admitted to closing the investigation unlike what @dogcows said. 
 

I’m just holding you guys to the same standard. Shame he has to keep pumping out falsehoods.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Fnord said:

Are you new here? Most of the MAGA around here refuse to share links and if they do, they go with garbage from Red State, pjmedia, Breitbart or some other well known right wing outlet. If you think we're holding you to some kind of standard, you're failing miserably.

Shockingly, our esteemed FBI has not admitted to closing the investigation. That would require them disclosing that they have completely deviated from established procedure and law. For some reason, they don't wanna admit that.

One might ask why that's the case. That is if one didn't already know the answer, which is explicitly stated within the links I provided.

Kash Patel claimed under oath that Epstein only trafficked kids to himself. Not sure why anybody would consider a report from him on anything to be reliable. The anonymous sources are far more likely to be true.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Why didn’t they have their medics out there?

That’s a good question why it took so long for medics to check on Ms Good

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kash Patel stopped Renee Good investigation in order to protect Trump’s assessment on the shooting: Report

Quote

Top Trump administration officials, including FBI Director Kash Patel, intervened to stop federal agents from carrying out a civil rights investigation into an ICE agent’s fatal shooting of Renee Good in Minneapolis last month, fearing such a probe would undermine President Trump’s claims about Good’s death, an explosive new report claims.

The day of the shooting, Minnesota-based federal prosecutor Joseph Thompson allegedly sought a warrant to search Good’s vehicle for evidence, part of an effort he told colleagues would involve the state’s Bureau of Criminal Apprehension and investigate whether the shooting was justified or it violated the slain mother’s rights.

 

However, once FBI agents obtained a warrant to document blood spatter and bullet holes in Good’s SUV, they received orders to stop, The New York Times reports, citing anonymous sources.

Instead, according to the paper, the Justice Department encouraged investigators to seek new warrants for a criminal investigation into whether Good assaulted ICE agent Jonathan Ross and to probe Good’s partner instead.

A civil rights case was never pursued, and the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension has said federal officials blocked it from accessing case files and evidence from the scene.

The Independent has contacted the FBI and DOJ for comment.

In the immediate aftermath of the shooting, top Trump officials presented a narrative of the shooting that was unsupported by evidence and at odds with widely available video of the encounter.

 

President Trump originally claimed that Good “violently, willfully, and viciously ran over the ICE Officer,” while Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Nome referred to her as a domestic terrorist.

The Trump administration’s handling of the case has prompted a string of resignations from Minnesota officials.

Prosecutors, including Thompson, have resigned en masse from the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the state, and an FBI officer reportedly quit amid pressure to avoid a civil rights investigation into Good’s death.

Attorney General Pam Bondi has said she fired the prosecutors, whom she told Fox News had “suddenly decided they didn’t want to support the men and women at ICE.”

The Trump administration’s handling of Good’s death, as well as the subsequent shooting by federal agents that month of Alex Pretti, has been roundly criticized.

Federal agents allegedly blocked state investigators with a warrant from accessing the scene of Pretti’s killing.

News outlets were the ones who publicly identified the agents involved in the shooting, rather than the government.

Under heavy pressure after both shootings, the Trump administration changed course and launched a federal civil rights investigation into Pretti’s death, led by the DOJ. Previously, Homeland Security was leading an investigation.

Kevin Flynn, a former U.S. attorney for the DOJ in Washington, D.C., told the Marshall Project the Trump administration’s conduct so far has been a “complete aberration.”

Officials continue to press the Trump administration for more transparency.

Hennepin County, home to Minneapolis, has submitted formal demands to the DOJ and DHS for evidence as part of its own local investigation into Good’s death.

“I expect the federal government to provide the requested information, documents and physical items to our office,” Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty said in a statement this month. “The federal government has been clear that they are not conducting an investigation into Renee Good’s death. But we are. We require these records as part of our ongoing thorough investigation into her death at the hands of a federal agent, Jonathan Ross.”

In late January, Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee petitioned Bondi for records on how the DOJ decided against a civil rights investigation in the case.

"Someone affirmatively ordered federal law enforcement to instead investigate Ms. Good's widow,” the lawmaker wrote.

“Someone affirmatively ordered line agents to block state prosecutors from accessing key evidence. Someone is now taking the same actions with regard to the killing of another American citizen.”

No federal investigation underway. A bunch of career prosecutors that helped put away the Somalian fraudsters resigned after being told to ignore a civil rights investigation into Ross and begin an investigation into Ms. Good's partner instead. Those resignations have completely handicapped the state's ability to prosecute actual crimes while being inundated with immigration cases being filed against ICE. 

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, dogcows said:

Read more carefully. It says “they said” - so you know everything after that is based on what anonymous sources said. So you, the reader, have to determine how much those sources might know about those internal deliberations or not. It wasn’t the opinion of the author, but something reported by the sources.

Leave that part out, and you still have this basic fact: A federal officer-involved shooting is NOT being investigated by the FBI. That is simply inexcusable.

Looks like you need to read more carefully.  It didn't say "they said" with respect to the DOJ, it was individuals "opinions".  I didn't say it was the authors comments.  If you kept reading, it said the DOJ wanted the prosecuter to go to the judge to broaden the scope.  Sounds to me like the administration wanted to make sure that everything was being taken into account.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Ron_Artest said:

What else did I miss?  The head of the FBI stopped an investigation because he didn't want to upset Trump.  You're ok with that?

Well, I mean, this is now 2 posts where you got it wrong.  The FBI didn't stop the investigation because of what Trump said.  If you kept reading the article said that they wanted the prosecutor to expand the scope to include a wider time frame.  The part you emboldend was the author writing the accounts of people's opinions, on why the FBI wanted to stop the investigation.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Looks like you need to read more carefully.  It didn't say "they said" with respect to the DOJ, it was individuals "opinions".  I didn't say it was the authors comments.  If you kept reading, it said the DOJ wanted the prosecuter to go to the judge to broaden the scope.  Sounds to me like the administration wanted to make sure that everything was being taken into account.

It was what the sources said. As to whether that was their opinion or they overheard something? That isn’t clear.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, dogcows said:

It was what the sources said. As to whether that was their opinion or they overheard something? That isn’t clear.

Ok, then let's just call it as, neither FBI nor DOJ or any "official said it".  Mainly because, the source apparently wanted to be kept anonymous.  But, further on in that article, it does say that the FBI told the prosecutor that they want to expand the time frame.  That tells us they're not opposed to the inquiry, but opposed to the time frame.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Ok, then let's just call it as, neither FBI nor DOJ or any "official said it".  Mainly because, the source apparently wanted to be kept anonymous.  But, further on in that article, it does say that the FBI told the prosecutor that they want to expand the time frame.  That tells us they're not opposed to the inquiry, but opposed to the time frame.

So poor @dogcows spread falsehoods. Words matter bud. Sad. 
 

:) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, cyclone24 said:

So poor @dogcows spread falsehoods. Words matter bud. Sad. 
 

:) 

You need a new boyfriend. I’m not into the stalker type.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×