Why didn't democrats use all of the allegations against Trump to arrest him?

[Frozenbeernuts]

During Biden's term, why didn't they use numerous allegations in the Epstein files to arrest Trump?

[Maximum Overkill]

1 hour ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

During Biden's term, why didn't they use numerous allegations in the Epstein files to arrest Trump?

Because Biden was protecting Pedos. 

They obviously have nothing on Trump, otherwise he would of released the list in year 3 of his Presidency. 

[seafoam1]

This is really fun to watch the liberals lose their shlt 24x7 about this. 

But that said, that's all they have been doing since the middle of 2015. They just change topics every now and then. Kind of like an old sitcom that never stops playing. 

 

[SaintsInDome2006]

2 hours ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

During Biden's term, why didn't they use numerous allegations in the Epstein files to arrest Trump?

“We’re all looking for the DOJ who did this.”

[Frozenbeernuts]

9 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

“We’re all looking for the DOJ who did this.”

This doesn't answer my question. Why wasn't he arrested if there were so many allegations when he wasn't the president? He was charged with a much lesser crime. Why not the more serious ones?

If the allegations were all legitimate, this is a level of predator that is unmatched in anything we have ever seen. Surely they would have had something to get him with. Even one conviction from one victim would have been enough to be rid of Trump forever.

[Maximum Overkill]

Libs need a shiny new toy now that the economy is great, illegals are finally being deported, crime is down and America is Great Again! 

NYC, you got what you deserved! 

[Tree of Knowledge]

Because they have NOTHING on Trump. He has been FULLY EXONERATED.  Their hope is to keep flooding the zone with lies, misinformation and blatant falsehoods to distract their low IQ highly emotional TDS base from the fact their overlords are adrenochrome guzzling child trafficking sickos.  

[cyclone24]

Because don’t you know, Trump simultaneously was running a prostitution ring and finding new batches apparently of information. So nice of him to campaign on and keep finding all this information that would definitely implicate him right? 
 

lol liberals are funny

[Hardcore troubadour]

Trump was in the Epstein files. 
 

For calling the cops on Epstein. 

[SaintsInDome2006]

5 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Trump was in the Epstein files. 
 

For calling the cops on Epstein. 

After he was indicted, he & one of the masseuses called the sheriff saying they had nothing to do with it.

[SaintsInDome2006]

49 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

This doesn't answer my question. Why wasn't he arrested if there were so many allegations when he wasn't the president? He was charged with a much lesser crime. Why not the more serious ones?

If the allegations were all legitimate, this is a level of predator that is unmatched in anything we have ever seen. Surely they would have had something to get him with. Even one conviction from one victim would have been enough to be rid of Trump forever.

Before I answer, did you look at AG Bondi’s presentation? TIA.

[edjr]

6 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Trump was in the Epstein files. 
 

For calling the cops on Epstein. 

same reason Al Capone went into the vault

[SaintsInDome2006]

7 minutes ago, cyclone24 said:

Trump simultaneously was running a prostitution ring

A witness was interviewed by the FBI and she told them that a girlfriend invited to a party for Epstein at Maralago & that it was a party with prostitutes. Good point.

[Hardcore troubadour]

1 minute ago, edjr said:

same reason Al Capone went into the vault

I like when you get all gibberishy. 

[seafoam1]

1 minute ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

After he was indicted, he & one of the masseuses called the sheriff saying they had nothing to do with it.

You are convinced Trump is guilty of something. No one could produce any evidence for the past 5 years of whatever you think he's done. . If you have any, maybe forward it to the DOJ. 

[cyclone24]

1 minute ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

A witness was interviewed by the FBI and she told them that a girlfriend invited to a party for Epstein at Maralago & that it was a party with prostitutes. Good point.

Uh huh…sure babe…sure. 
 

So they got him then! Why didn’t they bring any charges?

[SaintsInDome2006]

1 minute ago, seafoam1 said:

You are convinced Trump is guilty of something. No one could produce any evidence for the past 5 years of whatever you think he's done. . If you have any, maybe forward it to the DOJ. 

I just corrected the facts. Just because Trump (& a masseuse) called after Epstein was charged doesn’t mean he was guilty, it just means he’s been constantly lying about knowing nothing about it.

[Hardcore troubadour]

5 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Before I answer, did you look at AG Bondi’s presentation? TIA.

From within the Epstein files and outside of it, how many women have alleged That Trump assaulted them? 

[SaintsInDome2006]

Just now, cyclone24 said:

Uh huh…sure babe…sure. 
 

So they got him then! Why didn’t they bring any charges?

They don’t, that’s the point FBN was making.

