Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, The Psychic Observer said:

It's coming lol.  So you lied about knowing beyond a shadow of a doubt.

I didn’t lie.  The evidence is everywhere.  Do your research or wait until the AG aggregates it for you.  

Posted
Just now, Tree of Knowledge said:

I didn’t lie.  The evidence is everywhere.  Do your research or wait until the AG aggregates it for you.  

I did my research.  There is no evidence that shows the 2020 Election was stolen.  You're either a liar or a troll.  Likely both.

Posted
6 hours ago, thegeneral said:

School lunches for poor kids, no way…slush fund for Jan 6th shitheads and the like, yes.

If the Dems can’t win the next election bigly what’s the point anymore 😂

And this is  reduction and change from the original I want 10 billion because a freelance contractor of the IRS leaked my taxes...because that's the harm he suffered. 

 

FFS

  • Thanks 1
Posted
56 minutes ago, The Psychic Observer said:

I did my research.  There is no evidence that shows the 2020 Election was stolen.  You're either a liar or a troll.  Likely both.

You missed another option: He is low IQ.

  • Haha 1
Posted
On 5/17/2026 at 9:15 AM, Voltaire said:

This hasn't happened. Nobody has been awarded, let alone received, a penny. At this point, it's still just a lawsuit.

But the lawsuit does exist and there is a chance it may very well all transpire as dogcows predicts it will.

Update: It was officially announced by the DOJ today.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/justice-department-announces-a-1-7-billion-anti-weaponization-fund-fund-to-compensate-trump-allies

Posted

The 14th amendment clearly states that this payout to Jan 6ers is unconstitutional.

Section 4 reads:

Quote

The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

 

Posted
50 minutes ago, dogcows said:

The 14th amendment clearly states that this payout to Jan 6ers is unconstitutional.

Section 4 reads:

 

 

On 5/16/2026 at 11:40 AM, seafoam1 said:

The 2020 liberal riots cost the insurance industry far more than any prior incidents of social unrest. $2 Billion in insurance claims alone. 

After the destruction, Minneapolis alone made a list of more than 1,000 businesses damaged in the chaos.

At least 25 people killed because of those liberal riots.

 During the 2020 riots, more than 900 law enforcement officers were injured, including 277 officer injuries while defending the federal courthouse in Portland, Oregon, and 60 Secret Service officers defending the White House.

 

 

 

Posted

He talked about a way for people to get compensated months ago. He picks the commission members, they don’t have to disclose how they reached their ruling, and he can replace any of them for any reason 😂😂

Besides that he knows very little about it and had nothing to do with this. 

  • Like 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

Liberals fault 

 

Liberals fault. It's why they all need to go. And we should help them be booted from the US. We can give them to Iran.

Posted
4 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:
30 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

Liberals fault. It's why they all need to go. And we should help them be booted from the US. We can give them to Iran.

This is top notch content.

Have you two consider starting your own podcast?

Posted

There were reports that were correct about this settlement last week that said this would also end any audits and reviews of Trump and his family by the IRS.

We’ll see if that’s true.

The nuthuggers will all hope so!

Posted

The President openly admits to a reporter that he is using this fund to pay people that broke the law for him. 

He’s admitting crimes publicly and nobody is doing a darn thing to stop it. 

 

Posted
17 minutes ago, dogcows said:

The President openly admits to a reporter that he is using this fund to pay people that broke the law for him. 

He’s admitting crimes publicly and nobody is doing a darn thing to stop it. 

 

Complete BS, did you even listen to the clip?  Nowhere, NOWHERE does Trump say anything close to

 

"Because in my world, loyalty outranks law. They broke the rules for me, so you pay the bill for them. That’s the transaction."

 

This is why you are considered a complete idiot on this board

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Our government paid Japanese people that were put in internment camps during WW 11 reparations.  People that have been wrongly persecuted by the illegitimate Biden Regime should be no different.  It’s what we do as Americans.  

Posted
23 minutes ago, dogcows said:

The President openly admits to a reporter that he is using this fund to pay people that broke the law for him. 

He’s admitting crimes publicly and nobody is doing a darn thing to stop it. 

 

Michael Cohen wants to know where this Trump was when he got tossed into the clink. 

  • Like 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, Meglamaniac said:

Complete BS, did you even listen to the clip?  Nowhere, NOWHERE does Trump say anything close to

 

"Because in my world, loyalty outranks law. They broke the rules for me, so you pay the bill for them. That’s the transaction."

 

This is why you are considered a complete idiot on this board

 

No, Trump didn't say that; the tweet in question also did not note that it was a Trump quote. It was an interpretation the tweeter made of what was said. So, not exactly good journalism.

With that said, do you disagree with the assessment?

