cyclone24 Posted March 4 Posted March 4 7 minutes ago, thegeneral said: What does this mean? Got rid of the rinos…. Quote
thegeneral Posted March 4 Posted March 4 6 minutes ago, cyclone24 said: Got rid of the rinos…. The NC guy? Quote
FrancieFootball Posted March 4 Posted March 4 20 minutes ago, cyclone24 said: Tillis out….this is a bloodbath He announced last summer that he wasn't seeking re-election, idiot. 1 Quote
FrancieFootball Posted March 4 Posted March 4 3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: Crenshaw out! Buh bye ! Nothing like MAGAs setting up themselves for failure in November. BUH BYE! Quote
seafoam1 Posted March 4 Posted March 4 19 minutes ago, FrancieFootball said: Nothing like MAGAs setting up themselves for failure in November. BUH BYE! Princess rusty is hurting so bad right now. Quote
Strike Posted March 4 Posted March 4 Jasmine Crockett says there was cheating in the election. Wait, the Dems always tell us that's not possible!!!! https://wabcradio.com/2026/03/03/crockett-calls-cheating/ She also bailed on her watch party. She's more of a sore loser than Hitlery!!!!! Quote
Caine Mutiny Posted March 4 Author Posted March 4 1 hour ago, Strike said: Jasmine Crockett says there was cheating in the election. Wait, the Dems always tell us that's not possible!!!! https://wabcradio.com/2026/03/03/crockett-calls-cheating/ She also bailed on her watch party. She's more of a sore loser than Hitlery!!!!! Only you could deliberately misconstrue this. She’s not talking about her opponent. She’s talking about what she believes is a deliberate Republican attempt to suppress voting by (1) changing the rules in the heavily black area of Dallas (2) misinforming voters where to go to vote (3) successfully asking the state Supreme Court not to allow extended voting hours despite these mistakes. Now personally I don’t think Republicans did all of this deliberately (beyond the initial suppression.) I have no idea what Paxton is thinking; if he wants to win in November he has a much better shot against Talarico. The whole thing is stupid, plus it’s a good way for the GOP to piss voters off (they’re good at that.) But Crockett is absolutely right to be upset, unlike the whining moron in the White House you voted for. 1 Quote
seafoam1 Posted March 4 Posted March 4 4 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said: Only you could deliberately misconstrue this. She’s not talking about her opponent. She’s talking about what she believes is a deliberate Republican attempt to suppress voting by (1) changing the rules in the heavily black area of Dallas (2) misinforming voters where to go to vote (3) successfully asking the state Supreme Court not to allow extended voting hours despite these mistakes. Now personally I don’t think Republicans did all of this deliberately (beyond the initial suppression.) I have no idea what Paxton is thinking; if he wants to win in November he has a much better shot against Talarico. The whole thing is stupid, plus it’s a good way for the GOP to piss voters off (they’re good at that.) But Crockett is absolutely right to be upset, unlike the whining moron in the White House you voted for. Crockett cries cheating and the tim supports it full force. But doesn't believe it happens. This is weird. 1 Quote
TimHauck Posted March 4 Posted March 4 7 hours ago, FrancieFootball said: He announced last summer that he wasn't seeking re-election, idiot. @cyclone24 just says stuff Quote
Tree of Knowledge Posted March 4 Posted March 4 6 hours ago, Strike said: Jasmine Crockett says there was cheating in the election. Wait, the Dems always tell us that's not possible!!!! https://wabcradio.com/2026/03/03/crockett-calls-cheating/ She also bailed on her watch party. She's more of a sore loser than Hitlery!!!!! Racism in the Democrat party is still alive and well. Only allow a sister a taste before they pull the rug out from under her. Hopefully, they realize those are the plantation rules and walk away. 1 Quote
TimHauck Posted March 4 Posted March 4 6 hours ago, Strike said: Jasmine Crockett says there was cheating in the election. Wait, the Dems always tell us that's not possible!!!! https://wabcradio.com/2026/03/03/crockett-calls-cheating/ She also bailed on her watch party. She's more of a sore loser than Hitlery!!!!! 4 hours ago, Caine Mutiny said: Only you could deliberately misconstrue this. She’s not talking about her opponent. She’s talking about what she believes is a deliberate Republican attempt to suppress voting by (1) changing the rules in the heavily black area of Dallas (2) misinforming voters where to go to vote (3) successfully asking the state Supreme Court not to allow extended voting hours despite these mistakes. Now personally I don’t think Republicans did all of this deliberately (beyond the initial suppression.) I have no idea what Paxton is thinking; if he wants to win in November he has a much better shot against Talarico. The whole thing is stupid, plus it’s a good way for the GOP to piss voters off (they’re good at that.) But Crockett is absolutely right to be upset, unlike the whining moron in the White House you voted for. You mean Strike believed a biased source taking something completely out of context? No way! 1 Quote