[SaintsInDome2006]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

Form within the Epstein files and outside of it, how many women have alleged That Trump assaulted them? 

Two according to that presentation as to Epstein claims. I’m not sure counting the allegations against him - one he made himself btw - helps his defense in Epstein.

[cyclone24]

Just now, SaintsInDome2006 said:

They don’t, that’s the point FBN was making.

It’s OK I’ll answer it for you. They didn’t have enough evidence or literally anyone to corroborate the story. Gee you think you’d strong arm a prostitute or two to at least drop his name that he was running it. I mean, you guys have a history of it so doesn’t seem that hard to wrestle up a to lie.  

[seafoam1]

2 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

I just corrected the facts. Just because Trump (& a masseuse) called after Epstein was charged doesn’t mean he was guilty, it just means he’s been constantly lying about knowing nothing about it.

If I go get a massage, and somebody else is doing something else somewhere else, that doesn't mean I know what somebody else is doing. 

[SaintsInDome2006]

2 minutes ago, cyclone24 said:

It’s OK I’ll answer it for you. They didn’t have enough evidence or literally anyone to corroborate the story. Gee you think you’d strong arm a prostitute or two to at least drop his name that he was running it. I mean, you guys have a history of it so doesn’t seem that hard to wrestle up a to lie.  

That’s fine. I was just correcting the witness report about the party at Maralago.

[SaintsInDome2006]

2 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

If I go get a massage, and somebody else is doing something else somewhere else, that doesn't mean I know what somebody else is doing. 

Ok but Trump called the Sheriff and told him he did know what was going on & that others did too. It’s also a super relevant point he was the manager of the business where girls were being recruited & parties being held.

[cyclone24]

Just now, SaintsInDome2006 said:

That’s fine. I was just correcting the witness report about the party at Maralago.

Right, but do you understand that you’re doing the thing I exactly was worried people would do? You’re taking bits of pieces of this information that got kicked out, gobbling up it as fact, and then kicking it back out as factual when it’s probably far from it. 

I mean, yeah I would expect that Trump has been places where there’s tons of prostitutes.  Heck I wouldn’t lose a minute sleep if he told me he bought some I’m sure he has. There’s an ocean difference between that and abusing kids or trafficking a prostitute that apparently like being trafficked over and over which is again really weird.

[Hardcore troubadour]

5 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Two according to that presentation as to Epstein claims. I’m not sure counting the allegations against him - one he made himself btw - helps his defense in Epstein.

I recall 14 of them going on 60 minutes right before the election.  And then there is E Jean Carroll. Any I’m missing ? 

[SaintsInDome2006]

Just now, cyclone24 said:

Right, but do you understand that you’re doing the thing I exactly was worried people would do? You’re taking bits of pieces of this information that got kicked out, gobbling up it as fact, and then kicking it back out as factual when it’s probably far from it. 

I mean, yeah I would expect that Trump has been places where there’s tons of prostitutes.  Heck I wouldn’t lose a minute sleep if he told me he bought some I’m sure he has. There’s an ocean difference between that and abusing kids or trafficking a prostitute that apparently like being trafficked over and over which is again really weird.

And I just want you to know I respect your point, & I also respect FBN’s point in the OP. And my answer to that is when a witness is interviewed and describes a crime under penalty of perjury to the FBI there should be some documentation of what was done with that information. And really that’s the point of the OP even if FBN doesn’t realize it.

[seafoam1]

4 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Ok but Trump called the Sheriff and told him he did know what was going on & that others did too. It’s also a super relevant point he was the manager of the business where girls were being recruited & parties being held.

Ok. So you have all these answers that Trump is guilty of obstructing an investigation. Take all that concrete evidence and take it to the media and the DOJ. 

The question stands though. You joined a thread where this is the topic. Address the topic.  Why didn't democrats use all of the allegations against Trump to arrest him?

[edjr]

15 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I like when you get all gibberishy. 

[SaintsInDome2006]

7 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I recall 14 of them going on 60 minutes right before the election.  And then there is E Jean Carroll. Any I’m missing ? 

Well yes, you’re are missing Trump telling an interviewer that he likes to walk up to women & grab them by the crotch (while talking about a hot TV chick outside of earshot) & you forgot Beatrice Keul who said Trump did that exact thing to her.

[SaintsInDome2006]

6 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Ok. So you have all these answers that Trump is guilty of obstructing an investigation. Take all that concrete evidence and take it to the media and the DOJ. 

The question stands though. You joined a thread where this is the topic. Address the topic.  Why didn't democrats use all of the allegations against Trump to arrest him?

I’ve already said that we should be looking for documentation on that point.

