cyclone24 Posted March 4 Posted March 4 13 minutes ago, MDC said: You’re the one going on about Trump has balls, like it takes courage to send other people to war on the taxpayer dime. What a big brave man your Daddy is! True real bravery is leaving them to die in Benghazi. Quote
dogcows Posted March 4 Posted March 4 6 hours ago, cyclone24 said: I know both sides bash each other’s peoples capabilities and mental capacity, but holy crap Democrats you couldn’t possibly thought she could navigate any of this with any effectiveness whatsoever. One cannot say 100% for sure what Harris would have done as President. But I can say one thing for sure. The current president is a massive Fock-up. It’s hard to imagine anybody doing worse. Quote
seafoam1 Posted March 4 Posted March 4 1 minute ago, dogcows said: One cannot say 100% for sure what Harris would have done as President. Yes. One can. And suck it up lib boy. You lost. We win. Life is good. Quote
dogcows Posted March 4 Posted March 4 1 minute ago, seafoam1 said: Yes. One can. And suck it up lib boy. You lost. We win. Life is good. Why don’t you just keep posting about sunken ships “floating” at the bottom of the sea? Saying you can perfectly predict alternate timelines is beyond crazy even for you. Quote
Engorgeous George Posted March 4 Posted March 4 I believe Michael Dukakis would have been a better President than either Harris or Trump. We are talking a pretty low bar. Quote
Hardcore troubadour Posted March 4 Posted March 4 10 minutes ago, dogcows said: One cannot say 100% for sure what Harris would have done as President. But I can say one thing for sure. The current president is a massive Fock-up. It’s hard to imagine anybody doing worse. Lol. Bush and Obama were worse. Way worse. Both left the country worse than when they started. Quote
seafoam1 Posted March 4 Posted March 4 3 minutes ago, dogcows said: Why don’t you just keep posting about sunken ships “floating” at the bottom of the sea? Saying you can perfectly predict alternate timelines is beyond crazy even for you. So you still don't think things can float under water? I even gave you all the lessons on that topic. Quote
posty Posted March 4 Posted March 4 6 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said: I believe Michael Dukakis would have been a better President than either Harris or Trump. We are talking a pretty low bar. He would have probably garnered more respect... Honestly, who was the last president that was respected across party lines, even if they didn't agree with the policies? Quote
Gepetto Posted March 4 Posted March 4 6 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said: I believe Michael Dukakis would have been a better President than either Harris or Trump. We are talking a pretty low bar. Quote
seafoam1 Posted March 4 Posted March 4 14 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said: I believe Michael Dukakis would have been a better President than either Harris or Trump. We are talking a pretty low bar. No. "We" aren't talking that. You delusional libs are. Quote
MDC Posted March 4 Posted March 4 43 minutes ago, cyclone24 said: True real bravery is leaving them to die in Benghazi. Back on this? Did you glitch because I said maybe bombing Iran isn’t an unqualified slam dunk success? You’re even more sensitive than Daddy. Quote
TBayXXXVII Posted March 4 Posted March 4 9 minutes ago, posty said: He would have probably garnered more respect... Honestly, who was the last president that was respected across party lines, even if they didn't agree with the policies? Probably Reagan. Personally, I don't think ANY politician is worth respect. Quote
cyclone24 Posted March 4 Posted March 4 30 minutes ago, dogcows said: One cannot say 100% for sure what Harris would have done as President. But I can say one thing for sure. The current president is a massive Fock-up. It’s hard to imagine anybody doing worse. it’s always hilarious to say this in the face of lower inflation, easier to borrow better trade, fewer regulations, lower gas and energy prices, lowet taxes, border closed and removing world threats. truly bizarre Quote
dogcows Posted March 4 Posted March 4 19 minutes ago, posty said: He would have probably garnered more respect... Honestly, who was the last president that was respected across party lines, even if they didn't agree with the policies? Biden was respected by the former version of the GOP. He was known for working “across the aisle.” The GOP has changed a lot since those days, and not for the better IMO. 1 Quote