Sean Mooney Posted March 4 Posted March 4 39 minutes ago, TimHauck said: You mean Strike believed a biased source taking something completely out of context? No way! Not @Strike.......BTW Strike- you come up with the banned alias yet? Quote
MDC Posted March 4 Posted March 4 21 hours ago, Sean Mooney said: So you are a hypocrite then? I mean we all knew that...but always good to see you lay it bare for everyone over and over. Quote
Meglamaniac Posted March 4 Posted March 4 LOL Lots of good in this thread Gotta love There's going to be a huge blue wave this November!! Followed closely by But if there isn't it's because of excuse, excuse, excuse and excuse Also also, RealTim wrong, I didn't see that coming LOL 1 Quote
TimHauck Posted March 4 Posted March 4 23 minutes ago, Meglamaniac said: LOL Lots of good in this thread Gotta love There's going to be a huge blue wave this November!! Followed closely by But if there isn't it's because of excuse, excuse, excuse and excuse Also also, RealTim wrong, I didn't see that coming LOL Strike not backing up his claim, being a hypocrite, and believing misleading sources was pretty funny too Quote
thegeneral Posted March 4 Posted March 4 8 minutes ago, cyclone24 said: Whoops…. people like Trump. Who would’ve guessed. He picks them when there’s no doubt. That’s why he hasn’t picked one in the Texas race yet. Front runner. Quote
Strike Posted March 4 Posted March 4 6 hours ago, seafoam1 said: Crockett cries cheating and the tim supports it full force. But doesn't believe it happens. This is weird. It's (D)ifferent when candidates he supports cry cheating, even the vile disgusting candidates that no one should support. Quote
TimHauck Posted March 4 Posted March 4 10 minutes ago, Strike said: It's (D)ifferent when candidates he supports cry cheating, even the vile disgusting candidates that no one should support. The actual difference is she’s not accusing anyone of fraud 1 Quote
TimHauck Posted March 4 Posted March 4 7 hours ago, Caine Mutiny said: Only you could deliberately misconstrue this. She’s not talking about her opponent. She’s talking about what she believes is a deliberate Republican attempt to suppress voting by (1) changing the rules in the heavily black area of Dallas (2) misinforming voters where to go to vote (3) successfully asking the state Supreme Court not to allow extended voting hours despite these mistakes. Now personally I don’t think Republicans did all of this deliberately (beyond the initial suppression.) I have no idea what Paxton is thinking; if he wants to win in November he has a much better shot against Talarico. The whole thing is stupid, plus it’s a good way for the GOP to piss voters off (they’re good at that.) But Crockett is absolutely right to be upset, unlike the whining moron in the White House you voted for. Well if Paxton has a better shot against Talarico, wouldn’t he be in favor of suppressing the black vote that would be more likely to vote for Crockett? Quote
cyclone24 Posted March 4 Posted March 4 23 minutes ago, thegeneral said: He picks them when there’s no doubt. That’s why he hasn’t picked one in the Texas race yet. Front runner. man he’s good. Just happened to pick 46 front runners and didn’t miss any of them. Quote
Strike Posted March 4 Posted March 4 8 minutes ago, TimHauck said: The actual difference is she’s not accusing anyone of fraud Right. It's because she's losing. She never would have made any accusations if she had 52% or whatever her opponent has. She's doing EXACTLY what Dems accuse Republicans of doing when they lose and argue about voting irregularities. You and banned Tim only THINK it's (D)ifferent. Quote
thegeneral Posted March 4 Posted March 4 Just now, cyclone24 said: man he’s good. Just happened to pick 46 front runners and didn’t miss any of them. I can pick 50 Dems right now too. Thats how rigged districts are. Pretty sad actually. Why don’t you think he’s picked the Texas race yet? Quote
TimHauck Posted March 4 Posted March 4 2 minutes ago, cyclone24 said: man he’s good. Just happened to pick 46 front runners and didn’t miss any of them. Well 35% of those ran unopposed… 1 Quote
