Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
RaiderHaters Revenge

bye bye WaPo

Recommended Posts

They're cutting the book section, not that MAGAs actually read books.

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, FrancieFootball said:

They're cutting the book section, not that MAGAs actually read books.

They're cutting a lot more than books :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Strike said:

They're cutting a lot more than books :lol:

 

I'm sure whatever losses the Washington Post has suffered will be gained back with all the money that "Melania" is making.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Our same board liberals who constantly tell us to turn off Fox News were turning to this for their info.
 

One is a thriving medium, and the other has people that are going to have to learn how to code

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, FrancieFootball said:

They're cutting the book section, not that MAGAs actually read books.

Rusty is this true?  👇

 

Quote

Bezos is firing about 33% of the Washington Post staff. Almost every person laid off is a registered Democrat.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Liberals ruin something else. As usual. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I seriously doubt there are few, if any, conservatives at the Washington Post.

The problem has been its audience.

https://www.npr.org/2026/02/04/nx-s1-5699328/washington-post-layoffs-jobs-bezos

Having focused so much on investigative journalism, politics and trying to be the big boy against the New York Times, Politico and a variety of other sources that focus on the same thing, it's tough to survive.

Major metro newspapers such as the Houston Chronicle, Boston Globe, Philadelphia Inquirer, Tampa Bay Times and Dallas Morning New are thriving because their cities and regions are the audiences. 

They can produce the sports, food, entertainment and hyperlocal news content that consumers can't get anywhere else. The newspapers that jettisoned news staff to focus on that bottom line wound up shooting off their feet one toe at a time because they weren't producing essential content that readers wanted. That leveled the content field for local TV news outlets, particularly in mid-sized markets, with websites being the great equalizer.

It's no surprise that the Washington Post is having to pivot away from playing the big boy and put more focus on its own city and region instead of national and international coverage.

Fox does well because it feeds its conservative viewers a steady stream of what they want to see, like Democrat bashing, with the occasional reporting of news that makes them butt hurt and flee farther right to an outlet more to their liking. Fox knows its audience

I flip over to Fox news or see it on the screen at the gym, and it's always the same stuff that posters here wind up parroting.

Fox doesn't have to complete the same way the left-leaning MS NOW and CNN have to compete with each other. You add those two together, and it's a bit closer to the viewership that Fox gets.

But here's an interesting statistic that a quick Google search produced:

Cable News Ratings (January 2026 - Primetime)
  • Fox News: Averaged 2.05 million viewers (down 26% from Jan 2025).
  • MS NOW (formerly MSNBC): Averaged 887,000 viewers (up 20% from Jan 2025).
  • CNN: Averaged 660,000 viewers (up 26% from Jan 2025). 

 

Obviously this reflects Trump's rapidly diminishing popularity and moderates moving farther to the left.

 

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I flip over to Fox news or see it on the screen at the gym, and it's always the same stuff that posters here wind up parroting.

Fox doesn't have to complete the same way the left-leaning MS NOW and CNN have to compete with each other. You add those two together, and it's a bit closer to the viewership that Fox gets.
 

msdnc is left leaning according to tranny retard. No it’s extreme left progressive and nothing less 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well.  This isn't unexpected.  Print media is dying...fast.  This one was probably accelerated when they refused to endorse Kamala and the liberals left in droves.  What the liberal media doesn't get is they made this bed.  Catering to them exclusively.  And when they do anything non-liberal, they lose that support. The WaPo should have understood their customer base better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, supermike80 said:

Well.  This isn't unexpected.  Print media is dying...fast.  This one was probably accelerated when they refused to endorse Kamala and the liberals left in droves.  What the liberal media doesn't get is they made this bed.  Catering to them exclusively.  And when they do anything non-liberal, they lose that support. The WaPo should have understood their customer base better.

Washington Post's news and opinion sections were quite separate in the past. But, like the "conservative" Wall St Journal, they could be counted on for solid news.

I think with the internet, they (and other big news sites) put all the opinion stuff on the front of the website instead of making people look for it in the paper. Front and center, and for many more important than the actual news.

WaPo always had conservative and liberal opinion writers. But definitely when they fired some of the liberal ones and flipped the editorial board from liberal to conservative, they were certain to lose a lot of readers.

IMO, Bezos thought that by flipping, he might keep a lot of average folks, and also get new conservative readers. Nope. Right-wing radio and other media over the years has had a massive hate boner for WaPo, so even if he turned it into something to the right of Fox News, he'd never get enough conservatives to sign up, as they've got decades of anti-WaPo sentiment pumped into their ears and eyes.

Jeff might have been good at running a shipping business, but he's not great at running a news organization.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, FrancieFootball said:

I seriously doubt there are few, if any, conservatives at the Washington Post.

The problem has been its audience.

https://www.npr.org/2026/02/04/nx-s1-5699328/washington-post-layoffs-jobs-bezos

Having focused so much on investigative journalism, politics and trying to be the big boy against the New York Times, Politico and a variety of other sources that focus on the same thing, it's tough to survive.

