Gavin Newsom spox tells reporter 'f--- off' when asked for records of his dyslexia diagnosis

[seafoam1]

 960 on the SAT. 

https://www.foxnews.com/media/gavin-newsom-spox-tells-reporter-f-off-when-asked-records-his-dyslexia-diagnosis

A chief spokesperson for Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom lashed out at a reporter Monday asking for medical records documenting his dyslexia diagnosis.

Newsom, who's been outspoken about his dyslexia since at least 2004 when he was mayor of San Francisco, is facing blowback for comments he made in Atlanta, Georgia over the weekend when he invoked his reading disability.

RealClearPolitics correspondent Susan Crabtree revealed the expletive-tinged response she received when she asked for proof of Newsom's dyslexia diagnosis, which the governor previously said he received in 1972 when he was a young child.

"Hey Susan — thanks for reaching out," wrote Newsom's communications director Izzy Gardon, according to a screenshot of the email Crabtree shared on X.

"Respectfully, f--- off," Gardon told Crabtree.

[squistion]

You know the MAGA folks are worried about Gavin Newsom in 2028 or they wouldn't keep starting threads about him.

[seafoam1]

2 minutes ago, squistion said:

You know the MAGA folks are worried about Gavin Newsom in 2028 or they wouldn't keep starting threads about him.

No. He's funny like biden was. 

All there is left is for newsom to keep falling down. 

Now go start a thread about Trump because you haven't reached 200,000 Trump threads yet. 

[Voltaire]

9 minutes ago, squistion said:

You know the MAGA folks are worried about Gavin Newsom in 2028 or they wouldn't keep starting threads about him.

We want Gavin Newsom to win the Democratic Primary. We can just point to California and ask "do you want this for you?" His state ought to be one of the richest, as it use to be, but now it's a basket case. That's because their governor is proud to have the IQ of a pencil-eating retard and their voting population, composed of people that aren't smart enough to have already fled, are just as stoopid as he is.

You can just point to California and its dysfunction and compare and contrast it to wherever you live. Newsom personifies all the flaws of the Democratic Party in 2026.

[Caine Mutiny]

2 hours ago, Voltaire said:

We want Gavin Newsom to win the Democratic Primary. We can just point to California and ask "do you want this for you?" His state ought to be one of the richest, as it use to be, but now it's a basket case. That's because their governor is proud to have the IQ of a pencil-eating retard and their voting population, composed of people that aren't smart enough to have already fled, are just as stoopid as he is.

You can just point to California and its dysfunction and compare and contrast it to wherever you live. Newsom personifies all the flaws of the Democratic Party in 2026.

You can make all of these arguments and I’m sure you will. But they won’t matter. I have no idea if Newsom is going to win the nomination at this point but if it’s Newsom vs Vance, Newsom will destroy him and win quite easily. Surely you realize this, right? 

[weepaws]

4 hours ago, squistion said:

You know the MAGA folks are worried about Gavin Newsom in 2028 or they wouldn't keep starting threads about him.

Heck I’m worried about him, any  person should, would be, only a complete insane  person wouldn’t be.  

[Frozenbeernuts]

This guy is a train wreck.

[Maximum Overkill]

7 hours ago, seafoam1 said:

Newsom, who's been outspoken about his dyslexia

I knew he was a tard. 

[Voltaire]

5 hours ago, Caine Mutiny said:

You can make all of these arguments and I’m sure you will. But they won’t matter. I have no idea if Newsom is going to win the nomination at this point but if it’s Newsom vs Vance, Newsom will destroy him and win quite easily. Surely you realize this, right? 

This is a dream matchup and I'd love to see Newsom or AOC win the Democrat nomination since its so important that Trump's reforms last another presidential term and all this radical leftwing extremism be as close to permanently stomped out for good as possible. 

Newsom has zero accomplishments, whacko California beliefs, and a bajillion tons of failure baggage as the governor of the most failing state in the nation. JD Vance, literally (and I know how to use that word properly) wrote the book on blue collar Midwest resentments of Coastal dipsh!ts like Newsom and speaks it as his native tongue. Some failed California twit like Newsom has no chance against home-grown Vance in purple Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin let alone any red states.

The Democrats are going to need to find a mainstream moderate candidate to win, but not only are they are fresh out of any, they don't want one anyways. They'll want a hair-on-fire Communist freak and I want them to find one too. Newsom works for me. Better him than Halfwhit or Josh Shapiro. PetButt could be formidable but I suspect that he would also help catalyze the Blexit from the Democratic party.

[Tree of Knowledge]

Let’s not leave out the fact he was Paul Pelosi’s original cabana boy.  