cyclone24 Posted March 4 Posted March 4 14 minutes ago, MDC said: Back on this? Did you glitch because I said maybe bombing Iran isn’t an unqualified slam dunk success? You’re even more sensitive than Daddy. Lol after 3 days where we have descimated them already? Uhhh ok. Quote
cyclone24 Posted March 4 Posted March 4 Just now, dogcows said: Biden was respected by the former version of the GOP. He was known for working “across the aisle.” The GOP has changed a lot since those days, and not for the better IMO. Please dont confuse republicans not objecting to everything that comes down the pike to some sort of bipartisan support for liberal policies….given you guys dont take a piss without consulting each other that you are all on board to do it…. and holy lack of awareness. You have literally lost your party to the radical left. Please. Quote
MDC Posted March 4 Posted March 4 9 minutes ago, cyclone24 said: Lol after 3 days where we have descimated them already? Uhhh ok. The hard part isn’t bombing the F out of them. It’s ensuring they don’t descend into total chaos and adopt another hostile regime. You really didn’t learn anything from Iraq or Afghanistan, huh? Quote
cyclone24 Posted March 4 Posted March 4 1 minute ago, MDC said: The hard part isn’t bombing the F out of them. It’s ensuring they don’t descend into total chaos and adopt another hostile regime. You really didn’t learn anything from Iraq or Afghanistan, huh? Again…you are assuming. We definitely learned not to let you goofballs do foreign policy. Dont assume because you guys were a disaster with it that Trump has…because from either trade deals or threat hes doing fine…Spain backed down in about 2 seconds. Quote
MDC Posted March 4 Posted March 4 4 minutes ago, cyclone24 said: Again…you are assuming. I’m actually not assuming. I said we don’t know yet whether bombing Iran was the right idea. That simple statement of fact was enough to make you go full retard because of your unhealthy relationship with Daddy. HTH Quote
cyclone24 Posted March 4 Posted March 4 3 minutes ago, MDC said: I’m actually not assuming. I said we don’t know yet whether bombing Iran was the right idea. That simple statement of fact was enough to make you go full retard because of your unhealthy relationship with Daddy. HTH 6 hours ago, MDC said: It’s quite possible what we did in Iran last week ends up costing far more $$$ and makes us less safe in the long term. And Harris is as qualified as Trump was in 2016. Uh huh…”We dont know yet” seemed pretty sure on page 1…and 2…and 3 it will fail.Do you really think you are fooling anyone? we know you are cheering against it. We know 1 1 Quote
FrancieFootball Posted March 4 Posted March 4 1 hour ago, cyclone24 said: No, you think he is. What we have left as the presidency and that’s before you get Vance. You’re left with crying on a message board. Womp womp We'd have peace and prosperity instead of world chaos and a Middle East-consuming war that Trump invented, and Americans already are paying the price. No new wars! Woo! 1 Quote
cyclone24 Posted March 4 Posted March 4 Just now, FrancieFootball said: We'd have peace and prosperity instead of world chaos and a Middle East-consuming war that Trump invented, and Americans already are paying the price. No new wars! Woo! Haha oh yeah, I mean, as long as we get worked in trade deals, we supply these countries with funding and then military protect other ones. I’d be happy to if I was one of these countries. And if you don’t think Iran has been a threat for the last 50 years, you really should just sit out talking politics because you are completely clueless. I could pull up quotes from Obama and Biden to a future if you’d like me to or you can just stop being an idiot. Quote
FrancieFootball Posted March 4 Posted March 4 2 minutes ago, cyclone24 said: Haha oh yeah, I mean, as long as we get worked in trade deals, we supply these countries with funding and then military protect other ones. I’d be happy to if I was one of these countries. And if you don’t think Iran has been a threat for the last 50 years, you really should just sit out talking politics because you are completely clueless. I could pull up quotes from Obama and Biden to a future if you’d like me to or you can just stop being an idiot. Lots of countries are threats. This isn't about threats, regime change or oppressed people. This is about oil and natural resources, just like with Venezuela. Just like with Greenland. North Korea has nukes and a crazy-ass leader. MAGAs desperately try to justify whatever Daddy does and lap up the latest contradiction and hypocrisy of the moment, like a flock following the lead bird as it darts around in the sky. You guys really are brainwashed. Quote
