Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
31 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said:

I’m a WWII nerd as well so I don’t think I should speak for other people. Let’s put it this way: I knew more details about the Holocaust than my father did and he was in the Holocaust. 
 

I have no idea what Platner’s tattoo said about him, but I do believe it is plausible that people can be attracted to Nazi symbols without being Nazis. I will offer the example of Siouxie (of the Banshees) who used to wear a swastika armband for shock value. 

I saw this piece (Barkhuff) (On Platner & Me) a while back and I thought it was interesting.

<<<Why do I relate to Platner? Well, in January 2005, when we both were in Iraq, my unit, a SEAL platoon, had as its platoon baseball hats the emblem of the Knights Templar and “infidel” written in Arabic on the back. We weren’t expressing an opinion on the Crusades; we just thought it looked gangster (there was barely even Wikipedia back then).>>>

- What got me about this is that “Kafir” (“Infidel”) & the Templar cross are the Tattoos that Hegseth has, not Platner.

Posted
11 minutes ago, League Champion said:

C'mon, you remember, when Elon gave the "Nazi" salute. 

Yes but I didn’t comment on it. I HAVE commented when Elon has made or re-texted white supramacist comments in the past. 

Posted

<<<The Maine Democratic State Committee overwhelming voted in favor of a 600+ person nominating convention to replace Graham Platner.>>>

<<<What comes next in Maine? All 16 counties have to select delegates to choose who replaces Graham Platner as the #MESEN nominee before the July 27 deadline Oxford County in western Maine (population ~58K) will caucus on July 19.>>>

<<<Maine Dems are leaning toward a runoff voting system for the convention not traditional RCV [ranked choice voting], per sources. Not official but idea is multiple rounds of balloting. Lowest votegetter is eliminated + new rounds begins. Winner must clear 50%.>>>

Punchbowl News

- Real convention!:banana:

Posted
5 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

<<<The Maine Democratic State Committee overwhelming voted in favor of a 600+ person nominating convention to replace Graham Platner.>>>

<<<What comes next in Maine? All 16 counties have to select delegates to choose who replaces Graham Platner as the #MESEN nominee before the July 27 deadline Oxford County in western Maine (population ~58K) will caucus on July 19.>>>

<<<Maine Dems are leaning toward a runoff voting system for the convention not traditional RCV [ranked choice voting], per sources. Not official but idea is multiple rounds of balloting. Lowest votegetter is eliminated + new rounds begins. Winner must clear 50%.>>>

Punchbowl News

- Real convention!:banana:

Disenfranchise.  

Posted
Just now, Strike said:

Disenfranchise.  

You think a statewide caucus by county is disenfranchisement? Trump must have won thousands of delegates on a statewide caucus level, this is county level.

Posted

Thank God, it's officially over and we can move on to the next phase.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Caine Mutiny said:

. I will offer the example of Siouxie (of the Banshees) who used to wear a swastika armband for shock value

She was copying Mick Jones of London SS and The Clash

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Caine Mutiny said:

I’m a WWII nerd as well so I don’t think I should speak for other people. Let’s put it this way: I knew more details about the Holocaust than my father did and he was in the Holocaust. 
 

I have no idea what Platner’s tattoo said about him, but I do believe it is plausible that people can be attracted to Nazi symbols without being Nazis. I will offer the example of Siouxie (of the Banshees) who used to wear a swastika armband for shock value. 

Also becase she hates Jews. FYI

Posted
1 hour ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

You think a statewide caucus by county is disenfranchisement? Trump must have won thousands of delegates on a statewide caucus level, this is county level.

Of course it's disenfranchisement.  Something like 72% of the Dems who voted in the Primary will not have their chosen candidate on the ballot, and they have no say in the replacement.  One black person cries that they can't get an I.D., while slurping the 40 they just bought, and you guys whine "DISENFRANCHISED."  But a good chunk of a state can't vote for their candidate and you have no problem with that.  I wonder what's (d)ifferent?

  • Like 2
Posted
35 minutes ago, HellToupee said:

Unbelievable . The puppet master back in the news

 

He doesn't want to grow up, he's into Toys 'R Us kids. There's a million tranny Democrats the kids can play with. From whips and chains to GHB grains, its the biggest gay orgy there is. (Gee whiz!) He doesn't want to grow up cuz baby if he did, he couldn't rape Toys 'R Us kids.

  • Haha 2
Posted
4 hours ago, Strike said:

Of course it's disenfranchisement.  Something like 72% of the Dems who voted in the Primary will not have their chosen candidate on the ballot, and they have no say in the replacement.  One black person cries that they can't get an I.D., while slurping the 40 they just bought, and you guys whine "DISENFRANCHISED."  But a good chunk of a state can't vote for their candidate and you have no problem with that.  I wonder what's (d)ifferent?

100%!

IF there is one thing leftists should be barred from saying anymore, it's "disenfranchisement".  These mfers are the worst hypocrites in the world. 

