Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Caine Mutiny said:

No actually Im arguing that there are already controls in place that work just fine and the additional safeguards you’re proposing aren’t necessary. 
 

After all how would an undocumented person go about voting? They have to give a name and that name has to be on the register the voting people have. They don’t have to show ID sure but how would they even know the name and address of the person if they weren’t that person? I suppose that if somebody really wanted to take the time and effort they could commit fraud. But it’s not easy and the notion that it would ever be done in large enough numbers to effect an outcome is simply absurd. 

This is all that matters.  It's totally possible your supposition that it is not done in large numbers is correct, but I fail to understand the rational argument for not securing it.  If you live in a gated community, you still have locks on your doors.

To say that small fraud could never affect an outcome is the absurd part.  We had a state senate election decided by 1 vote out of 17,000 and there was a provisional ballot thrown out that would have tied it.  You can't say with any certainty that the error/fraud rate is less than 1:17,000. 

We should always strive to have secure and fair elections even if we aren't perfect.  To say we are accepting of some fraud or we leave some loopholes in our security because the fraud it likely allows is probably not significant is the risk.  By not securing it, we don't know what that fraud/error rate truly is.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Caine Mutiny said:

And @Mark Davis I am opposed to these additional safeguards not only because they’re unnecessary but because in my judgment they would do actual harm. 

I know.  I've heard that talking point on MSNBC for years.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Becase some blacks find it difficult to get an ID? 

No no.  They have moved off that because of how racist and absurd it sounded and is.  To whites, blacks and any logical thinker.

Its now that no married women will not be able to vote.  Dems moved to that one.

Posted
13 minutes ago, supermike80 said:

No no.  They have moved off that because of how racist and absurd it sounded and is.  To whites, blacks and any logical thinker.

Its now that no married women will not be able to vote.  Dems moved to that one.

Married white women too? 

Posted
40 minutes ago, supermike80 said:

 

Its now that no married women will not be able to vote.  Dems moved to that one.

This was brought up a long time ago.  And will probably impact R voters more than D ones.

Posted
10 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said:

What I wrote is that no election has been altered by undocumented immigrants. Can you find a small handful who vote? Sure. Are they enough to impact an election result? No. 

Mark Davis already proved this entire premise wrong.  That's what's so frustrating with you.  It's ok to have differing opinions.  You push opinions as FACT, even when proven wrong.  

Posted
6 hours ago, Fnord said:

When I truly dislike someone, it's very obvious. And I usually put them on ignore.

So we were having a respectful back and forth for once, and you post this:

5 hours ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

Opinions change? You are sick in the head and would doom this country if you got your way. Democrat politicians see you coming and they thank the gods for sending such a low state of consciousness their way. You are a gift to the profane. Don't worry, we will save you from yourself. I expect thanks when you figure it out.

I particularly enjoy the GIFT TO THE PROFANE part, for real. I appreciate the hell out of the profane!

My mistake for engaging an epically delusional pr!ck that somehow has himself convinced he's enlightened. 

@Meglamaniac apologies for tagging you, but here's a perfect example of someone that is a truly sorry human.

Posted
13 minutes ago, Fnord said:

So we were having a respectful back and forth for once, and you post this:

I particularly enjoy the GIFT TO THE PROFANE part, for real. I appreciate the hell out of the profane!

My mistake for engaging an epically delusional pr!ck that somehow has himself convinced he's enlightened. 

@Meglamaniac apologies for tagging you, but here's a perfect example of someone that is a truly sorry human.

Are you having a seizure or something? 

Jeez, get some medication little boy. 

Posted
3 hours ago, TimHauck said:

This was brought up a long time ago.  And will probably impact R voters more than D ones.

And yet, as a republican,  im perfectly fine with it.  Strange how R's and D's are different

Posted
2 hours ago, Strike said:

Mark Davis already proved this entire premise wrong.  That's what's so frustrating with you.  It's ok to have differing opinions.  You push opinions as FACT, even when proven wrong.  

He certainly did not prove anything of the sort. 

Posted

You would think this would be such an easy bill to pass, but the left has lost all sense of reason and just reflexively says 'no' to everything.

This has to be done state-by-state as ballot referendum around the country.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

You would think this would be such an easy bill to pass, but the left has lost all sense of reason and just reflexively says 'no' to everything.

This has to be done state-by-state as ballot referendum around the country.

I don’t say no to everything. I’m saying no to this one because it would cause unnecessary harm. 