cyclone24 Posted March 4 Posted March 4 Just now, FrancieFootball said: Lots of countries are threats. This isn't about threats, regime change or oppressed people. This is about oil and natural resources, just like with Venezuela. We get less than .1% of our oil from Iran. you’re literally too dumb to participate in a rational conversation. This is what TDS looks like….in any alias. Go lay by your dish. Quote
dogcows Posted March 4 Posted March 4 5 minutes ago, cyclone24 said: We get less than .1% of our oil from Iran. A lot of other countries get oil from Iran. When that supply is blocked, they need to get it from somewhere. Which pushes costs way up for everybody. Just a few days into the Epstein war, and that is already happening. 1 Quote
FrancieFootball Posted March 4 Posted March 4 1 minute ago, cyclone24 said: We get less than .1% of our oil from Iran. you’re literally too dumb to participate in a rational conversation. This is what TDS looks like….in any alias. Go lay by your dish. It's not what we got from pre-war Iran, moron. It's the potential for what we get afterward. Venezuela and Iran rank among the top three when it comes to world's oil reserves. Let's say Crapzhakistan holds 75 percent of the world's buttplug reserves but sells barely any to Magamoronland, which only holds 15 percent of of the world's buttplug reserves. Buttplugs are are very, very valuable, so Magamoronland defeats Crapzhakistin in a war and now holds 90 percent of the world's buttplug reserves, making it more powerful and rich worldwide. Bloodbath! Quote
cyclone24 Posted March 4 Posted March 4 1 minute ago, dogcows said: A lot of other countries get oil from Iran. When that supply is blocked, they need to get it from somewhere. Which pushes costs way up for everybody. Just a few days into the Epstein war, and that is already happening. NOW you guys are worried about oil prices!!!??? Hilarious Quote
FrancieFootball Posted March 4 Posted March 4 2 minutes ago, dogcows said: A lot of other countries get oil from Iran. When that supply is blocked, they need to get it from somewhere. Which pushes costs way up for everybody. Just a few days into the Epstein war, and that is already happening. cyclod doesn't understand that if we take control of Iran's oil production and reserves, we become more rich and powerful. Quote
TheNewGirl Posted March 4 Posted March 4 1 minute ago, dogcows said: A lot of other countries get oil from Iran. When that supply is blocked, they need to get it from somewhere. Which pushes costs way up for everybody. Just a few days into the Epstein war, and that is already happening. The prices have actually been going up slowly for a while. 2 Quote
MDC Posted March 4 Posted March 4 29 minutes ago, cyclone24 said: Uh huh…”We dont know yet” seemed pretty sure on page 1…and 2…and 3 it will fail.Do you really think you are fooling anyone? we know you are cheering against it. We know Deep down you know saying something is possible isn’t the same as saying it will happen. You’re just seeing red because I said it’s too soon to call the Iran War an unqualified success. Trump is your surrogate Daddy so that made you sad and mad. Quote
cyclone24 Posted March 4 Posted March 4 2 minutes ago, MDC said: Deep down you know saying something is possible isn’t the same as saying it will happen. You’re just seeing red because I said it’s too soon to call the Iran War an unqualified success. Trump is your surrogate Daddy so that made you sad and mad. Lol you’re not smart enough to make me mad with one of your takes. And if you think this daddy thing which you seem to have some daddy fixation because you keep saying it is doing it? Yeah I can assure you that it’s not. Projecting? I didn’t say the whole thing was success and I don’t think anybody is. I would say a few days of military strikes, and what we’ve done have been an absolute overwhelming success. Quote
