Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
22 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Asking a question isn’t a position.  HTH

Actually, on the internet it is a passive aggressive way of stating a position often used by those without the integrity to stand behind their position.  It is used by those who think they are cute and smarter than others as they have reserved their "out", their claim to some sort of bogus neutrality.  But sure, go ahead and hide behind this now tired and threadbare ruse nobody buys.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 4
  • Sad 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said:

Actually, on the internet it is a passive aggressive way of stating a position often used by thsoe witdhout the integrity to stand behind their position.  It is used by those who think they are cute and smarter tahn others as they have reserved there "out", there claim to some sort of bogus neutrality.  But sure, go ahead and hide behind this not tired and threadbare ruse nobody buys.

You’re right, sometimes it can be.  I don’t think that one was though. I guess the “position” that question displays is simply that we don’t know for sure if the shooter was after Trump.  Which I agree with, as any rational person should.

Posted
2 hours ago, Kopy said:

Do you guy's remember when the right went nuts. Protesting in the streets. All the assassination attempts on Obama and Biden.

Oh wait. We never did that?

 

I remember Jan 6 very well.

Trying to pretend that didn’t happen? Not surprised at all. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Alias Detective said:

Another black doing black things.

Another racist comment, so original

Posted
37 minutes ago, Alias Detective said:

Prolly just hungry from living on a food 🌵.  @peenie @FrancieFootball

Why are you tagging me in this nonsense? I may think Trump is con-man and a lunatic liar, but I don’t want anyone to kill him. 

Posted
24 minutes ago, dogcows said:

I remember Jan 6 very well.

Trying to pretend that didn’t happen? Not surprised at all. 

🤣🤣 Jan 6!! Fill in your bingo cards!! 
 

It was six freaking years ago. 🤣

  • Haha 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
53 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

You’re right, sometimes it can be.  I don’t think that one was though. I guess the “position” that question displays is simply that we don’t know for sure if the shooter was after Trump.  Which I agree with, as any rational person should.

No.  Rational people assume that when a gumen tries to jailbreak into an area where there is a highly controversial figure that people spend all day complaining about on the internet for years and years, it is to kill the controversial figure.  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, nobody said:

No.  Rational people assume that when a gumen tries to jailbreak into an area where there is a highly controversial figure that people spend all day complaining about on the internet for years and years, it is to kill the controversial figure.  

It's nice to see a liberal like you say something that isn't stupid like you normally would.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, nobody said:

No.  Rational people assume that when a gumen tries to jailbreak into an area where there is a highly controversial figure that people spend all day complaining about on the internet for years and years, it is to kill the controversial figure.  


Maybe Dana White was behind it.  What a weird response to a supposed assassination attempt.  Also lol at people taking selfies with him right after a supposed assassination attempt

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

speaking of “toning down the rhetoric”
 

“Shots will be fired”

-Karoline Leavitt

She knows liberals well. There will be more shots fired from liberals against Americans. You can bet on it. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

speaking of “toning down the rhetoric”
 

“Shots will be fired”

-Karoline Leavitt

No idea about this quote or its context, but let me guess given the history of the Correspondents Dinner often essentially being a roast of the president and then the President roasting the correspondants.  My guess is she was speaking clearly and plainly within context of rhetorical humorous shots at the reputations of persons in the room.  If so the disengenuous nature of anybody deliberately taking the quote out of context  cannot be overemphasized.  

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said:

No idea about this quote or its context, but let me guess given the history of the Correspondents Dinner often essentially being a roast of the president and then the President roasting the correspondants.  My guess is she was speaking clearly and plainly within context of rhetorical humorous shots at the reputations of persons in the room.  If so the disengenuous nature of anybody deliberately taking the quote out of context  cannot be overemphasized.  

Agree, just like righties posting clips of Dems saying things like “we’re in a war to save this country” is disingenuous. Sorry I thought it was obvious my post was sarcastic.  

