Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Massive hospice care fraud exposed in California under Newsomes watch. That’s how they pay off donors and unions. 

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Newsomes wife says that when she reads books to her kids if the protagonist is a male she just changes it to a female. The he’s become she’s becase she wants her kids to see that a woman can be important too! I guess because women have been shut out of all the important roles in our society. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

Holy crap there is a lot of fraud coming out from California. Who would have guessed the guy who called blacks dumb to their face would be such a fraudster.

Just so we’re clear…if someone commits fraud in a particular state, that means the governor of that state is a fraudster?

Posted
23 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Just so we’re clear…if someone commits fraud in a particular state, that means the governor of that state is a fraudster?

To the magnitude it is happening in California? Obviously. Look at the high speed rail that will never be completed. It's either that or Newsome is as retarded as he claims.

Posted
27 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Just so we’re clear…if someone commits fraud in a particular state, that means the governor of that state is a fraudster?

Yes, he's 100% responsible for the fake bridge to nowhere. It's all Newsome, stop making excuses. 

Posted

Newsom will have a lot of competition for the noninatikn. That is because all Democrats know that, just as in 2008, whoever wins the 2028 Democratic nomination will be the next President. 

  • Haha 3
Posted
27 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

Yes, he's 100% responsible for the fake bridge to nowhere. It's all Newsome, stop making excuses. 

No idea why this needs to be explained to Tim like so many other things.

Posted
Just now, Frozenbeernuts said:

No idea why this needs to be explained to Tim like so many other things.

Newsome made tens of millions with this fraud, I'm sure his Aunt Pelosi got some to. 

Posted
43 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said:

Newsom will have a lot of competition for the noninatikn. That is because all Democrats know that, just as in 2008, whoever wins the 2028 Democratic nomination will be the next President. 

⬆️

Brought to you by the same brain that repeated Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris were 100% surefire winners.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
54 minutes ago, CaptainObvious1 said:

⬆️

Brought to you by the same brain that repeated Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris were 100% surefire winners.

I swear this time it's true! Trump is done! CNN promised us. They will stop lying to us eventually. I just know it.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Fraud is part of the structure of the economy in California. It’s all smoke and mirrors. 

Their entire party is all fake. Fake numbers in everything they touch. Pretending there are way more goofy tranny loving lunatics than there actually are.

The push to drop men's T isn't a coincidence. They figure if T gets low enough people's brains will be more amenable to their sick ideas.

Posted
3 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Just so we’re clear…if someone commits fraud in a particular state, that means the governor of that state is a fraudster?

No, that's your strawman.  But go ahead and finish your thought.  I'm sure you have some other Democrat governor in mind like Walz with the massive Somali fraud, since you are moderate and all.  :thumbsup: 

  • Sad 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

No, that's your strawman.  But go ahead and finish your thought.  I'm sure you have some other Democrat governor in mind like Walz with the massive Somali fraud, since you are moderate and all.  :thumbsup: 

I don’t.   But I don’t see why governors should be blamed for fraud in their state.  I’d be curious to hear what @Frozenbeernuts thinks of Rick Scott though.

Posted

More fraud being found. The left acts like fraud, just like illegal border crossings, are a shoulder shrug issue. They can't be solved. Barely mitigated. You just let the fraud happen and hope for the best.

Trump is showing that this mentality is BS, like most of us have been trying to tell the left.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

More fraud being found. The left acts like fraud, just like illegal border crossings, are a shoulder shrug issue. They can't be solved. Barely mitigated. You just let the fraud happen and hope for the best.

Trump is showing that this mentality is BS, like most of us have been trying to tell the left.

Thats part of the plan…allow it to become so bad it’s perceived at unfixable. Posters here have said it themselves, illegal migration is so bad it can’t be fixed. Then, we’re supposed to take the Hillary mindset after Benghazi…at this point what does it really matter? 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

No surprise is that the left assumes Newsome has no clue about any of the billions upon billions of dollars worth of fraud in the state.

Which means he must be that incompetent.

Of course they also argue that he is hugely competent while having no clue what is happening to the money in his state. Nor is he responsible for anything related to money for some reason.

Posted
4 hours ago, TimHauck said:

I don’t.   But I don’t see why governors should be blamed for fraud in their state.  I’d be curious to hear what @Frozenbeernuts thinks of Rick Scott though.

You don't what?  You clearly had a governor in mind, and shockingly, it's a Republican former governor.

Your premise is still a strawman.  Just because governors like Newsom and Walz set up environments which are systemically somewhere between complicit and willfully ignorant about fraud, does not mean that every individual act of fraud in every state is because of the governor.

  • Sad 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

You don't what?  You clearly had a governor in mind, and shockingly, it's a Republican former governor.