Posted
27 minutes ago, Fnord said:

No, Trump didn't say that; the tweet in question also did not note that it was a Trump quote. It was an interpretation the tweeter made of what was said. So, not exactly good journalism.

With that said, do you disagree with the assessment?

Who's assessment, the President's or the Twitta poster's

Posted
33 minutes ago, Fnord said:

No, Trump didn't say that; the tweet in question also did not note that it was a Trump quote.

And it absolutely implied it was a Trump quote, not good journalism, LOL, it's plain dishonesty and misleading. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Meglamaniac said:

And it absolutely implied it was a Trump quote, not good journalism, LOL, it's plain dishonesty and misleading. 

What do you think about our money being set aside, just shy of 1.8 billion, after a lawsuit by the president over an agency he ultimately oversees that awarded a commission that Donald has firing power over, that doesn’t have to make their decision making process public, that the decision was settled by Trump’s AG who was previously his private attorney.

Does that seem normal and on the up and up?

Posted

Probably a coincidence

Guy probably wanted to spend more time with his family or pick up some hobbies

“Top Treasury Lawyer Resigns After Creation of ‘Anti-Weaponization Fund

Brian Morrissey, the department’s general counsel, stepped down hours after the Trump administration announced the $1.8 billion fund”

Posted
4 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

What do you think about our money being set aside, just shy of 1.8 billion, after a lawsuit by the president over an agency he ultimately oversees that awarded a commission that Donald has firing power over, that doesn’t have to make their decision making process public, that the decision was settled by Trump’s AG who was previously his private attorney.

Does that seem normal and on the up and up?

I have no idea what you are trying to say/imply in your ramblings above.

As for up and up, I don't know, I don't know enough on the subject but none of that has anything to do with what I called Dogcow out on

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Meglamaniac said:

I have no idea what you are trying to say/imply in your ramblings above.

As for up and up, I don't know, I don't know enough on the subject but none of that has anything to do with what I called Dogcow out on

I’m implying this commission is total bullshit. Once you have read up on it I’d be curious what you think. 

Here’s my thumbnail. A commission was created after a settlement of Donald’s lawsuit of the IRS by his AG for the leaking of some of his taxes that he said he would release. The settlement creates a 1.8 billion dollar fund that will be overseen by a group that Donald has firing power over and has essentially no oversight.

The only positive responses I have seen in here are that Jan 6th is comparable to the Boston Tea Party and that Jan 6ers are like American Japanese in WW2.

Posted
Just now, thegeneral said:

I’m implying this commission is total bullshit. Once you have read up on it I’d be curious what you think. 

Here’s my thumbnail. A commission was created after a settlement of Donald’s lawsuit of the IRS by his AG for the leaking of some of his taxes that he said he would release. The settlement creates a 1.8 billion dollar fund that will be overseen by a group that Donald has firing power over and has essentially no oversight.

The only positive responses I have seen in here are that Jan 6th is comparable to the Boston Tea Party and that Jan 6ers are like American Japanese in WW2.

I'll pass, like I said I don't care one way or the other and it has noting to do with what I said about Dogcows post

Posted
21 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

What do you think about our money being set aside, just shy of 1.8 billion, after a lawsuit by the president over an agency he ultimately oversees that awarded a commission that Donald has firing power over, that doesn’t have to make their decision making process public, that the decision was settled by Trump’s AG who was previously his private attorney.

Does that seem normal and on the up and up?

Why don't you libtard taxpayers pay back the insurance companies who had to dole out over $2 billion dollars for all the destruction you caused in 2020? 

Get back to me when that's done. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Meglamaniac said:

I'll pass, like I said I don't care one way or the other and it has noting to do with what I said about Dogcows post

Fair enough but knowledge of what happened here would allow better insight on what the Twitter person was implying.

It’s pretty awful turn of events even by this administration’s standards. 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, thegeneral said:

Fair enough but knowledge of what happened here would allow better insight on what the Twitter person was implying.

It’s pretty awful turn of events even by this administration’s standards. 

 

OK

Posted
1 hour ago, Meglamaniac said:

Complete BS, did you even listen to the clip?  Nowhere, NOWHERE does Trump say anything close to

But that’s also not what DC said. You’re just reading the tweet. DC’s comment was perfectly legitimate based on the video.

Posted
1 minute ago, seafoam1 said:

Why don't you libtard taxpayers pay back the insurance companies who had to dole out over $2 billion dollars for all the destruction you caused in 2020? 

Get back to me when that's done. 

The equivalent would be if a Dem president sued his own government agency, settled it through his own justice department, that then paid money out to the rioters who were arrested in the name of injustice from a commission of people that Obama picked.

I’d think that was crazy.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...