Posted
8 minutes ago, HellToupee said:

Peak retard level

Check out TheHack trying to turn this into.just an innocent guy who just wanted to see what was going on and accidentally fired a gun not meaning to shoot anyone.

Next up: "He is the victim." 

Posted
1 hour ago, nobody said:

No.  Rational people assume that when a gumen tries to jailbreak into an area where there is a highly controversial figure that people spend all day complaining about on the internet for years and years, it is to kill the controversial figure.  

There were a lot of controversial people there that a crazy person might want dead

Dana White

Stephen A Smith

Don Lemon

etc


Yes, again Trump the most likely individual odds, but not sure if it’s more than the odds of everyone else combined

Posted
14 hours ago, HellToupee said:

JD Vance’s security detail removed him about 12 seconds before Donald. FFS what are they doing 

Totally agree about Vance.

Same thing in Butler, they create a turtle rather than hustle him out of there. Look at the 1982 attempt on Reagan, they grabbed Reagan & tossed him in a car.

Posted
12 hours ago, Caine Mutiny said:

It may have been political. It may have been a liberal. I’m just sick of folks who blame ALL liberals, or all conservatives, or all anything. I’m sick of this bigoted blame the group bullsh!t. It’s so focking annoying. Anyone who does it is an a$$hole. Sorry but you are. 

I suspect you're melting down because it rings true, hits too close to home.  You're to blame.  

  • Like 1
Posted
48 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

There were a lot of controversial people there that a crazy person might want dead

Dana White

Stephen A Smith

Don Lemon

etc


Yes, again Trump the most likely individual odds, but not sure if it’s more than the odds of everyone else combined

Of course you are sure, but you feel the need to try to double down to butress your idiotic take.  Tell me, how many assassination attemtpts have been made on the lives of Don Lemon, Stephen A. Smith, and Dana White.  Also, tell me, when are they easy targets and when next to impossible targets, could it be they are easy in their day to day lifes and impossible when rubbing elbows with the president, the V.P. and members of the cabinet?  Are you really trying to act as if there is plausibility that a Cal Tech grad chose the most difficult time in the last year to go after Stephen A. Smith?

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

These WHCD events are really dumb & it was good that Trump never participated. Now he shows up, during a war (with a terror state no less), & brings the VP, SOD & what looks like almost the whole cabinet.

I agree this was a foolish choice by the Trump Administration.  I have never been comfortable with the gathering of power at the SOTU and I am particularly not comfortable with it at a vacuous event for teh press and politicians to preen.  Iran learned not to gather too much power in one place.  I hope we do not learn the lesson in as hard a way as did they.

  • Sad 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said:

Of course you are sure, but you feel the need to try to double down to butress your idiotic take.  Tell me, how many assassination attemtpts have been made on the lives of Don Lemon, Stephen A. Smith, and Dana White.  Also, tell me, when are they easy targets and when next to impossible targets, could it be they are easy in their day to day lifes and impossible when rubbing elbows with the president, the V.P. and members of the cabinet?  Are you really trying to act as if there is plausibility taht a Cal Tech grad chose the most difficult time in teh last year to go after Stephen A. Smith?

 

 

Stop responding to the gimp.  You're the only one that even bothers anymore and this thread is entertaining other than that part. 

  • Like 1
Posted
Quote

Gunman Cole Allen sent an anti-President Trump manifesto to his family members about 10 minutes before opening fire at Saturday night’s White House Correspondents’ Dinner — calling himself the “Friendly Federal Assassin” and revealing he was trying to kill Trump and administration officials.

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, JuneJuly said:

Stop responding to the gimp.  You're the only one that even bothers anymore and this thread is entertaining other than that part. 

I generally and habitually ignore him even when he tags me.  For some reason O chose not to do so here.  You are right though, his nonsense, his moving of goalposts, his insistence to be literal when context is figurative and figurative when the context is literal all in the pathetically needy and desperate hope to score a "gotcha" only he percieves merits no  response whatsoever. 

  • Thanks 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...