[Mike Hunt]

9 hours ago, squistion said:

You know the MAGA folks are worried about Gavin Newsom in 2028 or they wouldn't keep starting threads about him.

 

 

Newsom has a couple of things to run on.   His best lib friends should be worried about him banging their wives. 

Despite the state's high tax rate California's total state and local government debt is estimated at over $1.3 trillion to $1.6 trillion, ranking it the highest in the U.S.

[Tree of Knowledge]

Is Newsom ever doing governor work?

[TimHauck]

Very unprofessional response.  Seems to be par for the course in politics these days 

[cmh6476]

[Fnord]

2 hours ago, Voltaire said:

This is a dream matchup and I'd love to see Newsom or AOC win the Democrat nomination since its so important that Trump's reforms last another presidential term and all this radical leftwing extremism be as close to permanently stomped out for good as possible. 

Newsom has zero accomplishments, whacko California beliefs, and a bajillion tons of failure baggage as the governor of the most failing state in the nation. JD Vance, literally (and I know how to use that word properly) wrote the book on blue collar Midwest resentments of Coastal dipsh!ts like Newsom and speaks it as his native tongue. Some failed California twit like Newsom has no chance against home-grown Vance in purple Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin let alone any red states.

The Democrats are going to need to find a mainstream moderate candidate to win, but not only are they are fresh out of any, they don't want one anyways. They'll want a hair-on-fire Communist freak and I want them to find one too. Newsom works for me. Better him than Halfwhit or Josh Shapiro. PetButt could be formidable but I suspect that he would also help catalyze the Blexit from the Democratic party.

This is how I know you live in an information bubble. You have no concept of how reviled this current admin is. You still think some silent majority supports MAGA. They don't. Americans that aren't beholden to entirely right wing news sources are finally understanding that this admin has caused more constitutional damage, violated more laws, and lied to them more times in 13 months than any other regime could manage in 8 years. Keep ignoring it though, so you can claim FRAUD endlessly over the next two election cycles. It's all you've got left, other than focking with the elections themselves, which will be attempted.

[HellToupee]

7 hours ago, Caine Mutiny said:

You can make all of these arguments and I’m sure you will. But they won’t matter. I have no idea if Newsom is going to win the nomination at this point but if it’s Newsom vs Vance, Newsom will destroy him and win quite easily. Surely you realize this, right? 

Are you short?

[seafoam1]

It's funny to see liberals cling to the notion that Trump is hated by Americans who voted for him a second time in landslide victory fashion.

Liberals are drowning and deperately looking for something to hang on to while they are sucking salt water into the their lungs and flailing about. 

[Meglamaniac]

51 minutes ago, Fnord said:

This is how I know you live in an information bubble. Keep ignoring it though, so you can claim FRAUD endlessly over the next two election cycles. It's all you've got left, other than focking with the elections themselves, which will be attempted.

This isa truly delusional post.

To say 

You have no concept of how reviled this current admin is. You still think some silent majority supports MAGA. They don't. Americans that aren't beholden to entirely right wing news sources are finally understanding that this admin has caused more constitutional damage, violated more laws, and lied to them more times in 13 months than any other regime could manage in 8 years.

 

and 

This is how I know you live in an information bubble.

In the same breath is comical

Someone is living in an information bubble but it's not who you claim

[Meglamaniac]

8 hours ago, Caine Mutiny said:

You can make all of these arguments and I’m sure you will. But they won’t matter. I have no idea if Newsom is going to win the nomination at this point but if it’s Newsom vs Vance, Newsom will destroy him and win quite easily. Surely you realize this, right? 

More delusion, but thanks for the laugh

[Hardcore troubadour]

He’s lost Charlemagne the God. It’s over. Who’s next? 

[Fnord]

35 minutes ago, Meglamaniac said:

This isa truly delusional post.

To say 

You have no concept of how reviled this current admin is. You still think some silent majority supports MAGA. They don't. Americans that aren't beholden to entirely right wing news sources are finally understanding that this admin has caused more constitutional damage, violated more laws, and lied to them more times in 13 months than any other regime could manage in 8 years.

 

and 

This is how I know you live in an information bubble.

In the same breath is comical

Someone is licing in an information bubble but it's not who you claim

No? Perhaps you can educate me then. Please elaborate on how folks that defend the Don endlessly without (or barely) acknowledging the unprecedented nature of what he does aren't in a bubble? Calling his every defeat a result of outside forces, TDS, judicial activism, etc. as opposed to blaming him directly for anything? Maintaining joyful ignorance of the MANY examples of apparent corruption? Telling us every single democrat is violent, crazy, tranny, etc? Praising every member of the cabinet, hired exclusively for their loyalty, while complaining about DEI on an endless loop? Dismissing practically every negative statement by spewing "TDS!"