Your premise is still a strawman.  Just because governors like Newsom and Walz set up environments which are systemically somewhere between complicit and willfully ignorant about fraud, does not mean that every individual act of fraud in every state is because of the governor.

No I didn’t have a governor in mind.   I just don’t think governors are at fault for fraud that happens in their state.  But like I said, I am curious to hear if@Frozenbeernuts thinks Rick Scott was responsible for the fraud the company he was CEO of was convicted of.

Posted
35 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

You don't what?  You clearly had a governor in mind, and shockingly, it's a Republican former governor.

Your premise is still a strawman.  Just because governors like Newsom and Walz set up environments which are systemically somewhere between complicit and willfully ignorant about fraud, does not mean that every individual act of fraud in every state is because of the governor.

Putting aside the details in each case (which at worst don’t prove either Newsom or Walz are guilty of anything) it’s amazing that some of you guys are even talking about this given the blatant open level of corruption going on in the White House. You’re behaving like useful idiots. You’re especially guilty of this @jerryskids IMO because many of the rest of these dudes are trolls. You’re not, you should know better. 
 

Beginning in 2027 there will be plenty of hearings about corruption, but they won’t be focused on Minnesota or California. The subject matter will be the White House as it should. It will concentrate on Donald Trump’s two sons and Jared Kushner and the rest of them making money off this war, off the ICE and DOGE shams, off the pardon scams, off Crypto and all the other crap the executive is involved with. And of course Epstein. And a lot of people are going to spend some time in prison. 

  • Haha 2
Posted
42 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

No I didn’t have a governor in mind.   I just don’t think governors are at fault for fraud that happens in their state.  But like I said, I am curious to hear if@Frozenbeernuts thinks Rick Scott was responsible for the fraud the company he was CEO of was convicted of.

Moderate Tim, I don't know how to break this to you, but you have Rick Scott in mind.  To repeatedly say you don't, then mention him, is an interesting way to carry on the intelligent discussion @dogcowswas talking about.

21 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said:

Putting aside the details in each case (which at worst don’t prove either Newsom or Walz are guilty of anything) it’s amazing that some of you guys are even talking about this given the blatant open level of corruption going on in the White House. You’re behaving like useful idiots. You’re especially guilty of this @jerryskids IMO because many of the rest of these dudes are trolls. You’re not, you should know better. 
 

Beginning in 2027 there will be plenty of hearings about corruption, but they won’t be focused on Minnesota or California. The subject matter will be the White House as it should. It will concentrate on Donald Trump’s two sons and Jared Kushner and the rest of them making money off this war, off the ICE and DOGE shams, off the pardon scams, off Crypto and all the other crap the executive is involved with. And of course Epstein. And a lot of people are going to spend some time in prison. 

I see we've moved from the strawman to the red herring part of the intelligent discussion now.  

I do like the presumptive "Democrats gonna take over Congress.  Full stop" confidence, though.  :thumbsup: 

  • Sad 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Moderate Tim, I don't know how to break this to you, but you have Rick Scott in mind.  To repeatedly say you don't, then mention him, is an interesting way to carry on the intelligent discussion @dogcowswas talking about.

I see we've moved from the strawman to the red herring part of the intelligent discussion now.  

I do like the presumptive "Democrats gonna take over Congress.  Full stop" confidence, though.  :thumbsup: 

Come on. You gotta know the House is a lock right? More than a lock. 

Posted
21 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said:

Come on. You gotta know the House is a lock right? More than a lock. 

Gavin newsom said he can relate to blacks because he himself is stupid.

That is what this thread is about. 

Posted
55 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Moderate Tim, I don't know how to break this to you, but you have Rick Scott in mind.  To repeatedly say you don't, then mention him, is an interesting way to carry on the intelligent discussion @dogcowswas talking about.

Rick Scott isn’t a governor, genius.

Posted
47 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Rick Scott isn’t a governor, genius.

He was for 8 years, Einstein

  • Sad 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

He was for 8 years, Einstein

I honestly didn’t realize that, ya got me.  The point in bringing him up was because the company he was CEO of, before getting into politics, was convicted of massive fraud, so I’m curious if @Frozenbeernuts thinks he was “responsible” for that.   Because it’d be funny if he didn’t while simultaneously saying Walz and Newsom are responsible for fraud that happens in the state they’re governor of.  But yeah, there is a lot of, dare I say, systemic, fraud in Florida, so sure, that would probably also apply to the governor comparison as well.

Posted
1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

I honestly didn’t realize that, ya got me.  

You could have stopped here.  It kinda takes the bloom off your failed moderate gotcha rose.

But I doubt you'll stop, because you are securing your spot on the Mount Rushmore of Most Insufferable.  :thumbsup: 

  • Haha 1
  • Sad 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...