And I’m not saying Trump partook, only that he knew what Epstein was doing & envied him for it. But *IMO the reason is like the Kennedy assassination, the DOJ & FBI f’d up and every day & every year it got worse & worse so they hid it more & more.

[cyclone24]

2 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Well yes, you’re are missing Trump telling an interviewer that he likes to walk up to women & grab them by the crotch (while talking about a hot TV chick outside of earshot) & you forgot Beatrice Keul who said Trump did that exact thing to her.

I know, but you’re trying to make 1+1 equal five. 
 

It’s like Trump coming out and saying how he loves blowjobs and then finding someone that says I was at a party once where they were blowjobs going on Trump was there. And I’m pretty sure there was someone under age there therefore Trump got a blowjob from someone under age. 
It’s like all these loose unverified in improving connections.

[Hardcore troubadour]

3 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Well yes, you’re are missing Trump telling an interviewer that he likes to walk up to women & grab them by the crotch (while talking about a hot TV chick outside of earshot) & you forgot Beatrice Keul who said Trump did that exact thing to her.

So Trump is a serial rapist/ assaulter. Surely he must have paid some of them off? 

[seafoam1]

4 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

I’ve already said that we should be looking for documentation on that point.

And I’m not saying Trump partook, only that he knew what Epstein was doing & envied him for it. But *IMO the reason is like the Kennedy assassination, the DOJ & FBI f’d up and every day & every year it got worse & worse so they hid it more & more.

Who "we"?

You all had these so called files for four years. 

Where were all you democrat voters turning the screws on Biden telling him you want answers? 

I saw nothing at all from the media nor on social media.. 

[SaintsInDome2006]

Just now, cyclone24 said:

I know, but you’re trying to make 1+1 equal five. 
 

It’s like Trump coming out and saying how he loves blowjobs and then finding someone that says I was at a party once where they were blowjobs going on Trump was there. And I’m pretty sure there was someone under age there therefore Trump got a blowjob from someone under age. 
It’s like all these loose unverified in improving connections.

Let’s just say I agree with your general premise, because I do. The standard practice of the DOJ is to not reveal implications against uncharged subjects who come up in investigations. I keep trying to agree with your general premise on this, it’s a perfectly reasonable point.

But this *is a different point than the OP. And my point is when those investigations happen - like happened with Trump at least twice - there are conclusions made about who to charge & not charge, & on the credibility of the witnesses, and we have not seen that. 

[seafoam1]

7 minutes ago, cyclone24 said:

I know, but you’re trying to make 1+1 equal five. 
 

It’s like Trump coming out and saying how he loves blowjobs and then finding someone that says I was at a party once where they were blowjobs going on Trump was there. And I’m pretty sure there was someone under age there therefore Trump got a blowjob from someone under age. 
It’s like all these loose unverified in improving connections.

Remember when liberals produced old college associates accusing Kavenaugh of rape? 

Crying about possible crimes from the past is all about timing for liberals. It's a main political strategy for them. 

[SaintsInDome2006]

7 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

So Trump is a serial rapist/ assaulter. Surely he must have paid some of them off? 

Backup. Let’s say you *do agree with me about Trump’s history (Trump’s statement, Carroll, Keul all being consistent) that doesn’t mean he engaged in Epstein’s activities.

Epstein & his estate have paid out millions. One thing DOJ has not produced - & you raised this & I gave you credit for it - was Trump’s deposition in one of the Epstein cases.

I’ve just said Trump knew what was going on & admired it. I haven’t said he was involved in it.

[cyclone24]

1 minute ago, seafoam1 said:

Remember when liberals produced old college associates accusing Kavenaugh of rape? 

Crying about possible crimes from the past is all about timing for liberals. 

Yeah, that’s what I’ve been getting at. They’ve shown they don’t have any problem, drumming someone up to just blatantly lie for them. But for some reason in four years having the information, the liberals claim they had why didn’t they just do it again? 
 

I mean, it’s almost political malpractice not to have used it if you actually had something which tells me they never really actually had anything

[Hardcore troubadour]

It seems all of Trumps victims, and there are a lot, all wait years/ decades to make an allegation, usually around election time. What happened to those 14 skanks that went on 60 minutes? 

[SaintsInDome2006]

3 minutes ago, cyclone24 said:

Yeah, that’s what I’ve been getting at. They’ve shown they don’t have any problem, drumming someone up to just blatantly lie for them. But for some reason in four years having the information, the liberals claim they had why didn’t they just do it again? 
 

I mean, it’s almost political malpractice not to have used it if you actually had something which tells me they never really actually had anything

Unless the DOJ followed traditional policy, which is the thing you properly call for, which is to keep confidential investigations confidential. The only administration to aberrate from that decades long policy is Trump2.