This is Volty, FFS. A revered Geek, even by those of us that disagree with him politically. He used to have functional reasoning capabilities:

3 hours ago, Voltaire said:

This is a dream matchup and I'd love to see Newsom or AOC win the Democrat nomination since its so important that Trump's reforms last another presidential term and all this radical leftwing extremism be as close to permanently stomped out for good as possible. 

Newsom has zero accomplishments, whacko California beliefs, and a bajillion tons of failure baggage as the governor of the most failing state in the nation. JD Vance, literally (and I know how to use that word properly) wrote the book on blue collar Midwest resentments of Coastal dipsh!ts like Newsom and speaks it as his native tongue. Some failed California twit like Newsom has no chance against home-grown Vance in purple Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin let alone any red states.

The Democrats are going to need to find a mainstream moderate candidate to win, but not only are they are fresh out of any, they don't want one anyways. They'll want a hair-on-fire Communist freak and I want them to find one too. Newsom works for me. Better him than Halfwhit or Josh Shapiro. PetButt could be formidable but I suspect that he would also help catalyze the Blexit from the Democratic party.

This is openly advocating for zero dissent, zero discussion, and rule by fiat. It's extremism. Show me where I'm wrong. Please. 

I mean, JD Vance was nurtured under the wing of a Silicon Valley nutjob that doesn't believe in Democracy. But he's a blue collar midwesterner? C'mon, man!

[Hardcore troubadour]

Obama spied on his political opponents.  He should be charged 

[Strike]

8 hours ago, Caine Mutiny said:

You can make all of these arguments and I’m sure you will. But they won’t matter. I have no idea if Newsom is going to win the nomination at this point but if it’s Newsom vs Vance, Newsom will destroy him and win quite easily. Surely you realize this, right? 

That's what everyone said about Hitlery too.  How'd that work out for you?

[Meglamaniac]

12 minutes ago, Fnord said:

No? Perhaps you can educate me then. Please elaborate on how folks that defend the Don endlessly without (or barely) acknowledging the unprecedented nature of what he does aren't in a bubble? Calling his every defeat a result of outside forces, TDS, judicial activism, etc. as opposed to blaming him directly for anything? Maintaining joyful ignorance of the MANY examples of apparent corruption? Telling us every single democrat is violent, crazy, tranny, etc? Praising every member of the cabinet, hired exclusively for their loyalty, while complaining about DEI on an endless loop? Dismissing practically every negative statement by spewing "TDS!"

This is Volty, FFS. A revered Geek, even by those of us that disagree with him politically. He used to have functional reasoning capabilities:

This is openly advocating for zero dissent, zero discussion, and rule by fiat. It's extremism. Show me where I'm wrong. Please. 

I mean, JD Vance was nurtured under the wing of a Silicon Valley nutjob that doesn't believe in Democracy. But he's a blue collar midwesterner? C'mon, man!

No where in my reply did I address people that endlessly defend Don or any of the other multiple hyperboles you list in your rant above

HTH

What is comical is this statemen, mainly the bolded, it's quite the proclamation based on absolutely nothing other than your emotions 

 

You still think some silent majority supports MAGA. They don't. Americans that aren't beholden to entirely right wing news sources are finally understanding that this admin has caused more constitutional damage, violated more laws, and lied to them more times in 13 months than any other regime could manage in 8 years.

[listen2me 23]

When he said im just like you guys was he speaking to a room full of dyslexic people?

Did he explain what he meant by it?

 

[thegeneral]

He should have written “FCUK OFF”.

[Caine Mutiny]

13 minutes ago, Strike said:

That's what everyone said about Hitlery too.  How'd that work out for you?

It didn’t work out for me and it won’t this time either since I have no particular love for Newsom, or Kamala or practically any other Democrat. 

I think @Voltaire is correct that if an extreme leftist like AOC is the candidate, which is very possible, then Vance will be the favorite in 2028. But if it’s Newsom or Shapiro or Pritzker, whom, whatever their faults, are generally regarded as “mainstream” Dems, forget it. The Democrat will win easily because America will spend the next two election cycles, at least, rejecting Donald Trump and MAGA. That’s my expectation and it really doesn’t matter what either you or I might WANT to happen. 

[Hardcore troubadour]

Shapiro isn’t winning.  Young democrats are antisemitism. Ya heard? 