Major metro newspapers such as the Houston Chronicle, Boston Globe, Philadelphia Inquirer, Tampa Bay Times and Dallas Morning New are thriving because their cities and regions are the audiences. 

They can produce the sports, food, entertainment and hyperlocal news content that consumers can't get anywhere else. The newspapers that jettisoned news staff to focus on that bottom line wound up shooting off their feet one toe at a time because they weren't producing essential content that readers wanted. That leveled the content field for local TV news outlets, particularly in mid-sized markets, with websites being the great equalizer.

It's no surprise that the Washington Post is having to pivot away from playing the big boy and put more focus on its own city and region instead of national and international coverage.

Fox does well because it feeds its conservative viewers a steady stream of what they want to see, like Democrat bashing, with the occasional reporting of news that makes them butt hurt and flee farther right to an outlet more to their liking. Fox knows its audience

I flip over to Fox news or see it on the screen at the gym, and it's always the same stuff that posters here wind up parroting.

Fox doesn't have to complete the same way the left-leaning MS NOW and CNN have to compete with each other. You add those two together, and it's a bit closer to the viewership that Fox gets.

But here's an interesting statistic that a quick Google search produced:

Cable News Ratings (January 2026 - Primetime)
  • Fox News: Averaged 2.05 million viewers (down 26% from Jan 2025).
  • MS NOW (formerly MSNBC): Averaged 887,000 viewers (up 20% from Jan 2025).
  • CNN: Averaged 660,000 viewers (up 26% from Jan 2025). 

 

Obviously this reflects Trump's rapidly diminishing popularity and moderates moving farther to the left.

 

 

Wow, not that I agree with everything here, but well written.  Good thing we’re all convinced that you’re a random tranny that randomly found this board, or you could be mistaken as an alias of someone who actually wrote this from experience gained in local newsrooms in Texor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, cyclone24 said:

Our same board liberals who constantly tell us to turn off Fox News were turning to this for their info.
 

One is a thriving medium, and the other has people that are going to have to learn how to code

Too late for code.  I'd recommend a trade.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Fireballer said:

Wow, not that I agree with everything here, but well written.  Good thing we’re all convinced that you’re a random tranny that randomly found this board, or you could be mistaken as an alias of someone who actually wrote this from experience gained in local newsrooms in Texor.

I am a woman.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Did it to themselves. 

Exactly. They were way too far left. They tried to bring it back a little more central and the liberals ate themselves over it and now they’re looking for work.
 

Almost feel like there’s a saying about going low, but I can’t quite put my finger on it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They're dying in their darkness.

Now, the challenge to kill democracy falls to another darkening entity.

:wave:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, cyclone24 said:

Exactly. They were way too far left. They tried to bring it back a little more central and the liberals ate themselves over it and now they’re looking for work.
 

Almost feel like there’s a saying about going low, but I can’t quite put my finger on it.

Not everything is right v left.

They were doing better before Bezos took over. 

Whole Foods is junk now too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not the end for WaPo but probably the beginning of the end. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Disappointed in the GC.  Nobody said “go woke go broke” yet.   Although WaPo had been going less woke really recently 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Disappointed in the GC.  Nobody said “go woke go broke” yet.   Although WaPo had been going less woke really recently 

⬆️ Voted for Trump 3x

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

⬆️ Voted for Trump 3x

What does that comment have to do with Trump?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

What does that comment have to do with Trump?

Just reminding everyone how FOS you are.  Carry on nonsense boy. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Just reminding everyone how FOS you are.  Carry on nonsense boy. 

So you don’t think anyone that criticizes idiots that use the phrase “go woke go broke” would vote for Trump?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

So you don’t think anyone that criticizes idiots that use the phrase “go woke go broke” would vote for Trump?

It's not logical to criticize go woke go broke. 

It's simply truth peetim. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very clearly remember when they decided to shelve the Kamala endorsement.   Heard it was Bezos that made that call but doesn't matter.  That was the right call because Kamala was awful.  However, the people(and lets be honest, they are mostly liberal) that subscribed to it dropped their subscriptions in protest.  And now they are upset cause the paper is losing millions and need to cut costs.   It's amazing logic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, dogcows said:

Not everything is right v left.

They were doing better before Bezos took over. 

Whole Foods is junk now too.

Don’t knock their carrot cake though. Elite carrot cake at Whole Foods.

MEDIA sure is outside of what? Maybe BBC? But that’s about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

“The Washington Post reportedly laid off 14 of its 19 climate change reporters”

 

🤣🤣 please i hope this is true.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the opening couple of paragraphs of an article from the Washington Post that came out YESTERDAY, not 10 years ago:

 

Quote

 

SAN FRANCISCO — The most relevant figure to Super Bowl LX is absent from it. The game will be played in his former home stadium, in the place where his protest made him a national lightning rod and a global symbol. The social issues swirling around America’s largest sporting spectacle carry distinct echoes of what prompted his actions and what led to his exile. And yet he remains outside the conversation and invisible within the confines of the NFL.

Colin Kaepernick might as well be a ghost.

 

And people wonder why that entity is failing.  And Squissy just came.   :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×