TimHauck Posted March 4 Posted March 4 1 minute ago, Strike said: This is probably what you're referring to. This is from another one of those biased right wing sources like CBS, ABC, but even they called it a concession speech. I'm not going to argue about the fact that he didn't use the WORD concede. If you don't see this as a concession speech I don't know what to tell you but I'm posting this video so anyone with a brain can: You said he conceded the night of the election. Link? Quote
Strike Posted March 4 Posted March 4 1 minute ago, TimHauck said: You said he conceded the night of the election. Link? No Tim. I'm in training. You can go find it yourself. I won't guarantee 100% that he did it that night if you want to call that a win. I was going off memory but i'm not wasting time looking. He conceded. Quote
TimHauck Posted March 4 Posted March 4 9 minutes ago, Strike said: This is probably what you're referring to. This is from another one of those biased right wing sources like CBS, ABC, but even they called it a concession speech. I'm not going to argue about the fact that he didn't use the WORD concede. If you don't see this as a concession speech I don't know what to tell you but I'm posting this video so anyone with a brain can: Stopping fighting back against the transition isn’t really a concession. Have you seen the outtakes? “I don’t want to say the election is over” Quote
Tree of Knowledge Posted March 4 Posted March 4 25 minutes ago, thegeneral said: He said the election was rigged yesterday while talking about dead troops and the war. It was. How can a reasonable intelligent person say it wasn’t. Quote
Strike Posted March 4 Posted March 4 4 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said: It was. How can a reasonable intelligent person say it wasn’t. Come on man. Biden got 183 million votes!!!!! Quote
Tree of Knowledge Posted March 4 Posted March 4 4 minutes ago, Strike said: Come on man. Biden got 183 million votes!!!!! We don’t even need to get that far in the weeds. The suppression of the Hunter laptop won the election. 1 1 Quote
RaiderHaters Revenge Posted March 4 Posted March 4 41 minutes ago, FrancieFootball said: This makes zero sense. Of course it doesn’t. You didn’t hear about it on msnbc. Steven Colbert gave an interview using his shows funding and failed to provide equal time to an opponent. Then blamed the trump administration for censoring his program so he had to move it to YouTube. He single handedly cheated Crockett. I’m glad she lost though either way Quote
Caine Mutiny Posted March 4 Author Posted March 4 Good morning. Crockett was upset over voter suppression in Dallas, rightfully so. She never claimed that she won or that she was cheated; the article that @Strike posted was junk. As it turns out the votes lost in Dallas wouldn’t have made a difference; that’s why she conceded. Crockett didn’t run a great campaign. She was promoted by Republicans who saw her as a weak candidate, easy to beat. But personally I think she is a talent with future potential. 2 Quote
Hardcore troubadour Posted March 4 Posted March 4 Turnout was up in Dallas. What’s she complaining about Quote
Caine Mutiny Posted March 4 Author Posted March 4 Last night was a great night for Democrats. I think Talarico crushes Paxton and it’s a dead heat between him and Cornyn. Talarico is a fascinating candidate, a Christian who rejects Christian nationalism, a moderate. He will be tough to beat this year no matter what. In addition the numbers last night continue to suggest that Democrats are energized and Republicans are not. The RNC is going to be forced to spend millions of dollars promoting Cornyn over the next few months. Any Republican with common sense should support Cornyn but who knows? Paxton is the maga guy. 2 Quote
thegeneral Posted March 4 Posted March 4 35 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said: It was. How can a reasonable intelligent person say it wasn’t. Right! Quote
Sean Mooney Posted March 4 Posted March 4 Talarico was already running into the far left idiots saying "I can't believe people would vote for him over Crockett..." and "Talarico is just another Christian running for office..." This all happened before the election. And as we've seen countless times in the past- the far left idiots have no problem biting off their nose to spite their face- hell it's probably another elective surgery procedure in their minds. So I don't think the far left in Texas will rally behind Talarico. I will continue to think that until results come out the day after the election that show that he won. Quote
Caine Mutiny Posted March 4 Author Posted March 4 23 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said: Of course it doesn’t. You didn’t hear about it on msnbc. Steven Colbert gave an interview using his shows funding and failed to provide equal time to an opponent. Then blamed the trump administration for censoring his program so he had to move it to YouTube. He single handedly cheated Crockett. I’m glad she lost though either way Everything you wrote here is wrong. First off the Fairness Doctrine is almost never enforced these days; the FCC threatened it against CBS so it was correct to blame the Trump administration. Colbert’s show WAS censored. Second it was a huge story on MSNow, and the exposure of Talarico nationally hurt Crockett’s campaign. Previously she had been up 8 points (mostly based on name recognition) then she wasn’t. It wasn’t cheating but Trump definitely had his thumb on the scale in this situation, inadvertently helping Talarico over the top. Which I find hilarious. Quote
