Why didn't democrats use all of the allegations against Trump to arrest him?

[Hardcore troubadour]

5 minutes ago, Strike said:

Oh boy.  Another alias 

I’m on it. We’ll know who in a few. They can’t resist me. 

[cyclone24]

17 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said:

There are some very specific claims, apparently, about Trump raping children in the files: 

https://www.c-span.org/clip/news-conference/rep-ted-lieu-claims-president-trump-is-accused-of-raping-children-in-the-epstein-files/5191713
 

That’s per Congressman Ted Lieu. I make no claims as to whether or not it’s accurate. But it’s not correct to say “there’s nothing there.” 

Lol… i’m going to ignore whatever alias this is but like I said this is the danger and kicking this all out because liberal goofballs will just take everything they see and gobble it up as fact

[Caine Mutiny]

27 minutes ago, cyclone24 said:

Lol… i’m going to ignore whatever alias this is but like I said this is the danger and kicking this all out because liberal goofballs will just take everything they see and gobble it up as fact

Of course they do. Just as conservative goofballs do. Shouldn’t reasonable people on either side investigate what is true and what isn’t? 
 

 

[Strike]

5 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said:

Of course they do. Just as conservative goofballs do. Shouldn’t reasonable people on either side investigate what is true and what isn’t? 
 

 

Reasonable people don't hide behind an alias.

[seafoam1]

8 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said:

Of course they do. Just as conservative goofballs do. Shouldn’t reasonable people on either side investigate what is true and what isn’t? 
 

 

Poor princess rusty..

[Caine Mutiny]

3 minutes ago, Strike said:

Reasonable people don't hide behind an alias.

Of course they do. 100% of the people posting here do so under a name not their own. 
 

But you don’t need to address me as Mr. Mutiny. Caine is fine. 

[Frozenbeernuts]

3 hours ago, Red White and Blue said:

Mutually assured destruction. The files are full of politicians and power brokers on both sides of the aisle. Obviously. 

Terrible logic. Many of the accusations are not even related to Epstein. They could have used those accusations without needing to Crack open the files to get him.

[SaintsInDome2006]

1 hour ago, Caine Mutiny said:

There are some very specific claims, apparently, about Trump raping children in the files: 

https://www.c-span.org/clip/news-conference/rep-ted-lieu-claims-president-trump-is-accused-of-raping-children-in-the-epstein-files/5191713
 

That’s per Congressman Ted Lieu. I make no claims as to whether or not it’s accurate. But it’s not correct to say “there’s nothing there.” 

I’ve posted that presentation that Lieu is holding up several times here. It was created by Bondi’s DOJ in summer last year but no matter. The Trump loyal Attorney General’s own information but it matters not. 

I’ve also posted the two original interview summaries here, so they were real form 302s which witnesses gave under penalty of perjury. One of them did the interview with their attorney. One of the cases likely was part of a settlement with Epstein (or his estate). It’s all treated like kryptonite.

[SaintsInDome2006]

3 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

First of all Ted Lieu. Also there’s nothing credible there. 

It’s not important if you or I think it’s credible, question is if the FBI or DOJ did. One of those two witnesses was interviewed 4 times. One settled with Epstein. Both had case numbers assigned by the FBI and both made it to Bondi.

[Red White and Blue]

18 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

Terrible logic. Many of the accusations are not even related to Epstein. They could have used those accusations without needing to Crack open the files to get him.

You asked why the Dems didn’t use the files against Trump. I’m assuming because the files were also full of Dems like Bill Clinton and because they don’t contain much prosecutable evidence on their own. HTH

[Frozenbeernuts]

1 hour ago, Red White and Blue said:

You asked why the Dems didn’t use the files against Trump. I’m assuming because the files were also full of Dems like Bill Clinton and because they don’t contain much prosecutable evidence on their own. HTH

I asked why they didn't use the allegations against Trump. They happen to be included in the files, but at least a large chunk seem to be unrelated to Epatein. I used that cache of files as an example.

Without unsealing the files, why didn't they use unrelated claims of abuse to imprison him?

[dogcows]

11 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

I asked why they didn't use the allegations against Trump. They happen to be included in the files, but at least a large chunk seem to be unrelated to Epatein. I used that cache of files as an example.

Without unsealing the files, why didn't they use unrelated claims of abuse to imprison him?

I may have mentioned this above, but a lot of liberals think Merrick Garland should have done exactly that.

