squistion Posted July 1 Posted July 1 1 hour ago, Hardcore troubadour said: Weiner is the author of numerous pro pedophile bills in California. That is a complete lie but carry on. Quote
Frozenbeernuts Posted July 1 Author Posted July 1 28 minutes ago, squistion said: That is a complete but carry on. I am really surprised to see you defending the democrat who has been involved in multiple pieces of legislation to make the lives of pedophiles easier. Quote
Frozenbeernuts Posted July 1 Author Posted July 1 Libs don't find it weird that they are more triggered that someone may have very slightly mis-attributed certain things to a guy who very obviously is trying to legislate a more easy life for pedophiles than something like Anericans being killed by illegals. No red flags for the squisher or snored as to why they react that way. Quote
squistion Posted July 1 Posted July 1 3 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said: I am really surprised to see you defending the democrat who has been involved in multiple pieces of legislation to make the lives of pedophiles easier. I am not surprised you are repeating the same lies about Weiner that Hardcore Troubadour has told for weeks. He has been asked multiple times for links which has never provided and all we have gotten from others here who have made this claim are reposts of the same unsubstantiated Tweets from sites like Libs of Tik Tok and Gays Against Groomers. Quote
Engorgeous George Posted July 1 Posted July 1 On 6/26/2026 at 12:25 PM, Frozenbeernuts said: Why do these liberal governments need more more more more? Always more. This is coming from the guy is directly responsible for billions of dollars of fraud and waste in Cali. https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/26/gavin-newsom-national-billionaires-tax-california.html Good question. We are told at the inception of any of the social programs that they are to be temporary, a hand up, not a hand out. That our compassion will in a generation or much less have those folks off the dole and made into productive citizens. If that were so moneys to the programs could be redirected to their new programs, the previous ones being a success. They would not need additional funds, they would simply reprogram existing funds from successful programs which then no longer have a purpose or a need. The tax burden is high enough. Time to prioritize causes. If a new cause is urgent enough it can trump a previous, less currently urgent matter and have those funds, but no new additional taxes. 1 Quote
Frozenbeernuts Posted July 1 Author Posted July 1 16 minutes ago, squistion said: I am not surprised you are repeating the same lies about Weiner that Hardcore Troubadour has told for weeks. He has been asked multiple times for links which has never provided and all we have gotten from others here who have made this claim are reposts of the same unsubstantiated Tweets from sites like Libs of Tik Tok and Gays Against Groomers. Again, I am not surprised at all that out of all of the people you could possible lend concern to, it would be defending Weiner. Not surprised in the least. You know what they say, birds of a feather and all. Quote
squistion Posted July 1 Posted July 1 4 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said: Again, I am not surprised at all that out of all of the people you could possible lend concern to, it would be defending Weiner. Not surprised in the least. You know what they say, birds of a feather and all. People should read the what the bills he has supported actually say and/or do along with the reasons he gave for supporting them, rather than just reposting some misleading tweet from Libs Of TikTok or Gays Against Groomers. Quote
Frozenbeernuts Posted July 1 Author Posted July 1 11 minutes ago, squistion said: People should read the what the bills he has supported actually say and/or do along with the reasons he gave for supporting them, rather than just reposting some misleading tweet from Libs Of TikTok or Gays Against Groomers. Yes yes, we know. It was super important that you come to the defense of Weiner, a guy who dresses in bondage in public. Quote
squistion Posted July 1 Posted July 1 6 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said: Yes yes, we know. It was super important that you come to the defense of Weiner, a guy who dresses in bondage in public. No he hasn't dressed in bondage, however he has attended San Francisco’s annual Folsom Street Fair festival in a leather vest and leather tie. https://nypost.com/2025/10/17/us-news/leather-wearing-democratic-state-lawmaker-scott-wiener-to-challenge-nancy-pelosi-for-california-house-seat/ Quote
League Champion Posted July 1 Posted July 1 31 minutes ago, squistion said: No he hasn't dressed in bondage, however he has attended San Francisco’s annual Folsom Street Fair festival in a leather vest and leather tie. https://nypost.com/2025/10/17/us-news/leather-wearing-democratic-state-lawmaker-scott-wiener-to-challenge-nancy-pelosi-for-california-house-seat/ California has the highest homeless population in the Country. Tell me again how Newsome is doing it right. Quote
Frozenbeernuts Posted July 1 Author Posted July 1 2 minutes ago, League Champion said: California has the highest homeless population in the Country. Tell me again how Newsome is doing it right. He will most likely resort to butt Trumping Quote
Frozenbeernuts Posted July 2 Author Posted July 2 The citizens of LA want more of Bass despite their largest homeless NGO being caught in a fraud scheme? Remember, California has spent $25 billion to fight homelessness. Yet their homeless population has increased. Wouldn't the goal be to get people back on their feet and off the streets? If you think Bass didn't know about this, I have a pile of wood that identifies as gold to sell you. Quote
TimHauck Posted July 3 Posted July 3 On 4/30/2026 at 1:27 PM, Hardcore troubadour said: LAPD police chief says he does not have enough cops for the Olympics this summer and he has not received any additional resources in anticipation of the Games. Wow. Trump to the rescue. On 5/1/2026 at 7:22 AM, TimHauck said: Olympics aren’t this summer Lol Quote
Frozenbeernuts Posted July 3 Author Posted July 3 57 minutes ago, TimHauck said: Lol You pick the dumbest things to point out. Quote
Frozenbeernuts Posted July 8 Author Posted July 8 This is getting proper focked by California. It's definitely not a scam. They just need more and more taxes because... well just shut up and pay them liberals. Unless you want daddy Trump to win. Quote
easilyscan Posted Monday at 04:15 AM Posted Monday at 04:15 AM https://babylonbee.com/news/newsom-we-finna-teach-da-homies-to-talk-black-english-yo Quote
Frozenbeernuts Posted Tuesday at 02:41 PM Author Posted Tuesday at 02:41 PM So California takes tax payer dollars and gives it to NGOs to spend on pushing democrat political campaigns? What does NGO stand for again? Non Governmental Organization is it? That can't be right. Quote
Frozenbeernuts Posted Friday at 06:33 PM Author Posted Friday at 06:33 PM You can tell she is a psycho, and she is really wrestling with how to twist everything. Not the best liar in the world. Mamdani is better. He was trained really well. Quote
seafoam1 Posted Friday at 06:45 PM Posted Friday at 06:45 PM 11 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said: You can tell she is a psycho, and she is really wrestling with how to twist everything. Not the best liar in the world. Mamdani is better. He was trained really well. Why the heck would that woman feel comfortable going on television? She's a freaking wreck. Quote
seafoam1 Posted Friday at 06:48 PM Posted Friday at 06:48 PM And newscum was correct. He really is dumb. At least he knows that. Quote
Frozenbeernuts Posted Friday at 06:49 PM Author Posted Friday at 06:49 PM 3 minutes ago, seafoam1 said: Why the heck would that woman feel comfortable going on television? She's a freaking wreck. She isn't the best asset they have that's for sure. She is very white and good looking which makes her at least somewhat useful. Quote
seafoam1 Posted Friday at 06:54 PM Posted Friday at 06:54 PM 1 minute ago, Frozenbeernuts said: She isn't the best asset they have that's for sure. She is very white and good looking with makes her at least somewhat useful. Maybe. But she's a sputtering low IQ politician's spouse. All liberal politicians have them. I guess I can't blame the spouses, 90% of the actual democrat politicians are dumb as rocks. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.