dogcows Posted March 4 Posted March 4 6 minutes ago, cyclone24 said: NOW you guys are worried about oil prices!!!??? Hilarious Note, this isn’t a denial that Trump’s war is spiking oil prices. I personally don’t care about oil prices in the short term as I drive my EV around. But I know that they result in higher prices on other products as time goes on. Quote
Tree of Knowledge Posted March 4 Posted March 4 Walz getting owned in DC. Imagine that corrupt moron as VP. Quote
Gepetto Posted March 4 Posted March 4 44 minutes ago, cyclone24 said: Spain backed down in about 2 seconds. What are you saying Spain did in response to Trump saying he's cutting off all US trade with Spain? I just googled and the headlines say Spain has balked at his threat and doubled down on being against this war with Iran. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez delivered a strong rebuttal to Trump's threat by declaring his opposition to war and what he called the "breakdown of international law". Quote
cyclone24 Posted March 4 Posted March 4 2 minutes ago, dogcows said: Note, this isn’t a denial that Trump’s war is spiking oil prices. I personally don’t care about oil prices in the short term as I drive my EV around. But I know that they result in higher prices on other products as time goes on. Ahhh so when they go down, Trump has no effect on oil prices. But he takes out a threat and if prices go up, it’s directly because of him. Got it. Quote
MDC Posted March 4 Posted March 4 1 minute ago, cyclone24 said: Lol you’re not smart enough to make me mad with one of your takes. And if you think this daddy thing which you seem to have some daddy fixation because you keep saying it is doing it? Yeah I can assure you that it’s not. Projecting? I didn’t say the whole thing was success and I don’t think anybody is. I would say a few days of military strikes, and what we’ve done have been an absolute overwhelming success. You’re lashing out like a tard because I said it’s too soon to call the Iran War a success. You’re having a fit because I don’t think your favorite Reality TV POTUS walks on water. Sad! Quote
cyclone24 Posted March 4 Posted March 4 1 minute ago, MDC said: You’re lashing out like a tard because I said it’s too soon to call the Iran War a success. You’re having a fit because I don’t think your favorite Reality TV POTUS walks on water. Sad! Its a message board sparky…not mad at all…sorry. YOU are the only one saying it..so you are arguing with yourself. Not one person has said this has been such a success so far that it’s over and everyone can go home. literally making up an argument nobody is making Quote
Mark Davis Posted March 4 Posted March 4 The southern border would be wide open regardless of what Alejandro Mayorkas would tell us and Iran would be closer to a nuclear weapon. Those are the positives for the Trump Administration, but I'm not willing to call the current campaign a success just yet because we have a ways to go. This thing has too many ways it can go and none of us know how it's going to end up. When it comes to financial markets that uncertainty makes for volatility and I'm no huge fan of tariffs in the negative. Quote
dogcows Posted March 4 Posted March 4 2 minutes ago, cyclone24 said: Ahhh so when they go down, Trump has no effect on oil prices. But he takes out a threat and if prices go up, it’s directly because of him. Got it. You’re making peefoam look smart. There are many factors affecting oil prices, many of which aren’t directly controlled by the president. But starting a war with one of the world’s biggest oil producers just so happens to be something a president CAN do to directly affect oil prices. This isn’t a difficult concept… which is not a good sign for your comprehension skills. 1 Quote
cyclone24 Posted March 4 Posted March 4 1 minute ago, dogcows said: You’re making peefoam look smart. There are many factors affecting oil prices, many of which aren’t directly controlled by the president. But starting a war with one of the world’s biggest oil producers just so happens to be something a president CAN do to directly affect oil prices. This isn’t a difficult concept… which is not a good sign for your comprehension skills. Oh no, no I understand what causes oil issues. Hilarious to watch you guys suddenly care about oil prices when you didn’t for four years and did everything you could to jack them up. Similar to how affordability wasn’t an issue for four years until Trump got in then it had to be fixed immediately. kind of a theme for you folks. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.