[Frozenbeernuts]

1 hour ago, dogcows said:

I may have mentioned this above, but a lot of liberals think Merrick Garland should have done exactly that.

Why didn't he?

[Hardcore troubadour]

20 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

Why didn't he?

He was busy with parents at school board meetings that didn’t want boys in the girls locker room and tampons in the boys room. And Catholics. 

[Frozenbeernuts]

3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

He was busy with parents at school board meetings that didn’t want boys in the girls locker room and tampons in the boys room. And Catholics. 

If liberals tried running with this it would honestly be better than anything they have come up with yet.

[Frozenbeernuts]

10 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

A witness was interviewed by the FBI and she told them that a girlfriend invited to a party for Epstein at Maralago & that it was a party with prostitutes. Good point.

There are a ton of allegations. Why didn't a different one stick?

[Frozenbeernuts]

11 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

“We’re all looking for the DOJ who did this.”

These are not the totality of accusations against Trump. Why didn't Biden use the allegations not related to Epstein to convict Trump.

[Hardcore troubadour]

5 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

These are not the totality of accusations against Trump. Why didn't Biden use the allegations not related to Epstein to convict Trump.

Why didn’t Biden arrest anyone as it pertains to Epstein? Maxwell and Epstein were arrested under Trump.  

[Strike]

3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Why didn’t Biden arrest anyone as it pertains to Epstein? Maxwell and Epstein were arrested under Trump.  

Because he was focused on not dribbling his Oatmeal down his chin and all over his bib as the good Doctor fed him.

[Frozenbeernuts]

5 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Why didn’t Biden arrest anyone as it pertains to Epstein? Maxwell and Epstein were arrested under Trump.  

They jump through hoops to make excuses why Biden didn't arrest anyone in the files. I want them to answer why Trump wasn't arrested if all of these accusations not even related to Epstein are true.

[Frozenbeernuts]

4 minutes ago, Strike said:

Because he was focused on not dribbling his Oatmeal down his chin and all over his bib as the good Doctor fed him.

This is definitely part of the reason.

[HotRod]

EXONERATED 

[SaintsInDome2006]

37 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

These are not the totality of accusations against Trump. Why didn't Biden use the allegations not related to Epstein to convict Trump.

1, Because of DOJ regulations, 2. Dems would be exposed, 3. The coconspirators were extremely wealthy & powerful, 4. The DoJ’s & FBI’s failures would be exposed.

[SaintsInDome2006]

41 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

There are a ton of allegations. Why didn't a different one stick?

There are two that the DOJ felt credible enough to make it to Bondi’s presentation. They had case numbers, and the question is whether those files had any prosecution or investigation decisions in them. 

[Frozenbeernuts]

1 minute ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

1, Because of DOJ regulations, 2. Dems would be exposed, 3. The coconspirators were extremely wealthy & powerful, 4. The DoJ’s & FBI’s failures would be exposed.

Ok, so according to your logic, Bidens, Clintons, Obamas, kamala, almost everyone is all in on it. They are all best friends with Trump, and Hollywood loves him behind the scenes.

[Frozenbeernuts]

1 minute ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

There are two that the DOJ felt credible enough to make it to Bondi’s presentation. They had case numbers, and the question is whether those files had any prosecution or investigation decisions in them. 

I am not asking why Bondi didn't prosecute Trump. I am asking about the period during Biden's presidency.

[SaintsInDome2006]

Just now, Frozenbeernuts said:

I am not asking why Bondi didn't prosecute Trump. I am asking about the period during Biden's presidency.

Again it’s in those two files.

[SaintsInDome2006]

5 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

Ok, so according to your logic, Bidens, Clintons, Obamas, kamala, almost everyone is all in on it. They are all best friends with Trump, and Hollywood loves him behind the scenes.

It would help if maga would stop treating the docs like poison Ivy. Just one example is Harvey Weinstein, he was prosecuted but not for Epstein stuff, but he has 3 Epstein complaints against him.

[Frozenbeernuts]

28 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

It would help if maga would stop treating the docs like poison Ivy. Just one example is Harvey Weinstein, he was prosecuted but not for Epstein stuff, but he has 3 Epstein complaints against him.

Exactly my point. According to the anonymous allegations Trump was far more a predator than Weinstien. Weinstien was prosecuted for things outside of the Epstein files. Why couldn't they do that with Trump under the Biden DOJ?