Posted
12 hours ago, Voltaire said:

Where has the GOP embraced and normalized the behavior? Are we talking about Roy Moore or is this Epstein stuff or something else.

The president of the United States.

Are you really this clueless? :lol:

Trump: dozens of sexual assault allegations, found liable for sexual assault, Epstein best friend, grabbing puzzies

Musk: Epstein files

Hegseth: rape allegations 

Gaetz: rape and child trafficking allegations 

Lutnick: Went to Epstein island

Brett Ratnor, Kevin warsh, Steve bannon I could go on.

Posted
30 minutes ago, The Girlfriend said:

The president of the United States.

Are you really this clueless? :lol:

Trump: dozens of sexual assault allegations, found liable for sexual assault, Epstein best friend, grabbing puzzies

Musk: Epstein files

Hegseth: rape allegations 

Gaetz: rape and child trafficking allegations 

Lutnick: Went to Epstein island

Brett Ratnor, Kevin warsh, Steve bannon I could go on.

Mdc: "I'm someone's girlfriend."

Posted
1 hour ago, The Girlfriend said:

The president of the United States.

Are you really this clueless? :lol:

Trump: dozens of sexual assault allegations, found liable for sexual assault, Epstein best friend, grabbing puzzies

Musk: Epstein files

Hegseth: rape allegations 

Gaetz: rape and child trafficking allegations 

Lutnick: Went to Epstein island

Brett Ratnor, Kevin warsh, Steve bannon I could go on.

Now do the Dems :banana:

Posted
3 hours ago, The Girlfriend said:

The president of the United States.

Are you really this clueless? :lol:

Trump: dozens of sexual assault allegations, found liable for sexual assault, Epstein best friend, grabbing puzzies

Musk: Epstein files

Hegseth: rape allegations 

Gaetz: rape and child trafficking allegations 

Lutnick: Went to Epstein island

Brett Ratnor, Kevin warsh, Steve bannon I could go on.

Low information voter, aka Fox News viewer.

Posted
3 hours ago, The Girlfriend said:

The president of the United States.

Are you really this clueless? :lol:

Trump: dozens of sexual assault allegations, found liable for sexual assault, Epstein best friend, grabbing puzzies

Musk: Epstein files

Hegseth: rape allegations 

Gaetz: rape and child trafficking allegations 

Lutnick: Went to Epstein island

Brett Ratnor, Kevin warsh, Steve bannon I could go on.

Thanks for fleshing that out for me.

Posted

If you want to try to keep to the will of the people, shouldn't the nomination go to whoever came in second to Platner during the election?

That would be Janet Mills.

Posted
5 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

If you want to try to keep to the will of the people, shouldn't the nomination go to whoever came in second to Platner during the election?

That would be Janet Mills.

I’m really loving all the conservatives trying to insist to us what the will of the people is. 
 

The Democratjc Party has established rules. Their delegates are going to vote on a candidate. It will not be Janet Mills because she doesn’t want it. 
 

If a majority of the voters don’t like who the delegates choose they will re-elect Susan Collins. I don’t think that’s likely to happen but we will find out soon enough. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said:

I’m really loving all the conservatives trying to insist to us what the will of the people is. 
 

The Democratjc Party has established rules. Their delegates are going to vote on a candidate. It will not be Janet Mills because she doesn’t want it. 
 

If a majority of the voters don’t like who the delegates choose they will re-elect Susan Collins. I don’t think that’s likely to happen but we will find out soon enough. 

This is rich.  The entire Leftist movement is built on upper middle class white pseuds who think they know what is best for the poor people.  I've already shown that Chevalier was elected by those exact people in the Columbia/Morningstar area, whereas the ignorant poor people in the Bronx and upper Manhattan voted for the incumbent.  The Lefties I showed it to ignored it, as you will, because you have no response.  

  • Like 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said:

I’m really loving all the conservatives trying to insist to us what the will of the people is. 
 

The Democratjc Party has established rules. Their delegates are going to vote on a candidate. It will not be Janet Mills because she doesn’t want it. 
 

If a majority of the voters don’t like who the delegates choose they will re-elect Susan Collins. I don’t think that’s likely to happen but we will find out soon enough. 

I’m kinda thinking Collins will win regardless.  The Platner situation has probably resulted in people who liked him until the first serious credible allegation recently that won’t vote at all.

Posted
2 hours ago, TimHauck said:

I’m kinda thinking Collins will win regardless.  The Platner situation has probably resulted in people who liked him until the first serious credible allegation recently that won’t vote at all.

You loved him, what happened? 

 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

He was credibly accused of rape.  He’s still not a Nazi, never was.

I don't believe he is or was. His explanation for the tattoo was plausible and he said that he passed two Navy reviews after he got it with no mention being made of it or any objections brought up. 

Plus his platform was hardly fascistic. 