Caine Mutiny Posted March 4 Author Posted March 4 1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said: I’d rather lose the seat than Cornyon win. Oh I so hope Texas voters agree with you. Go Paxton go! Quote
Hardcore troubadour Posted March 4 Posted March 4 2 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said: Everything you wrote here is wrong. First off the Fairness Doctrine is almost never enforced these days; the FCC threatened it against CBS so it was correct to blame the Trump administration. Colbert’s show WAS censored. Second it was a huge story on MSNow, and the exposure of Talarico nationally hurt Crockett’s campaign. Previously she had been up 8 points (mostly based on name recognition) then she wasn’t. It wasn’t cheating but Trump definitely had his thumb on the scale in this situation, inadvertently helping Talarico over the top. Which I find hilarious. Did he have Crockett on during this campaign? Quote
Caine Mutiny Posted March 4 Author Posted March 4 5 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said: Talarico was already running into the far left idiots saying "I can't believe people would vote for him over Crockett..." and "Talarico is just another Christian running for office..." This all happened before the election. And as we've seen countless times in the past- the far left idiots have no problem biting off their nose to spite their face- hell it's probably another elective surgery procedure in their minds. So I don't think the far left in Texas will rally behind Talarico. I will continue to think that until results come out the day after the election that show that he won. Agree with most of what you wrote here. But not your conclusion. Progressives will absolutely unite behind Talarico. The main reason he will win in November, IMO, is because Trump has lost almost 100% of the gains he achieved in Latino voting in 2024, due to ICE’s behavior. Quote
Hardcore troubadour Posted March 4 Posted March 4 2 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said: Oh I so hope Texas voters agree with you. Go Paxton go! Some of us think for ourselves. You aren’t some of us. Quote
Caine Mutiny Posted March 4 Author Posted March 4 Just now, Hardcore troubadour said: Did he have Crockett on during this campaign? Nope. He might have, but the FCC didn’t wait to threaten CBS. Trump hates Colbert. Quote
Caine Mutiny Posted March 4 Author Posted March 4 1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said: Some of us think for ourselves. You aren’t some of us. I want you to think for yourself. You should send Paxton some money! Quote
RaiderHaters Revenge Posted March 4 Posted March 4 2 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said: Everything you wrote here is wrong. First off the Fairness Doctrine is almost never enforced these days; the FCC threatened it against CBS so it was correct to blame the Trump administration. Colbert’s show WAS censored. Second it was a huge story on MSNow, and the exposure of Talarico nationally hurt Crockett’s campaign. Previously she had been up 8 points (mostly based on name recognition) then she wasn’t. It wasn’t cheating but Trump definitely had his thumb on the scale in this situation, inadvertently helping Talarico over the top. Which I find hilarious. Dude you are high as fock if it was on MSNBC it was to blame Trump trump trump. Nothing about Colbert cheating and lying. CBS said the fcc never even contacted them nor did they censor it https://www.foxnews.com/media/fcc-chair-rips-colbert-hoax-after-cbs-denied-blocking-talarico-interview-says-media-fell-for-it Quote
Caine Mutiny Posted March 4 Author Posted March 4 Just now, RaiderHaters Revenge said: Dude you are high as fock if it was on MSNBC it was to blame Trump trump trump. Nothing about Colbert cheating and lying. CBS said the fcc never even contacted them nor did they censor it https://www.foxnews.com/media/fcc-chair-rips-colbert-hoax-after-cbs-denied-blocking-talarico-interview-says-media-fell-for-it Bari Weiss is lying about this. So is Fox. Why do you continue to trust sources who lie to you constantly? It’s really sad. 1 Quote
RaiderHaters Revenge Posted March 4 Posted March 4 1 minute ago, Caine Mutiny said: Bari Weiss is lying about this. So is Fox. Why do you continue to trust sources who lie to you constantly? It’s really sad. Says the idiot who lives on msnbc. You believe Colbert constantly lying. I know the vaccine jab song is your ringtone retard 1 Quote
Strike Posted March 4 Posted March 4 5 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said: Agree with most of what you wrote here. But not your conclusion. Progressives will absolutely unite behind Talarico. The main reason he will win in November, IMO, is because Trump has lost almost 100% of the gains he achieved in Latino voting in 2024, due to ICE’s behavior. You're starting to sound like Banned Tim, who makes predictions constantly and is rarely correct. 1 Quote
Sean Mooney Posted March 4 Posted March 4 All sides are kind of right on this Colbert interview thing. While CBS may not have literally received pressure from the FCC on this particular thing it was known that the FCC was starting to turn the screws on programs like it as it relates to equal time laws. CBS just dumped the interview to YouTube because they knew it would potentially lead to something Quote
