Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, FrancieFootball said:

Typical MAGA projecting.

MAGAs refuse to believe anything other than what Daddy and their infotainment overlords tell them, no matter how falsely ridiculous.

If Daddy told you the reflecting pool was blue, MAGAs would believe that and weave some conspiracy theory about how photoshopping keeps the pond from showing up puke green in photos.

 

Question #1 posed to Google:  Did conservatives or liberals first use the word triggered to describe the other side?

Answer:  

Conservatives were the first to use the word "triggered" to mock and describe the opposing side. [1]

While the term originated in psychology to describe involuntary PTSD responses, in the mid-2010s, conservative commentators and internet forums popularized using "triggered" as a pejorative. It was used to mock liberals as overly emotional, easily offended, or weak. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

Eventually, liberals and left-leaning internet users co-opted the insult to turn it back on conservatives, frequently labeling their opponents as "triggered" when they exhibited anger or distress over cultural, social, or political issues.

 

Tubby 1
Liberal 0

 

Question #2 posed to Google:  Did conservatives or liberals first use the word snowflake to describe the other side?

Answer:

Neither political side originally invented the term, but conservatives first popularized its modern usage as an insult to describe liberals. [1, 2, 3, 4]

 

Present Day (Liberals): Following its widespread conservative use, liberals and progressives eventually adapted the term to mock the right. It is now commonly used as a bipartisan insult, but conservatives originally popularized it as a political weapon. [1, 2, 3, 4]


Tubby 2
Liberal 0

Seriously, whoever is behind your username, is plain 'ol dumb.  You couldn't see you were being set up. You didn't grasp the fact that I had the answer before I said it to you.  You blurt without thinking. I'm playing chess while you're playing stick your own thumb up your butt.  

That's why you're in the situation you're in.  

  • Thanks 2
Posted
43 minutes ago, tubby_mcgee said:

Question #1 posed to Google:  Did conservatives or liberals first use the word triggered to describe the other side?

Answer:  

Conservatives were the first to use the word "triggered" to mock and describe the opposing side. [1]

While the term originated in psychology to describe involuntary PTSD responses, in the mid-2010s, conservative commentators and internet forums popularized using "triggered" as a pejorative. It was used to mock liberals as overly emotional, easily offended, or weak. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

Eventually, liberals and left-leaning internet users co-opted the insult to turn it back on conservatives, frequently labeling their opponents as "triggered" when they exhibited anger or distress over cultural, social, or political issues.

 

Tubby 1
Liberal 0

 

Question #2 posed to Google:  Did conservatives or liberals first use the word snowflake to describe the other side?

Answer:

Neither political side originally invented the term, but conservatives first popularized its modern usage as an insult to describe liberals. [1, 2, 3, 4]

 

Present Day (Liberals): Following its widespread conservative use, liberals and progressives eventually adapted the term to mock the right. It is now commonly used as a bipartisan insult, but conservatives originally popularized it as a political weapon. [1, 2, 3, 4]


Tubby 2
Liberal 0

Seriously, whoever is behind your username, is plain 'ol dumb.  You couldn't see you were being set up. You didn't grasp the fact that I had the answer before I said it to you.  You blurt without thinking. I'm playing chess while you're playing stick your own thumb up your butt.  

That's why you're in the situation you're in.  

TRIGGERED!

Posted
On 6/17/2026 at 4:20 PM, HellToupee said:

Poor Rusty

 

Ilia quit on the stool? Joe would know better than me, I mean he was there and that is literally his job, but until now, it looked to me that it was his corner looking out for him, not Ilia himself. Ilia's face was meat but he is a tough SOB, and seeing as he survived round four, I thought he would push through.

Posted
19 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

Ilia quit on the stool? Joe would know better than me, I mean he was there and that is literally his job, but until now, it looked to me that it was his corner looking out for him, not Ilia himself. Ilia's face was meat but he is a tough SOB, and seeing as he survived round four, I thought he would push through.

When I was watching his brother kept saying he was going back out there but I didn’t realize Ilia quit

Posted

The libs defended  Kimmel for a joke about Donald being dead ("Mrs. Trump, you have a glow like an expectant widow." ) but 1 fighter out of 14 jokes about an internet meme….

Posted
20 minutes ago, HellToupee said:

The libs defended  Kimmel for a joke about Donald being dead ("Mrs. Trump, you have a glow like an expectant widow." ) but 1 fighter out of 14 jokes about an internet meme….

So it’s just a joke, no one actually thinks Michelle is a man?

Posted
23 hours ago, HellToupee said:

When I was watching his brother kept saying he was going back out there but I didn’t realize Ilia quit

Yes, his brother wanted him to go, it looked to me that it was somebody (else) in that corner that threw in the towel.