  • Haha 3
Posted
2 hours ago, TimHauck said:

I’m kinda thinking Collins will win regardless.  The Platner situation has probably resulted in people who liked him until the first serious credible allegation recently that won’t vote at all.

I don’t share your pessimism. Or, actually I am an even bigger pessimist than you. 
 

See I think that we are only beginning to see the pain from Trump’s disastrous decision to bomb Iran. I believe we will see that pain increase by November and then I don’t think any of this stuff is going to matter. It’s going to be toss the (R) bums out. 
 

of course I hope I’m wrong about the pain part 

  • Haha 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Caine Mutiny said:

I’m really loving all the conservatives trying to insist to us what the will of the people is. 
 

The Democratjc Party has established rules. Their delegates are going to vote on a candidate. It will not be Janet Mills because she doesn’t want it. 
 

If a majority of the voters don’t like who the delegates choose they will re-elect Susan Collins. I don’t think that’s likely to happen but we will find out soon enough. 

They don't have rules.  Two days ago they had no clue how they were going to pick a candidate.  The one thing I am sure of is that the first thing they said was they can't do it like they did Kamala so they had to figure out a way to do it and get the result they wanted but make it LOOK different and more legitimate.  Either way, they disenfranchising their constituents and you libs have lost the right to ever use that word again in the eyes of independence and conservatives.  But we always knew you didn't really care.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Strike said:

They don't have rules.  Two days ago they had no clue how they were going to pick a candidate.  The one thing I am sure of is that the first thing they said was they can't do it like they did Kamala so they had to figure out a way to do it and get the result they wanted but make it LOOK different and more legitimate.  Either way, they disenfranchising their constituents and you libs have lost the right to ever use that word again in the eyes of independence and conservatives.  But we always knew you didn't really care.

Yeah we know. What you want is to force an election between Platner and Collins. You’ve posted as much. You have no credibility. You support a political party that attempted to steal the 2020 election and is trying to steal this one. The good news is you have no say in the matter, and the better news is that you’re going to be stunned just how many Republicans and independents in Maine end up voting for the Democrat no matter who it is. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
17 hours ago, Strike said:

Of course it's disenfranchisement.  Something like 72% of the Dems who voted in the Primary will not have their chosen candidate on the ballot, and they have no say in the replacement.  One black person cries that they can't get an I.D., while slurping the 40 they just bought, and you guys whine "DISENFRANCHISED."  But a good chunk of a state can't vote for their candidate and you have no problem with that.  I wonder what's (d)ifferent?

Platner can run as Indie or a 3rd party candidate. No one is stopping him.

I’m glad he’s not but that’s his choice & his fault. And we all know “new information has come to light.” I very much disagree that voters who were lied to should be held to their choices while there is still time.

All these people can vote for a myriad of other candidates too, including socialists & communists as maga likes to claim Platner is.

And you raise a good point. In fact disenfranchisement means you are prevented from voting when you have a right to. It doesn’t mean because you voted for Jeb Bush or Bernie Sanders that you are disenfranchised because your choice isn’t on the final ballot. The “franchise” means the right to vote.

I’ll add that as a reminder the GOP cancelled multiple party primaries in 2020. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Platner can run as Indie or a 3rd party candidate. No one is stopping him.

I’m glad he’s not but that’s his choice & his fault. And we all know “new information has come to light.” I very much disagree that voters who were lied to should be held to their choices while there is still time.

All these people can vote for a myriad of other candidates too, including socialists & communists as maga likes to claim Platner is.

And you raise a good point. In fact disenfranchisement means you are prevented from voting when you have a right to. It doesn’t mean because you voted for Jen Bush or Bernie Sanders that yiu are disenfranchised because your choice isn’t on the final ballot. The “franchise” means the right to vote.

Is Platner not a socialist?  You make it sound like it's MAGA's fault for calling him a socialist.  

I'm beginning to think you don't realize how much you've been programmed to phrase things incorrectly to favor Leftist ideologies.  

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Is Platner not a socialist?  You make it sound like it's MAGA's fault for calling him a socialist.  

I'm beginning to think you don't realize how much you've been programmed to phrase things incorrectly to favor Leftist ideologies.  

Ok great he’s a socialist. He can run as a Socialist with one of the Socialist parties that are on a myriad of ballots or he can be an Independent & plaster “Socialist” on his campaign.

Well I already agreed with you on 10/7/23, and I agree with you here. Apologies for not carefully editing my posts.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Is Platner not a socialist?  You make it sound like it's MAGA's fault for calling him a socialist.  

I'm beginning to think you don't realize how much you've been programmed to phrase things incorrectly to favor Leftist ideologies.  

He's not a Socialist - he's a Communist.  That's what ALL of these "Socialists" are - Communists in hiding.  Once they get enough power the masks will come off, but make no mistake - these people are Communists.

And I don't need to remind anyone of what that looks like. We have over 100 years of history of how that works out - it's never good.  Communism makes Fascism look like Choir Rehearsal.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...