[SaintsInDome2006]

26 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

Exactly my point. According to the anonymous allegations Trump was far more a predator than Weinstien. Weinstien was prosecuted for things outside of the Epstein files. Why couldn't they do that with Trump under the Biden DOJ?

Again, you won’t look at the docs. The FBI was investigating two claims against Trump but three against Weinstein. This is about Epstein claims not the whole wide world of everything claimed about Weinstein & Trump. Weinstein was never indicted by the Feds though, just state DAs in NY & CA. Nothing in the docs about what happened to the three claims about Weinstein.

Also in Bondi’s presentation: Prince Andrew, also with three claims.

[Caine Mutiny]

1. All the files should be released. 
2. Both Merrick Garland and Pam Bondi should be forced to answer to the American public as to why those directly involved were not further investigated or prosecuted. If their answers are not satisfactory then perhaps both of them should be charged with corruption as well. 
 

Does anyone object to this? 
 

The truth is nobody knows the answer to @Frozenbeernuts’s question here, and it’s a legitimate question. I think there’s a lot of corrupt folks here on both sides of the aisle. This is a disgusting story and anyone culpable deserves to go down. 

[seafoam1]

1 hour ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Again, you won’t look at the docs. The FBI was investigating two claims against Trump but three against Weinstein. This is about Epstein claims not the whole wide world of everything claimed about Weinstein & Trump. Weinstein was never indicted by the Feds though, just state DAs in NY & CA. Nothing in the docs about what happened to the three claims about Weinstein.

Also in Bondi’s presentation: Prince Andrew, also with three claims.

Where was all this crying under creepy joe?

You don't care about any "victims"(if there are any). You care about politics. 

 

[SaintsInDome2006]

25 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Where was all this crying under creepy joe?

Good question. Though, again, maga was very much on this as well as the whole issue of Epstein’s death. Funny how maga refuses to take the bow now.

[seafoam1]

27 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Good question. Though, again, maga was very much on this as well as the whole issue of Epstein’s death. Funny how maga refuses to take the bow now.

I don't recall that very much. On this site alone this was never much of a topic at all. Now if you want to talk about conservatives laughing their asses off about creepy joe falling on his face every other few minutes, THAT, was a topic. And how freaking brain dead the guy was, yes. I laughed at that a LOT. 

Me? Myself? Once Epstein was dead and gone, I thought, wait to see what comes of it and then I'll take some notice.

But nothing at all came of it. Until now, TRUMP!! 

Too late. Go suck it. 

[SaintsInDome2006]

16 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

On this site alone this was never much of a topic at all.

No?

[SaintsInDome2006]

3 hours ago, HotRod said:

EXONERATED 

 

On 3/1/2025 at 11:44 AM, HotRod said:

Deep state will never let this out.  Trump needs to go scorched earth.

Take a bow, you were right.

[seafoam1]

3 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

1, Because of DOJ regulations, 2. Dems would be exposed, 3. The coconspirators were extremely wealthy & powerful, 4. The DoJ’s & FBI’s failures would be exposed.

Ok. Well show us all your intel on this. You seem to know all the facts. 

Show us all the proof. 

[seafoam1]

36 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

No?

Half that thread was last year. 

The other half was mostly conservative posters and liberals wanted no part of this in 2023. 

And a couple of the biggest libtards on this site said this early on:

On 11/30/2023 at 10:37 PM, Sean Mooney said:

I don't care about scoring political points over any of it- let them all rot in hell. But people need to stop bringing up Epstein- dude is dead as he should be and the only problem is he didn't suffer enough in his death. 

 

On 12/1/2023 at 5:49 AM, Sean Mooney said:

 

Why does everything have to be a conspiracy with you?

 

On 12/1/2023 at 3:45 PM, Sean Mooney said:

Holy crap dude....the tin foil on your head is strangling your neck and not allowing oxygen to your brain. 

 

On 12/3/2023 at 11:45 AM, thegeneral said:

It was a joke.

You personally have posted about 5000 posts about this since last January. Never before.

Same for the majority of liberals on this site. And the ones that did post back then, wanted nothing to do with this. 

And you found 1 thread. Versus how many do we have since last year? Compare the number of posts pre Trump, vs. post 2024 Trump. And the only similarity between those posts back then and now from the liberals, is, GET TRUMP.

[Hardcore troubadour]

Nice work Mooney. lol. 

[SaintsInDome2006]

9 hours ago, seafoam1 said:

And a couple of the biggest libtards on this site said this early on:

Like I said, maga should take a bow.