Meglamaniac Posted March 4 Posted March 4 39 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said: Last night was a great night for Democrats. I think Talarico crushes Paxton and it’s a dead heat between him and Cornyn. Talarico is a fascinating candidate, a Christian who rejects Christian nationalism, a moderate. He will be tough to beat this year no matter what. In addition the numbers last night continue to suggest that Democrats are energized and Republicans are not. The RNC is going to be forced to spend millions of dollars promoting Cornyn over the next few months. Any Republican with common sense should support Cornyn but who knows? Paxton is the maga guy. Kiss of death, sorry Talarico and Dems Quote
RaiderHaters Revenge Posted March 4 Posted March 4 37 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said: All sides are kind of right on this Colbert interview thing. While CBS may not have literally received pressure from the FCC on this particular thing it was known that the FCC was starting to turn the screws on programs like it as it relates to equal time laws. CBS just dumped the interview to YouTube because they knew it would potentially lead to something Not according to cbs. You’d think you know Colbert if he wasn’t lying would be able to provide an email or memo. But hey. Here you are attempting to pretend to be a centrist. Colbert made up the entire thing to get clicks on his personal channel 1 Quote
Caine Mutiny Posted March 4 Author Posted March 4 Crockett pledges to support Talarico in any way she can: https://apple.news/Ai1DyaH48RDybxzmecXDDFw Sorry dudes. I know you all were hoping for an ugly split here but it’s not gonna happen. Democrats are unified this time around. The ugliness is all on the other side. Quote
cyclone24 Posted March 4 Posted March 4 13 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said: Crockett pledges to support Talarico in any way she can: https://apple.news/Ai1DyaH48RDybxzmecXDDFw Sorry dudes. I know you all were hoping for an ugly split here but it’s not gonna happen. Democrats are unified this time around. The ugliness is all on the other side. these mental fantasy land scenarios you just make up are always really funny. Couldn’t have even told you who that Guy was before he beat her last night. Much less was anyone concerned they would have some sort of ugly split anyone would care about. “ ha ha jokes on you guys. The thing you weren’t even thinking about didn’t happen so boom roasted.” Quote
Caine Mutiny Posted March 4 Author Posted March 4 7 minutes ago, cyclone24 said: these mental fantasy land scenarios you just make up are always really funny. Couldn’t have even told you who that Guy was before he beat her last night. Much less was anyone concerned they would have some sort of ugly split anyone would care about. “ ha ha jokes on you guys. The thing you weren’t even thinking about didn’t happen so boom roasted.” The point is Democrats are likely to win the Senate in November. (House is already a given.) Then at the very least we can halt the damage that is currently being done to this country. It’s going to take a long time to dig ourselves out of the mess you and everyone who voted for Trump put us in, but at least it will be a start. 1 Quote
cyclone24 Posted March 4 Posted March 4 10 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said: The point is Democrats are likely to win the Senate in November. (House is already a given.) Then at the very least we can halt the damage that is currently being done to this country. It’s going to take a long time to dig ourselves out of the mess you and everyone who voted for Trump put us in, but at least it will be a start. You mean like increased inflation? which is yours. Increased oil prices?which is yours. Increased terrorism? Which is yours increased criminal illegal aliens killing our citizens? Which is yours. Increased taxes? Which is yours don’t worry, we get it. You don’t really care about the will of the American people. You just care that your side has power. The people be damned. Quote
cyclone24 Posted March 4 Posted March 4 I say it all the time….no minority Hispanic, black, etc hate white people a tenth of what white liberals do…. This is who Cornyn faces in texas? Quote
TimHauck Posted March 4 Posted March 4 4 minutes ago, cyclone24 said: I say it all the time….no minority Hispanic, black, etc hate white people a tenth of what white liberals do…. This is who Cornyn faces in texas? Do you disagree that Arbery was killed because of racism? Quote
cyclone24 Posted March 4 Posted March 4 1 minute ago, TimHauck said: Do you disagree that Arbery was killed because of racism? Lol classic. You picked the one guy to try to minimize the post which is steep in misinformation and marginalizing their roles in their own demise. Still stands…white liberals hate white people far more than any black person ive ever met Quote
Caine Mutiny Posted March 4 Author Posted March 4 Trump expected to endorse Cornyn: https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/2026/03/trump-cornyn-endorsement-texas/686232/ This should put Cornyn over the top against Paxton but who knows? Quote
Strike Posted March 4 Posted March 4 8 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said: Trump expected to endorse Cornyn: https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/2026/03/trump-cornyn-endorsement-texas/686232/ This should put Cornyn over the top against Paxton but who knows? YOU do. ALWAYS. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.