[Strike]

2 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said:

It didn’t work out for me and it won’t this time either since I have no particular love for Newsom, or Kamala or practically any other Democrat. 

I think @Voltaire is correct that if an extreme leftist like AOC is the candidate, which is very possible, then Vance will be the favorite in 2028. But if it’s Newsom or Shapiro or Pritzker, whom, whatever their faults, are generally regarded as “mainstream” Dems, forget it. The Democrat will win easily because America will spend the next two election cycles, at least, rejecting Donald Trump and MAGA. That’s my expectation and it really doesn’t matter what either you or I might WANT to happen. 

Okay Tim.

[Meglamaniac]

3 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said:

It didn’t work out for me and it won’t this time either since I have no particular love for Newsom, or Kamala or practically any other Democrat. 

I think @Voltaire is correct that if an extreme leftist like AOC is the candidate, which is very possible, then Vance will be the favorite in 2028. But if it’s Newsom or Shapiro or Pritzker, whom, whatever their faults, are generally regarded as “mainstream” Dems, forget it. The Democrat will win easily because America will spend the next two election cycles, at least, rejecting Donald Trump and MAGA. That’s my expectation and it really doesn’t matter what either you or I might WANT to happen. 

Yep, RealTimish reply here

[TheNewGirl]

45 minutes ago, Strike said:

Okay Tim.

 

44 minutes ago, Meglamaniac said:

Yep, RealTimish reply here

Excellent call. 

[Gladiators]

13 hours ago, squistion said:

You know the MAGA folks are worried about Gavin Newsom in 2028 or they wouldn't keep starting threads about him.

Yeah right.  

[Caine Mutiny]

19 minutes ago, Gladiators said:

Yeah right.  

They need a distraction. Gavin Newsom could spend the next 20 years making dumb comments, insults, and offensive statements and he still couldn’t catch up to the President: 

[Hardcore troubadour]

It’s almost a trend with white Democrat males to make up some sort of disability. 

[seafoam1]

6 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said:

They need a distraction. Gavin Newsom could spend the next 20 years making dumb comments, insults, and offensive statements and he still couldn’t catch up to the President: 

Trump won by a landslide timmy. 

[Engorgeous George]

Kuff cof

[Fnord]

8 hours ago, Meglamaniac said:

No where in my reply did I address people that endlessly defend Don or any of the other multiple hyperboles you list in your rant above

HTH

What is comical is this statemen, mainly the bolded, it's quite the proclamation based on absolutely nothing other than your emotions 

 

You still think some silent majority supports MAGA. They don't. Americans that aren't beholden to entirely right wing news sources are finally understanding that this admin has caused more constitutional damage, violated more laws, and lied to them more times in 13 months than any other regime could manage in 8 years.

I can back up everything I said there with multiple links if you want, using nothing but respected legacy media sources.

But I'm pretty sure you won't care, or read any of it. Apologies if I'm wrong.

I'm not doing a time consuming project like that so it can be ignored by folks that have already determined I'm FOS. But for you, I will. Just say the word and tell me you'll look at it with an open mind.

[Hardcore troubadour]

Pretty good bet Newsome made the whole dyslexia thing up. Just like Biden and his stutter. What a bunch of weaklings. 

[Meglamaniac]

1 minute ago, Fnord said:

I can back up everything I said there with multiple links if you want, using nothing but respected legacy media sources.

But I'm pretty sure you won't care, or read any of it. Apologies if I'm wrong.

I'm not doing a time consuming project like that so it can be ignored by folks that have already determined I'm FOS. But for you, I will. Just say the word and tell me you'll look at it with an open mind.

You're going to post proof that 

You still think some silent majority supports MAGA. They don't.

and

Americans that aren't beholden to entirely right wing news sources are finally understanding that this admin has caused more constitutional damage, violated more laws, and lied to them more times in 13 months than any other regime could manage in 8 years.

 

Yes, by all means prove these speculations of yours

 

[TimHauck]

8 hours ago, Caine Mutiny said:

It didn’t work out for me and it won’t this time either since I have no particular love for Newsom, or Kamala or practically any other Democrat. 

I think @Voltaire is correct that if an extreme leftist like AOC is the candidate, which is very possible, then Vance will be the favorite in 2028. But if it’s Newsom or Shapiro or Pritzker, whom, whatever their faults, are generally regarded as “mainstream” Dems, forget it. The Democrat will win easily because America will spend the next two election cycles, at least, rejecting Donald Trump and MAGA. That’s my expectation and it really doesn’t matter what either you or I might WANT to happen. 

AOC the Dem nominee?  No chance, IMO