  • Haha 2
Posted

So the democrats still refuse to fund DHS. And this the Senate for  gods sake. I’m sure everyone has seen the lines at the airport. So everyone is bunched up in an enclosed area. A terrorist doesn’t even have to blow up a plane for a mass casualty event that would still cripple air travel. 

Posted

Senator Maggie Hassan admitted today that the Democrat shutdown and defunding of DHS has nothing to do with ICE 

Posted
On 3/10/2026 at 1:44 PM, HotRod said:

Democrats would be happy if we had a large scale terrorist attack hoping it would make President Trump look bad

trump can’t possibly look any worse. dude is an absolute  🤡  that should never speak again. just be potus and stfu

will he not get elected again if he looks worse?

Posted
19 minutes ago, edjr said:

trump can’t possibly look any worse. dude is an absolute  🤡  that should never speak again. just be potus and stfu

will he not get elected again if he looks worse?

He won in a landslide and would win again today.

Libtards are dumb

Posted
24 minutes ago, HotRod said:

He won in a landslide and would win again today.

Libtards are dumb

conservatives are dumber for thinking how people feel about him matter 

Posted
4 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

So ICE is doing a great job reducing wait times at airports. Trump wins again. 

It's amazing!!! Problem resolved thanks to Trump.

More proof that the Democrats prefer illegal aliens over real Americans. 

Posted
Just now, Sean Mooney said:

Oh the MAGA news cycle is past that now....they will be cancelling Sharpies soon or whatever the hell Trump was rambling about today

Wait til they fly 😂

Posted
37 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Update?

When they first started all the way back on Monday wait times in some airports decreased.  Unfortunately callouts by TSA agents have increased. But the ICE patriots have been getting trained up the last few days and three are plans for them to take over a terminal in certain airports freeing up the remaining TSA agents. We’ll see. Or you can just pick your nose and point as you like to do. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

When they first started all the way back on Monday wait times in some airports decreased.  Unfortunately callouts by TSA agents have increased. But the ICE patriots have been getting trained up the last few days and three are plans for them to take over a terminal in certain airports freeing up the remaining TSA agents. We’ll see. Or you can just pick your nose and point as you like to do. 

Things are going great!

You could also pass this stuff and fund the rest through other measures. Republicans in the Senate are asking for this, they have the blueprints to bozo but he said no.

Incompetence is the brand. 

Posted

Schumer, Dems block DHS funding again, Trump intervenes to pay TSA agents

The Senate was again unable to end the Homeland Security shutdown on Thursday despite signs of a possible breakthrough to end the long-running closure, which prompted President Donald Trump to make a move. 

Senate Democrats blocked Department of Homeland Security (DHS) funding for a seventh time as the partial shutdown entered its 41st day on Thursday, after Senate Republicans made a new offer earlier in the day after late night negotiations. 

Trump then ordered DHS to pay airport workers on, and accused "their ‘Leader,’ Cryin' Chuck Schumer," of making it clear where Democrats stand, "and that is, ON THE SIDE OF CRIMINAL ILLEGAL ALIENS, AND NOT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE."

Thune says Republicans sent Dems 'last and final' DHS shutdown offer | Fox News https://share.google/Dubhyc7aYofNLfCc0

Posted

Trump caved again.

Senate passed the Democrats funding bill that funds tsa, FEMA, coast guard, everything except ice.  After 10 tries, Senate Republicans finally caved and tsa agents will get paid.

The house should cave as well.  Trump keeps losing.

Posted
54 minutes ago, The Psychic Observer said:

Trump caved again.

Senate passed the Democrats funding bill that funds tsa, FEMA, coast guard, everything except ice.  After 10 tries, Senate Republicans finally caved and tsa agents will get paid.

The house should cave as well.  Trump keeps losing.

How does the President lose if the American people win?  As President Trumps said “These people are crazy!”.

Posted
6 minutes ago, blick said:

How does the President lose if the American people win?  As President Trumps said “These people are crazy!”.

Because he didn't get what he wanted.  Americans did.  Odd that the president is against the people he's supposed to represent.

  • Confused 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, The Psychic Observer said:

Because he didn't get what he wanted.  Americans did.  Odd that the president is against the people he's supposed to represent.

He’s going to get what he wanted. The Dems are just willing to continue to punish the people to try to prove some kind of political point. At least the Republicans are adult enough to end this madness. 

Posted
21 minutes ago, The Psychic Observer said:

Because he didn't get what he wanted.  Americans did.  Odd that the president is against the people he's supposed to represent.

This post was so stupid I thought it was Rusty 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...