Posted
42 minutes ago, HellToupee said:

The libs defended  Kimmel for a joke about Donald being dead ("Mrs. Trump, you have a glow like an expectant widow." ) but 1 fighter out of 14 jokes about an internet meme….

@supermike80 said Kimmel should be fired for that joke (lol).  I’m not fan of cancel culture like much of the right, Hokit shouldn’t be fired, just called out.

Posted

Can we just fast forward to the part where Tim and the other liberals can’t distinguish the difference between joking about 8647 or the murder of the president or his family and an obvious joke about Michelle Obama being a man? 
 

I mean, I know they rarely laugh about anything, but even they have to understand humor on some level, correct?

Posted
3 hours ago, cyclone24 said:

Can we just fast forward to the part where Tim and the other liberals can’t distinguish the difference between joking about 8647 or the murder of the president or his family and an obvious joke about Michelle Obama being a man? 
 

I mean, I know they rarely laugh about anything, but even they have to understand humor on some level, correct?

8647 wasn’t a joke, but 86 doesn’t mean kill.  Even Matt Gaetz knows this.

@cyclone24 just says stuff.

Posted

Whoops, they killed all the grass on the Eliipse.

Between this and the algae-covered pool, all we need are a few rusted out trucks with “for sale” signs on the White House lawn. Then our Capital will finally look like the average MAGA fan’s lawn. They’re gonna feel so at home when they visit for July 4th.

Posted
10 minutes ago, dogcows said:

Whoops, they killed all the grass on the Eliipse.

Between this and the algae-covered pool, all we need are a few rusted out trucks with “for sale” signs on the White House lawn. Then our Capital will finally look like the average MAGA fan’s lawn. They’re gonna feel so at home when they visit for July 4th.

I think they make dyes or paints to spray on lawns to make them look green even when they are not.  They might use some of that, though it might look silly, particularly when there is no lawn left having been trampled to dirt.  I think the spray products are the lawn equivilent of those spray on hair products for bald men.  The President may have some experience with those.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, dogcows said:

Whoops, they killed all the grass on the Eliipse.

Between this and the algae-covered pool, all we need are a few rusted out trucks with “for sale” signs on the White House lawn. Then our Capital will finally look like the average MAGA fan’s lawn. They’re gonna feel so at home when they visit for July 4th.

ScottsMiracleGrow has already donated 1 million to restore the lawn.  It was always been part of the plan. So was keeping that fact from liberals so we could watch you lose your chit over nothing.  

Posted
1 hour ago, JuneJuly said:

ScottsMiracleGrow has already donated 1 million to restore the lawn.  It was always been part of the plan. So was keeping that fact from liberals so we could watch you lose your chit over nothing.  

If they pumped the green algae water from the reflecting pool onto the area perhaps that would green it up.

Posted
Just now, Engorgeous George said:

If they pumped the green algae water from the reflecting pool onto the area perhaps that would green it up.

Or they could just do what they've normally done for years as their profession.  

Posted
22 hours ago, dogcows said:

Whoops, they killed all the grass on the Eliipse.

Between this and the algae-covered pool, all we need are a few rusted out trucks with “for sale” signs on the White House lawn. Then our Capital will finally look like the average MAGA fan’s lawn. They’re gonna feel so at home when they visit for July 4th.

How do we know someone didn't watch the fight without them telling us they didn't watch the fight?

Here's one way.

If you expect people who watched the fight be shocked by this lawn abuse, you failed big time.

When a fight ends early, there's a lot of dead time between matches to fill. One of the talking points that was prominently addressed, was the lawn would be wrecked. The solution had also been addressed between fights on a few occasions. A lawn care company, Scotts Miracle-Gro, was one of the sponsors.

So, unlike you, we knew in advance that this would be the outcome for the lawn. The lawn will be back to normal soon. It may already have been completely restored before I typed this. I don't rightly know how long it takes for these Miracle-Gro miracles to happen. It was restored for free, a donation by Scotts.

Link: Instagram

Also, you only have to go four seconds into this fight to see a prominently displayed Scotts ad on the turnbuckle in the background. 

 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 6/15/2026 at 12:25 PM, Strike said:

No, we went through this last night.  I've already addressed this.  You just want to pretend I didn't and argue some more.  That's your M.O..  You really do act like a 6 year old child sometimes.  

 

On 6/15/2026 at 12:39 PM, TimHauck said:

I called it corruption when commenting about World Liberty Financial sponsoring the event.

You replied immediately after that with a spasm about companies that sponsored UFC “all the time” (direct quote). 

Except World Liberty Financial just started sponsoring UFC.

You were wrong.  It’s okay, you can admit it.  You should be used to it, you’re wrong a lot.

Strike can’t admit he was wrong.  Sad.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...