TimHauck Posted March 4 Posted March 4 2 minutes ago, Strike said: Right. It's because she's losing. She never would have made any accusations if she had 52% or whatever her opponent has. She's doing EXACTLY what Dems accuse Republicans of doing when they lose and argue about voting irregularities. You and banned Tim only THINK it's (D)ifferent. Lots of people on both sides are sore losers. Most of them don’t spend 5+ years crying about it. Quote
Strike Posted March 4 Posted March 4 1 minute ago, TimHauck said: Lots of people on both sides are sore losers. At least you finally admit she's just being a sore loser Mongo. Now explain that to your banned namesake Quote
cyclone24 Posted March 4 Posted March 4 2 minutes ago, TimHauck said: Well 35% of those ran unopposed… How about the 30 other ones? Again y’all we’re just gonna have to cope with the fact people like him and despite all this nonsense about in six months his base is going to abandon him. It was gibberish as usual. Quote
TimHauck Posted March 4 Posted March 4 6 minutes ago, Strike said: At least you finally admit she's just being a sore loser Mongo. Now explain that to your banned namesake Well Crockett did formally concede the race. Did Trump ever formally do that for 2020? Quote
RaiderHaters Revenge Posted March 4 Posted March 4 7 hours ago, Caine Mutiny said: Only you could deliberately misconstrue this. She’s not talking about her opponent. She’s talking about what she believes is a deliberate Republican attempt to suppress voting by (1) changing the rules in the heavily black area of Dallas (2) misinforming voters where to go to vote (3) successfully asking the state Supreme Court not to allow extended voting hours despite these mistakes. Now personally I don’t think Republicans did all of this deliberately (beyond the initial suppression.) I have no idea what Paxton is thinking; if he wants to win in November he has a much better shot against Talarico. The whole thing is stupid, plus it’s a good way for the GOP to piss voters off (they’re good at that.) But Crockett is absolutely right to be upset, unlike the whining moron in the White House you voted for. The democrats are the one that focked her Colbert and the rest of that while lying about Trump‘s suppressing an interview Quote
FrancieFootball Posted March 4 Posted March 4 3 hours ago, TimHauck said: @cyclone24 just says stuff Ronald Reagan got zero votes. #bloodbath. Quote
Strike Posted March 4 Posted March 4 3 minutes ago, TimHauck said: Well Crockett did formally concede the race. Did Trump ever formally do that for 2020? Yes. One would think you'd be aware of that if you're not just an ignorant troll. Quote
FrancieFootball Posted March 4 Posted March 4 1 minute ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said: The democrats are the one that focked her Colbert and the rest of that while lying about Trump‘s suppressing an interview This makes zero sense. Quote
FrancieFootball Posted March 4 Posted March 4 1 minute ago, Strike said: Yes. One would think you'd be aware of that if you're not just an ignorant troll. He conceded that he lost an election that he falsely claims to this day was rigged. Quote
thegeneral Posted March 4 Posted March 4 2 minutes ago, Strike said: Yes. One would think you'd be aware of that if you're not just an ignorant troll. He said the election was rigged yesterday while talking about dead troops and the war. Quote
Strike Posted March 4 Posted March 4 4 minutes ago, FrancieFootball said: He conceded that he lost an election that he falsely claims to this day was rigged. I have no idea what else he has said. I don't listen to him much. But he conceded the 2020 election the day of the election. And Hitlery conceded her defeat but to this day says she was cheated but I've never heard you call her out. I wonder what's (D)Ifferent? Quote
TimHauck Posted March 4 Posted March 4 Just now, Strike said: I have no idea what else he has said. I don't listen to him much. But he conceded the 2020 election the day of the election. Link? The closest I see is a video from January 7 after the insurrection when he says “a new administration will be inaugurated” and doesn’t even name Biden. Quote
Strike Posted March 4 Posted March 4 3 minutes ago, TimHauck said: Link? The closest I see is a video from January 7 after the insurrection when he says “a new administration will be inaugurated” and doesn’t even name Biden. This is probably what you're referring to. This is from another one of those biased right wing sources like CBS, ABC, but even they called it a concession speech. I'm not going to argue about the fact that he didn't use the WORD concede. If you don't see this as a concession speech I don't know what to tell you but I'm posting this video so anyone with a brain can: Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.